Google's new app might stop you from making your next regretful purchase
Earlier this year, Google Shopping introduced virtual try-ons for clothes using your own photo – and now, Doppl takes that to a whole new level. The new experimental app builds on that tech, letting you try on outfits using photos or even screenshots.If you spot a look you love on Instagram, your favorite creator or even in a thrift shop window, just snap a pic, upload it to Doppl and you'll see how it might look on you.
But it doesn't stop there – Doppl also uses AI to turn static outfit images into short videos. So, instead of just seeing how something might look in a still photo, you get a more dynamic, realistic feel for the outfit in motion. That is a pretty big upgrade from traditional virtual try-ons.
Video credit – Google You can also save and share your looks, which is going to be huge for content creators. Imagine showing off endless outfits you never even bought. I believe Reels and TikToks are about to be packed with Doppl-created fashion videos – because why not flex a fresh look without spending a dime?
Doppl is still in its experimental phase under Google Labs, so don't expect perfection just yet. The fit, textures and how the clothes look might not always be spot on. But that's the whole point of Labs – test things out, get feedback, and improve from there.
Right now, Doppl is only available in the US for both iOS and Android. And sure, some fashion retailer apps already let you virtually try on clothes, but Doppl feels different. It's not tied to any one brand, it gives you way more freedom to test looks. Plus, the AI video feature makes a big difference. Being able to see how an outfit moves on your body could help you decide if you really like it – before it ends up sitting in a return box.So, it could also be a win for sustainability. Fewer blind buys and fewer returns mean less waste. That said, generating all these AI videos… you know, that does take some serious computing power. Still, it's a cool glimpse at how far Google's AI has come and how it's starting to show up in everyday things like how we shop. Secure your connection now at a bargain price!
We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Phone Arena
an hour ago
- Phone Arena
Judge orders Huawei to face U.S. criminal charges
China's Huawei Technologies, one of the top networking companies globally, must face criminal charges in the U.S., according to U.S. District Judge Ann Donnelly. On Tuesday, Judge Donnelly rejected Huawei's request to dismiss the 16-count federal indictment against the company. In her 52-page decision, the judge said that Huawei's arguments in its filing asking her to dismiss the case were premature. Huawei is accused of stealing technology, engaging in racketeering, wire and bank fraud, and committing other illegal acts. For example, the U.S. says that Huawei and some of its subsidiaries planned to illegally obtain U.S. trade secrets. It is also accused of installing surveillance equipment that allowed Iran to spy on anti-government protesters in 2009. Huawei also violated U.S. sanctions by doing business with North Korea. The U.S. has long considered Huawei to be a national security threat and in 2019 it was placed on the Entity List by the Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS). As a result, Huawei cannot obtain U.S.-origin parts and components without the supplier obtaining a special license from the U.S. Commerce Department. Exactly one year later, the Commerce Department tightened the noose around Huawei by using the Foreign-Produced Direct Product Rule (FPDPR). As a result, any foundry using American technology to build chips is blocked from shipping said chips to Huawei without a license. Huawei has managed to get around these sanctions by developing its own HarmonyOS operating system. Replacing the chips it could no longer receive was a harder problem to solve. After using all of its remaining Kirin 9000 inventory (this was the Huawei-designed 5nm chip that was the first to support 5G with an integrated 5G modem), Huawei was able to obtain Snapdragon application processors for its flagship phones. However, the U.S. issued the necessary licenses to Qualcomm because it tweaked the chips so they couldn't work with 5G networks. While the inability of Huawei and China's SMIC foundry to obtain the necessary lithography machines prevent it from closing the gap with chips designed by Apple, Qualcomm, MediaTek and others, Huawei stunned the wireless world in 2023 by using a 7nm chip built by SMIC with 5G support to power the Mate 60 series. This allowed the manufacturer to sell 5G phones once again. China has accused the U.S. of "economic bullying" and using national security to oppress Chinese companies. In its filing requesting a dismissal, Huawei says that the U.S. allegations are too vague. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer
Phone Arena
5 hours ago
- Phone Arena
This new Google Home feature gives you more control over who gets access
Google has introduced a new way to manage smart home access in the latest update to the Google Home app. With version 3.33, a new Member role is now available, giving users more control over who can do what in their smart when you invited someone to your Google Home, they were given Admin access by default. That meant they could make major changes like adding or removing devices, linking subscriptions, and even deleting the entire home. For many households, this was more control than necessary — especially for guests, roommates, or you can choose between Admin and Member access. Admins still get full control of the home. But if you select the new Member role, you can customize exactly what that person can do. Members can use devices like lights, music speakers, smart locks, and thermostats, but you decide if they can go further. There are two permission toggles you can enable for Members. The first is for "Settings" access, which lets them manage device configurations and home-wide features like automations or Nest Wifi. The second is for "Activity" access, which allows them to see history from cameras, locks, and presence sensors. If neither option is enabled, Members still get basic control of devices but won't be able to make changes or view logs. You can now drill down on permissions for device management in the Google Home app. | Image credit — Google This update also allows kids under 13 to use the Google Home app for the first time. As long as they're part of your Google family group, they can now be added as Members. That gives them the ability to do things like turn on lights or unlock the door after school, all without access to sensitive settings or Admins and Members can use features tied to their personal Google accounts, such as Voice Match and shared media services. However, only Admins can manage other users, link subscriptions, or change high-level Member role originally appeared in Public Preview back in December 2024. With its full rollout, it's now available to everyone using the latest version of the Google Home change might seem small, but it addresses a long-standing issue with smart home sharing: how to give people access without giving them too much power. Whether you're managing a household with kids, roommates, or frequent visitors, the new Member role offers a flexible and safer way to share your devices without losing control. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer
Phone Arena
6 hours ago
- Phone Arena
Last call: Apple's $95M Siri privacy payout deadline is today
Receive the latest Apple news Subscribe By subscribing you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy Did you file a claim for Apple's Siri privacy settlement? Yes, I got the email and submitted it I'm about to — thanks for the reminder No, I don't qualify I had no idea this existed! Yes, I got the email and submitted it 0% I'm about to — thanks for the reminder 0% No, I don't qualify 0% I had no idea this existed! 0% Grab Surfshark VPN now at more than 50% off and with 3 extra months for free! Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer Today, July 2, is the last day to claim your part of a $95 million settlement from a lawsuit on Siri privacy. Affected customers are receiving emails about a "Lopez Voice Assistant Class Action Settlement", explaining that the recipient could be owed some money. Apple agreed to settle a class-action lawsuit on Siri privacy and the time to collect the payments has come. AppleInsider saw the email that recipients received – the recipients who were identified as potentially being a member of the settlement class, based on Apple's settlement class is defined as a current or former owner of a Siri-enabled device living in the United States. They must also believe that their confidential or private communications were obtained by Apple and possibly shared by third parties between September 17, 2014 and December 31, total amount of the settlement is $95 million, but in reality, affected class members would receive less. There are deductions for attorneys' fees and expenses, service awards, and costs from notice and settlement administration. The amount each member of the class receives also depends on how many people apply to the can submit claims for up to five Siri-enabled devices. There's a cap of up to $20 per device, meaning each class member could receive up to $100, but it's very likely that the final figure would be a lot are being made through this dedicated website and forms need to be completed and submitted by July 2. Postal claims can also be submitted but they need to be postmarked by July 2 as email that potential class members receive also contains Claim Identification Codes and Confirmation Codes that are to be used during the claim process. For people who don't have these codes, there are instructions provided if they believe they should be part of the has agreed to settle the lawsuit but is denying that it did anything improper or unlawful. Apple has underlined that the settlement is not an admission of lawsuit started back in 2019. The main claim is that Apple had unlawfully recorded conversations through Siri without users' permission. Apple agreed to a $95 million settlement in January of this year.
