HC rejects Firoz Nadiadwala's plea to dismiss ₹24-crore suit over film financing dispute
MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court on Monday rejected a plea by filmmaker Firoz A Nadiadwala seeking dismissal of a ₹24-crore commercial suit filed against him on grounds that he was never formally served a writ of summons.
Justice Abhay Ahuja, who heard the matter, observed that since Nadiadwala had already appointed lawyers and was represented by senior counsel during earlier proceedings, formal service of summons was not required under the law.
The case stems from a financing agreement dated July 16, 2015, between Nadiadwala and businessman Anil Dhanraj Jethani, who had agreed to fund a film production. Jethani later filed a suit on August 19, 2015, to recover ₹24 crore, alleging non-payment of dues.
On September 1, 2015, the high court passed a consent order permitting Jethani to withdraw ₹12.5 crore deposited by another defendant. The remaining amount was to be paid by Nadiadwala before the release of his upcoming film Welcome to the Jungle, which was initially scheduled for December 28, 2024, but has since been delayed.
Following the enactment of the Commercial Courts Act in October 2015, the suit was reclassified as a commercial case. Nadiadwala later moved an application arguing that he had never been served a summons, and therefore, all subsequent orders—including the consent order—were invalid and contrary to the Civil Procedure Code.
His counsel further pointed out that Jethani had not taken any steps to issue or serve a writ of summons for over seven years and contended that the financing agreement remained unsigned by one party, raising questions about its enforceability.
Countering the claim, Jethani's senior counsel argued that once a defendant enters an appearance during interlocutory proceedings or files a vakalatnama, formal service of summons is no longer necessary. He accused Nadiadwala of acting in bad faith and attempting to evade a binding commitment made to the court.
The court noted that Nadiadwala had received copies of the plaint and exhibits on August 20, 2015, and that his legal team had participated in hearings on August 24 and 28 that year. It held that his participation established his awareness of the proceedings and dismissed his application accordingly.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
a day ago
- Hindustan Times
HC comes to the rescue of POSH survivor, strike down her transfer orders
Jun 29, 2025 07:06 AM IST MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court on June 25 came to the rescue of an assistant professor at a Sanskrit college who was abruptly transferred from Nashik to Bhilwara in Rajasthan and later to Mathura in Uttar Pradesh after she filed a sexual harassment complaint against another professor at the college. The court cancelled her transfers and allowed her to resume her work in Nashik. (Shutterstock) The division bench of justice Ravindra Ghuge and justice Ashwin Bhobe said, 'No teacher can be treated in this manner, and surely not a lady teacher.' The judges added that she had a 3-year-old child who was under medication and needed regular treatment. The bench found that the transfer orders were triggered by her Prevention of Sexual Harassment (POSH) complaint and struck them down. The judges were displeased at how abruptly her complaint had been closed without a conclusion, and asked the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) to reopen her POSH complaint and follow it through. The court also granted her 50% of her wages from October 2023 to July 31, 2025, when she is expected to report at the Nashik campus of the institute. In 2024, the woman had challenged the transfer orders in the high court, saying that because of them she had been forced into involuntary unemployment until she resumed work and had not been receiving her salary since 2023. She said that she had joined the Mumbadevi Adarsh Sanskrit Mahavidyalay in April 2018. In June 2023 when she she filed a sexual harassment complaint against assistant professor Manoj Kumar Dubey, an FIR was registered at the Gamdevi police station against the assistant professor. Her complaint was referred under the POSH Act to the ICC. Ten days after the committee met, they closed her complaint saying that they could not reach any specific conclusion based on her complaint against Dubey. A month after the Gamdevi police filed a charge-sheet against the assistant professor, the woman was first transferred to Bhilwara and later to Mathura. She requested the transfers be cancelled but when the institute took no action she turned to the high court.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
MahaRERA starts verification of occupancy certificates submitted by developers
1 2 3 Pune: Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) has initiated a statewide verification of 2,600 occupancy certificates (OCs) submitted by developers on its official portal. These certificates have been sent to respective planning authorities to ensure authenticity and prevent discrepancies or forgery, officials said on Saturday. The crackdown stems from 2022 Kalyan-Dombivli Municipal Corporation (KDMC) scam, in which 65 illegal buildings were constructed using forged documents, including fake 7/12 extracts (land records), fabricated building plans, and counterfeit MahaRERA registrations. The scam led to the arrest of 15 people, including developers and agents, and a Bombay High Court-ordered demolition drive that displaced over 6,500 residents. You Can Also Check: Pune AQI | Weather in Pune | Bank Holidays in Pune | Public Holidays in Pune "Many developers have uploaded OCs on MahaRERA portal. We are verifying these with the respective planning authorities," a senior MahaRERA official said. The OCs serve as completion certificates for real estate project. As per an earlier directive by the state's urban development department (UDD), verified commencement certificates (CCs), building plans, and OCs issued to developers must be sent by the planning authorities to MahaRERA's designated email if their websites are not integrated. While many developers have submitted CCs and building plans, OCs are often not uploaded by them. So far, only 136 OCs have been verified by the authorities, with the remaining still under process. Officials said integration of local authority websites with MahaRERA portal would have significantly expedited the process. "We've been pushing for website integration for months. Only Mumbai's municipal corporation has completed integration. Others have cited technical issues, which are now being addressed by the Maharashtra IT department," the official added. MahaRERA is also checking whether the submitted certificates indicate full or partial occupancy, after several instances of developers misrepresenting partial OCs as full approvals to mislead homebuyers. "While developers upload these certificates, we want to be doubly sure," the official said. MahaRERA has instructed planning authorities to verify OCs within a stipulated timeline. If no response is received within that period, the certificates will be deemed valid by default. However, any discrepancies found later will make the concerned authorities fully liable. "Homebuyers must have access to verified commencement and occupancy certificates before making a purchase decision. This verification drive is critical to restoring trust in Maharashtra's real estate sector," said a MahaRERA official. Many homebuyers complain that while project details are available through MahaRERA registration number, OCs are often missing. "Builders diligently upload CCs and building plans, but frequently skip uploading OCs, and local authorities don't follow up with them," an official noted. A Pune-based homebuyer said the developer claimed to possess an OC, but it wasn't available on the MahaRERA website. "It's confusing for buyers. The verification process should be simplified," said Priya P, a first-time investor. Under MahaRERA norms, developers must register projects before selling units, submit quarterly progress and financial reports, and upload verified OCs before withdrawing project funds from escrow accounts. This verification drive is seen as a key step in strengthening regulatory compliance and protecting buyers from fraud, added an official. Pune: Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) has initiated a statewide verification of 2,600 occupancy certificates (OCs) submitted by developers on its official portal. These certificates have been sent to respective planning authorities to ensure authenticity and prevent discrepancies or forgery, officials said on Saturday. The crackdown stems from 2022 Kalyan-Dombivli Municipal Corporation (KDMC) scam, in which 65 illegal buildings were constructed using forged documents, including fake 7/12 extracts (land records), fabricated building plans, and counterfeit MahaRERA registrations. The scam led to the arrest of 15 people, including developers and agents, and a Bombay High Court-ordered demolition drive that displaced over 6,500 residents. "Many developers have uploaded OCs on MahaRERA portal. We are verifying these with the respective planning authorities," a senior MahaRERA official said. The OCs serve as completion certificates for real estate project. As per an earlier directive by the state's urban development department (UDD), verified commencement certificates (CCs), building plans, and OCs issued to developers must be sent by the planning authorities to MahaRERA's designated email if their websites are not integrated. While many developers have submitted CCs and building plans, OCs are often not uploaded by them. So far, only 136 OCs have been verified by the authorities, with the remaining still under process. Officials said integration of local authority websites with MahaRERA portal would have significantly expedited the process. "We've been pushing for website integration for months. Only Mumbai's municipal corporation has completed integration. Others have cited technical issues, which are now being addressed by the Maharashtra IT department," the official added. MahaRERA is also checking whether the submitted certificates indicate full or partial occupancy, after several instances of developers misrepresenting partial OCs as full approvals to mislead homebuyers. "While developers upload these certificates, we want to be doubly sure," the official said. MahaRERA has instructed planning authorities to verify OCs within a stipulated timeline. If no response is received within that period, the certificates will be deemed valid by default. However, any discrepancies found later will make the concerned authorities fully liable. "Homebuyers must have access to verified commencement and occupancy certificates before making a purchase decision. This verification drive is critical to restoring trust in Maharashtra's real estate sector," said a MahaRERA official. Many homebuyers complain that while project details are available through MahaRERA registration number, OCs are often missing. "Builders diligently upload CCs and building plans, but frequently skip uploading OCs, and local authorities don't follow up with them," an official noted. A Pune-based homebuyer said the developer claimed to possess an OC, but it wasn't available on the MahaRERA website. "It's confusing for buyers. The verification process should be simplified," said Priya P, a first-time investor. Under MahaRERA norms, developers must register projects before selling units, submit quarterly progress and financial reports, and upload verified OCs before withdrawing project funds from escrow accounts. This verification drive is seen as a key step in strengthening regulatory compliance and protecting buyers from fraud, added an official.
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Nagpur Rural police remove 265 unauthorized loudspeakers from religious places
Nagpur: In a major drive to enforce Bombay High Court directives, the Nagpur rural police have removed 265 unauthorised loudspeakers from religious sites across the district. The action was carried out under the supervision of SP (Rural) Harssh Poddar, with a focus on impartial enforcement across all communities and religious establishments. The loudspeakers removed included: 34 under Ramtek police sub-division, 9 under Saoner, 45 under Katol, 164 under Umred, and 13 under Nagpur police sub-division. The drive follows a directive issued by the Bombay High Court in January, instructing police authorities to act against sound systems violating noise pollution norms. The HC specifically called for the removal of unauthorised loudspeakers and barred new illegal installations at religious places. Further reinforcing this, the Maharashtra director general of police (DGP) issued an order on April 11 mandating strict action under the Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Act, 2000. Police have also warned vendors against supplying non-compliant audio equipment, stressing that legal action will be taken against violators. Local communities have been urged to cooperate with the authorities to ensure compliance. The Nagpur rural police reiterated their commitment to continuous monitoring and strict enforcement to prevent future violations.
