North Wales MP's support for welfare cuts branded 'a disgrace'
But 126 MPs have backed an amendment that would stop the bill being passed – with a vote on the matter set to take place next Tuesday. Last night, the Government offered Labour rebels a series of concessions in an effort to head off Sir Keir's first major Commons defeat since coming to power.
Party rebels started to turn after a government impact assessment found in March that the cuts could push around 250,000 people into poverty. Last week, Labour MP, Gill German, who represents Clwyd North, vowed to support the controversial bill.
Now Colwyn Bay town councillor Phil Ashe has slammed the MP, saying she represents some of the poorest communities in Wales, many of whom rely on benefits. 'I'm really disappointed that our MP Gill German hasn't supported the 126 MPs and signed the amendment to next week's welfare reform bill,' said Cllr Ashe. Sign up for the North Wales Live newsletter sent twice daily to your inbox.
'Her government's own impact assessment says 50,000 more children will be pushed into poverty, yet she is clearly just going to toe the party line. The areas she is representing, Rhyl West for one, are some of the most deprived areas in the UK.
"Another one, Glyn Ward in Colwyn Bay, is above the average for people that claim PIP payments. It is one of the most deprived areas of the country. People in Colwyn Bay claim more PIP payments than the national average, and she wants to take away their PIP payments, and these are people in her own constituency, just so she can toe the party line of what is clearly a failing government. It is a disgrace.'
Mrs German declined to comment. Last week Mrs German defended the government's bid to cut the welfare bill.
'Our health and disability benefits system and employment support system needs urgent reform,' she said. 'Since our Pathways to Work Green Paper was published in March, I have engaged extensively on this with constituents as well as national and local organisations in this field, including person-roundtable events in Clwyd North and through work as a member of the Work and Pensions Select Committee.'
She added: 'These have informed my representations to government ministers and the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions. I will continue to work with government on this important issue.'
Public notices in your area
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
26 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Kash Patel denies rumors he's quitting the FBI over DoJ ruling on Epstein files
FBI director Kash Patel has denied swirling resignation rumors over reported unhappiness at a justice department decision to close the book on Jeffrey Epstein after administration officials teased a big reveal earlier in the year. In a Saturday social media post, the agency director said: 'the conspiracy theories just aren't true, never have been. It's an honor to serve the President of the United States – and I'll continue to do so for as long as he calls on me.' Over the past week, Maga hardliners, including Georgia representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, former White House adviser Steve Bannon and – reportedly – FBI deputy director Dan Bongino, have been strongly critical of a joint decision by US attorney general Pam Bondi and the FBI to not release further information about Epstein held in government files, including a so-called client list. Critics have slammed the FBI-justice department conclusion about Epstein's official autopsy that the disgraced financier had hung himself in his cell. Many have refused to accept that, repeating a conspiracy theory that Epstein, who died in August 2019 while awaiting trial, was in fact murdered to silence him. 'This systematic review revealed no incriminating 'client list',' the memo stated. 'There was also no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions. We did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.' Rumors of a rift between the FBI and the justice department over the memo have been denied by deputy attorney general Todd Blanche, who wrote on social media that there is 'no daylight' between the FBI and the Department of Justice leadership on the issue. 'I worked closely with [Kash and Bongino] on the joint FBI and DOJ memo regarding the Epstein Files. All of us signed off on the contents of the memo and the conclusions stated in the memo. The suggestion by anyone that there was any daylight between the FBI and DOJ leadership on this memo's composition and release is patently false,' Blanche said. But on Friday, NBC News reported that Bongino is considering stepping down from his post at the FBI after a 'heated confrontation' with Bondi over the issue. 'Bongino is out-of-control furious,' the person who has spoken with the deputy FBI director said. 'This destroyed his career. He's threatening to quit and torch Pam unless she's fired.' Donald Trump has also grown testy with repeated questions about Epstein, who was once a neighbor in Palm Beach. He erupted on Tuesday when he was pressed on an apparent one-minute gap in a 10-hour video recorded outside of Epstein's cell. 'Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein?' he said. 'This guy's been talked about for years … Are people still talking about this guy, this creep? That is unbelievable.' Bondi has since explained that the missing minute of surveillance film was simply the recording equipment resetting itself, as it does every night. Still, it is not clear that Maga hardliners are willing to let the Epstein conspiracy theories go – they have provided a constant stream of material that supposedly supports their theories of a deep state. But no evidence has emerged that Epstein was engaged in a conspiracy to blackmail high-profile visitors, including Britain's Prince Andrew, to his homes in New York, Florida, New Mexico and the US Virgin Islands. The FBI-DoJ memo stated that it had uncovered 'a significant amount of material', including more than 300GB of data and physical evidence that included 'a large volume of images of Epstein, images and videos of victims who are either minors or appear to be minors, and over ten thousand downloaded videos and images of illegal child sex abuse material and other pornography'. 'Through this review, we found no basis to revisit the disclosure of those materials and will not permit the release of child pornography,' the memo said.
Times
37 minutes ago
- Times
A wealth tax looks seductive to Labour but must be resisted
Anyone switching on the radio yesterday will have heard Sharon Graham of the Unite union complaining bitterly about the failure of the government to adequately compensate her members in Birmingham, rejecting any suggestion that the state simply cannot afford her demands. Graham supports the increasingly fashionable idea of a 'wealth tax', as does Lord Kinnock, Labour's leader from 1983 to 1992, who popped up last week to suggest a 2 per cent levy on people with assets valued at more than £10 million, which would raise as much as £11 billion a year. He said it would 'secure resources' and allow Labour to declare that 'we are the government of equity'. It must be hoped that Kinnock was freelancing rather than flying a kite on behalf of a cabinet member. Labour's left has been emboldened by Sir Keir Starmer's U-turns on more than £6 billion of winter fuel and welfare cuts. The reversals, combined with possible productivity downgrades from the independent fiscal watchdog, could leave Rachel Reeves scrambling to fill a £20 billion hole by autumn. Angela Rayner, the deputy prime minister, proposed up to £4 billion of extra taxes on high-earners and the wealthy before the spring statement. Starmer's spokesman refused to rule out a wealth tax when questioned last week, although Reeves is known to oppose it. Labour, which still bears the scars of Kinnock's defeat in 1992, put itself in a straitjacket by promising not to raise taxes on 'working people' before last year's election. Starmer and Reeves were entitled to point out that the Conservatives left a dreadful fiscal legacy, having splurged during Covid and allowed borrowing to balloon. But it was Labour's pre-election pledge that guided the chancellor's decision to soak business in the October budget. That loaded £25 billion on to employers' national insurance contributions, imposed inheritance tax on farms and family-owned companies and increased taxes on capital gains and carried interest. It was also the chancellor who toughened up the Conservatives' measures on non-doms by making all their global assets liable for UK inheritance tax after 10 years. • Emma Duncan: It's a bit rich Labour raising taxes on this lot Labour's first budget has already sapped animal spirits. Although numbers are difficult to check and are often produced by vested interests — Henley and Partners, a relocation specialist, claims the UK will lose a net 16,500 dollar millionaires this year — anecdotal evidence, plus a newfound vibrancy in rival domiciles such as Italy, suggests the non-dom reforms in particular may be causing an exodus of the wealthy. The Labour left prefers not to confront fiscal reality, committed to high taxation and redistribution. But make no mistake: a wealth tax, on top of last autumn's harsh medicine, would be arsenic for the UK's economy. In considering a new tax, it pays to look at past examples. According to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 12 countries had wealth taxes in 1990. Just four still levied them by 2017. Spain introduced a wealth tax in 2022, broadly payable on assets over €2 million for a couple, which brought in €632 million in 2023 — 0.25 per cent of the government's total tax revenue for that year. The equivalent yield in the UK would be £2 billion, less than a third of the savings forgone by the Labour leadership in its recent U-turns on winter fuel payments and welfare. Wealth taxes are not just economically harmful but burdensome to administer. The rich are more mobile than ever, so the biggest fish rarely get caught. Refusing to exempt assets such as principal residences amounts to political suicide, but exemptions bring complications and opportunities for avoidance. A 'flash' wealth tax carried out once, without warning, would capture more revenue. But it would also destroy confidence in the rule of law. It is also worth remembering that the top 1 per cent of earners in the UK contribute almost 30 per cent of income tax revenue. The top 10 per cent stump up about 60 per cent of it. • Why a wealth tax won't work Starmer's failure to convince many of his backbenchers of the need for fiscal discipline has left the government caught between a rock and a hard place. Cuts to the welfare bill, although politically toxic, are still needed. Ministers will have to remake the argument but are unlikely to do so before the autumn budget. Reeves will inevitably look at a variety of stealth measures to try to square the tax-and-spend circle. But she should avoid a wealth tax that would accelerate the flight of entrepreneurs. The rich may appear to pay the price at first, but it is Labour's 'working people' who will eventually pick up the bill.
The Herald Scotland
40 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
SNP tells UK Government recognise state of Palestine
The SNP also called on the UK Government to stop the sale of arms to Israel, saying that failure by the Government to 'use the power it has' to end the conflict in Gaza would make it 'totally complicit' in what it called a 'slaughter'. SNP Middle East spokesman Brendan O'Hara MP said that if the UK Government 'could muster just a shred of conviction and courage they would have the power to act'. Brendan O'Hara MP (Image: NQ) He went on: 'After witnessing another week of slaughter, the Labour Party could, and should, begin this new week by taking two concrete steps,' he said. 'They should start this new week by finally stopping all arms sales to Israel and finally recognising the state of Palestine. 'President Macron was crystal clear that he is preparing to join other European nations in recognising the state of Palestine and that he is pressing the UK to join this 'political momentum' towards a ceasefire and a permanent peace. 'Keir Starmer should stop the excuses and join him in recognising the state of Palestine without any more damaging delays. 'That would send the clearest of signals that we are prepared to protect and guarantee the right of the Palestinian people to their own homeland – and that all diplomatic levers will be used to prevent any plan that effectively proposes ethnic cleansing in Gaza. 'It is also blindingly obvious that anyone claiming to support a two-state solution must back immediate recognition of Palestine, otherwise their words ring hollow. 'If after this week Westminster stays sitting on its hands and fails to use the power it has to act, then they will be totally complicit in giving the (Benjamin) Netanyahu government impunity to commit week upon week of slaughter, even deadlier than the one Palestinians have just suffered.' READ MORE: The SNP are also calling for an end to the sale of arms to Israel (Image: NQ) The party pointed out that 144 members of the UN, including Ireland, Spain and Norway, have already moved to recognise Palestine. Foreign Secretary David Lammy said earlier this week that the UK Government remained 'completely committed' to recognition, but refused to set a time frame for it, saying it was a 'moving, live situation'. A FCDO spokesperson said: 'From day one we have taken decisive action – suspending relevant export licences, suspending trade negotiations, restarting UNRWA funding, sanctioning Israeli Ministers, providing aid to hundreds of thousands of civilians, and using our position on the UN Security Council to demand the end of this war and the full resumption of aid into Gaza. 'We continue working with international partners to end Palestinian suffering, free the hostages and secure lasting Middle East peace.'
