logo
Sinner powers into Wimbledon last 16 as Djokovic eyes century

Sinner powers into Wimbledon last 16 as Djokovic eyes century

Yahoo17 hours ago
Wimbledon top seed Jannik Sinner crushed Pedro Martinez to reach the last 16 without losing a set on Saturday while title rival Novak Djokovic targets his 100th victory at the tournament.
Sinner took just one hour and 55 minutes to demolish 52nd-ranked Martinez 6-1, 6-3, 6-1 in a Centre Court masterclass, though the Spaniard was struggling with a shoulder issue.
Advertisement
The 23-year-old will face Bulgarian 19th seed Grigor Dimitrov or Austria's Sebastian Ofner in the fourth round at the All England Club.
Sinner has lost just 17 games across his first three matches at this year's tournament, in contrast to defending champion Carlos Alcaraz, who has shown patchy form on route to the last 16.
The Italian returned from a doping ban in May, losing the Italian Open final to Alcaraz and squandering three championship points against the Spaniard in the French Open final last month.
His best performance at Wimbledon was a run to the semi-finals in 2023 and he reached the quarter-finals last year.
Advertisement
"Every time you reach the second week of a Grand Slam it's a very special occasion," said Sinner, who acknowledged Martinez's discomfort with his shoulder.
"Even more special here in Wimbledon, so I'm very happy to be in the second week."
Later on Centre Court, Djokovic will resume his bid for a record-breaking 25th Grand Slam crown.
The seven-time champion, locked with the long-retired Margaret Court on 24 majors, is aiming to reach the fourth round for the 17th time in his 20th appearance at Wimbledon.
A third-round clash against Serbian Davis Cup teammate Miomir Kecmanovic will hold few fears for the sixth seed, who has not lost against his 49th-ranked compatriot in three previous meetings.
Advertisement
If Djokovic beats Kecmanovic he will reach a century of victories at the All England Club, a feat only surpassed by eight-time champion Roger Federer, who won 105 times on the lawns of southwest London, and Martina Navratilova, who chalked up 120 victories.
"If I play like this, I feel like I have a very good chance against anybody, really, on the Centre Court of Wimbledon, a place where I maybe feel the most comfortable on any court," Djokovic said after beating Britain's Dan Evans in the second round.
Djokovic's first Wimbledon win came against Argentine Juan Monaco 20 years ago, when Kecmanovic was aged just five.
- Swiatek's title chance -
Advertisement
Former champion Elena Rybakina became the latest star to suffer a shock exit, losing to Denmark's Clara Tauson 7-6 (8/6), 6-3.
Rybakina, the Kazakh 11th seed, won her maiden Grand Slam title at Wimbledon in 2022 and reached the semi-finals last year.
But the 26-year-old's hopes of another strong run were ended by 23rd-seeded Tauson in a third-round tie on Court Two.
Russian teenager Mirra Andreeva thrashed American world number 55 Hailey Baptiste 6-1, 6-3 in just 78 minutes on Court One.
The 18-year-old, seeded seventh, is one of the few leading players left in the women's draw.
World number one Aryna Sabalenka is the only player remaining from among the top six seeds.
Advertisement
Iga Swiatek has quietly gone about her business at this year's Wimbledon but will have watched the mass exodus of her top rivals with interest.
The five-time Grand Slam champion is seeded eighth at the All England club after slipping down the rankings, though she is now back in the world's top four after reaching the Bad Homburg final last week.
The Pole, who faces American Danielle Collins in the third round, has never been beyond the quarter-finals at the All England Club.
Swiatek, who has won four titles on the French Open clay, was beaten by former Australian Open finalist Collins at the Italian Open in May.
Defending women's champion Barbora Krejcikova is also in action on Saturday against American 10th seed Emma Navarro.
smg/jw
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How to Watch Wimbledon Round of 16: Live Stream Wimbledon 2025, TV Channel
How to Watch Wimbledon Round of 16: Live Stream Wimbledon 2025, TV Channel

Newsweek

time31 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

How to Watch Wimbledon Round of 16: Live Stream Wimbledon 2025, TV Channel

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Wimbledon's Round of 16 takes place on Sunday morning in the U.S., a morning of tennis that will feature stars such as Aryna Sabalenka and Jannik Sinner. Carlos Alcaraz of Spain stretches to reach a shot from Jan-Lennard Struff of Germany in the third round of the Gentlemen's Singles Competition on Centre Court during the Wimbledon Lawn Tennis Championships at the All... Carlos Alcaraz of Spain stretches to reach a shot from Jan-Lennard Struff of Germany in the third round of the Gentlemen's Singles Competition on Centre Court during the Wimbledon Lawn Tennis Championships at the All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club at Wimbledon on July 4th, 2025, in London, England. More Photo bySinner, the first Italian tennis player to be ranked atop the ATP standings, has been on fire in Wimbledon this year, not dropping a single set through three rounds so far. If Sinner gets past Bulgarian tennis player Grigor Dimitrov on Sunday, he will reach the quarterfinals at a grand slam event for a seventh straight time. Sinner smoked Spain's Pedro Martínez, defeating him 6-1, 6-3, 6-1, to reach the Round of 16 at Wimbledon. How to Watch Wimbledon, Round of 16 Date: Sunday, July 6, 2025 Time: 6:00 a.m. ET Venue: All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club Channel: ESPN Stream: Fubo (WATCH FOR FREE) Women's No. 1 Aryna Sabalenka won a close match against England's Emma Raducanu to advance to the round of 16, defeating her 7-6 (8-6), 6-4, in front of what was a hostile crowd that was cheering for the local Raducanu. On Sunday, Sabalenka will face Belgium's Elise Mertens, the No. 24 seed in this year's Wimbledon. Meanwhile, on the men's side, we have another fascinating matchup that will take place on Sunday when we see young Spanish star Carlos Alcaraz, the No. 2 seed, face Taylor Fritz, the No. 5 seed. Alcaraz is looking to win Wimbledon for a third straight year, as the young Spaniard is a two-time reigning champion at the event, a ridiculous proposition considering Alcaraz is still just 22 years old. Tune to ESPN at 6:00 a.m. ET on Sunday morning for Round of 16 Wimbledon action, from the historic All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club. Live stream the Wimbledon Round of 16 for free on Fubo: Start your subscription now! Regional restrictions may apply. If you purchase a product or register for an account through one of the links on our site, we may receive compensation.

How does Sarina Wiegman solve England's problems after her first Euros defeat?
How does Sarina Wiegman solve England's problems after her first Euros defeat?

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

How does Sarina Wiegman solve England's problems after her first Euros defeat?

Midway through England's victorious run at Euro 2022, there was a debate about whether Lionesses fans should sing 'Football's Coming Home'. Some argued it was effectively England's national football anthem, regardless of gender. But many thought the words didn't quite apply to England Women, and that the whole experience of supporting that side was very different. Advertisement Well, England's 2-1 defeat to France in their opening Euro 2025 game felt incredibly familiar to watching the men's side over the years. There was a promising start which gave way to weariness in warm conditions as the match continued. There was a lack of control in midfield. There was a spirited late rally which came to nothing. Ultimately, there was a 2-1 defeat to France — the result that knocked the men's side out of the last World Cup. This is England. But this isn't Sarina Wiegman. In Euro 2022 we marvelled at Wiegman's insistence on keeping her starting XI intact for every game, despite calls to give others a chance, and despite the fact England had topped the group after two matches and could have rested players for their final group game. Then again, it's easy to name an unchanged side when it's a winning side. And Wiegman usually is: from 12 group stage matches with the Netherlands and England, across two European Championships and two World Cups, she had previously collected 12 wins. Indeed, this was her first loss outside of the tournament's final. So this is an unfamiliar situation for Wiegman, and it's slightly difficult to know how she'll react. England had a couple of clear problems in Zurich. First, the midfield was overrun at least partly because of Wiegman's use of Lauren James in the advanced midfield role. James was England's brightest player in the opening moments, and it's a perfectly viable system against weak opponents, but given Georgia Stanway's long injury lay-off, Keira Walsh's disjointed season and the quality of France's midfield, it was a risk that ultimately didn't pay off. 'I make a lot of considerations before I make a starting line up; sometimes it goes well, sometimes it doesn't go well, but I don't have regrets,' Wiegman said afterwards. 'I don't see (playing James as the No 10) as a mistake, it was a choice. If she scored in the first minute, and if the cross she made in the first where we couldn't just get a head on it, I think we'd be having a different conversation.' The other issue was at full-back, where England found themselves overrun by France's wingers. In particular, Jess Carter was skinned three times by Delpinhe Cascarino in the first half — two warning signs, and then the assist for Marie-Antoinette Katoto's opener. This was something of a surprise given Carter is regarded as England's best player in one-against-one duels out wide, and she was probably favoured over Niamh Charles precisely for this reason. But with England's defensive line pushing up and squeezing the play, they left space in behind into which the wingers ran. On the opposite flank, Lucy Bronze twice went haring forward when England lost possession and allowed France to break, first when Sakina Karchaoui lobbed into the sidenetting, then for Sandy Baltimore's goal to make it 2-0, when Bronze inadvertently teed her up. So does Wiegman make changes ahead of Wednesday night? Well, England will face a different task against the Netherlands. The Dutch didn't field electric wingers in their 3-0 win over Wales. Jill Roord is more of a midfielder, although she offered a serious goal threat from the left, twice hitting the woodwork. On the right, Victoria Pelova is more scrappy, effective at slaloming past challenges in more central positions. Advertisement But that could change: Lineth Beerensteyn can play either as a No 9 or out wide, and given England's struggles in the full-back positions, you wouldn't be surprised if Netherlands manager Andries Jonker showed her a couple of videos of Cascarino's performance and told her to do the same. It's also fair to say the Dutch don't quite have the midfield quality of France, and therefore Walsh and Stanway may cope better. That said, the Dutch are feisty and aggressive, and won't stand off England or let them play. One solution would be to keep the defence intact, but move James to a right-sided position, where she has often excelled in the past. That would allow her to attack Esme Brugts, a talented left-back but one who is better going forward than defensively. James also works well with Bronze, a good relationship that predates them being Chelsea team-mates. That would allow Wiegman to stiffen the midfield with Grace Clinton or Jess Park, providing support for Walsh and Stanway. Ella Toone is another option, although she does her best work in the opposition box, and England need someone who can help out in deeper positions. Wiegman's selection decision will be crucial. England suddenly find themselves in a very difficult situation. Defeat to the Netherlands would eliminate them (unless Wales were to beat France, leaving England praying for an unlikely 9-3-3-3 group and scraping through in second, which simply isn't going to happen). But even a draw wouldn't be great. Assuming a France victory over Wales, that would leave France on six points, the Netherlands on four, England on one and Wales yet to get off the mark. France and the Netherlands could therefore engineer a draw in their final group game, which would send them both through and the champions home. Or France could rest up and allow the Netherlands to get the win they need, in the knowledge that finishing Group D runners-up might be better — it would probably mean avoiding Spain until the final. It would be out of England's hands. The way to avoid all this, of course, is by winning on Wednesday night. Wiegman is known as a stubborn manager, but in this situation, changes are surely needed if England are to remain in the competition.

England left exposed in midfield as Sarina Wiegman struggles to strike a balance
England left exposed in midfield as Sarina Wiegman struggles to strike a balance

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

England left exposed in midfield as Sarina Wiegman struggles to strike a balance

It was a long walk for Georgia Stanway, head down, as she trudged around the edge of the Stadion Letzigrund pitch in front of a sell-out crowd. England trailed 2-0 and she had been replaced by Grace Clinton in the 77th minute. The Bayern Munich midfielder has had a long road to recovery, too — 70 to 80 rehab sessions — since undergoing knee surgery on January 30. Her rustiness showed as, alongside Keira Walsh, the duo struggled to get a grip in the midfield area and were overrun. Advertisement Before starting England's opening game against France on Saturday, Stanway had only played 135 minutes of football since her injury. Given her importance in midfield, and England's lack of depth in that area, she seemed a must-starter against a front-footed, technically proficient and physical France midfield. The bigger surprise was seeing Lauren James start. Up until last Sunday, she had not played a game for three months because of a hamstring injury and only played 30 minutes against Jamaica last weekend. The gamble seemed to have paid off, though, when in the opening minute James, playing in the advanced midfield role, found herself with a great goalscoring opportunity but failed to hit the target, then delivered a promising deep cross which her team-mates could not reach. The Chelsea forward instigated an England goal on the quarter-hour mark which was eventually disallowed. She cut inside and ran at the French defenders before switching the ball to Beth Mead who was in space. Pauline Peyraud-Magnin palmed Hemp's shot away and Alessia Russo was quickest to react, but VAR found Mead to be a millimetre offside. Advertisement England struggled to recover from that disappointment and, from then on in, were architects of their own downfall. They were sloppy in possession, particularly in midfield which looked exposed. Sarina Wiegman put that down to losing the ball early in the build-up play. Her team created their own problems by playing short passes which allowed France to press aggressively. Wiegman wanted her side to skip players and play balls in behind, but they were not tight enough on the ball nor quick enough to play out of the press. Stanway and Walsh failed to get into any kind of rhythm and looked off the pace. They were not the only ones. France's technical midfield trio of Oriane Jean-Francois, Grace Geyoro and captain Sakina Karchaoui stayed compact, were intense but tidy, hoovered up second balls and ruled the middle of the pitch. Advertisement As shown below, they released the ball quickly out wide to release wingers Sandy Baltimore and Delphine Cascarino and wreaked havoc, terrorising England full-backs Jess Carter and Lucy Bronze. 'It felt like they could go wherever they wanted,' said Carter, who thought England were a 'little bit scared' and not 'aggressive enough'. 'We all have days where we're just having a bit of a 'mare on the ball and, unfortunately, today there was more than one player doing that.' This was not a game where England could afford to let standards drop. 'France is a proper team,' said Wiegman. 'You have to do things right.' Captain Leah Williamson described the one-v-one defending as 'cheap' and disagreed that the defence was disjointed, instead pointing to her team being too 'expansive' and failing to keep the ball. Advertisement By contrast, as shown by the pass map below, England's midfield was left exposed with a big hole in the middle of the pitch. For all of James' offensive talents, her freer role leaves the midfield vulnerable. Mead tucked in more centrally to compensate but it was not effective. James has more often played on the wing for the Lionesses and only in the No 10 role when England have played a 3-5-2 with more bodies in midfield. Should Wiegman have started her on the wing or even kept it tighter for an hour and then brought James off the bench? Ella Toone or Grace Clinton do not offer the same attacking threat as James and may have been too safe against such a hard-hitting opponent. Equally, looking to the bench, England do not have any depth behind Walsh and Stanway that could have elevated their levels. Advertisement Wiegman did not have any regrets about her starting XI and did not think starting James was a mistake. 'We'd be having a different conversation,' she pointed out, had James scored in the first minute or a team-mate had got a head to her cross. Indeed, if Russo's goal had stood, would we have been questioning Wiegman's decisions? You need a lot of quality and a bit of luck in major tournaments. England had neither. They were unlucky to have their goal ruled out and that France's second goal stood following another VAR check on Maelle Lakrar's challenge on Russo in the build-up, but the reality is they were still outclassed. Walsh's well-hit strike in the 87th minute reignited the England machine but it was too little, too late. Advertisement England could not afford to start this tournament slowly and must improve against the Netherlands on Wednesday to stand any chance of making the knockout stages. This article originally appeared in The Athletic. England, Women's Soccer, Women's Euros 2025 The Athletic Media Company

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store