
Parents back push to expand child care subsidy options
A bill empowering authorities to strip funding from childcare operators who fail to meet safety standards, among other measures, was this week fast-tracked during the first sitting of the 48th federal parliament.
Operators who fall down on quality, safety and compliance standards could be cut out of subsidies, which typically cover a large proportion of parents' fees, and also blocked from opening new centres.
Education Minister Jason Clare says he doesn't want to see funding removed and that the legislation should more compel providers to improve standards in the wake of recent abuse cases.
The crackdown is part of the government's promise to guarantee universal access to early education and while welcomed by parents and advocates, there are also calls for a national early-childhood commission to ensure consistent oversight and accountability.
Advocacy group For Parents has gone a step further, launching a petition calling on the government to provide equitable support for families who choose alternatives to centre-based care.
In an economy where most families need both parents to work, there should be more choice when it comes to childcare, says co-founder Cecelia Cobb.
"This is about giving families more freedom because the way that the subsidy currently works is that centre-based childcare is the only option many can afford," she told AAP.
"There is a huge potential for additional workplace participation, as lots of people delay going back to work until they can get into their preferred centre."
The childcare subsidy is predicted to exceed $16.2 billion in 2025/26 and helps families manage childcare costs but access and the amount depend on specific eligibility criteria.
Yet services such as BubbaDesk and CoWork Creche, which combine co-working spaces with flexible childcare, are not supported by the subsidy.
While the price per day is based on the average of local daycare centres, the lack of subsidy means many parents cannot afford to use the service.
"The demand is huge as traditional daycare doesn't always fit with people's needs," BubbaDesk founder Lauren Perrett said.
"When you become a parent, you wonder why close-proximity care hasn't been built into traditional office spaces - it's a no-brainer.
"Parents are delaying their return to work and considering not returning at all because they don't feel their kids are safe in out-of-home care and the instinct is to keep our babies close."
Illawarra-based mum Jenna Bush placed her baby girl Grace on multiple childcare waitlists when she was born but received few placement offers.
The one place she was offered and toured gave her the "ick" and she could not bring herself to enrol Grace there.
Instead, she started using BubbaDesk as she was able to work remotely from the co-working space.
"Being in close proximity and having that contact to her throughout the day gives me that peace of mind," she said.
"But financially, even though I can claim some of the co-working part through tax, reducing that fortnightly payment would be really helpful if the subsidy was expanded."
Liberal senator Maria Kovacic is among those backing the For Parents petition.
She says it's not about "tearing down" formal childcare centres.
"Expanding the subsidy in the way these families are calling for would not only deliver flexibility," she told parliament on Wednesday.
"It would (also) begin to recognise in a tangible way the value of informal care and the unpaid labour that holds up our economy and our communities."
A push to expand Australia's childcare subsidy to include more care options has the support of parents, advocates and politicians as the government remains focused on improving standards at existing centres.
A bill empowering authorities to strip funding from childcare operators who fail to meet safety standards, among other measures, was this week fast-tracked during the first sitting of the 48th federal parliament.
Operators who fall down on quality, safety and compliance standards could be cut out of subsidies, which typically cover a large proportion of parents' fees, and also blocked from opening new centres.
Education Minister Jason Clare says he doesn't want to see funding removed and that the legislation should more compel providers to improve standards in the wake of recent abuse cases.
The crackdown is part of the government's promise to guarantee universal access to early education and while welcomed by parents and advocates, there are also calls for a national early-childhood commission to ensure consistent oversight and accountability.
Advocacy group For Parents has gone a step further, launching a petition calling on the government to provide equitable support for families who choose alternatives to centre-based care.
In an economy where most families need both parents to work, there should be more choice when it comes to childcare, says co-founder Cecelia Cobb.
"This is about giving families more freedom because the way that the subsidy currently works is that centre-based childcare is the only option many can afford," she told AAP.
"There is a huge potential for additional workplace participation, as lots of people delay going back to work until they can get into their preferred centre."
The childcare subsidy is predicted to exceed $16.2 billion in 2025/26 and helps families manage childcare costs but access and the amount depend on specific eligibility criteria.
Yet services such as BubbaDesk and CoWork Creche, which combine co-working spaces with flexible childcare, are not supported by the subsidy.
While the price per day is based on the average of local daycare centres, the lack of subsidy means many parents cannot afford to use the service.
"The demand is huge as traditional daycare doesn't always fit with people's needs," BubbaDesk founder Lauren Perrett said.
"When you become a parent, you wonder why close-proximity care hasn't been built into traditional office spaces - it's a no-brainer.
"Parents are delaying their return to work and considering not returning at all because they don't feel their kids are safe in out-of-home care and the instinct is to keep our babies close."
Illawarra-based mum Jenna Bush placed her baby girl Grace on multiple childcare waitlists when she was born but received few placement offers.
The one place she was offered and toured gave her the "ick" and she could not bring herself to enrol Grace there.
Instead, she started using BubbaDesk as she was able to work remotely from the co-working space.
"Being in close proximity and having that contact to her throughout the day gives me that peace of mind," she said.
"But financially, even though I can claim some of the co-working part through tax, reducing that fortnightly payment would be really helpful if the subsidy was expanded."
Liberal senator Maria Kovacic is among those backing the For Parents petition.
She says it's not about "tearing down" formal childcare centres.
"Expanding the subsidy in the way these families are calling for would not only deliver flexibility," she told parliament on Wednesday.
"It would (also) begin to recognise in a tangible way the value of informal care and the unpaid labour that holds up our economy and our communities."
A push to expand Australia's childcare subsidy to include more care options has the support of parents, advocates and politicians as the government remains focused on improving standards at existing centres.
A bill empowering authorities to strip funding from childcare operators who fail to meet safety standards, among other measures, was this week fast-tracked during the first sitting of the 48th federal parliament.
Operators who fall down on quality, safety and compliance standards could be cut out of subsidies, which typically cover a large proportion of parents' fees, and also blocked from opening new centres.
Education Minister Jason Clare says he doesn't want to see funding removed and that the legislation should more compel providers to improve standards in the wake of recent abuse cases.
The crackdown is part of the government's promise to guarantee universal access to early education and while welcomed by parents and advocates, there are also calls for a national early-childhood commission to ensure consistent oversight and accountability.
Advocacy group For Parents has gone a step further, launching a petition calling on the government to provide equitable support for families who choose alternatives to centre-based care.
In an economy where most families need both parents to work, there should be more choice when it comes to childcare, says co-founder Cecelia Cobb.
"This is about giving families more freedom because the way that the subsidy currently works is that centre-based childcare is the only option many can afford," she told AAP.
"There is a huge potential for additional workplace participation, as lots of people delay going back to work until they can get into their preferred centre."
The childcare subsidy is predicted to exceed $16.2 billion in 2025/26 and helps families manage childcare costs but access and the amount depend on specific eligibility criteria.
Yet services such as BubbaDesk and CoWork Creche, which combine co-working spaces with flexible childcare, are not supported by the subsidy.
While the price per day is based on the average of local daycare centres, the lack of subsidy means many parents cannot afford to use the service.
"The demand is huge as traditional daycare doesn't always fit with people's needs," BubbaDesk founder Lauren Perrett said.
"When you become a parent, you wonder why close-proximity care hasn't been built into traditional office spaces - it's a no-brainer.
"Parents are delaying their return to work and considering not returning at all because they don't feel their kids are safe in out-of-home care and the instinct is to keep our babies close."
Illawarra-based mum Jenna Bush placed her baby girl Grace on multiple childcare waitlists when she was born but received few placement offers.
The one place she was offered and toured gave her the "ick" and she could not bring herself to enrol Grace there.
Instead, she started using BubbaDesk as she was able to work remotely from the co-working space.
"Being in close proximity and having that contact to her throughout the day gives me that peace of mind," she said.
"But financially, even though I can claim some of the co-working part through tax, reducing that fortnightly payment would be really helpful if the subsidy was expanded."
Liberal senator Maria Kovacic is among those backing the For Parents petition.
She says it's not about "tearing down" formal childcare centres.
"Expanding the subsidy in the way these families are calling for would not only deliver flexibility," she told parliament on Wednesday.
"It would (also) begin to recognise in a tangible way the value of informal care and the unpaid labour that holds up our economy and our communities."
A push to expand Australia's childcare subsidy to include more care options has the support of parents, advocates and politicians as the government remains focused on improving standards at existing centres.
A bill empowering authorities to strip funding from childcare operators who fail to meet safety standards, among other measures, was this week fast-tracked during the first sitting of the 48th federal parliament.
Operators who fall down on quality, safety and compliance standards could be cut out of subsidies, which typically cover a large proportion of parents' fees, and also blocked from opening new centres.
Education Minister Jason Clare says he doesn't want to see funding removed and that the legislation should more compel providers to improve standards in the wake of recent abuse cases.
The crackdown is part of the government's promise to guarantee universal access to early education and while welcomed by parents and advocates, there are also calls for a national early-childhood commission to ensure consistent oversight and accountability.
Advocacy group For Parents has gone a step further, launching a petition calling on the government to provide equitable support for families who choose alternatives to centre-based care.
In an economy where most families need both parents to work, there should be more choice when it comes to childcare, says co-founder Cecelia Cobb.
"This is about giving families more freedom because the way that the subsidy currently works is that centre-based childcare is the only option many can afford," she told AAP.
"There is a huge potential for additional workplace participation, as lots of people delay going back to work until they can get into their preferred centre."
The childcare subsidy is predicted to exceed $16.2 billion in 2025/26 and helps families manage childcare costs but access and the amount depend on specific eligibility criteria.
Yet services such as BubbaDesk and CoWork Creche, which combine co-working spaces with flexible childcare, are not supported by the subsidy.
While the price per day is based on the average of local daycare centres, the lack of subsidy means many parents cannot afford to use the service.
"The demand is huge as traditional daycare doesn't always fit with people's needs," BubbaDesk founder Lauren Perrett said.
"When you become a parent, you wonder why close-proximity care hasn't been built into traditional office spaces - it's a no-brainer.
"Parents are delaying their return to work and considering not returning at all because they don't feel their kids are safe in out-of-home care and the instinct is to keep our babies close."
Illawarra-based mum Jenna Bush placed her baby girl Grace on multiple childcare waitlists when she was born but received few placement offers.
The one place she was offered and toured gave her the "ick" and she could not bring herself to enrol Grace there.
Instead, she started using BubbaDesk as she was able to work remotely from the co-working space.
"Being in close proximity and having that contact to her throughout the day gives me that peace of mind," she said.
"But financially, even though I can claim some of the co-working part through tax, reducing that fortnightly payment would be really helpful if the subsidy was expanded."
Liberal senator Maria Kovacic is among those backing the For Parents petition.
She says it's not about "tearing down" formal childcare centres.
"Expanding the subsidy in the way these families are calling for would not only deliver flexibility," she told parliament on Wednesday.
"It would (also) begin to recognise in a tangible way the value of informal care and the unpaid labour that holds up our economy and our communities."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


West Australian
16 minutes ago
- West Australian
Hope for tariff carve-out wanes as Trump strikes deals
Australia's hopes for a total tariff exemption are dwindling as Donald Trump's deals with other nations lay bare the limits of trade negotiations. Since pushing his tariff deadline to August 1, the US president has struck trade agreements with Japan, and on Monday, the European Union. While the deals landed on tariffs lower than Mr Trump's initial threats, both were higher than the 10 per cent baseline levy imposed on Australian goods. No US trading partner has managed to completely dodge tariffs on their items. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Trade Minister Don Farrell have maintained Australian products should not be hit with any tariffs, but the latest deals show an exemption could be off the table. "Trump really does see tariffs as something that is good in themselves," University of Sydney US politics expert David Smith told AAP. "Even though there were a lot of hopes at the beginning of this process that countries could negotiate their way out of tariffs altogether - that's not really happening." Australia, like other nations, might instead have to pivot approaches and try to strategically position its industries within these deals. For example, the US pharmaceutical sector has long taken issue with Australia's drug subsidy scheme and urged the president to act. In early July, Mr Trump threatened a 200 per cent tariff on pharmaceuticals, which could be seen as a way for the US to chip away at the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in exchange for a trade deal. Both of Australia's major parties have maintained the program is not up for negotiation. Instead, the federal government revealed it would lift restrictions on certain US beef imports. "Australia is thinking about other areas where we would be prepared to make concessions, because we were not going to be making concessions on (the PBS)," Associate Professor Smith said. Mr Albanese has maintained his government is engaging in Australia's national interest. While the government said its decision to lift restrictions followed a decade-long scientific review and noted the measure would not compromise biosecurity, the opposition and figures within the cattle industry have called for an independent examination of the issue. "If we have created a brand new threat, we should be very clear about that," Liberal senator Jane Hume told parliament.


Perth Now
16 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Hope for tariff carve-out wanes as Trump strikes deals
Australia's hopes for a total tariff exemption are dwindling as Donald Trump's deals with other nations lay bare the limits of trade negotiations. Since pushing his tariff deadline to August 1, the US president has struck trade agreements with Japan, and on Monday, the European Union. While the deals landed on tariffs lower than Mr Trump's initial threats, both were higher than the 10 per cent baseline levy imposed on Australian goods. No US trading partner has managed to completely dodge tariffs on their items. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Trade Minister Don Farrell have maintained Australian products should not be hit with any tariffs, but the latest deals show an exemption could be off the table. "Trump really does see tariffs as something that is good in themselves," University of Sydney US politics expert David Smith told AAP. "Even though there were a lot of hopes at the beginning of this process that countries could negotiate their way out of tariffs altogether - that's not really happening." Australia, like other nations, might instead have to pivot approaches and try to strategically position its industries within these deals. For example, the US pharmaceutical sector has long taken issue with Australia's drug subsidy scheme and urged the president to act. In early July, Mr Trump threatened a 200 per cent tariff on pharmaceuticals, which could be seen as a way for the US to chip away at the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in exchange for a trade deal. Both of Australia's major parties have maintained the program is not up for negotiation. Instead, the federal government revealed it would lift restrictions on certain US beef imports. "Australia is thinking about other areas where we would be prepared to make concessions, because we were not going to be making concessions on (the PBS)," Associate Professor Smith said. Mr Albanese has maintained his government is engaging in Australia's national interest. While the government said its decision to lift restrictions followed a decade-long scientific review and noted the measure would not compromise biosecurity, the opposition and figures within the cattle industry have called for an independent examination of the issue. "If we have created a brand new threat, we should be very clear about that," Liberal senator Jane Hume told parliament.

The Age
10 hours ago
- The Age
Ansett Australia is back for travellers. But not as you knew it
Acquiring the Ansett brand was relatively straightforward, Frantzeskos said. The trademark had lapsed, and the domain name was also available for purchase. He's confident that despite the painful downfall, there are many Australians – particularly those aged 35 and above – with fond memories of the airline. 'It's a shame it went away, but I think that brand voice is still compelling, and people have nostalgia for it,' Frantzeskos said. 'Just because the corporate entity behind something didn't work doesn't mean that the brand still doesn't mean something. When I mention what I'm doing to people, they get a big smile on their face.' The Ansett brand also lives on as a pilot training offering, under the brand Ansett Aviation Training. Frantzeskos, a digital marketing veteran, has worked with Emirates, Saudi Tourism and Dubai Tourism as clients and said that experience will help deliver compelling customer experiences with Ansett. He has partnered with Melbourne-based travel start-up Travlr, which is providing the platform's technical back-end and customer support infrastructure. While many of the AI features are yet to be built out, the entrepreneur said he eventually wants to provide travel experiences for customers that would be possible only with AI. For now, customers can book at near-wholesale prices on flights and accommodation and pay a $99 yearly fee for VIP membership. 'One thing I'm hoping to do is, if you've booked a holiday for your family, we'll know who you are and your name and where you're going, so I want to give you an AI-written jingle and send it to you so it can be the soundtrack of your holiday,' he said. 'I'm a big believer that you don't need armies of people out there doing stuff that can be done better with AI. And the cost of implementation is really declining so much – you don't need thousands of staff and to train them any more. With AI, you can just get going straight away. 'I think there are new, cool, fun experiences we can do what would never be achievable by humans.' Loading He added that, eventually, he believed people wouldn't have to search or plan holidays at all. 'Your travel concierge will know when the kids are on school holidays, or when you need a break, and quietly offer the perfect trip. It's not about replacing people – it's about anticipating and tailoring times when we want to have fun or disconnect.'