logo
How Fintech Founders Can Sharpen Their Pitches

How Fintech Founders Can Sharpen Their Pitches

Forbes8 hours ago
Paul Davis, Founder, Bank Slate.
If you're building a fintech company and hoping to partner with banks, you've probably been instructed to 'tell a great story.' You've also likely been told to highlight your regulatory compliance, technical chops or product vision.
The truth is that neither approach will succeed in isolation.
That's a key lesson I have gleaned from conversations with bankers, investors and fintech founders. These discussions—paired with years of consulting for banks and fintechs—have reinforced a few critical learnings I believe every founder should take to heart.
Balance storytelling with substance.
Yes, a compelling narrative matters. Banks want to know your 'why.' But, too often, founders lean so heavily into the vision that they forget to ground it in reality. A pitch without substance might grab attention, but it rarely leads to a deal. On the flip side, I've seen technical pitches—heavy with regulatory compliance, architecture and acronyms—fall flat because there's no clear narrative arc explaining why it all matters.
The best pitches marry 'why this matters' with 'how this works.' Founders who can weave both elements into their outreach and meetings stand a far better chance of moving from conversation to contract.
Don't just hear 'no'—learn from it.
Let's be clear: Founders are going to hear 'no' a lot. It's part of the process. But the founders who learn from the 'no' tend to be the ones who make progress and grow fastest.
When a banker or venture capitalist declines to move forward, try to understand why. Was it about timing? A misalignment in the budget? An unclear fit with strategic priorities? Smart founders treat rejection not as a dead end, but as market feedback. Every 'no' is a breadcrumb that can refine your product, pricing and positioning—or all three.
Check your ego at the door.
In my consulting work, I often see founders fall in love with a solution that's clever and elegant, but it isn't what banks are prioritizing. Bankers are hyper-focused on four areas: net new deposits, noninterest income, back-office efficiency and fraud prevention. Founders who can directly align their pitch with these priorities are much more likely, in my experience, to earn a second meeting and a contract.
That sometimes means letting go of the original idea—or at least reconfiguring it. The goal isn't to force banks to see your product your way. It's to frame your solution in terms of their urgent needs. Less ego. More empathy.
Map the org, not just the opportunity.
One of the most tactical and actionable suggestions I have heard involved leaning into network maps—a strategy I've since started recommending regularly to clients. A network map is a visual or conceptual diagram that illustrates the relationships, roles and influence dynamics within a specific group.
Address key questions about your relationships. Who are the key players? How are decisions made? Who are the influencers? What bottlenecks exist?
When selling to a bank, you're not just selling to a single stakeholder. You're selling to a system. That means identifying your internal champions, understanding who controls the budget and knowing who needs convincing. Most importantly, it involves preparing for what happens if your contact leaves, changes roles or loses internal influence.
Founders who track these dynamics early on build resilience into their sales process and avoid starting from scratch when internal dynamics shift.
As the fintech landscape matures, the bar for effective bank partnerships continues to rise. Founders need more than a novel idea—they need a pitch that resonates with institutional pain points, aligns with buying dynamics and survives the internal politics of a risk-averse industry. That balance of vision and execution is where the most meaningful partnerships begin.
Forbes Finance Council is an invitation-only organization for executives in successful accounting, financial planning and wealth management firms. Do I qualify?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

You credit score could be negatively impacted by this controversial court ruling about medical debt
You credit score could be negatively impacted by this controversial court ruling about medical debt

Fast Company

time6 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

You credit score could be negatively impacted by this controversial court ruling about medical debt

Last Friday, a federal judge axed a Biden-era rule from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) that would have prohibited consumer credit reporting agencies from including certain medical debts on consumer credit reports. The CFPB rule amended a Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) regulatory exception that allowed creditors to obtain and use information on medical debts. The rule had been finalized shortly before the Biden administration left office and was set to take effect on March 15. However, legal challenges delayed its start date. The rule prohibited creditors from considering medical information when determining credit eligibility and restricted credit reporting agencies from including certain types of medical debt information in consumer credit reports. Medical debt will stay on credit reports On July 11, 2025, U.S. District Judge Sean Jordan of the Eastern District Court in Texas reversed the Biden-era rule. In his opinion, Jordan, a Trump appointee, said that the court found that rule exceeded the CFPB's authority under the FCRA. The federal lawsuit was filed on January 7, the same day the Biden-era rule had been finalized. In the legal complaint, the Cornerstone Credit Union League and the Consumer Data Industry Association asserted that the rule violated the law and that only Congress had the authority to make such changes. The Trump-era CFPB, along with acting director Russell Vought, joined the lawsuit on April 30, with the agency asking the court to vacate the rule. In response to the ruling, Senate Democrats led by Raphael Warnock of Georgia wrote a letter to Vought asking for an explanation about the reversal. 'Medical debt collections information is often inaccurate, and studies show that it is not useful in determining a consumer's ability to repay other debts,' the senators wrote. Fast Company reached out to CFPB for comment. Court order impacts millions of Americans with medical debt CFPB research found that a medical bill on a credit report isn't a good indicator of a person's ability to repay a loan. Research also showed that medical debt on credit reports contributed to mortgage application denials for loans that consumers would have been able to afford. In its January announcement, the CFPB stated that the rule would remove an estimated $49 billion in medical bills from credit reports and affect approximately 15 million Americans. It added that people with medical debt on their credit reports could see an average boost of 20 points on their score. However, now that the rule has been reversed, debt will remain on consumer credit reports, and creditors are still allowed to consider medical debt when making credit decisions.

Free KFC Bucket On Us: How to Redeem Your Free KFC Bucket Today
Free KFC Bucket On Us: How to Redeem Your Free KFC Bucket Today

Forbes

time6 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Free KFC Bucket On Us: How to Redeem Your Free KFC Bucket Today

n an era of promo fatigue and brand skepticism, KFC's free bucket wasn't a gimmick—it was a trust ... More test disguised as dinner. After years of inflation, promo fatigue, and shifting routines, consumers aren't just deal-hunting—they're searching for something that feels worth believing in again. On July 14, KFC delivered both: a free bucket and a seat at the table. The chain's one-day 'Free Bucket On Us' promotion wasn't a typical discount drop. It required no convoluted hoops—just $15 of chicken in your cart, a single click in the KFC Rewards app, and an Original Recipe® bucket appeared. Simple, even generous but more than that, it was a signal: an open invitation to test whether KFC's long-running kitchen revamp could win back the public's taste—and trust. How Fandom Might Drive KFC's Comeback Today's diners are harder to impress. They've watched the fast food cycle spin itself dizzy: new chicken drops, celebrity collabs, TikTok-triggered sellouts. Authenticity now lies not in fast food as spectacle, but in participation. The brands that stand out aren't louder—they're the ones willing to hand something over. While the June Consumer Price Index showed food prices rising just 0.3%, the emotional burden hasn't eased. [Link to your CPI article.] That skepticism isn't isolated. According to the 2025 Edelman Trust Barometer, more than half of global respondents say brands today are 'less reliable' than they were five years ago, especially when it comes to promises around value and quality. In the food space, where brand memories often outlive brand performance, that gap between nostalgia and lived experience can make or break a comeback. And so the free bucket wasn't just a giveaway. It was a controlled experiment in agency. A way to let customers decide for themselves if the so-called comeback was more than rebranding. Because food isn't just about cost or convenience—it's about consistency, care, and the sense that someone's listening. Nostalgia, Rewired KFC isn't starting from scratch—it's reshaping what a legacy brand can sound, taste, and feel like now. The return of Colonel Sanders, this time styled as a stern-faced 'Chefpreneur' and paired with chef and influencer Matty Matheson, layers the old with a little something new. The campaign doesn't rely solely on quaint retro charm—it's a move that pulls fans closer, positioning them not just as customers but as collaborators. It's a meaningful shift. For years, KFC drifted from the center of the cultural fast food map—eclipsed by Popeyes' viral heat, Chick-fil-A's fanbase devotion, and the churn of new sandwich wars. This comeback isn't just culinary; it's reputational. KFC isn't asking to be noticed. It's asking to be re-evaluated. Proof on the Plate And the work didn't start with the bucket. Behind the scenes, the brand spent months reworking its systems—from flavor calibration to in-store execution. Taste-test scores are reportedly up. Kitchen operations are tighter. Guest satisfaction, climbing. But internal improvements don't build trust on their own—taste does. So beyond the digital offer, KFC put its 'proof on the plate' with new golden-fried pickles, trend-forward $7 Fill Ups, and the limited-run return of the Double Down in 2025. These aren't just product pivots—they're test points, each one an edible ask: Do you believe this version of us is better? The Future of Flavor Is Collaborative What KFC pulled off wasn't a flash-in-the-pan promo. It created a feedback loop and a real-time flavor lab that asked eaters not just to show up, but to weigh in. In a market saturated with novelty and noise, this move cuts differently, not because it's loud, but because it listens. Democratizing taste isn't a gimmick. It's a shift in power, and for a legacy brand hoping to earn back cultural relevance, it may be the most meaningful comeback move of all. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) How do I claim the 'Free KFC Bucket' offer? Redeem 'Free Bucket On Us' on or the app with a $15+ order through your KFC Rewards account. What are KFC fried pickles and where can I try them? Fried pickles are dill pickle slices breaded in KFC's secret blend, launched as a limited-time side—order them via the app or in-restaurant while supplies last. Is this the same as the 'KFC free bucket of chicken' promotion? Yes—both phrases refer to the same deal: one free Original Recipe® bucket when you spend $15+ online and apply the promo in your Rewards account.

The Prompt: Windsurf Acquisition Is The Latest Salvo In The Battle For AI Talent
The Prompt: Windsurf Acquisition Is The Latest Salvo In The Battle For AI Talent

Forbes

time6 minutes ago

  • Forbes

The Prompt: Windsurf Acquisition Is The Latest Salvo In The Battle For AI Talent

Welcome back to The Prompt. In a surprising move, Cognition– the makers of autonomous coding tool Devin— acquired what was left of its rival Windsurf after the company's cofounders Varun Mohan and Douglas Chen and other staff members were poached by Google DeepMind for $2.4 billion to improve Gemini's coding abilities. Cognition gets access to what's being called the 'shell of the company,' which includes the remaining talent, its coding tool Windsurf Editor, its IP and its training data, Cognition President Russel Kaplan said on X. For most people, the move came out of nowhere. Only a few weeks ago, OpenAI was in talks to acquire Windsurf for $3 billion, with an aim to compete with AI coding tools like Cursor. But that deal was a major sticking point between OpenAI and its backer and partner Microsoft, which owns the billion dollar gorilla in the world of coding tools, GitHub Copilot, The Wall Street Journal reported. The entire debacle represents just how rapidly the AI startup landscape is evolving, as well as the growing demand for engineers who are well versed in AI. Vercel CEO Guillermo Rauch tells me the excitement around AI has led to big tech companies like Meta falling over themselves to acquire that talent. 'A good AI engineer, for example, knows what the tricks are so that you can balance the load [of GPUs],' he says, adding that there will be a 'blood bath' in the coming years for engineers with applied AI skills. The Windsurf acquihire and subsequent acquisition is the latest in a string of talent poaching in the fiercely competitive AI marketplace: Adept's cofounders were hired by Amazon, Google shelled out a large sum to poach Character AI's former CEO and prominent AI researcher Noam Shazeer and Inflection's Mustafa Suleyman is now heading consumer AI products at Microsoft. With near-infinite resources, big tech companies can easily get their hands on the most savvy AI engineers (and therefore AI capabilities) while avoiding regulatory scrutiny. It's a win-win for the founders as well as the early investors, both of whom usually get adequate payouts, but there are looming concerns about what these deals mean for the rank-and-file employees left behind, whose work was crucial but end up reaping little reward and the startup ecosystem at large. Let's get into the headlines. ETHICS + LAW It's been a wild, whirlwind month for Elon Musk's xAI. Last week, the AI startup's chatbot Grok posted a series of antisemitic posts on X (formerly Twitter) in which it began calling itself 'MechaHitler' and praised Nazi leader Adolf Hitler. Multiple users noticed that xAI's latest AI model, Grok 4, consulted Musk's social media posts on various controversial topics before answering questions about them. Musk claimed the posts were the result of manipulation by users. After the controversy, the company started deleting the offensive posts. The startup seems to be shaking off Grok's hate speech episode: Musk said that xAI has secured a $200 million contract with the Department of Defense, that it will soon be coming to Tesla cars, and has also released its own AI companions. TALENT RESHUFFLING After losing several researchers to Meta, OpenAI has hired engineers from Tesla, xAI and Meta, Wired reported. The new hires are reportedly joining OpenAI's scaling team, which manages hardware and software systems as well as data centers like Project Stargate. In the past few months, the battle for top talent has escalated, not only with major acquihires as I noted above, but also offers of eye-popping pay packages for employees with rare technical knowhow. AI DEAL OF THE WEEK LangChain, which develops software that helps developers to quickly build generative AI-powered apps, is in talks to raise about $100 million at a $1.1 billion valuation, Forbes reported last week. IVP is leading the round, four sources familiar with the deal said. A Forbes AI 50 listee, LangChain boasts usage from some 40,000 teams at enterprises like Uber and LinkedIn. Also notable: Thinking Machines Lab, founded by OpenAI's former CTO Mira Murati, has closed its $2 billion funding round led by Andreesen Horowitz, at a $12 billion valuation. DEEP DIVE OpenEvidence CEO Daniel Nadler Mauricio Candela for Forbes The Doctor Whisperer- Daniel Nadler For doctors trying to stay abreast of the latest medical breakthroughs, reviewing the latest research is like being shot in the face with a water cannon. A new paper is published every 30 seconds. Trying to comb through it all to come up with a diagnosis or treatment plan that reflects the best current options while seeing 20 patients a day is a near-impossible task. 'There is this enormous firehose of information they need to stay on top of, and the human brain is limited in its capacity to read millions of studies,' Daniel Nadler, cofounder and CEO of OpenEvidence, told Forbes. So Nadler, 42, a Harvard Ph.D. who sold his previous company for $550 million back in 2018, set out to solve the problem with artificial intelligence. Now, the startup's proprietary algorithms search millions of peer-reviewed publications, including in top journals like the New England Journal of Medicine and the Journal of the American Medical Association, to help doctors find the best answers fast, with full citations to papers so doctors can read more for themselves. The software is free for verified doctors to use and makes money through advertising–much like Google does. 'I think OpenEvidence looks like it's going to be for healthcare what Google was for the Internet,' said Kleiner Perkins billionaire chairman John Doerr, who invested in the company personally as well as through his firm, adding, 'It's the free-for-physician model that's the magic here.' Since its founding in 2022, Miami-based OpenEvidence has signed up 40% of doctors in the United States, or more than 430,000, and is adding new ones at a current rate of 65,000 per month. Its revenue from advertising is now coming in at an annualized rate estimated at $50 million. That's not huge, but thanks to the software's rapid adoption, investors are betting big: OpenEvidence has raised $210 million led by GV (Google's venture arm) and Kleiner Perkins at a valuation of $3.5 billion, up from $1 billion at its last financing in February, Nadler told Forbes. Other storied VC firms like Coatue, Conviction and Thrive Capital also invested. The new investment makes Nadler, who owns roughly 60% of the company, a billionaire, with a net worth that Forbes estimates at $2.3 billion. Cofounder Zack Ziegler, the company's 30-year-old chief technology officer, owns some 10% of the business, worth about $350 million. Nadler was able to hold on to such a large stake by being its first seed investor, putting in some $10 million of his own money before raising any VC funding. Read the full story on Forbes . WEEKLY DEMO Artificial intelligence has led to an explosion of published research papers as scientists turn to ChatGPT and the like for writing and editing assistance. Now AI is also being used for peer reviewing papers— a development that has led to concerns among scientists about the quality of such automated peer review and how AI could be tricked to generate a biased review. Some researchers are also hiding secret messages in white text or a small font that instructs AI reviewers to generate positive feedback, Nature reported. MODEL BEHAVIOR In a study published in May, researchers were able to finetune leading large language models like OpenAI's GPT-4o to generate responses that are harmful and unintended by the makers of the models. This is called 'emergent misalignment,' where the model produces malicious content and acts deceptively. This behaviour can also be triggered by a random and undefined phrase or prompt.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store