MINISTER MOTSHEKGA, SANDF OWE SOUTH AFRICANS AN APOLOGY
Image: GCIS
WHEN President Cyril Ramaphosa appointed Angie Motshekga the Defence Minister, there was little hope that things would change for the better for this crucial department.
That skepticism was informed by her track record as Basic Education Minister. It was during her long stint in that ministry that some of the worst stories were exposed.
We are referring to incidents where children drowned in pit toilets while that department was among those allocated a huge chunk of the budget. Many will not forget about the time children were on the verge of not receiving their daily meals at school because contractors were not paid in time.
A drive to some rural schools in Limpopo, KwaZulu-Natal and the Eastern Cape confirmed the existence of mud schools, with children not having the basics such as desks and chairs.
Then there were scandals involving the delivery or the lack thereof of stationery including textbooks before schools opened. We will not talk about the quality of education our children received and continue to receive in public schools because that should be blamed on her party's failure, the ANC.
Nonetheless, Motshekga's track record suggests that she was not the right person to turn the fortunes of our defence force around.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
For a moment, forget the saga involving the killing of our troops in the Democratic Republic of Congo earlier this year and focus on the events here at home.
The SANDF's response to the deadly Eastern Cape deserves much scrutiny and Motshekga must tell the families of the victims why it only responded to the disaster seven days after having been called to assist.
The country equally deserves to know why the Oryx helicopter, a medium utility aircraft essential for rescue missions, was not immediately available to be deployed during the flooding.
Of course the Eastern Cape government owes South Africans an explanation for only requesting assistance from the SANDF on the day the tragedy struck, when it had enough warnings about what was to come.
Above everything else, Motshekga and the SANDF top brass owe the country an apology. An apology for not helping minimise the impact of one of the worst tragedies in recent history. Our SANDF can't be the first to respond to other countries' problems then be spectators when tragedy strikes at home.
CAPE TIMES
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
40 minutes ago
- IOL News
Why DA appoints independent civil servants like Mettler, and why ANC wants him removed?
History might be repeating itself in the City of Tshwane, where Johann Mettler now works as municipal manager, says Cilliers Brink Image: Jacques Naude / Independent Newspapers One of the reasons that so many municipalities collapse is that so few of them hire competent professionals as municipal managers (MMs). A MM is the chief executive of a municipality. Unlike the mayor, an MM is not meant to be a politician. The skillset of a good MM is different to that of a good mayor. For local government to work, you need both. Each has to stay in their respective lanes, supporting the other, and not competing for political power. A good mayor, and there are far too few of them, too, will soon realise the impossibility of delivering on your election promises without the help of a good MM. That is what makes Johann Mettler such a rare creature. A giant of a man, he speaks little but works hard. You'll find him at the office at 7:00 AM, and often long after the sun has set. He grew up on the Cape Flats during apartheid, qualified as a lawyer, and took his first job in government when South Africa became a democracy. In 1998, he was part of the team that drafted the White Paper on Local Government. He is probably one of the most experienced local government practitioners still working. What makes him truly exceptional is that he wears no party political colours. In a local government sector dominated by recycled politicians, this also makes him highly vulnerable. All the same, Mettler is usually in high demand to fix broken municipalities. He has worked with DA mayors, but he has also been headhunted by ANC ministers. That's what happened in 2015 when he was appointed to lead the national government intervention in Nelson Mandela Bay. The details of that story are told by Chippy Olver in his book 'How to steal a city'. In Olver's otherwise vexing cast of characters, Mettler is one of the good guys. When the ANC lost control in the Bay in 2016, he was rehired as MM by a DA coalition. At the time, the mayor was Athol Trollip, now ActionSA's parliamentary leader. The irony of this will become obvious later. In 2018, Trollip was toppled as mayor when one of his coalition partners switched sides to the ANC. Even though Mettler had been brought to the Bay under an erstwhile ANC mayor, he soon became an immovable object to the irresistible force represented by the new ANC coalition. The Coalition of Corruption, as the DA branded them, spent a fortune of taxpayers' money to get rid of Mettler. And he spent a great deal of his own money to defend himself. But he did get away with his reputation intact, while one of his former persecutors, Mayor Mongameli Bobani, was later implicated in fraud and corruption (Bobani died of Covid-19 before the matter could proceed). History might be repeating itself in the City of Tshwane, where Mettler now works as MM. He got the Tshwane job in September 2022, a few months after the city emerged from a prolonged period of administration under the Gauteng provincial government. Aside from an unstable coalition and what would turn out to be an adverse audit opinion for the year preceding his appointment, Mettler also inherited an enormous ANC-induced operating deficit. This led to the city falling behind on its payments to Eskom. In my own 18-month stint as mayor, Mettler and I worked hard to turn the city around, a job that I have to stress is not yet done. Similar to Athol Trollip in Nelson Mandela Bay, I was turned out of office as mayor in September last year after my coalition partners decided to join an ANC coalition. The irony was that the coalition partner who rebalanced the forces in the ANC's favour is Trollip's new party, ActionSA. In exchange for getting rid of a DA mayor, an ActionSA councillor now gets to wear the mayoral chain. But there is little doubt where the real power lies. As before, the non-political Mettler is seen by the ANC as a threat to whatever they plan to do in Tshwane. In meetings I had with the ANC in my last weeks as mayor, they had made clear to me that they did not want Mettler as MM. They said that they would prefer a Tshwane local as MM. But what I suspect they want is someone who will withdraw the case against five city officials implicated in awarding an irregular tender to a consortium with links to ANC benefactor Edwin Sodi. That project, the upgrade of Rooiwal Wastewater Treatment Plant, was set back years because Sodi's people did not have the qualifications and experience to finish the job. The business interests of ANC deputy mayor Eugene Bonzo Modise and ANC regional secretary George Matjila can fill an article of their own. Let's just say the ANC would prefer an MM in Tshwane who is less concerned about doing things by the book. And so, Matjila is now on record as suggesting that when Mettler was appointed as MM in September 2022, the right processes weren't followed. This is, as far as the DA is concerned, a legal absurdity. If this is the pretext for moving against Mettler, our lawyers will be on call. In the meantime, what has happened to the likes of Mettler is a major chapter in the story of the decline of South African towns and cities. Let's make sure that this time the good guys win. Cilliers Brink is the DA Tshwane Caucus Leader
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
SA's Debt Crisis: A Crippling Embrace of the World Bank
(From left) President of World Bank, Mr Ajay Banga, Brazil President Lula da Silva, India Prime Minister Narendra Modi, President Cyril Ramaphosa and US President Joe Biden on the margins of the G20 Leaders' Summit held at the Bharat Mandapam International Exhibition Convention Centre in New Delhi, India on September 9, 2023. Image: GCIS Zamikhaya Maseti On June 24, 2025, the National Treasury released an official statement: 'South Africa and the World Bank sign USD 1.5 billion loan agreement to support infrastructure modernisation and development.' According to Treasury, the loan will 'unlock key infrastructure bottlenecks,' particularly in the energy and freight transport sectors. The financing terms are said to be generous: a 16-year maturity, a three-year grace period, and an interest rate benchmarked at the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) + 1.49%. In simple Development Finance terms, this interest margin suggests that the loan carries relatively favourable conditions compared to commercial borrowing. The World Bank technocrats would have us believe that this Development Policy Loan (DPL) is both progressive and developmental. But behind this clinical language of policy and project finance lies a deeper crisis, a State slowly surrendering its developmental autonomy in exchange for liquidity. In 2022, South Africa was granted a US$750 million COVID-19 relief loan, drawn from the same DPL mechanism. It was intended to stabilise the health system and support social protection. But that loan was scavenged shamelessly and systematically by the compradorial bourgeoisie and economic vultures. They tore through it like hyenas around a carcass. Who can forget, during the great looting spree, how overnight, car guards, taxi owners, tavern tycoons, traditional leaders, and healers became registered 'suppliers' of the Personal Protective Equipment (PPEs)? Most of the PPEs were of dubious quality, grossly overpriced, and delivered late, if at all, while the dying masses gasped for breath in overcrowded, under-equipped COVID-19 wards. Those who survived the pandemic awoke in a country where the crisis had been monetised, and the hospital became a feeding trough for a corrupt elite dressed in designer ethics. Yes, another World Bank loan. Another embrace of the very institution that generations of African Political Economists from Walter Rodney to Samir Amin warned us would never be a partner in liberation. The intellectual bloodlines of our radical thinkers have long declared: the Bretton Woods institutions are not development partners; they are enforcers of dependency. Walter Rodney, in How Europe Underdeveloped Africa, did not write in polite ambiguity. He was precise and surgical. Underdevelopment, he argued, was not a historical accident nor a technical gap, but a deliberate act imposed through imperial finance, colonial infrastructure, and economic coercion. Today, that analysis breathes again. South Africa, a constitutional democracy, a supposed developmental State, is now borrowing from the very institution that has for decades rehearsed economic suffocation across the continent: Ghana, Zambia, Kenya. We are told this loan will modernise transport corridors, reform Eskom, and support a 'green economy transition.' But herein lies the enduring warning of African Political Economy scholars of the 1960s and 70s: World Bank conditionalities were never neutral technocratic tools. They were ideological weapons designed to discipline post-colonial states and re-inscribe Western hegemony in economic terms. In the first decade of economic development and independence (1960–1970), newly independent nations like Ghana and Tanzania pursued bold paths of import substitution, state-led industrialisation, and social welfare. The World Bank responded by pressuring them to liberalise trade, dismantle subsidies, and invite foreign capital. When they resisted, funding was frozen. Sovereignty was punished. In the second decade of economic development and independence (1970–1980), as oil shocks and collapsing commodity prices crippled African economies, the World Bank returned not with solidarity, but with Structural Adjustment Programmes (SAPs): austerity masquerading as reform. Zambia was forced to privatise its mines, slash public spending, and devalue its currency. These were not technical corrections. They were ideological assaults driven by a neoliberal agenda to open Africa's veins to global capital. Development was delayed. Poverty was institutionalised. Today, South Africa, which still boasts of its economic sophistication, appears to have forgotten these lessons. Our gross government debt has now ballooned to R5.2 trillion, more than 74% of GDP, with R385 billion spent annually just to service that debt. This is not fiscal management, this is economic haemorrhaging. And we have yet to account for the hidden costs of this new loan: procurement dependency, policy capture, and technocratic drift. At the centre of this crisis lies the crumbling foundation of our public health system. For decades, it leaned heavily on foreign aid, especially from USAID, which supported HIV, TB, and maternal health programmes. But now, under Donald Trump's second term with its evangelical, nationalist, anti-globalist turn, USAID funding has been pulled. The consequences are immediate and brutal: clinics without ARVs, retrenched health workers, and rural hospitals collapsing. The system is already disintegrating. And into these vacuum steps, the World Bank not with a health rescue package, but with a spreadsheet of infrastructure loans and governance reforms. So, we must ask, again: what exactly is this new loan for? What does a 'green transition' mean when rural clinics can't even keep the lights on? Will Eskom's restructured grid serve the poor, or simply power private extraction? Why has there been no public debate, no parliamentary interrogation, no provincial consultation? Is South Africa bankrupt? Not yet, in the narrow technical sense. But ideologically, we are bankrupt of imagination. Development has been outsourced to multilateral lenders with no stake in our sovereignty. The borrowing continues, but each loan chips away at our autonomy, our dignity, our democratic will. We must re-read Walter Rodney. Revisit Samir Amin. Reclaim the dreams of Kwame Nkrumah, Samora Machel, Steve Biko, and Robert Sobukwe. Maybe we must begin to learn from Captain Ibrahim Traoré of Burkina Faso, who is sending the imperialists packing.
IOL News
5 hours ago
- IOL News
David Dabede Mabuza: A shrewd leader, political strategist
THE African National Congress (ANC) top six elected at the party's 54th national conference held at the NASREC Expo Centre on December 18, 2017 (from left) deputy secretary-general Jessie Duarte, secretary-general Ace Magashule, national chairperson Gwede Mantashe, president Cyril Ramaphosa, deputy president David Mabuza and treasurer-general Paul Mashatile. Prof. Bheki Mngomezulu THE sad news about the passing of David Dabede Mabuza, affectionately known as 'DD', took many South Africans by surprise. Surely, those who are close to him would have known about his disappearance from the public eye. However, many South Africans thought that his disappearance was part of what he had been known for – being out of the limelight. Mabuza was not nicknamed 'The cat' for nothing. He was a difficult person to understand. He seldom talked and was literally 'an absentee Deputy President' during his two terms after he was first appointed on 27 February 2018, and again on 30 May 2019. The big question we must pose as we pen his obituary is: What legacy is Mabuza bequeathing to the nation and the world? Importantly, what will the ANC, as his political home, indeed remember him for? These questions are not as simple as they appear at first glance. Part of the reason is that Mabuza knew how to manoeuvre politics, when to act and how. To understand his politics, we must trace his historical background, albeit briefly. Mabuza was born on 24 August 1960 in present-day Mpumalanga province and passed away on 3 July 2025. After completing his high school education, he obtained his National Teachers Certificate at Mgwenya College in Mpumalanga in 1985 before obtaining his BA degree at the University of South Africa (UNISA) in 1989. What is noticeable is that Mabuza majored in psychology. This explains some of his political acumen. His political leadership includes inter alia being elected MEC of Education in Mpumalanga from 1994 to 1998, being elected to serve in the ANC's National Executive Committee (NEC) for the first time in 2007, being elected as the ANC's Provincial Chairperson in Mpumalanga from 2008 until 2017, being Premier of Mpumalanga from 2009 until 2018 when he resigned to ascend to the position of Deputy President of the Republic of South Africa from 2018 until he resigned in March 2023 to allow Paul Mashatile to occupy that position after being elected Deputy President of the party (ANC). As we mourn Mabuza's passing, we also reflect on his politics and the legacy he is leaving behind. To the ANC, Mabuza was a hero. Following his passing, Fikile Mbalula spoke on behalf of the ANC in his capacity as the party's Secretary-General. He described Mabuza as someone who liked unity, discipline, and transformation. Some people in Mpumalanga will remember him as a strategist who knew how to deal with his political opponents and neutralise them. Others will remember him as a shrewd leader who did not want to be opposed. More will remember him as someone who brought political stability where there was none. Some of those who were close to him will remember him as someone who tried his level best not to make his hands 'dirty' even when he was alleged to have been involved in wrongdoing. Linked to the above is what happened before Mabuza was sworn in as Deputy President after the 2019 general election. He was expected to appear before the ANC's National Disciplinary Committee (NDC). Mabuza delayed being sworn in until he had been cleared. This decision distinguished him from his political colleagues, who could not wait to be cleared before taking their positions in parliament. Many will forever admire him for that. The youth of Mpumalanga will remember Mabuza for his emphasis on the role of education while being MEC of Education in that province. The Congress of South African Students (COSAS) benefited from Mabuza's advice. On that score, Mabuza was smarter than many of his political contemporaries, both in the ANC and outside. Many South Africans will remember Mabuza for handing Ramaphosa the Presidency. When the race between Dr Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma and Ramaphosa reached a boiling point, there were clear signs that the former was on the verge of making history by becoming the ANC and South Africa's first female president. It was Mabuza who saved Ramaphosa through what he called a 'Unity vote' from Mpumalanga. As soon as he announced that Mpumalanga would support Ramaphosa, Dr Dlamini-Zuma's hope of winning the race was dashed. Indeed, when the official results were announced, Ramaphosa won the day. To prove that DD saved Ramaphosa, the latter only won the election with a mere 179 votes. This was unheard of in the history of the ANC. Had DD not done what he did, Ramaphosa would have lost the ANC election. Secondly, many South Africans will remember DD as the 'absent Deputy President' during his term in office. There were many instances when DD was nowhere to be seen. To be fair to him, his ill health also contributed to this, as he would at times be reported to have flown to Russia to seek medical attention. What has been said above should not be misconstrued to mean that Mabuza had nothing to do as Deputy President of the country. Among his responsibilities was being the leader of government business, leading land reforms, assisting in the promotion of rural development, assisting in the mechanisms meant to accelerate service delivery, coordinating plans to address poverty, leading programmes on HIV Aids, COVID-19 and many others. Unlike many ANC leaders, Mabuza was groomed by the Black Consciousness Movement (BCM) during his youth. Whether this is what made him different from his colleagues remains debatable. May his soul rest in peace! * Prof. Bheki Mngomezulu is Director of the Centre for the Advancement of Non-Racialism and Democracy at Nelson Mandela University. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.
