Monday's Campaign Round-Up, 7.7.25: Democrats target Republican megabill in new ads
* According to a new report in Roll Call, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee's first national ad buy of the 2026 cycle will focus on the impact of Republicans' far-right megabill. A variety of progressive groups, including Unrig Our Economy, Protect Our Care and the League of Conservation Voters, have also begun airing related ads.
* In North Carolina's U.S. Senate race, with Republican incumbent Sen. Thom Tillis retiring, Donald Trump is already promoting his daughter-in-law, Fox News' Lara Trump, and her unannounced candidacy.
* On a related note, there was some scuttlebutt about North Carolina Rep. Richard Hudson, the current chair of the National Republican Congressional Committee, possibly running to succeed Tillis, but he declared that he's not running for the Senate next year.
* In South Carolina's U.S. Senate race, Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham is favored to keep his seat, but the longtime incumbent is facing a new primary rival: Former Lt. Gov. André Bauer kicked off his Senate campaign last week.
* With 17 weeks to go before Election Day in New Jersey, the latest Rutgers-Eagleton Poll found Democratic Rep. Mikie Sherrill with a big lead over former Republican assemblyman Jack Ciattarelli, 51% to 31%. (Click the link for more information on the poll's methodology and margin of error.)
* On a related note, Gov. Kathy Hochul isn't winning any popularity contests in New York, but the latest Siena College poll found the Democratic incumbent with 20-point leads over the top Republican contenders in next year's gubernatorial race.
* At a White House event on the Fourth of July, Trump once again focused on election victory last fall, claiming he won 2,750 congressional districts, while losing 505. As best as I can tell, this was the sixth different version of the meaningless electoral statistic he's come up with in recent months, rendering the claim meaningless.
* In the 2024 election cycle, Elon Musk donated $288 million to help put Republicans in power. Now, the megadonor claims he's creating a new third party called the 'America Party.' (Note, the 'American Party' named was already taken, and it has an unfortunate history).
* On a related note, Trump was quick to denounce Musk's endeavor, both publicly and online, trashing the very idea of third-party candidacies. What the president might not remember is that he ran as a Reform Party candidate in the 2000 cycle and threatened to run as an independent in 2016 if GOP voters denied him the Republican nomination.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oil Dips as Traders Take Stock of US Tariffs and OPEC+ Shift
(Bloomberg) -- Oil slipped for the third time in four days as investors focused on the fallout from a wave of US trade levies and a decision by OPEC+ to restore more of the group's idled capacity. Are Tourists Ruining Europe? How Locals Are Pushing Back Trump's Gilded Design Style May Be Gaudy. But Don't Call it 'Rococo.' Denver City Hall Takes a Page From NASA In California, Pro-Housing 'Abundance' Fans Rewrite an Environmental Landmark Can Mamdani Bring Free Buses to New York City? Brent dipped toward $69 a barrel and West Texas Intermediate was below $68. President Donald Trump threatened new tariff rates on trading partners, while suggesting that he was still open to negotiations. The duties on countries including Japan and South Korea won't take effect until at least Aug. 1. 'Traders are watching Trump's new tariff threats and global growth risks, which could soften demand,' said Haris Khurshid, chief investment officer at Karobaar Capital LP. 'Looking ahead, we should be paying attention to any new OPEC+ signals about extending or adjusting supply cuts.' Oil closed higher on Monday after sliding at the open following a decision by OPEC+ to boost output more than expected in August. The group cited summer demand as one reason for their optimism that the barrels could be absorbed, and Saudi Arabia raised the price of its main crude grade to Asia. The oil market has been volatile in recent weeks after the war between Israel and Iran, with a fragile truce now in place, but tensions in the Middle East are starting to rise again following fresh attacks in the Red Sea. A second vessel was targeted near Yemen on Monday, hours after Iranian-backed Houthis claimed responsibility for an earlier attack on a ship in the same area. 'These attacks raise supply-chain costs and insurance premiums for oil cargoes,' said Khurshid. 'But unless there's a major supply disruption, the impact stays mostly at the margins.' Elsewhere, there are signs of tightness showing in the diesel market, as traders grapple with a summer supply squeeze. US stockpiles are at the lowest seasonally since 1996, while Europe benchmark futures signal a tighter market than during the height of the recent Israel-Iran conflict. SNAP Cuts in Big Tax Bill Will Hit a Lot of Trump Voters Too 'Telecom Is the New Tequila': Behind the Celebrity Wireless Boom For Brazil's Criminals, Coffee Beans Are the Target Sperm Freezing Is a New Hot Market for Startups Pistachios Are Everywhere Right Now, Not Just in Dubai Chocolate ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jon Stewart and Steve Kroft Break Down Paramount's $16 Million Trump Settlement, Former '60 Minutes' Correspondent Slams Deal as ‘Tribute to the King'
On this week's episode of 'The Daily Show,' host Jon Stewart was joined by journalist Steve Kroft to discuss Paramount's $16 million settlement with Donald Trump, a deal the former '60 Minutes' correspondent called 'tribute to the king.' Stewart opened the interview by asking Kroft what it meant for a news organization like '60 Minutes' to pay such a large settlement to the president, offering the word 'devastating' as a descriptor for internal attitudes. Kroft agreed that 'devastating' was a 'good word' for the situation. More from Variety Trump Claims '60 Minutes' Settlement Is Worth as Much as $35 Million Including 'Advertising'; Paramount Denies Deal Includes PSAs Dan Rather on Paramount's $16 Million Trump Settlement: 'It Was a Sell-Out to Extortion by the President' (EXCLUSIVE) California Gov. Gavin Newsom Says Paramount's Trump Settlement 'Seems Transactional,' Tells Media Companies to 'Do the Right Thing' Amid Threats 'I think there's a lot of fear,' Kroft said. 'Fear of losing their job, fear of what's happening to the country, fear of losing the First Amendment. All of those things.' When asked why he thinks Paramount paid the settlement, Kroft cleverly dodged the question, stating that 'a couple of congressmen think that it was bribery.' He later let his own thoughts be known, calling the deal 'a shakedown.' 'That's what I call it,' he added. 'Some people call it extortion.' He later explained that many in the journalism community feel similarly about Paramount's decision to pay up. 'It's not just me or '60 Minutes' or you that think it's a shakedown,' Kroft said. 'It's pretty much every reporter that's looked at this case and said, 'This is ridiculous. It's going to be thrown out of any court that it goes before.' Except maybe one in Amarillo, [Texas], and that's where they brought the suit.' When asked how the media should respond to such a historic development, Kroft took the opportunity to point out that Trump didn't get everything he wanted from the Paramount camp. 'This lawsuit, the one thing that they didn't get, Trump didn't get, he didn't get an apology, and he had been pushing really hard,' he explained. 'He was demanding an apology and wanted CBS to admit that it had made a mistake, so he could use that against [them] and erode the credibility of the program and the network. But he did not get it, and that was, that's important.' Trump filed a lawsuit against Paramount and CBS days before the 2024 presidential election. In it, he alleged that a '60 Minutes' interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris, Trump's former presidential opponent, violated a Texas consumer-protection law and misled voters. He originally asked for $10 billion in damages, but then upped it to $20 billion in an amendment. Trump thought the edited interview made Harris look 'more presidential' and claimed that it was 'the biggest Broadcasting SCANDAL in History!!!' All against the backdrop of Paramount's $8 billion deal with Skydance, which awaits approval from the Trump-controlled FCC, the studio agreed to pay the president $16 million rather than fight on against a lawsuit they had previously slammed as 'meritless.' Watch Stewart's entire interview with Kroft below. Best of Variety Oscars 2026: George Clooney, Jennifer Lopez, Julia Roberts, Wagner Moura and More Among Early Contenders to Watch New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts?
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Today's trade deadline was no such thing
Three months later, President Donald Trump's endgame for his once market-rattling tariffs was supposed to arrive tonight at midnight. But it won't. As the clock rapidly ticked toward the long-standing July 9 end of Trump's 90-day pause on soaring 'reciprocal' tariff rates on more than 60 countries, Trump on Monday signed an executive action extending that reprieve until August 1. Despite significant progress with several trading partners, including India, Brazil, the European Union and several Asian countries, according to US officials, the global financial system has started to grapple with the reality that the deals, the details and even the deadline sit in a state of limbo. Trump's top trade and economic advisors insisted, as they have for the better part of the last two months, that deals will be announced in rapid succession this week. They also spent Sunday telling the world tariff rates wouldn't snap back into place until August 1, in an implicit hedge if those deal predictions once again proved hollow. It has been a whirlwind since then: Trump then announced on social media late Sunday night that he'd begin sending letters outlining the tariff rates or terms of bilateral agreements to trading partners. Then he announced a 25% tariff on Japan and South Korea and higher tariffs on a number of smaller trading partners Monday, with more letters expected to come in the days ahead. He also launched a new tariff threat at the 10-nation bloc known as BRICS, which he's long viewed as a direct and acute threat to US dominance in the global financial system. Trump didn't mention that several BRICS countries are top US trade partners and currently engaged in intensive bilateral trade talks with Trump's lead negotiators. The actual deadline – whether August 1 or some future date Trump announces on social media – is a lot like the months-long bilateral talks launched in early April: fuzzy on actual details, light on actual outcomes, ambiguous on actual goals, all while projecting unflinchingly bold predictions of success. All of it, most critically, contingent on the whims of the current inhabitant of the Oval Office. 'When you think about it, it's kind of the perfect window into the whole second term approach,' a trade lawyer who worked in Trump's first term told CNN. 'Everything revolves around the president, and you can safely assume he rather enjoys everything that entails.' Trump has spent the last 80-plus days fielding a steady stream of offers with concessions on market access for US products, reduced tariff rates, delayed tax and regulatory enforcement for US-based companies and a veritable potpourri of offers on unrelated policy matters thought to be important to his domestic agenda, according to multiple people involved in the process. Trump views the deadline – or deadlines – as the most critical leverage to squeeze trading partners for a few more concessions or to drop their own red lines in the ongoing bilateral talks, officials said. In other words, the pervasive uncertainty and ambiguity are kind of the point. 'I think what President Trump is concerned about is the quality of the deals, not the quantity,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Monday on CNBC. The US economy has held up and overcome the dire predictions of catastrophe that sent the stock and bond markets into a sustained period of tumult through the spring. Wall Street has settled into a general state of Zen about Trump's actual tariff intentions after a series of pauses and de-escalations. The general exhaustion consuming investors after months on a hair trigger isn't an insignificant factor driving that view, according to several market participants, who nonetheless expressed little anxiety about the optimism that has driven stocks to record highs. Trump just signed the cornerstone of his legislative agenda into law, a major win. At the same time, the US has collected $81.5 billion in tariff revenue through June, according to the US Customs and Border Protection, only serving to bolster Trump's position, officials say. 'In his mind, he's in a no-lose situation,' the former official said. 'He's going to keep amping up the pressure.' That's the backdrop to keep in mind throughout the critical week ahead. The Trump administration has announced two bilateral agreements and a third with China that is better described as a de-escalation than a deal. That's not to dismiss the China détente, as the de facto trade embargo between the world's two largest economies that existed in April carried with it the potential to fracture the backbone of global commerce. Trump has inked a trade framework with the UK (which wasn't actually subject to the stratospheric 'reciprocal' rates announced on April 2 in the Rose Garden). The granular details of that agreement are still in process, officials said. Trump announced on social media last week that he'd signed off on a deal with Vietnam, which was facing a catastrophic 46% 'reciprocal' rate at the end of the 90-day pause. The agreement would implement a 20% tariff on the country and a more draconian penalty on goods deemed by the US to be of Chinese origin but passed through Vietnam to avoid harsher tariffs. The details remain opaque on how exactly that would be applied – or defined – and Vietnamese officials have been more cautious about declaring the agreement final. We got our first glimpse Monday of Trump's regularly promised trade letters, with missives sent to the leaders of South Korea, Japan, South Africa, Malaysia and several others that the president posted to Truth Social. He decried America's imbalance of trade with those countries, as well as tariffs and other non-tariff barriers they place on US goods. Trump said the door was open to negotiation, but he threatened the countries with higher tariffs if they retaliate. Is this how trade talks actually work? Not normally. Bessent during his CNBC interview described the contents like this: 'Thank you for wanting to trade with the United States of America. We welcome you as a trading partner, and here's the rate unless you want to come back and try to negotiate.' The administration is not seeking or planning to secure 'trade deals' in the historical sense. Those pacts, which take years to negotiate and even longer to implement, have never really been the goal. Instead, the White House is seeking frameworks with a heavy focus on market access for US industries and products, while at the same time including commitments to reduce or remove entirely regulatory and legislative barriers to US exports. So where do the crush of bilateral talks actually stand? India has long been viewed as the most likely major partner to sign onto a framework with the US and may still do so this week, though Indian officials have hardened their positions in recent days, according to US officials. India is also a member of the BRICS group, so it's unclear what Trump's tariff threat Sunday means for trade negotiations. South Korea had also been viewed for weeks as likely to reach an agreement, though Trump's auto tariffs remain a key sticking point in those talks, and Trump's letter Monday may have thrown a wrench in those gears. Japan steadily moved further away from an outcome in recent weeks, and Trump cast significant doubt on talks that once seemed on a path to a certain agreement. Japanese officials, who just weeks ago were scrambling to lay the groundwork for an announcement by last month's Group of Seven summit, have delivered far more pessimistic messages in their public statements in recent days. EU officials have signaled more optimism in the last few days about clinching a framework with Trump's trade negotiators after an intensive series of meetings and technical discussions in the last two weeks. Indonesia, Cambodia and Thailand have all delivered substantial offers to their US counterparts in the last 10 days in an effort to move to the front of the line for an agreement and are likely candidates for any near-term deal in the next few days, officials said. Brazil has ramped up its efforts to secure an agreement, including bilateral talks at the end of last week designed to expand on an earlier offer to sharply reduce tariffs on certain US products, officials said. The most prevalent point of contention among foreign trade teams has been a lack of clarity on what their US counterparts envision for any final agreement. But the most biggest roadblock in the more expansive negotiations has been the existence – or promised imposition - of Trump's sectoral tariffs on autos, steel and pharmaceuticals, officials said. Sign in to access your portfolio
