Meta taps top researchers from Google and Sesame for new AI lab
Meta has poached top engineers from multiple tech firms, including Google, for a new team focused on achieving a more advanced form of AI called artificial general intelligence.
Jack Rae, a principal researcher at Google DeepMind, is expected to join Meta's "superintelligence' team, according to multiple people familiar with the matter, who spoke on condition of anonymity as the information is not public. Meta has also recruited Johan Schalkwyk, a machine learning lead at AI voice startup Sesame, other people said.
Alexandr Wang, co-founder and chief executive officer of Scale, is also expected to be part of the team after Meta finalizes a multibillion-dollar investment in the data labeling startup that could be announced as soon as this week.
The new group is part of an ambitious, and costly, effort by Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg to gain ground on rivals like Google and OpenAI after he was frustrated by the poor reception to the company's latest AI offering, Llama 4. Zuckerberg hopes the new hires can help improve Llama's models and build better AI tools for voice and personalization features.
Meta and Zuckerberg are offering compensation packages worth tens of millions of dollars over several years, including equity, according to people familiar with the matter. A spokesperson for Meta declined to comment. Rae confirmed he's leaving Google for Meta, but declined to comment further. Schalkwyk did not respond to a request for comment.
Zuckerberg has begun recruiting a brain trust of AI researchers and engineers, at times meeting with candidates at his homes in Lake Tahoe and Palo Alto, California. Often, the CEO has reached out to potential hires directly, according to people familiar with the process. Meta aims to hire around 50 people for the new team, including a chief scientist to help oversee the group, one person said.
The team is coming together as Meta is also nearing a deal to invest billions of dollars in Scale to bolster its AI efforts. Scale uses an army of contractors to label the data that tech firms such as Meta and OpenAI need to train and improve their AI models.
Wang, Scale's 28-year-old CEO, is an influential figure in the industry who has cultivated close ties with some in Washington. Other employees from Scale are likely to join Meta's superintelligence team after the investment is finalized, according to a person familiar with the deal.
The three pillars of AI development are chips, talent and data. Meta has lots of chips. The Scale partnership may help bolster its access to quality data. And with the power of its checkbook, Meta and Zuckerberg hope to make a bigger dent in the AI talent wars.
"There are very few people globally who can do those type of large AI trainings very, very efficiently,' said Vahan Petrosyan, co-founder of SuperAnnotate, an AI data platform. For that reason, he said, higher pay packages may make sense for companies like Meta.
Still, not everyone is jumping at Zuckerberg's recruitment push. At least one person at a leading AI research lab rejected a lucrative offer from Zuckerberg, according to a person familiar with the matter.
Meanwhile, Meta's competitors are racing to retain top talent. Google named Koray Kavukcuoglu, one of its top AI researchers, as its chief AI architect — a new senior vice president role that reports directly to Chief Executive Officer Sundar Pichai, according to an internal memo.
Kavukcuoglu will continue to serve as the GenAI unit lead and chief technology officer of Google DeepMind, Pichai said in the memo.
"Koray will help to accelerate how we bring our world-leading models into our products, with the goal of more seamless integration, faster iteration, and greater efficiency,' Pichai said.
Google didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NHK
2 hours ago
- NHK
US treasury secretary hints at restoring 'reciprocal' tariffs on trade partners
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has hinted that even countries involved in trade negotiations with the United States in good faith could face what President Donald Trump calls "reciprocal tariffs." The tariffs were imposed in April on countries and regions with large trade surpluses with the US. Later in the month, the US suspended the measures for 90 days for negotiations, with a deadline set for July 9. Bessent, who is leading the talks, spoke in an interview with Bloomberg Television on Monday. He said, "we have countries that are negotiating in good faith, but they should be aware that if we can't get across the line because they're being recalcitrant, then we could spring back to the April 2 levels." He added, "I hope that won't have to happen." Also on Monday, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that the president will meet his trade team this week. She said Trump "is going to set the rates for many of these countries if they don't come to the table to negotiate in good faith." Leavitt said that Trump and his team are finalizing these agreements, and "you'll hear from" them "very soon when it comes to India."
Japan Times
3 hours ago
- Japan Times
Apple weighs using Anthropic or OpenAI to power Siri in major reversal
Apple is considering using artificial intelligence technology from Anthropic or OpenAI to power a new version of Siri, sidelining its own in-house models in a potentially blockbuster move aimed at turning around its flailing AI effort. The iPhone maker has talked with both companies about using their large language models for Siri, according to people familiar with the discussions. It has asked them to train versions of their models that could run on Apple's cloud infrastructure for testing, said the people, who asked not to be identified discussing private deliberations. If Apple ultimately moves forward, it would represent a monumental reversal. The company currently powers most of its AI features with homegrown technology that it calls Apple Foundation Models and had been planning a new version of its voice assistant that runs on that technology for 2026. A switch to Anthropic's Claude or OpenAI's ChatGPT models for Siri would be an acknowledgment that the company is struggling to compete in generative AI — the most important new technology in decades. Apple already allows ChatGPT to answer web-based search queries in Siri, but the assistant itself is powered by Apple. Apple's investigation into third-party models is at an early stage, and the company hasn't made a final decision on using them, the people said. A competing project internally dubbed LLM Siri that uses in-house models remains in active development. Making a change — which is under discussion for next year — could allow Cupertino, California-based Apple to offer Siri features on par with AI assistants on Android phones, helping the company shed its reputation as an AI laggard. Representatives for Apple, Anthropic and OpenAI declined to comment. Shares of Apple closed up over 2%. Siri struggles The project to evaluate external models was started by Siri chief Mike Rockwell and software engineering head Craig Federighi. They were given oversight of Siri after the duties were removed from the command of John Giannandrea, the company's AI chief. He was sidelined in the wake of a tepid response to Apple Intelligence and Siri feature delays. Rockwell, who previously launched the Vision Pro headset, assumed the Siri engineering role in March. After taking over, he instructed his new group to assess whether Siri would do a better job handling queries using Apple's AI models or third-party technology, including Claude, ChatGPT and Alphabet's Google Gemini. Sam Altman, chief executive officer of OpenAI, left, and Eddy Cue, senior vice president of services at Apple | Bloomberg After multiple rounds of testing, Rockwell and other executives concluded that Anthropic's technology is most promising for Siri's needs, the people said. That led Adrian Perica, the company's vice president of corporate development, to start discussions with Anthropic about using Claude, the people said. The Siri assistant — originally released in 2011 — has fallen behind popular AI chatbots, and Apple's attempts to upgrade the software have been stymied by engineering snags and delays. A year ago, Apple unveiled new Siri capabilities, including ones that would let it tap into users' personal data and analyze on-screen content to better fulfill queries. The company also demonstrated technology that would let Siri more precisely control apps and features across Apple devices. The enhancements were far from ready. Apple initially announced plans for an early 2025 release but ultimately delayed the launch indefinitely. They are now planned for next spring. AI uncertainty People with knowledge of Apple's AI team say it is operating with a high degree of uncertainty and a lack of clarity, with executives still poring over a number of possible directions. Apple has already approved a multibillion dollar budget for 2026 for running its own models via the cloud but its plans for beyond that remain murky. Still, Federighi, Rockwell and other executives have grown increasingly open to the idea that embracing outside technology is the key to a near-term turnaround. They don't see the need for Apple to rely on its own models — which they currently consider inferior — when it can partner with third parties instead, according to the people. John Giannandrea (left), Apple's senior vice president of machine learning and AI strategy, has lost oversight of some artificial intelligence projects during management shake-ups this year. | Bloomberg Licensing third-party AI would mirror an approach taken by Samsung. While the company brands its features under the Galaxy AI umbrella, many of its features are actually based on Gemini. Anthropic, for its part, is already used by Amazon to help power the new Alexa+. In the future, if its own technology improves, the executives believe Apple should have ownership of AI models given their increasing importance to how products operate. The company is working on a series of projects, including a tabletop robot and glasses that will make heavy use of AI. Apple has also recently considered acquiring Perplexity in order to help bolster its AI work, Bloomberg has reported. It also briefly held discussions with Thinking Machines Lab, the AI startup founded by former OpenAI Chief Technology Officer Mira Murati. Souring morale Apple's models are developed by a roughly 100-person team run by Ruoming Pang, an Apple distinguished engineer who joined from Google in 2021 to lead this work. He reports to Daphne Luong, a senior director in charge of AI research. Luong is one of Giannandrea's top lieutenants, and the foundation models team is one of the few significant AI groups still reporting to Giannandrea. Even in that area, Federighi and Rockwell have taken a larger role. Regardless of the path it takes, the proposed shift has weighed on the team, which has some of the AI industry's most in-demand talent. Some members have signaled internally that they are unhappy that the company is considering technology from a third party, creating the perception that they are to blame, at least partially, for the company's AI shortcomings. They've said that they could leave for multimillion-dollar packages being floated by Meta and OpenAI. "Hello Apple Intelligence" on the screen of an Apple iPhone 16 Plus during the first day of in-store sales at Apple's Fifth Avenue store in New York on Sept. 20, 2024. | Bloomberg Meta, the owner of Facebook and Instagram, has been offering some engineers annual pay packages between $10 million and $40 million — or even more — to join its new Superintelligence Labs group, according to people with knowledge of the matter. Apple is known, in many cases, to pay its AI engineers half — or even less — than what they can get on the open market. One of Apple's most senior large language model researchers, Tom Gunter, left last week. He had worked at Apple for about eight years, and some colleagues see him as difficult to replace given his unique skillset and the willingness of Apple's competitors to pay exponentially more for talent. Apple this month also nearly lost the team behind MLX, its key open-source system for developing machine learning models on the latest Apple chips. After the engineers threatened to leave, Apple made counteroffers to retain them — and they're staying for now. Anthropic and OpenAI discussions In its discussions with both Anthropic and OpenAI, the iPhone maker requested a custom version of Claude and ChatGPT that could run on Apple's Private Cloud Compute servers — infrastructure based on high-end Mac chips that the company currently uses to operate its more sophisticated in-house models. Apple believes that running the models on its own chips housed in Apple-controlled cloud servers — rather than relying on third-party infrastructure — will better safeguard user privacy. The company has already internally tested the feasibility of the idea. Other Apple Intelligence features are powered by AI models that reside on consumers' devices. These models — slower and less powerful than cloud-based versions — are used for tasks like summarizing short emails and creating Genmoji. Apple is opening up the on-device models to third-party developers later this year, letting app makers create AI features based on its technology. The company hasn't announced plans to give apps access to the cloud models. One reason for that is the cloud servers don't yet have the capacity to handle a flood of new third-party features. The company isn't currently working on moving away from its in-house models for on-device or developer use cases. Still, there are fears among engineers on the foundation models team that moving to a third-party for Siri could portend a move for other features as well in the future. The Apple store in Sydney | Bloomberg Last year, OpenAI offered to train on-device models for Apple, but the iPhone maker was not interested. Since December 2024, Apple has been using OpenAI to handle some features. In addition to responding to world knowledge queries in Siri, ChatGPT can write blocks of text in the Writing Tools feature. Later this year, in iOS 26, there will be a ChatGPT option for image generation and on-screen image analysis. While discussing a potential arrangement, Apple and Anthropic have disagreed over preliminary financial terms, according to the people. The AI startup is seeking a multibillion-dollar annual fee that increases sharply each year. The struggle to reach a deal has left Apple contemplating working with OpenAI or others if it moves forward with the third-party plan, they said. Management shifts If Apple does strike an agreement, the influence of Giannandrea, who joined Apple from Google in 2018 and is a proponent of in-house large language model development, would continue to shrink. In addition to losing Siri, Giannandrea was stripped of responsibility over Apple's robotics unit. And, in previously unreported moves, the company's Core ML and App Intents teams — groups responsible for frameworks that let developers integrate AI into their apps — were shifted to Federighi's software engineering organization. Apple's foundation models team had also been building large language models to help employees and external developers write code in Xcode, its programming software. The company killed the project — announced last year as Swift Assist — about a month ago. Instead, Apple later this year is rolling out a new Xcode that can tap into third-party programming models. App developers can choose from ChatGPT or Claude.
Japan Times
4 hours ago
- Japan Times
Solar and wind industries see existential threat in U.S. tax bill
As Senate Republicans debate President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill, renewable energy companies are reeling at what looks like a worst-case scenario for the industry. The latest version of the Senate bill includes a new excise tax on wind and solar projects with certain Chinese components, a late addition that stunned renewable advocates. Given China's dominance of the solar supply chain, developers would struggle to find ample equipment, including wafers, from other countries. The bill would also roll back clean energy tax credits sooner than the House version of the package. It would require wind and solar projects to be fully operational by the end of 2027 to qualify for incentives. Many observers had expected the Senate to ease the phaseout — not accelerate it. The moves by the Senate, as it seeks to cut spending to offset trillions of dollars in tax cuts, "came out of left field' and shocked the industry, according to Ben King, an associate director with research group Rhodium Group's Energy & Climate practice. If passed in its current form, the "One Big, Beautiful Bill' would threaten billions of dollars of investments, hobbling energy development at a time of skyrocketing power demand. It would also risk causing household energy bills to spike higher. "The willingness of the Senate to suggest policy changes that will dramatically increase cost of energy to their consumers and sacrifice significant job growth is very surprising,' said Jason Grumet, chief executive officer of the American Clean Power Association, or ACP, an industry trade group. "It suggests that the effort to repolarize this debate is now taking precedence over their actual constituent interests.' Republican Senators Joni Ernst and Chuck Grassley of Iowa, along with Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, worked Monday to advance an amendment to soften the clean electricity tax credit phaseout and jettison the proposed excise tax. The tax is "unprecedented,' and "the extremity of the proposal may motivate key Senators to support excise tax repeal,' analysts for research provider Capstone wrote in a note Monday. ACP estimates the new tax would raise costs on American clean energy companies by $4 billion to $7 billion in the next 10 years, while Rhodium projects it will result in a 10% to 20% increase in the cost of building wind and solar. Solar panels at the Cascadilla Community Solar Farm, owned by Cornell University, in Dryden, New York on April 10, 2023. | Bloomberg That cost increase would "drive down deployment' and, for some new solar and wind facilities that would otherwise be economically competitive with natural gas, push them "out of the sweet spot,' said King. Because this kind of policy has never been implemented before, the uncertainty it introduces would have a "chilling effect' on investment in renewables, he added. The current proposal would also prevent 300 gigawatts of wind and solar — on par with the output of 300 nuclear reactors — from being brought online within the next 15 years, ACP estimates, which Grumet called a "dramatic interruption' of bringing power to the grid as demand soars. Natural gas couldn't easily fill the gap, due to a shortage of turbines, while nuclear power plants take years to bring online. Industry wasn't alone in its dismay over the changes. On his platform X, Elon Musk called the bill "political suicide for the Republican Party' and "utterly insane and destructive' in its impact on energy. Labor groups assailed the potential for job losses, with North America's Building Trades Unions President Sean McGarvey calling the legislation "the biggest job-killing bill in the history of this country.' "The president has demanded that renewable energy credits for wind and solar be terminated as soon as humanly possible, and the Senate bill meets that request,' White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said in an email. Asked earlier Monday to respond to an allegation the excise tax would be tantamount to terminating more than a thousand Keystone XL pipeline projects, White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said the president understands "legislators want to protect jobs in their communities and in their districts, and so he understands why some of them are against this provision, but he also understands why people want the provision.' The Trump administration has made a concerted push to shift federal policy to favor fossil fuels over renewables. Agencies have moved to strip $3.7 billion in loan support for low— and zero-emission power projects and unexpectedly paused construction of an offshore wind farm for weeks, both unprecedented moves. But the clean energy incentives in the Inflation Reduction Act have spurred investment predominantly in red states and districts, giving some congressional Republicans reason to think twice about nixing them. As lawmakers debate the bill, one thing is clear: Its current iteration would "signal a real step back' on the energy transition, according to Rhodium's King. "Decarbonization effectively flatlines from where we are today,' he said.
