2,000 more National Guard troops on duty in L.A. as legal battle over deployment continues
The United States government will activate an extra 2,000 National Guard troops in Los Angeles, the military confirmed in a statement Tuesday night, as a legal battle continues over the deployment.
Protests against federal immigration policies that exploded in Los Angeles and across the country in recent weeks have since died down, and a nighttime curfew has been lifted as businesses return to normality.
Nevertheless, the U.S. Northern Command said the reinforcements were needed to "support the protection of federal functions, personnel, and property in the greater Los Angeles area."
The 2,000 troops are deployed at the direction of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, using Title 10, which allows the president to call in the National Guard when the country is at risk of invasion or rebellion.
That means at least 4,100 National Guard troops and 700 Marines have been deployed to the streets of L.A. after 2,100 were sent there on June 9. Tuesday's statement confirms a statement from last Monday on the troop increase.
The soldiers cannot participate in civilian policing, leading city leaders to attack the deployments as political theater.
"The soldiers are completing training on de-escalation, crowd control, and use of the standing rules for the use of force in advance of joining the federal protection mission," the military statement said.
Gov. Gavin Newsom condemned the move and said the troops would be "twiddling their thumbs."
"This isn't a new deployment — it's the same group of soldiers who have been diverted from critical wildfire work and work at the border, now twiddling their thumbs for Donald Trump's political theater," Diana Crofts-Pelayo, a spokesperson from Newsom's office, said.
Newsom said last week that the deployment of an extra 2,000 personnel would be "reckless, pointless and disrespectful to our troops."
L.A. Mayor Karen Bass has called the deployment a "chaotic escalation."
The confirmation of the extra personnel came hours after the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments on whether the federal government can deploy troops to American cities, or should turn over their command to Californian officials.
The court heard an appeal and ruled last week that President Donald Trump can retain command of the troops, pausing a ruling from District Court Judge Charles Breyer that said the deployment was unlawful.
Tuesday's hearing considered whether the most recent order can stand as the case proceeds through the courts. The three-judge panel seemed unlikely to be interested in lifting the pause that was imposed by the Appeals Court.
That court is expected to make a decision in the coming days, ahead of a Friday hearing before Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco federal court.
The Appeals Court's decision — and any potential Supreme Court involvement — could have huge ramifications for the political executive's powers and activities in Washington and whether troops can be sent to other cities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Don't count on the Iran-Israel ceasefire lasting. What Netanyahu really wants is a forever war
The war is over! Except it's not, not by a long chalk. The verbally agreed Iran-Israel ceasefire could be ripped to shreds at any moment. An aggressive theocratic regime still holds power in Tehran. The same is true of Jerusalem. In Washington, a president whose stupidity is matched only by his vanity prattles about making peace, but the angry old men in charge have learned nothing. Meanwhile, hundreds of civilians lie dead, thousands are wounded and millions have been terrorised. The war is over! Except only the naive believe that Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister and prime warmonger, is done fighting. Even if Donald Trump is right and Iran's nuclear facilities have been 'obliterated' ('severely damaged' appears more accurate), its nuclear knowhow and elusive stockpile of enriched uranium have not. At the first sign, real or imagined, of rebuilding, Netanyahu and his cronies will surely attack again. Trump called them off last week. But this is a man who can change his mind three times before he's even had breakfast. Who seriously believes Netanyahu will readily relinquish the dominance over Iran's airspace that his forces have established with unexpected ease? It's unlikely he will be able to resist the temptation to target Iran again, if fresh attacks are politically advantageous. Netanyahu is now reportedly weighing up the possibility of a snap election. Perhaps he hopes his Iran exploits will obscure his 7 October 2023 failures and abandonment of hostages held by Hamas. There is a pattern here. Since March, when he unilaterally wrecked the Gaza ceasefire, Netanyahu has sought to subjugate the territory. Palestinian civilians have been gunned down in repeated Israeli army and settler atrocities around Gaza food centres and in towns in the West Bank. In places such as Rafah, Bloody Sunday takes place almost every day. In Lebanon and Syria, Israel has dropped bombs with impunity. Netanyahu's military grinder never stops. Why imagine that he will be any different with Iran? Most people deplore 'forever wars', typified by dismal, multi-year western entanglements in Afghanistan and Iraq. Not Netanyahu. Peace is his enemy. Forever war keeps him in power, in the limelight and out of jail. Like Vladimir Putin, he sees continuing war as an opportunity to boost domestic support and outflank his opponents. Unending state violence is deadly for democracy, legality and good governance (and on this note, Americans should worry, too: Trump's presidency is on a similar trajectory, except his forever war is against the 'enemy within'). Despite Netanyahu's video appeal to the Iranian public in which he encouraged them to 'stand up' against an 'evil and oppressive regime', he cares little for their freedom. What he wants is what imperialist powers always want: a permanently weakened, divided, degraded country that poses no challenge to Israel's strategic interests and can be punished at will. By controlling Iranian skies and pursuing covert cyber-attacks, sabotage and assassinations, Israel could ensure an enfeebled Iran is held in check indefinitely – or so Netanyahu may calculate. The war is over … except it's not in Tehran, either. Rattled by talk of regime change and Israel's killing of prominent allies, the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has emerged from his bunker to wage another war, on his own people. Hundreds have been arrested in a security crackdown. Alleged spies have been executed. In order to survive, the mullahs may now do what they have never done before: secretly race to build a nuclear weapon, or buy one off the shelf from North Korea. In truth, Iran's loathsome regime didn't even come close to falling. If anything, Israel's bombs rallied public support and patriotic sentiment. Iran was attacked on the basis of a lie (neither US intelligence nor the UN backed Netanyahu's claim that it was weaponising) and European governments failed to condemn the bombing. These facts will only deepen distrust of the west. Iran wants relief from US sanctions, and may agree to discuss this, but not its future nuclear activities. It is suspending cooperation with International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors. Rejecting Israeli containment, Tehran may in time resume asymmetrical conflict and revive regional proxy wars. The war isn't over for Trump either (though, beguiled by delusions of a Nobel peace prize, he may think it is). He has demonstrated, as in Ukraine and Gaza, that his impulsive, unthinking, uninformed interventions only make the world more dangerous. He's made it harder for the US to walk away if war flares up again. His sneak attack on Iran, reminiscent of Pearl Harbor, breached the UN charter and will help rogue states justify illegal aggression. By continuing to aid and abet Netanyahu, an alleged war criminal, Trump is opening himself up to prosecution by the international criminal court. Trump has trashed multilateral diplomacy, sidelined and insulted European allies, relied on rookie envoys and rejected expert advice. His manifest untrustworthiness and monstrous egotism are all additional reasons why the US cannot be counted on. War across the Middle East is barely on hold. Trump took a shot at instant glory – and missed. The utter futility and pointlessness of this war is breathtaking. It achieved almost nothing positive. It caused misery, destruction and insecurity. Only rarely does brute force advance peaceful ends. Typically it inflames existing problems – and that's what happened here. When will these angry old men get it? Probably never, unless and until democrats summon the courage to defy them. Simon Tisdall is a Guardian columnist
Daily Mail
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Democrat grandstanding over nearly 16-hour long reading of Trump's budget bill draws ire of social media users
Social media users are seeing right through the grandstanding of Senate Democrats as they pull out every trick in the book to delay the passage of the GOP 's 'big, beautiful' budget bill. President Donald Trump has imposed a deadline of July 4th for the passage of his signature domestic policy legislation, and the bill still currently has not passed the U.S. Senate, or gone back to the House of Representatives for a vote on the Senate's version. At 11:08 PM Saturday evening, Democrat Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer called for the bill to be read in its entirety, kicking off the hours long marathon reading of the 940 page document. 'Senate Republicans are scrambling to pass a radical bill, released to the public in the dead of night, praying the American people don't realize what's in it,' Schumer (D-N.Y.) professed on the Senate floor Saturday night. 'If Senate Republicans won't tell the American people what's in this bill, then Democrats are going to force this chamber to read it from start to finish,' Schumer added. Massachusetts Senator and former Democrat Presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren posted at just after 2:00 AM Sunday morning that she was on the way to call for a reading of the nearly 1,000 page bill, nearly three hours after the reading had already started. FROM THE SENATE FLOOR: I objected to stop Republicans moving forward on their Big, Ugly Bill until they read every single word of it to the American people They are scrambling to pass their radical bill, released in the dead of night, praying Americans don't realize what's in it — Chuck Schumer (@SenSchumer) June 29, 2025 It's 2AM on Sunday and I'm heading to the Capitol to FORCE a full reading of the Republicans' 940-page bill. This bill will rip health care coverage away from 16 million people and cut food assistance. It's sick. And we will not stand for it. — Elizabeth Warren (@SenWarren) June 29, 2025 X user @crza_11 responded to Warren saying 'Why are you on your way there now? Shouldn't you be there the whole time listening to the reading?' X user @crza_11 replies to Senator Elizabeth Warren. A user with the handle @TMIWITW wrote 'It's absolutely amazing that Trump got you people to FINALLY read bills before you pass them. X user @TMIWITW replies to Senator Elizabeth Warren. As pointed out by a number of social media users, the latest Democrat approach to legislating is a far cry from from years past, when former House speaker Nancy Pelosi said during the 2010 debate over the Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare that 'we have to pass the bill ... so that you can find out what is in it.' In its present form, the budget bill extends most of the tax cuts Trump signed into law in 2017, including slashing rates on estates and for corporations. Deductions for state and local taxes as well as business owners are included. The legislation also fulfills a campaign promise to eliminate taxes on tips for the next three years. It doubles the child tax credit, as well as the standard deduction for tax filers. To pay for the massive tax cuts, the Senate is choosing to rein in spending programs for low-income Americans. One provision requires most Medicaid recipients with children over the age 15 to work. It also imposes more rules to qualify for health care subsidies. Still, not all of the members of even the President's own party are on board with passing the bill. Republican Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky voted no the motion to proceed on the bill Saturday due to the additional projected increases to the national debt. Paul said Friday that the 'deficit is the biggest threat to our national security, we've got to do something about it.' 'This bill has about $400 -$500 billion worth of new spending,' Paul also noted. Paul continually raised concerns about the $5 trillion dollars in additional debt through the entire Senate negotiation process. North Carolina Republican Thom Tillis was the second of two Republican senators who voted against the 'motion to proceed' on Trump's budget bill Saturday evening, along with Paul. In a post made to his social media site Truth Social Sunday morning, President Trump came after Tillis, claiming that he 'hurt the great people of North Carolina' and calling him a 'talker and complainer' 'Thom Tillis has hurt the great people of North Carolina. Even on the catastrophic flooding, nothing was done to help until I took office. Then a Miracle took place! Tillis is a talker and complainer, Not A Doer! He's even worse than Rand 'Fauci' Paul,' Trump wrote just after 10:00 AM Sunday morning. Tillis has since announced Sunday that he will not be seeking reelection during the 2026 midterms.
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Trump says the administration is working on a 'temporary pass' for immigrants in certain industries
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump said in an interview on Fox News that the administration is working to develop a temporary pass for immigrants who work in certain industries, which would mark the latest shift in the administration's approach to immigration enforcement for farmworkers. 'We're working on it right now. We're going to work it so that some kind of a temporary pass where people pay taxes, where the farmer can have a little control, as opposed to you walk in and take everybody away,' Trump said in an interview that taped Friday and aired Sunday on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures.' The president referenced authorities going to farms and taking 'away people that have been working there for 15 and 20 years, who are good, who possibly came in incorrectly.' 'What we're going to do is we're going to do something for farmers, where we can let the farmer sort of be in charge. The farmer knows. He's not going to hire a murderer,' Trump said. 'When you go into a farm and he's had somebody working with him for nine years doing this kind of work, which is hard work to do, and a lot of people aren't going to do it, and you end up destroying a farmer because you took all the people away. It's a problem.' Reached for comment, a spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security provided the same comment given by the department earlier this month after the White House reversed a plan to limit immigration enforcement activity at certain industry workplaces. "The President has been incredibly clear. There will be no safe spaces for industries who harbor violent criminals or purposely try to undermine ICE's efforts," the statement read. "Worksite enforcement remains a cornerstone of our efforts to safeguard public safety, national security and economic stability. These operations target illegal employment networks that undermine American workers, destabilize labor markets and expose critical infrastructure to exploitation," the statement continued. A White House spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for further details on Trump's plan and whether DHS' response conflicted with the temporary pass plan. The move marks the latest shift in the administration's handling of immigrant farmworkers. The White House has waffled in recent weeks on whether to exempt certain worksites from Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids. Trump said in a post to Truth Social on June 12 that farmers and people in the hotel and leisure industries said that the administration's immigration policy 'is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace.' The president said that 'we must protect our Farmers,' adding that 'changes are coming.' NBC News previously reported that at around the same time, ICE paused worksite arrests at agriculture, restaurant and hotel industries. But just days later, the administration reopened arrests of immigrant workers in these industries. Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary at DHS, provided the same statement then as the DHS statement on Sunday. 'The President has been incredibly clear. There will be no safe spaces for industries who harbor violent criminals or purposely try to undermine ICE's efforts,' McLaughlin said after DHS reversed the pause earlier this month. A White House spokesperson said after the pause reversal that Trump 'remains committed to enforcing federal immigration law — anyone present in the United States illegally is at risk of deportation.' Trump in April previously floated the idea that undocumented people working at farms and hotels could be allowed to leave the country and return legally. NBC News previously reported that an administration official said Trump wanted to improve H-2A and H-2B programs, which allow employers to temporarily hire migrant workers.
