
Trump admin. slashed federal funding for gun violence prevention
By
Bianca Flowers
CHICAGO o) – The Trump administration has terminated more than half of all federal funding for gun violence prevention programs in the U.S., cutting $158 million in grants that had been directed to groups in cities like New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Washington, DC, and Baltimore.
Of the 145 community violence intervention (CVI) grants totaling more than $300 million awarded through the U.S. Department of Justice, 69 grants in April, according to government data analyzed by Reuters.
4 people killed, including 36-year-old NYPD officer following a shooting in Midtown Manhattan on Monday. The alleged gunman , 27 who was identified as Shane Tamura died from an apparent self-inflicted gunshot wound. Another person was shot and remains in critical condition.
The elimination of CVI programs is part of a broader rollback at the department's grant-issuing Office of Justice Programs, which
terminated 365 grants valued at $811 million
in April, impacting a range of public safety and victim services programs.
A DOJ official told Reuters the gun violence grants were eliminated because they 'no longer effectuate the program's goals or agency's priorities.' Thousands of Office of Justice Programs grants are under review, the official said, and are being evaluated, among other things, on how well they support law enforcement and combat violent crime.
The majority of CVI grants were originally funded through the 2022 Bipartisan Safer Communities Act and part of a push by former President Joe Biden to stem the rise of gun violence in America, including establishing the first White House Office for Gun Violence Prevention.
That office was 'dismantled on day one' of Trump taking office, said former deputy director of the office, Greg Jackson.
Prior to the Biden-era funding, most gun violence prevention programs were funded on the state level.
'These programs five years ago, if they did exist, had very small budgets and didn't have large, multimillion-dollar federal investments,' said Michael-Sean Spence, managing director of community safety initiatives at Everytown for Gun Safety, which has worked with 136 community-based violence intervention organizations since 2019.
Twenty-five of the groups were impacted by funding cuts.
The grants supported a wide range of CVI programming to prevent shootings such as training outreach teams to de-escalate and mediate conflict, social workers to connect people to services and employment, and hospital-based programs for gun violence victims.
'[It's] preventing them from doing the work in service of those that need it the most at the most urgent, and deadliest time of the year,' Spence said, referring to summer months when there's typically an uptick in shootings.
Gun violence deaths in the U.S. grew more than 50% from 2015 to the pandemic-era peak of 21,383 in 2021, according to the
Gun Violence Archive.
, opens new tab
Since then, deadly shootings have been in decline, falling to 16,725 in 2024, which is more in line with the pre-pandemic trend. As of May 2025, deaths are down 866 from the same period last year.
DEFUNDED PROGRAMS
While cities like New York City, Chicago and Los Angeles received the bulk of gun violence prevention funding, southern cities like Memphis, Selma, Alabama and Baton Rouge, Louisiana also received millions and were more reliant on the grants due to limited state support for the programs, experts told Reuters.
'Very few state legislatures are passing funding right now, that's why the federal cuts were such a tragic hit,' said Amber Goodwin, co-founder of Community Violence Legal Network, who's part of a coalition of lawyers working to get grants reinstated.
Nearly a dozen interviews with legal experts, gun violence interventionists, and former DOJ officials said funding cuts threaten the long-term sustainability of community violence intervention initiatives that have taken years to establish and are embedded in predominantly Black and Latino communities.
Pha'Tal Perkins founded Think Outside Da Block in 2016, a nonprofit based in Chicago's violence-plagued Englewood neighborhood. Federal funding allowed him to hire full-time staff, but when grants were stripped, he was forced to lay off five team members.
'Being able to have outreach teams at specific places at the right time to have conversations before things get out of hand is what people don't see,' Perkins said.
The programs initiated in 2022 marked the first time grassroots organizations could apply for federal community violence prevention funding directly, without going through law enforcement or state intermediaries, according to three former DOJ officials.
Aqeela Sherrills, co-founder of Community Based Public Safety Collective in Los Angeles, provided training on implementing violence intervention strategies to nearly 94 grantees, including states, law enforcement agencies, and community-based organizations.
Prior to the cuts, 'we were onboarding 30 new grantees through the federal government. Many of these cities and law enforcement agencies have no idea how to implement CVI,' Sherrills said.
POLICE SUPPORT
Some critics of CVI argue that the programs aren't effective and that federal dollars would be better spent on law enforcement to stymie gun violence. Others view the initiatives as inherently 'anti-gun' and are 'nothing more than a funnel to send federal tax dollars to anti-gun non-profits who advocate against our rights,' said Aidan Johnston, federal affairs director of the Gun Owners of America.
That view is not universally shared by law enforcement, however. In June, a letter signed by 18 law enforcement groups and police chiefs in Louisville, Minneapolis, Tucson and Omaha called on Attorney General Pam Bondi to reinstate funding that has resulted in 'measurable and significant reductions in violence and homicides.'
'These aren't feel-good programs; they're lifesaving, law-enforcement-enhancing strategies that work,' they wrote.
Columbia, South Carolina Deputy Police Chief Melron Kelly, who was unaware of the letter, told Reuters that CVI programs were relatively new in the city, but as a result, the police began collaborating more with community organizations.
Kelly said Columbia's CVI programs focused on preventing retaliatory shootings that can escalate a neighborhood conflict.
'Public safety really starts in the neighborhood before police get involved. CVI work is very important; we've seen a drastic reduction in violent crime post-COVID and shootings are almost at a 10-year low,' Kelly said.
Now, organizations are trying to figure out how to keep the doors open now that federal money has run dry.
Durell Cowan, executive director of HEAL 901, a community violence prevention nonprofit in Memphis, received a $1.7 million CVI grant in October 2024.
Cowan's organization received $150,000 in federal funds since the beginning of the year before his grant was canceled. He's had to dip into his personal savings to keep his 14-person staff on payroll, he said.
Recently, he secured funding from an out-of-state nonprofit as well as a $125,000 emergency grant from the city. Still, he may be forced to conduct layoffs if federal government dollars don't start flowing again.
'We shouldn't be pulling from our own personal finances and life insurance policies to cover the cost of public safety,' he said.
Reuters, Exclusive report
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Ya Libnan
an hour ago
- Ya Libnan
Trump fires US labour statistics chief after dismal employment report
US President Donald Trump speaks to the media as he departs the White House on August 1, 2025 in Washington, DC. © Win McNamee, AFP President Donald Trump on Friday said that he was firing the head of the Bureau of Labour Statistics after a jobs report showed weakening employment. According to data from the Labor Department, job growth in July fell short of expectations, and recent revisions to hiring numbers showed the weakest employment gains since the COVID-19 pandemic. Washington- President Trump said Friday he has ordered the firing of a key economic official, accusing her of manipulating employment data for political reasons after a new report showed cracks in the US jobs market. US job growth missed expectations in July, Labour Department data showed, and revisions to hiring figures in recent months brought them to the weakest levels since the Covid-19 pandemic. Without providing evidence, Trump lashed out at the department's commissioner of labour statistics, writing on social media that the jobs numbers 'were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad'. In a separate post on his Truth Social platform, he charged that Commissioner Erika McEntarfer had 'faked' jobs data to boost Democrats' chances of victory in the recent presidential election. 'McEntarfer said there were only 73,000 Jobs added (a shock!) but, more importantly, that a major mistake was made by them, 258,000 Jobs downward, in the prior two months,' Trump said, referring to latest data for July. 'Similar things happened in the first part of the year, always to the negative,' Trump said, insisting that the world's biggest economy was 'booming' under his leadership. He later told reporters 'we need people that we can trust', accusing the economic official of inflating hiring figures under former president Joe Biden 's administration. 'Trump is tightening his grip on American economic policy and institutions' 'Dangerous precedent The United States added 73,000 jobs last month, while the unemployment rate rose to 4.2 percent from 4.1 percent, said the Department of Labour earlier Friday. Hiring numbers for May were revised down from 144,000 to 19,000. The figure for June was shifted from 147,000 to 14,000. This was notably lower than job creation levels in recent years. During the pandemic, the economy lost jobs. The employment data points to challenges in the key labor market as companies took a cautious approach in hiring and investment while grappling with Trump's sweeping – and rapidly changing – tariffs this year. The numbers also pile pressure on the central bank as it mulls the best time to cut interest rates . With tariff levels climbing since the start of the year, both on imports from various countries and on sector-specific products such as steel , aluminum and autos, many firms have faced higher business costs. Some are now passing them along to consumers. William Beach, who previously held McEntarfer post at the Bureau of Labour Statistics, warned that her firing 'sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the statistical mission of the Bureau'. The National Association for Business Economics (NABE) condemned her dismissal, saying large revisions in jobs numbers 'reflect not manipulation, but rather the dwindling resources afforded to statistical agencies'. 'Firing the head of a key government agency because you don't like the numbers they report, which come from surveys using long established procedures, is what happens in authoritarian countries, not democratic ones,' slammed Larry Summers, former US Treasury secretary under Democratic president Bill Clinton. 'Game changer' Heather Long, chief economist at the Navy Federal Credit Union, said Friday's jobs report was a 'gamechanger'. 'The labor market is deteriorating quickly,' said Long, noting that of the growth in July, '75 percent of those jobs were in one sector: health care.' 'The economy needs certainty soon on tariffs,' Long said. 'The longer this tariff whiplash lasts, the more likely this weak hiring environment turns into layoffs .' It remains unclear when the dust will settle, with Trump ordering the reimposition of steeper tariffs on scores of economies late Thursday, which are set to take effect in a week. A sharp weakening in the labour market could push the Federal Reserve towards slashing interest rates sooner to shore up the economy. On Friday, the two Fed officials who voted this week against the central bank's decision to keep rates unchanged warned that standing pat risks further damaging the economy. Both Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman and Governor Christopher Waller argued that the inflationary effects of tariffs were temporary. They added in separate statements that the bank should focus on fortifying the economy to avert further weakening in the labor market. Putting off an interest rate cut 'could result in a deterioration in the labor market and a further slowing in economic growth', Bowman said. (FRANCE 24 with AFP)


Ya Libnan
2 hours ago
- Ya Libnan
Trump is burning bridges with allies, not 'Making America Great Again'
Trump Is Burning Bridges With Allies, Not Making America Great Again By Vlad Green, Op-Ed History has a way of repeating itself—especially when its painful lessons are ignored. Today, President Donald Trump is once again using tariffs as a weapon, punishing nations for political disagreements and attempting to strong-arm trade concessions with threats instead of negotiations. His approach may resonate with a narrow base at home, but it is fracturing long-standing alliances abroad and putting America's global leadership at risk. As he wraps himself in the flag of economic nationalism, Trump forgets—or ignores—that tariffs have consistently backfired throughout American history. One of the first cautionary tales comes from President William McKinley, a staunch protectionist who, in the 1890s, championed high tariffs as a tool to shield American industries. But as the economic and diplomatic backlash grew, McKinley began to regret his position. Before his assassination in 1901, he had changed course, calling for greater international cooperation and freer trade, recognizing that economic isolationism would only harm American prosperity. McKinley's lesson went unheeded three decades later when the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 plunged the world into economic chaos. Enacted just months after the 1929 stock market crash, the tariffs raised duties on over 20,000 imported goods and prompted retaliatory measures from U.S. trading partners. Instead of protecting American jobs, it worsened the Great Depression, slashed global trade, and deepened the suffering of millions. Fast forward to today, and we're seeing history dangerously echo itself. President Trump has turned tariffs into tools of intimidation. With no coherent trade strategy, he threatens Mexico one day, slaps tariffs on Europe the next, and targets Canada—America's closest neighbor and trusted ally—as if it were a rival state. He boasts about 'winning' trade wars, but the reality is rising costs for American consumers, unstable global markets, and fraying relationships with the very nations that stood by the U.S. through thick and thin. It's not just the economic consequences that are alarming. Trump's brand of economic nationalism is wrapped in authoritarian tactics. He surrounds himself with loyalists, fires anyone who questions his decisions, and demands obedience over debate. This is not how a democracy operates. This is not how a civilized world leader behaves. Instead, America under Trump increasingly resembles a transactional bully, not a principled partner. The irony is that Trump claims to be making America great again—yet he is isolating it from the very world order it once led and helped build. From NATO to the World Trade Organization, America's credibility is shrinking as allies question whether they can count on Washington. What started as a promise to bring back manufacturing jobs is morphing into a full-blown foreign policy disaster. The tragedy is avoidable. America doesn't need to abandon its economic interests to remain a global leader. But it must stop using tariffs as threats and allies as bargaining chips. It must return to smart diplomacy, to building coalitions rather than burning bridges, and to leading not through fear, but by example. The world is watching. And history is watching too. The question is not just what Trump will do next—but what price America will ultimately pay for choosing confrontation over cooperation.


Cedar News
14 hours ago
- Cedar News
Adriana Kugler to Step Down from Federal Reserve Board
Adriana Kugler Resignation Opens Vacant Fed Board Seat Federal Reserve Governor Adriana Kugler Resignation was announced Friday, with her resignation taking effect on August 8, 2025. The Fed confirmed she will step down from the Board of Governors, months before her originally scheduled term end in January 2026> Early Departure Accelerates Trump Appointment Opportunity The Adriana Kugler Resignation creates an immediate opening on the seven-member Fed board, which has no other vacancies. That gives President Donald Trump the opportunity to nominate a successor well ahead of the standard timeline. Return to Academia Cited, No Detailed Explanation Provided Kugler's resignation letter did not provide a specific reason, although Fed sources and press reports noted she plans to return to her academic role at Georgetown University in the fall. Her early departure marks a shift from her unexpired term, which had been set to conclude on January 31, 2026. Implications for Fed's Policy Direction With the seat vacated by the Adriana Kugler Resignation, speculation is growing over who President Trump may choose—potential candidates include sitting governors or trusted economic advisers who may align with his push for lower interest rates. This change comes at a critical time as discussions around the Fed chairmanship beyond mid‑2026 intensify. Legacy and Profile of Adriana Kugler Adriana D. Kugler—confirmed in September 2023 as the first Latina member of the Federal Reserve Board—was nominated by President Biden and brought experience from her World Bank and Labor Department roles. Her term was set to expire in January 2026. As a labor economist, she has been active in research on inflation, labor markets, and monetary policy transmission