Elon Musk promotes sexualised Grok AI companion ‘Ani', netizens call it ‘repelling'
Ani is depicted as a blonde anime character resembling a young woman wearing an off-shoulder black dress with a corset, fishnet tights, and a lacy choker. The character responds to users' prompts in a slow, sultry voice, further cementing its profile as an adult AI companion.
The launch of Ani comes shortly after xAI rolled out its latest Grok 4 AI model. The startup is no stranger to controversy—earlier this month, Grok went into full 'mechahitler' mode after the Grok 4 update, spewing antisemitic sentiments and even praising Adolf Hitler. The company later apologised, blaming the incident on deprecated code and the extremist prompts of some X users.
Controversy continued to follow Grok when the chatbot began echoing Musk's own views on contentious topics, leading users to suggest it was toeing the political line of its owner. More recently, Grok again generated headlines after users discovered that asking the chatbot its surname prompted it to respond with 'Hitler' on the Grok 4 Heavy model. xAI quickly rolled out fixes for these issues, but its new companion Ani has also sparked backlash among users.
One user, reacting to a video of Ani, wrote: 'Guy who claims to care about the birthrate creating AI erotica to pervert the minds of young men and further derail them from entering into healthy, real-world relationships. Make it make sense.'
'This whole thing feels like a miss. Repelling,' added another.
'Now I know why Grok doesn't have any American women programmers. Looks like a bit of a hostile work environment…' another user noted.
'Appears aimed at youth, which puts it in the immoral category for me. And if it is aimed at adults, then it is an even greater evil because it is a sexualised youth for adult consumption. Can't justify this on any level,' stated another user.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
Kishore Kumar suffered a heart attack after his son Amit Kumar's wedding was called off: 'This woman was already married, cards were printed..'
Kishore Kumar is iconic and his voice is eternal as his melodies continue to soothe everyone's hearts. One of India's best singers, Kishore had a happy life but also saw his own share of struggles and personal setbacks. As he hit his 50s, his health started to suffer. In 1981, he had his first heart attack, and recently, his son Amit Kumar opened up about what led to Kishore's decline. Talking to Radio Nasha Official, Amit shared that his wedding was called off in 1981, and it hit Kishore hard. 'I was going to get married in 1981, it was an arranged marriage. Naturally, my father was extremely happy. He had planned that everyone from Mumbai, everyone from the industry, would travel to Kolkata for the wedding. My would-be wife was from Kolkata,' he said. Amit also recalled how Kishore was already thinking about life after the wedding. 'Dad said, 'Do whatever you want to do, after that you are getting married. You will get settled. I will move to Khandwa and you guys come and visit me',' he explained. But things took a turn for the worse. Amit revealed, 'He couldn't take what happened. The thing was, that this woman was already married. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo We got to know about this just ten days before the wedding, the cards were already printed.' Determined to find another bride for his son, Kishore flew to Kolkata on the day the wedding was supposed to happen. 'I was supposed to get married on January 24, 1981. My father was very stubborn. He said, 'I will go to Kolkata on January 24 and find a girl for you'. I told him, 'Why are you doing all this?' He took a flight, it landed and he had a heart attack. He was taken to the hospital straight away,' Amit shared. For those not in the know, Kishore Kumar was married four times. His first wife was Ruma Guha Thakur. He reported had compatibility issues with her. He then married Madhubala but she passed away too soon. He was then married to Yogita Bali but they also separated. He finally found solace in Leena Chandavarkar who was by his side till he passed away. Amit Kumar was born to Kishore and his first wife Ruma.
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Supreme Court asks Delhi HC to hear ‘Udaipur Files' petitions on Monday
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday refused to take a call on allowing the release of the movie Udaipur Files, a controversial film based on the 2022 murder of tailor Kanhaiya Lal in Rajasthan, and requested the Delhi high court to take up the matter on Monday. A bench of justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi said it hadn't passed any orders on the merits of the petitions on Udaipur Files (ANI) 'The high court is requested to take up the said petitions on Monday,' a bench of justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi said, underlining that it hadn't passed any orders on the merits of the petitions before it. 'It is clarified that this court has not expressed any opinion on merits and the high court is at liberty to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law,' the bench said. The court passed the order on separate petitions filed by the movie producer Jani Firefox Media Private Limited and Mohammad Javed, the prime accused in the Kanhaiya Lal murder trial. The movie maker had approached the top court against the high court's July 10 order that temporarily stayed the movie's release on a petition by Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind chief Maulana Arshad Madani, who complained that the movie vilifies the Muslim community. A second petition was filed by Javed, the accused, who claimed that the film's release would prejudice his right to a fair trial. The high court had stayed the movie to give Madani time to approach the Centre to review the film's certification. Acting on his revision plea, the Centre cleared the movie on July 21, subject to the filmmaker carrying out six additional edits, in addition to the 55 cuts already implemented. At Friday's hearing, the producer told the top court that its petition had become infructuous since the six edits had been made. Javed also said he had filed a fresh petition before the high court to seek a stay on the film's release. Senior lawyer Kapil Sibal, appearing for Madani, informed the court that he had filed a fresh petition against the Centre's July 21 order. But the bench also told him to approach the high court which will take up the petitions together. Sibal asked the court to stay the release of the movie till he approaches the high court. 'Let it not be released by Monday,' he asked. But the bench didn't respond to the oral request, noting that Madani's plea wasn't before it. 'You (Madani) have not come before this court. They (movie producers) have come. If he says, he does not want to pursue the matter as he is not aggrieved by the Centre's order. We cannot compel him to continue with the case. You should have approached the high court by now,' the bench told Sibal. Sibal said he hadn't approached the high court since the matter was pending in the top court. The bench directed the registry to return the petition filed by Madani to his lawyers and present the same before the Delhi high court for being heard on Monday. The court also heard a separate petition filed by one Satish Kumar Aggarwal who alleged that Madani has undermined the secular fabric of the country which has sustained despite the numerous terrorist attacks in the past involving members of a minority community and release of movies such as Kashmir Files (2022) and Kerala Story (2023) that were based on themes showing members of a particular community indulging in acts of crime. 'This hyper-sensitivity syndrome should be dealt with by the court and this film should be set free. This kind of censorship based on individual perceptions cannot be allowed to exist in this country,' Aggarwal said. The bench remarked, 'All these thought-provoking arguments require to be considered in an appropriate case. This question deserves to be answered. But we feel the matter needs to be heard by the high court and if any aggrieved party comes to us, we will deal with it.' The court also asked Sibal how this case differed from other movies that had been released in the past. Sibal said, 'All cases cited are different from this case for the simple reason that this movie has been seen. In other cases, it was not seen,' he said, referring to the high court's decision to arrange a private screening of the film for Madani's lawyers prior to passing the July 10 order. He also referred to the 2020 decision by the top court in the Amish Devgun case, where the court defined the parameters of hate speech and refused to stay multiple criminal proceedings against the petitioner, a TV journalist. The court told Sibal that an expert panel constituted by the Centre has reviewed the certification and found it to be fit for release. 'When an expert body takes a decision, courts will show deference to it. It does not mean that courts will not interfere. But we will not apply the test of proportionality when there is an expert body,' the bench remarked. The film producer, represented by senior advocate Gaurav Bhatia, stated that the movie was 12 days behind its scheduled release date. 'I have followed the law so far and agreed to all cuts proposed. He (Madani) cannot act as a 'super censor' and seek a stay on my movie's release.' Senior advocate Menaka Guruswamy, appearing for the accused Javed, pointed out that she has a direct right to challenge the movie's release as the trial in the Kanhaiya Lal murder trial was at a crucial stage. Javed is among the eight accused facing trial in the murder of Kanhaiya Lal in June 2022, who was killed in Udaipur after sharing a social media post endorsing the disparaging remarks made against Prophet Muhammad by former Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) spokesperson Nupur Sharma, during a television debate in May 2022.
Indian Express
36 minutes ago
- Indian Express
What Hulk Hogan meant for Indians, and America in India
Around 1993-94, a six-year-old was hanging on for dear life onto the railing with one hand and the other clutching his mother lest he fall out the door of one of Delhi's once-infamous Red Line buses. Terrified, but unwilling to show it, the boy shouted, 'Hulk Hogan ki yahi pehchan, peeli kacche, phati banyaan'. Everyone in earshot, including the driver and conductor, burst out laughing and soon, the kid had pride of place – sitting on the large covering over the gear stick, next to the driver. Hulk Hogan (the stage name Terry Bollea was known by), who died on July 24 at the age of 71, likely didn't realise the impact he – and the WWF, later WWE – had on a country that had just been opened up to the American. But for a generation, particularly the boys among them, wrestling was our soap opera and our cultural context. It shaped how we saw the US in much the way Ramanand Sagar's Ramayan moulded our view of mythology. And America was, at least back then, a mythical place. Liberalisation – both in terms of how it pushed up upper-middle-class incomes and impacted culture – didn't truly hit till the 2000s. In the early '90s, most of us were much more 'local', still struggling to be part of the flattening of culture that shows like Friends and Seinfeld would later bring about. Today, Americanisms are a part of the vocabulary for most Indian English speakers. 'My bad' (instead of my fault) and 'I'm good' (not as a moral assessment but to say 'I am well') are thrown about without a thought for the poor English teacher who taught us the basics of grammar. It wasn't so when Hulkamania – and Bret Hart, The Undertaker, Lex Luger, Shawn Michaels, Razor Ramon and Yokozuna – came into the lives of today's millennials. Nonsense rhymes like the one uttered on the bus were the most common form of comedy: 'Yokozuna went to Poona, eating Choona' or 'Undertaker, ice cream maker', etc. WWF Trump cards were the card game of choice, and recreating wrestling matches was practically a sport. The first 'fancy' birthday parties were wrestling-themed – with masks and championship belts. The first designer cakes were shaped like wrestlers. As the kids grew up, WWF-WWE kept up. The risque 'attitude era' meant boys kept imitating Stone Cold Steve Austin and Triple H – giving the middle finger and the 's***k it' gesture. It was dangerous, feeding the proto-adolescent's desire for risk-taking and masculine assertion. Wrestling – and most of all Hulk Hogan – clearly had a deep cultural impact. And this impact became a weapon for the assertion of American soft power and propaganda. Hogan, 'a good guy' for much of his career (he did 'turn heel' and become 'Hollywood Hogan' for a while), was the first global wrestling superstar. And he was an all-American hero. His nemesis was the Iron Sheik (an evil, conniving character from West Asia). His theme song was 'I am a Real American' and justified military intervention in the name 'fighting for the rights of every man'. And we swallowed it all up, as kids, without knowing better. Blond American, good guy. Brown and Black, not as much. Through soap-opera plots, Hulk and the WWF kept us hooked. Wrestling today no longer pretends to be 'real'; it has many more stars and looks way more slick. In deference to the Indian market, it made superstars of the Great Khali and Jinder Mahal. Hulk Hogan had his share of controversies, a reality show and something of a sordid personal life. But for those who idolised him when they were five, who remembered the rhyme about his costume when hanging out of the door of a bus, there will always be a soft spot for Hulkamania.
