Illinois Senate considers study of AI speed cameras on Lake Shore Drive
Why it matters: Many alarmed Chicagoans reached out last week to the bill's sponsor, state Sen. Sara Feigenholtz, to oppose speed cameras.
But she stresses that the amended legislation simply seeks a study. It wouldn't add cameras. Yet.
How it works: Unlike fixed cameras, the AI-powered cameras, already in use in the U.K. and Europe, can monitor drivers over time and be used randomly to prevent slowdowns near known sites followed by high speeds.
Backstory: Feigenholtz, whose district includes the lakefront from Montrose to Oak Street, got interested in the issue when Gold Cost residents shared concerns about crashes, especially near North Avenue and the Drive.
"You wouldn't believe the videos and photos they showed me," she tells Axios. "It's like a horror movie."
This added to data from 2019 to 2024 showing 61.5% of the road fatalities in her district happened on the Drive.
Between the lines: The recent panic Feigenholtz heard from residents was likely fueled by the reality that few consistently obey the Drive's 40mph speed limit.
Some even emailed her to suggest "increasing the limit to 55," she says.
Still, Feigenholtz believes any eventual cameras would be less about punishment and fees than deterrence, noting that, "studies show 80% of the people do not reoffend after getting a warning."
Zoom in: The potential study would be done by the UIC Urban Transportation Center analyzing:
Multi-year crash data on the Drive
Potential effectiveness of the cameras on improving safety
Possible psychological deterrents to habitual speeding and other non-AI options.
The intrigue: Ald. Daniel La Spata, whose effort to lower the city's speed limit last February was also whittled down to a study, tells Axios, "The study will come back ... showing that it will work and telling her what she already knows. I just hope Sen. Feigenholtz has the courage to act on this and that her colleagues do as well."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
6 hours ago
- UPI
Senate heads into recess as Trump tells Schumer to 'go to hell'
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-NY, speaks at a press conference calling on the administration to release the Epstein files in the U.S. Capitol building last week. File Photo by Annabelle Gordon/UPI | License Photo Aug. 3 (UPI) -- The U.S. Senate began its month‑long recess Saturday night amid negotiations to advance the nomination of dozens of Donald Trump's pending nominees, as the president told Sen. Chuck Schumer to "go to hell" when the talks collapsed. Trump, in a post to his Truth Social platform on Saturday, had wanted the Senate to stay in session but accused Schumer of "political extortion" for allegedly demanding a billion dollars in funding in order to approve dozens of his remaining "highly qualified nominees" for appointment to the administration. A source familiar with Schumer's alleged demands told Axios that Schumer wants the White House to release withheld federal funding in exchange for passing a small batch of the nominees. "Tell Schumer, who is under tremendous political pressure from within his own party, the Radical Left Lunatics, to GO TO HELL!" Trump said in his post. "Do not accept the offer, go home and explain to your constituents what bad people the Democrats are, and what a great job the Republicans are doing, and have done, for our country." Schumer later shared Trump's post and quipped, "The Art of the Deal." He later added that Trump had "attempted to steamroll" the Senate into approving his "historically unqualified nominees." But the standoff has led Senate Republicans to express support for the possibility that Trump use recess appointments, a controversial constitutional mechanism that allows the president to "temporarily" fill vacant positions when the Senate is in recess. "The Senate should immediately adjourn and let President Trump use recess appointments to enact the agenda 77M Americans voted for," Sen. Roger Marshall posted on Saturday. Senate Republicans also indicated they might pursue a change to Senate rules after they return from recess to make it easier to pass through confirmations. Sen. Markwayne Mullin told Fox News that lawmakers would be moving forward with a rule change in September.
Chicago Tribune
12 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Editorial: State control of Chicago Public Schools grows likelier as budget crisis intensifies
Chicagoans with long memories can hear echoes of the past in the growing crisis around finances at Chicago Public Schools. It was just before Christmas in 1979 when CPS, frozen out of debt markets and with state government unwilling to bail the district out after several such rescues in the 1970s, couldn't pay its workers. Vendors wouldn't provide services for fear of going unpaid. In January 1980, Gov. Jim Thompson hammered out a deal with the city, the Chicago Teachers Union and CPS to have the state essentially take over financial decision-making for Chicago's public schools. The state was able to borrow on the schools' behalf and collected new property taxes to finance the debt. The School Finance Authority, created to oversee CPS' finances, assumed control of CPS budgets and contracting. It was a monumental decision. The authority, established by the emergency legislation passed that January, didn't dissolve until 2010 — a full three decades later. Mayor Richard M. Daley convinced Springfield to hand him authority over the schools in 1995, but the bonds financing CPS through the difficult years of the 1980s didn't expire until 2010. We recount this history because once again there now is open discussion of some sort of Springfield takeover of CPS. State Rep. Curtis Tarver, who represents a South Side district, has proposed legislation to put CPS under the supervision of the existing Illinois Finance Authority. That measure was the focus of a legislative hearing Thursday in Chicago before the Illinois House Executive Committee on CPS' fraught financial condition. With former Chicago Teachers Union organizer Brandon Johnson now serving as Chicago mayor, the costs of an already unaffordable school system have only grown, as City Hall has abdicated its duty to represent taxpayers, at least when it comes to Chicago's massive school system. At the hearing, CPS representatives, led by interim Superintendent Maquline King, laid out the $734 million budget hole facing her and the Chicago Board of Education. The board must approve a budget for the upcoming school year no later than Aug. 28. After recently calling for a special session in Springfield to bail out CPS, King recognized that's not possible before she and the board have to make budget decisions. So it sounds like they're considering punting. 'Because there is a misalignment between the state, city and district's fiscal calendars, we can pass an FY 2026 budget with a reasonable assumption of future revenue, with the realization that we will need to make drastic midyear cuts if the revenue does not materialize,' she told lawmakers. The plan then, such as it is, is to continue to put the onus on the state to bail out a school system where a third of the schools are operating at less than 50% student capacity and where some of the highest-paid public school teachers in the land — taking advantage of a hopelessly compromised mayor — just a few months ago won 4% yearly pay raises over four years as a baseline. For many teachers, the raises will be far higher, with so-called step increases substantially inflating the sum to be charged to taxpayers. This is also the system that, as Civic Federation President Joe Ferguson noted in his testimony at the hearing, boosted the CPS employee head count by 7,000, or 20%, since 2020, using one-time federal pandemic cash to pay for the hiring binge. Over that same period of time, the CPS student population dropped by 8%, to 325,000 from 355,000. Name any other enterprise that boosts its staff by 20% while its customer count falls by nearly 10%. We spoke with Donald Haider, professor emeritus at Northwestern University's Kellogg School of Management who served as vice chairman of the Chicago School Finance Authority in the 1980s. 'Back in 1980, Mayor (Jane) Byrne had absolutely no choice because all of a sudden CPS was thrown out of capital markets,' he recalled. Now? It would be a stark admission of failure for a former CTU organizer to be the mayor to cede control of CPS to the state, he said. What seems clearer every day, as CPS careens toward its inevitable day of reckoning, is that the state ultimately will need to be involved in putting the system back on a stable course. That day will only arrive, though, when Johnson and his school board allies, as well as CTU, stop demanding cash from the state with no strings attached and become willing to enter real negotiations about what CPS reform entails. And, yes, there will need to be reform. A school board and a mayor that jack up teacher salaries and openly talk of taking on more junk-rated debt during a period of deficits well into the hundreds of millions have relinquished their right to determine CPS' future. There assuredly will be painful conditions attached to whatever assistance the state provides — if indeed a cash-strapped Springfield even summons the will and the means to help. A meaningful, enforceable school consolidation plan, perhaps? Limits on contracting authority maybe, including future negotiations with CTU? The bottom line: If you can't manage your own business, you're in no position to complain when others force concessions from you in return for fixing what you've broken. When the time comes for true hardheaded negotiations — and we believe that time is coming soon — a new or existing state oversight mechanism may well once again hold the purse strings for the nation's fourth-largest public school system. The reality of limited dollars is something every household or business must face. CTU and Mayor Johnson aren't any different.
Axios
a day ago
- Axios
Senate GOP eyes recess appointments as stalemate drags on
Fed-up Senate Republicans are starting to whisper about recess appointments again as Democrats stonewall them on nominees, cutting into the start of August recess. Why it matters: Senate leaders and the White House are still negotiating on a deal to end the standoff. But skipping town and letting President Trump speed-run his nomination list is an increasingly attractive option, some GOP senators told Axios. "The Senate should immediately adjourn and let President Trump use recess appointments to enact the agenda 77M Americans voted for," Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kansas) posted on Saturday. Recess appointments, as well as using the nuclear option to change chamber rules with a simple majority to expedite the confirmation process, are becoming real possibilities as talks drag into the evening. The Senate is in session on an August weekend voting on nominations, as Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and the White House struggle to find a compromise. How it works: Recess appointments would give Trump leeway to jam through numerous nominees without having to go through the usual Senate confirmation process. The Senate would have to agree to adjourn with a majority vote, and the House also would have to come back into town and agree to adjourn and cancel scheduled pro-forma days. Those nominees would only be able to serve through the end of 2026 — and without payment. Zoom in: Schumer wants the White House to release withheld federal funding in exchange for passing a small batch of uncontroversial nominees, per a source familiar. Democrats are also willing to commit to another batch later in the year — but only if it is formally written into an agreement that the deal is off if the White House so much as sends over another rescissions package. Republicans continue to point out that Democratic stonewalling is unprecedented. Typically, even the minority party ultimately allows some level of deference to the party in power and allows lower-level nominations to move more quickly.
