logo
'Papa sorry': Fugitive fatally runs down daughter, 2, while driving van without licence

'Papa sorry': Fugitive fatally runs down daughter, 2, while driving van without licence

New Paper17-07-2025
While driving a delivery van, a man ran over his wife and a stroller carrying their two-year-old daughter, who later died in hospital.
At the time of the accident, the 36-year-old man did not have a driving licence and was on the run for a previous unlicensed moneylending offence.
The accident occurred on March 13, 2023, at the carpark of Block 326 Woodlands Street 32, and his daughter died the same day.
On July 16, the man was sentenced to 12 weeks' jail and disqualified from driving for three years after pleading guilty to two charges of driving without a valid licence and driving without motor insurance.
Two other charges of driving without due care and attention were taken into consideration for his sentencing.
The man cannot be named as the identities of his other children are protected under the Children and Young Persons Act.
The court heard that the man was sentenced in December 2021 to a year's jail and three strokes of the cane for an unlicensed moneylending offence.
He was supposed to start serving his sentence in January 2022 but did not surrender himself on the scheduled date.
A warrant was issued for his arrest, but he remained on the run till the day of the accident.
That day, his wife was driving a rented delivery van to the Woodlands Street 32 area to deliver parcels. The man, their son and daughter were with her.
After the couple delivered some parcels, the man asked to drive the van to several other blocks to clear the remaining deliveries quickly so the family could have lunch.
His wife knew he did not have a valid driving licence but allowed him to drive. She walked to a block to deliver parcels while pushing their daughter in a stroller. Their son was with the man in the van.
Footage played in court shows the van making a turn in the carpark as the man's wife was pushing the stroller by the roadside. The crash happened off-camera.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Ng Jun Chong said the van, which was not driven at a safe distance from the wife, toppled the stroller and ran over the daughter and the wife's right foot.
Seeing their daughter motionless on the road, his wife screamed. The man immediately braked and reversed the van.
The man alighted and ran towards his wife, who was cradling the girl and crying hysterically. He took the girl from his wife's arms and tried to wake her but to no avail.
He then walked around aimlessly while carrying the toddler, mumbling: "Papa sorry."
Some passers-by called for an ambulance, which took the wife and daughter to hospital.
The girl suffered a bruise on her forehead and was bleeding profusely from her nose and mouth. She died in hospital at about 3.30pm that day.
The man was arrested and started serving his sentence the next day for his previous offence.
DPP Ng told the court the man had been fined $1,500 in August 2021 for driving without a licence.
He said: "The consequences which arose from the accused's driving was grave as well as tragic.
"An accident occurred, and the accused caused the death of his own daughter, as well as untold grief to both his wife and himself."
The man, who did not have a lawyer, took issue in court with the timeline of investigations as he was charged two years after the accident.
District Judge Shawn Ho found there was no inordinate delay by the police or prosecution as time was needed to obtain various documents, such as medical reports.
The judge pointed out that the man had absconded for his previous offence and thereafter had to serve his jail sentence, which also took time.
The man said in mitigation that he and his wife were remorseful and still grieving the loss of their daughter.
He said: "As a human, (how) do I feel if I cannot bury my own daughter when I'm inside (prison)?"
He said he is the family's sole breadwinner as his wife has not been in the right state of mind to work after the accident.
"It's our own daughter, not an outsider or a passer-by... It's hard for us to move on," he said.
The couple have since had another baby, a six-month-old boy, who was in court with the wife, elder son and other family members.
He continued requesting a lighter sentence after the jail term was handed down, but Judge Ho said he had already considered his mitigation plea seriously.
The man accepted his sentence and kissed his sons goodbye before he was taken away.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CNA938 Rewind - Safeguard against break-ins: Home owners in new BTO estates encountering alleged thefts
CNA938 Rewind - Safeguard against break-ins: Home owners in new BTO estates encountering alleged thefts

CNA

timea day ago

  • CNA

CNA938 Rewind - Safeguard against break-ins: Home owners in new BTO estates encountering alleged thefts

Residents in some of Singapore's new public housing estates are facing a worrying problem – they are allegedly reporting missing items and broken locks in their units that are undergoing renovations. At least three police reports have been filed. Hairianto Diman and Susan Ng find out how home owners can safeguard against such break-ins. For that, they speak with Ng Hwee Li, Co-Chair for the accreditation programme at Society of Interior Designers, Singapore. She also runs and Interior Design firm, Liid Studio

Teacher's appeal against 14-year jail sentence for sexually assaulting 11-year-old girl rejected
Teacher's appeal against 14-year jail sentence for sexually assaulting 11-year-old girl rejected

New Paper

time4 days ago

  • New Paper

Teacher's appeal against 14-year jail sentence for sexually assaulting 11-year-old girl rejected

A 33-year-old married primary school teacher was sentenced to 14 years in prison for sexually abusing an 11-year-old student over an 11-year period. Two months later, he appealed, claiming that their relationship was built on "true love". The judge rejected this claim, citing the 21-year age gap and ruling that it was exploitation, not love. The now 52-year-old primary school teacher faced eight charges, including sexual assault of a minor and offences under the Children and Young Persons Act. He pleaded not guilty but was convicted after trial and sentenced to 14 years and two months in prison. The victim is now 31 years old. A gag order has been imposed to protect the victim's identity. According to court documents reported by Shin Min Daily News, the victim said she began a relationship with the defendant in September 2006. The following year, their interactions escalated from physical intimacy to digital penetration. The defendant had sex with the victim when she was below 16 years old. The two had been in an inappropriate relationship for several years until June 13, 2017, when the victim's sister discovered three videos on her mobile phone. In the clips, the victim spoke about difficulties in the relationship and her intention to end it, but said she could not confide in anyone for fear the defendant would cause trouble. This led to the case being exposed. The defendant later appealed against his conviction and sentence, claiming he and the victim were in a consensual relationship and that she had taken the lead. However, the High Court judge rejected his account as implausible, calling it an attempt to evade responsibility and discredit the victim. Noting the 21-year age gap between them, the judge concluded the relationship was not one of love but of exploitation. The defendant argued that he had not coerced or pressured the victim, but the judge found that he had abused his position of authority to commit the offence. As the victim's teacher, the defendant should have guided and protected her, the judge said, but instead chose to exploit her for his own ends. The judge also found the sentence appropriate and dismissed the appeal.

Jail for ex-employee of agency under MOH who corruptly obtained $18k trip from 2 men
Jail for ex-employee of agency under MOH who corruptly obtained $18k trip from 2 men

Singapore Law Watch

time4 days ago

  • Singapore Law Watch

Jail for ex-employee of agency under MOH who corruptly obtained $18k trip from 2 men

Jail for ex-employee of agency under MOH who corruptly obtained $18k trip from 2 men Source: Straits Times Article Date: 01 Aug 2025 Author: Shaffiq Alkhatib The man was sentenced to five months and two weeks' jail after he pleaded guilty to one count of obtaining a bribe and two counts of attempting to do so. An engineer at an agency under the Ministry of Health (MOH) corruptly obtained a Paris trip worth more than $18,000 from two senior executives of different telecommunications companies in or around March 2022. Ng Kah Siang was then working for Integrated Health Information Systems (IHiS) – a wholly owned subsidiary of MOH Holdings. He is no longer working for the agency, now known as Synapxe. He committed the offence in exchange for advancing the business interests of the men's firms with IHiS. On July 31, Ng, 37, who is also known as Ronnie, was sentenced to five months and two weeks' jail after he pleaded guilty to one count of obtaining a bribe and two counts of attempting to do so. He has since voluntarily surrendered more than $18,000 to the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB). Court documents stated that he had obtained the bribe from Chiang Chee Seng, 50, then a senior sales director at Nera Telecommunications, and Peng Ming, 39, then an account director at Huawei International. Chiang was sentenced to 11 weeks' jail on July 21 after he pleaded guilty to a graft charge. Peng's case is pending. All three men are Singaporeans. Deputy public prosecutors Eugene Phua and Andre Ong told the court that while working for IHiS, Ng was in charge of various contracts that it signed with vendors, which would provide information technology products and services to all public healthcare institutions in Singapore. In or around November 2021, he was assigned to be the IHiS project manager in charge of the renewal of a master contract linked to a multi-year term deal, which would allow public healthcare institutions to purchase IT equipment and solutions from the approved vendors. The DPPs told the court that the average annual procurement from two earlier contracts was valued at around $22 million in 2020 and 2021. In November 2021, Peng found out that IHiS was going to renew a contract linked to a term deal in early 2022 via an open tender. Ng then tried to obtain a bribe of $20,000 from Peng. Peng later offered Ng a visit to Huawei's lab in Singapore to better understand the company's capabilities. However, Ng did not accept Peng's offer as he found Huawei's lab in Changi to be 'too far' from his office in Serangoon North. The prosecutors added: 'There was nothing to entice (Ronnie) to travel the distance... In response to Ronnie's previous attempt to obtain gratification of $20,000... Peng offered to organise a trip for Ronnie to a country where Huawei had presence. 'This discussion between Peng and Ronnie then evolved to a sponsored overseas trip in Europe for Ronnie and his wife.' Initially, Ng had asked to go to Rome, but later changed his mind and opted for Paris. Peng then agreed to accommodate his request, the court heard. At around this time, Peng introduced Ng to Chiang. Peng also told Ng that Huawei had a good working relationship with Nera. Court documents stated that Peng then told Ng that Chiang would join them for the trip, and that Chiang would also help to plan it. This included covering the expenses for flights, accommodation and food for Ng and his wife. Ng understood that the Paris trip was to induce him to help Huawei and Nera win the IHiS term deal. The DPPs said that Peng and Chiang also stood to gain personally as part of their remuneration packages in their respective companies was based on the value of the business that they brought in. In or around March 2022, Ng tried to obtain from Chiang gratification involving 1 per cent of Nera's sales revenue linked to the term deal. The Paris trip in March that year involved nine people, including the three men and their loved ones. In earlier proceedings, the prosecutors said: 'Two months after the Paris trip and just before the tender specifications for the term deal were due to be published, Chiang and Peng received confidential tender documents on the morning of May 10, 2022, which they knew would stand them in a better stead to win the term deal.' Court papers did not disclose how the offences came to light but the DPPs had earlier said that the offenders 'were stopped in their tracks' when the CPIB arrested all three men the next day on May 11. Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction. Print

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store