AfDB slashes SA's growth forecast by half amid structural challenges, trade war concerns
Image: Leon Lestrade/ Independent Newspapers
The African Development Bank (AfDB) has drastically cut South Africa's gross domestic product (GDP) forecast for 2025 below 1%, saying that the economy continued to be weighed down by a range of structural constraints and could take a hit from Trump's trade war.
In its Country Focus Report for South Africa published on Wednesday, the AfDB lowered its forecast for Africa's most-industrialised economy to a meager 0.8% this year from a previous estimate of 1.6%.
This forecast by the AfDB is more pessimistic than the National Treasury's growth forecast of 1.4% for the year, which was revised down from a prior 1.9% on the back of geopolitical tensions including Trump's trade levies.
It is also less than the South African Reserve Bank's latest projection of 1.2% this year amid declining mining and manufacturing output and rising unemployment, though it is expected to rise to 1.8% by 2027.
S&P Global also recently lowered its 2025 GDP growth projection for South Africa to 1.1% from 1.3% previously due to weaker-than-expected GDP print for the first quarter.
AfDB country economist Akhona Peter said South Africa's economy was vulnerable to external shocks particularly from the United States, its second largest export destination after China.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
The Trump administration is expected to implement its hefty 31 import tariffs on a number of exporting countries next week, including South Africa, which exports a variety of minerals and commodities to the US.
US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that he was not considering delaying implementing the tariffs again after he temporarily suspended them for 90 days in April.
'This is mainly on the fact that we expect trade tensions to pretty much affect net exports negatively,' Peter said.
'Industries such as agriculture, which rely heavily on US market access, will be particularly vulnerable. In the short-term, this could slow economic activity, decrease firm profitability, and constrain job creation in export-linked industries.'
The South African government is keen to ensure that the new requirements by the US do not unduly disadvantage local enterprises, hence the appeal for strategic patience from the South African industry.
South Africa's proposed Framework Deal, which was submitted to the US Trade Representative in May, aims to tackle a range of US concerns including non-tariff barriers and longstanding market access issues.
It seeks specific exemptions from Sections 232 duties for key export products such as automobiles, auto parts, steel, and aluminium, ensuring these critical sectors can remain competitive in the US market.
Meanwhile, the AfDB recommended that the South African government should accelerate structural reforms to offset global challenges.
The bank said priority actions should include enhancing governance and operational efficiency of State-Owned Enterprises, particularly of Eskom and rail, ports and pipelines operator Transnet, to restore service reliability and unlock growth.
It also called for strengthening local government capacity, addressing spatial inequality, advancing digital government, promoting public-private partnerships (PPPs), and reducing wasteful expenditure through fiscal consolidation are also essential to improve service delivery and public trust.
'To accelerate domestic capital mobilization, reforms must focus on improving governance, enhancing institutional effectiveness, and fostering transparency and accountability. At the same time, promoting industrialization, deepening trade and investment, and building a competitive export base can drive higher growth and employment,' recommended the report.
'Tackling youth unemployment requires focused skills development and capacity building initiatives, aligned with labor market demands, to take full advantage of the country's human capital.
'Trade needs to be diversified under AfCFTA and into new Asian markets. Lastly, improving the business environment by cutting red tape, ensuring fair market access for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), and increasing labor market flexibility will support entrepreneurship, firm growth, and job creation — essential ingredients for sustainable economic transformation.'
BUSINESS REPORT
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
21 minutes ago
- eNCA
US Supreme Court to weigh transgender athlete bans
The US Supreme Court agreed on Thursday to wade into the hot-button issue of transgender athletes in girls and women's sports. The court said it would hear a case next term challenging state laws in Idaho and West Virginia banning transgender athletes from female competition. More than two dozen US states have passed laws in recent years barring athletes who were assigned male at birth from taking part in girls or women's sports. The conservative-dominated Supreme Court's decision to hear the case comes two weeks after it upheld a Tennessee law banning gender-affirming medical treatment for transgender minors. The Supreme Court has also recently backed a move by President Donald Trump, who campaigned on the issue of transgender athletes, to have transgender troops dismissed from the military. Trump issued an executive order in February aimed at banning transgender athletes from girls and women's sports. "From now on women's sports will be only for women," Trump said. "With this executive order the war on women's sports is over." The executive order allows federal agencies to deny funding to schools that allow transgender athletes to compete on girls or women's teams. In a high-profile case, the University of Pennsylvania agreed this week to ban transgender athletes from its women's sports teams, settling a federal civil rights case stemming from the furor around swimmer Lia Thomas. The Department of Education said that UPenn had entered into a resolution agreement vowing to comply with Title IX, the federal law which prohibits sex-based discrimination in any educational program. It follows an investigation by the department's Office for Civil Rights which found the university had violated Title IX by allowing transgender swimmer Thomas to compete in women's competitions. Thomas became a lightning rod around the debate over transgender athletes in women's sport after competing in female collegiate competitions in 2022. She had earlier swam on UPenn's men's team while undergoing hormone replacement therapy. Critics and some fellow swimmers said she should not have been allowed to compete against women due to an unfair physiological advantage. The Idaho case accepted by the Supreme Court stems from the Republican-led state's "Fairness in Women's Sports Act." It was challenged by an athlete at an Idaho university and lower courts ruled that it violates the equal protection clause of the Constitution. The West Virginia case was challenged by a middle school student who was not allowed to compete for the girls' track team. An appeals court ruled that the ban was a violation of Title IX. The Supreme Court will hear the case during the term beginning in October and issue a ruling next year.
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
What do we know about the latest push for a Gaza truce?
Smoke billows from an Israeli airstrike that targeted the area of Jabal al-Rihan in the southern Lebanese province of Jezzine. US President Donald Trump this week urged the Palestinian militant group Hamas to seize the opportunity for a 60-day truce in Gaza, saying Israel had agreed to the proposal. After almost 21 months of devastating fighting in the Palestinian territory and following a speedy resolution to Israel's 12-day war with Iran, Trump's exhortations have reignited hopes for a third ceasefire in the Gaza war. But, with familiar obstacles to a truce still in place and an upcoming meeting between Trump and Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu critical to the outcome, the likelihood of a deal remains in the balance, analysts say. What's holding up a Hamas response? Efforts to strike a deal in numerous rounds of indirect talks have repeatedly failed, with the primary point of contention centred on Hamas's calls for an enduring ceasefire in Gaza. In a Wednesday statement, Hamas said it was weighing its response to the new proposal and sought "an agreement that guarantees ending the aggression" as well as the withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza and the entry of aid into the territory. Hugh Lovatt, a Middle East analyst at the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR), said there could be flexibility in Hamas's position if they adopt a "pragmatic understanding that this is as good as they'll get for the foreseeable future". He nonetheless noted that there were "still extremely sizable gaps" on Hamas's demands, including the path to a permanent end to the war, the re-opening of Gaza to humanitarian aid and Israel's withdrawal. "Those will be ultimately the most critical matters in deciding whether that initial 60-day period is put on," he added. Andreas Krieg, a Middle East analyst at King's College London, said Hamas's "deep mistrust of Israel's intentions -- given past ceasefires that collapsed under renewed strikes -- means Hamas would need firm guarantees before agreeing" to a deal. In January, Hamas and Israel agreed to a truce which broke down in March, with the two sides unable to agree on the next steps and Israel resuming air and ground attacks.
Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Gridlock: The urgent imperative to increase SA's transmission capacity
South Africa is not short on ambition or potential when it comes to energy reform. The country's renewable energy market is maturing. Investment appetite is increasing and policy shifts, like the recent Electricity Regulation Act, indicate focused commitment to achieving a more competitive, sustainable and competitive energy market. However, one obstacle remains a hindrance to this momentum - transmission. Despite billions of rand committed to generation, over 20GW of renewable energy remains untapped due to a lack of grid capacity. As the country scrambles to meet rising energy demand and decarbonise its economy, transmission has emerged as the single most critical enabler of energy security and low-carbon growth. Importantly, the lack of transmission is not just a technical hurdle. It is the vital lever that is needed to unlock real energy transformation. With open access to the grid, more independent power producers (IPPs) will be able to participate and, more importantly, the increased capacity created by a robust transmission ecosystem will mean that South Africa (SA) can unleash the full potential of renewables – cutting emissions while improving reliability. The good news is that we appear to finally be on the path towards this enhanced transmission capacity. The establishment of the National Transmission Company of South Africa (NTCSA), to be spun off from Eskom, was a significant early milestone on this journey. This unbundling will enable open and transparent access to the grid for public and private generators. It will also pave the way for the trading of electricity through market platforms and wheeling arrangements, creating the foundation for a more dynamic and competitive power sector. The NTCSA coupled with the proposed Independent Transmission Projects (ITP) programme, creates a compelling case for private sector participation, not just in generation but also in grid infrastructure. However, there is still a long road ahead. The Transmission Development Plan (TDP) 2024 identifies the ambitious objective of integrating around 56GW of new generation and constructing over 14 000km of transmission lines by 2034. That is less than 10 years from now. The initial phase to 2029 targets a more realistic 5 043km of powerlines, but with only 286km expected to be completed in 2025, the gap between ambition and delivery remains immense. Also, with Eskom's financial constraints and national debt levels limiting national government's capacity to finance these builds, the success of the ITP programme will depend heavily on attracting private sector buy in, partnership and investment. Private investment in these ITP projects will require clear revenue models, predictable tariff structures and credible counterparties. The private sector needs certainty, not just around returns, but also when it comes to things like termination and non-payment recourse. South Africa could apply lessons from past public-private partnerships, like the Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer Procurement Programme (REIPPPP). A stable, predictable, and transparent regulatory environment, consistently applied, is key. Investors will need absolute certainty regarding tariff structures, off-take agreements with the NTCSA, and the long-term security of their substantial investments. The government's commitment to late-stage tendering – ensuring environmental approvals and servitudes are largely in place before bids – is a sensible move to de-risk projects. Standard Bank is actively engaged in this sector, working to structure bankable transmission models. There are multiple avenues to de-risk transmission investments, and we can leverage global lessons and precedents to achieve this. Countries like Brazil and Peru have successfully deployed BOOT (Build, Own, Operate, Transfer) models to deliver thousands of kilometres of grid infrastructure. We do not see any reason why South Africa cannot do the same. Transmission infrastructure does not have to be the bottleneck; it is an enabler of energy reform. But to do that, it needs to become a national investment priority. There are encouraging signs that this may be the case. The Request for Information (RFI) that took place between December 2024 and February 2025 gathered insights from market participants on how to accelerate the development of transmission infrastructure. Further milestones include the imminent release of the full Request for Proposal (RFP), which will signal a vital shift from talking and planning to execution, and allow government to shape the legal frameworks, procurement mechanisms and support instruments that will guide the first batch of independent transmission projects to market. This is the crucial next step in shifting SA's energy reality from crisis management to long-term and sustainable resilience. DM
