
Iran says cooperation with UN nuclear watchdog will take 'new form'
Iran's 12-day war with Israel last month, sparked by an Israeli bombing campaign that hit military and nuclear sites as well as residential areas, rattled its already shaky relationship with the UN nuclear watchdog.
The attacks began days before a planned meeting between Tehran and Washington aimed at reviving nuclear negotiations, which have since stalled.
Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on Saturday that Iran's cooperation with the IAEA "has not stopped, but will take on a new form", after the Islamic republic formally ended cooperation with the UN watchdog in early July.
Iran has blamed the IAEA in part for the June attacks on its nuclear facilities, which Israel says it launched to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon — an ambition Tehran has repeatedly denied.
The United States, which had been in talks with Iran since April 12, joined Israel in carrying out its own strikes on June 22, targeting Iranian nuclear facilities at Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz.
Araghchi said requests to monitor nuclear sites "will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis... taking into account safety and security issues", and be managed by Iran's Supreme National Security Council.
'Assurances'
In early July, a team of IAEA inspectors left Iran to return to the organisation's headquarters in Vienna after Tehran suspended cooperation.
The talks were aimed at regulating Iran's nuclear activites in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions.
Before agreeing to any new meeting, "we are examining its timing, its location, its form, its ingredients, the assurances it requires", said Araghchi, who also serves as Iran's lead negotiator.
He said that any talks would focus only on Iran's nuclear activities, not its military capabilities.
"If negotiations are held... the subject of the negotiations will be only nuclear and creating confidence in Iran's nuclear programme in return for the lifting of sanctions," he told diplomats in Tehran.
"No other issues will be subject to negotiation."
Araghchi also warned that reimposing UN sanctions could eliminate Europe's role in the process.
Enrichment
"Such measures would signify the end of Europe's role in the Iranian nuclear dossier," Araghchi said.
A clause in the 2015 nuclear agreement, which US President Donald Trump withdrew from during his first term, allows for UN sanctions to be reimposed if Iran is found to be in breach of the deal.
Araghchi stressed that any new nuclear deal must uphold Iran's right under the Non-Proliferation Treaty to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes.
"I would like to emphasise that in any negotiated solution, the rights of the Iranian people on the nuclear issue, including the right to enrichment, must be respected," he said.
"We will not have any agreement in which enrichment is not included."
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said at the BRICS summit in Rio on Monday that Moscow would remain a committed ally of Iran and support its nuclear programme.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
32 minutes ago
- The National
Gazan fishermen fear Israel will stop them from setting out to sea
Israeli army renews ban on people in the enclave entering coastal waters, leading to worry that greater enforcement and further stress on Gaza's food supplies may follow


Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
UK: Divided police response to Palestine Action protests exposes 'chaos' of ban
Activists who staged nationwide protests in solidarity with direct action group Palestine Action over the weekend have said that widely differing police responses 'exposed a stark divide' and are 'indicative of the chaos' unleashed by the British government's order to proscribe the group. On Saturday, 86 people were arrested under the Terrorism Act for holding signs reading, 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action,' at protests in cities across the UK, including London, Manchester, Cardiff and Derry. The government passed legislation banning Palestine Action as a proscribed group on 4 July, making membership of and support for it a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. A bid by the group to apply for interim relief to temporarily block the ban pending a judicial review was rejected by the High Court on Friday. But according to the campaign group Defend Our Juries (DOJ), the policing response to the protests varied widely across cities, with police in Kendal and Derry making no arrests, while in Cardiff, the South Wales police treated the protest as if 'it were a serious terrorist incident'. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters DOJ reported that the South Wales Police conducted 13 arrests under the Terrorism Act Section 12 and held them in custody for an extended period after a superintendent authorised an extension of precharge detention beyond the maximum of 24 hours. The police also raided the arrestees' homes, breaking down front doors and seizing posters, books and technology. According to DOJ, two of the 13 arrestees were Quakers, aged 78 and 80. They reported that their food cupboards were tested for radioactive material. The group added that in London and Manchester the 'approach was somewhere in between', with protesters arrested under the Terrorism Act Section 13 - a much lesser charge than Section 12 - and were quickly released on police bail. 'The Chief Constable of South Wales police has got carried away with his new powers, treating peaceful protestors with cardboard signs like al-Qaeda operatives. Is this absurd diversion of police resources what [Home Secretary] Yvette Cooper really intended?' a DOJ spokesperson asked in a statement. Bringing the law into disrepute The DOJ said that the "massive variation" in the police response "brings the law into disrepute", and is demonstrative of the "chaos" unleashed by the order to ban the group. 'Like a kidnapping': How UK police are hunting pro-Palestine activists Read More » "Express your opinion in Kendal or Derry and the police will leave you be. Do the same thing in Cardiff, the police will react as if your cardboard sign is a grave danger to the public, keeping you locked up while they break down your doors and raid your homes." While DOJ noted that the signs that protesters held in Derry were worded slightly differently so that they read, 'Defend Your Right to Protest' instead of 'I Oppose Genocide', they said this does not explain a different police response, as it is the statement of support for Palestine Action written on the signs that is alleged to violate the Terrorism Act. Police Watchdog Netpol has previously told MEE about receiving multiple reports of assault against peaceful activists by the South Wales Police, who they described as being "extremely hostile to Palestine solidarity activism". Netpol also documented multiple incidents of violence by the South Wales police against Black Lives Matter activists in 2021 following the death of Mohamud Hassan in January of that year, shortly after his release from Cardiff Bay Police Station. The weekend's arrests follow similar actions the previous Saturday, when 27 people were arrested in London's Parliament Square, including an 83-year-old priest, a former government lawyer, an emeritus professor, and health workers.


The National
an hour ago
- The National
Trump and Netanyahu are masters of creating the illusion of regional peace
Meetings between US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are more akin to a master class in posturing and duplicity than in diplomacy. Last week's meetings were no exception. Both men are master manipulators, products of the current media age. They create illusions that they insist are real. They often repeat an untruth over and over, and with such force, that it becomes real for those who trust them. Those who do not believe in the illusion are threatened, belittled or shunned. Both leaders have used their guile to achieve personal success in domestic politics. They have developed strong constituent bases that include followers who believe that their leadership must be supported and protected. At the same time, they are polarising figures who have contributed to creating deep fissures within their countries. Ignoring the reality that a root cause of tension in the Middle East is the Israeli dispossession of Palestinians, their proposals only add to that dispossession and the resistance it spawns in Gaza But because some of the illusions they project are often based on untruths, there are limits to their successes. In the first place, reality invariably presents a strong check to illusions. And ignoring reality can result in social unrest and political chaos. For example, Mr Trump promoted his signature budget plan – which he called the ' Big Beautiful Bill '– promising that it would be fiscally sound and bring greater prosperity to more Americans. Instead, it appears that it will dramatically increase the nation's deficit while potentially causing 17 million Americans to lose their health care. For his part, Mr Netanyahu has prolonged his war on Gaza (and Lebanon, Syria and Iran) promising that it would lead to 'total victory', making Israel more respected and secure. Instead, it has led to the International Criminal Court issuing an arrest warrant for Mr Netanyahu for war crimes and crimes against humanity. Israel, meanwhile, has seen its international standing diminished because of its war effort. Truth wins out. And so, we can expect the day to come when many of Mr Trump's voters lose their healthcare plans and see their rural hospitals forced to close and realise that the illusion of the 'Big Beautiful Bill' didn't include them. Much the same will occur in Israel when Israelis realise that 'total victory' is a farce – the conflict with Palestinians will continue as long as they are denied rights – and as tens of thousands of young Israeli soldiers return from having served several tours of duty in Gaza with PTSD, wreaking havoc at home and in their communities. With this as a backdrop, it was both fascinating and deeply disturbing to see the two leaders at work with, and on, each other last week – a bizarre exercise in flattery. As we say in colloquial English: 'They laid it on thick.' Mr Netanyahu, charged with war crimes, gave Mr Trump the letter he sent to the Norwegian Nobel Committee nominating him for the peace prize. And Mr Trump returned the compliment calling Mr Netanyahu 'the greatest man alive'. All of this can be dismissed as harmless puffery. But where the efforts of these two leaders become truly dangerous is when they and their acolytes come to believe the deceit and attempt to extend their efforts to supplant reality with illusion through policies that affect others. From what little is known of what transpired in the meetings between Mr Trump and Mr Netanyahu, it's clear that the ideas driving both are not based on reality. Mr Trump's plan was to evacuate Palestinians from Gaza to a location outside of Palestine where housing will be provided so they can live productive lives, making way for Gaza to become a Riviera-style resort. This was criticised early on as being based on ethnic-cleansing and blatant colonialism. Mr Netanyahu appears to have nothing better to offer than a slight modification of Mr Trump's idea. He wouldn't expel all of Gaza's Palestinians. But he would force as many to leave as possible to other countries that would take them. Those who remain would be 'relocated' to what Israel is calling 'a humanitarian relocation site' where Palestinians can be provided for and 'deradicalised'. Both plans share three elements. First, to sell their ideas, both Mr Trump and Mr Netanyahu clothe them in humanitarian language. Second, no matter how they try to dress them up, both plans are designed and offered without consideration for what Palestinians really want. And finally, therefore, both are delusional and destined not only to fail, but to exacerbate an already volatile situation. Maybe the biggest illusion projected by both men is the notion that their plans will create the conditions for regional peace. Ignoring the reality that a root cause of tension in the Middle East is the Israeli dispossession of Palestinians, their proposals only add to that dispossession and the resistance it spawns in Gaza (all the while compounding the same dispossession in the West Bank and East Jerusalem). As history has shown, it is perilous to ignore the humanity of Palestinians. It is also foolish for Mr Trump and Mr Netanyahu to assume that their projected illusions will be believed in the Arab world, making possible an 'era of peace'. This fantasy only exists in their minds and in the minds of their acolytes. As Abraham Lincoln, a great Republican president, is believed to have said 160 years ago: 'You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time.'