US Catholic school fires teacher after husband's obituary reveals his marriage to a man
In an email to community members at the archdiocese-run school from which he was dismissed, Mark Richards explained that he had been fired because a parent notified officials about an obituary for his husband, who died of a heart attack in September 2023.
Richards' email alluded to how his employment contract at St Francis Xavier school in Metairie, Louisiana, contained a morality clause prohibiting educators from 'contracting a marriage in violation of the rules of the Catholic church' and 'actively engaging in homosexual activity', along with other conduct that the document maintains is inconsistent with the teachings of the religion that does not recognize same-sex matrimony.
He wrote that he signed the annually renewable contract and morality clause – which is required of all the archdiocese's teachers but historically has been far from universally enforced – with 'a wink and a nudge since it was no big secret that I am gay'. The St Francis Xavier community was comfortable enough with his marriage to his husband, John Messinger, that 'everyone at the school was very sympathetic and supportive' after his death.
But that changed when the parent who alerted local church officials to Messinger's obituary – which listed Richards as his husband – complained. He said he was fired on 25 June as music teacher and band director at St Francis after 21 years at the school, 'and the reason for this termination is that I am a gay man'.
'I have not been in violation of the morality clause for the last two years, and no one can find any incident of my acting inappropriately with anyone – let alone a student,' added Richards, who met Messinger two years before he started working at St Francis and then married him in 2014. Nonetheless, Richards said, all that his superiors would tell him was 'you're fired' after a parent – whose identity was shielded and whom the teacher presumed to be 'disgruntled' – reported discovering his being mentioned in Messinger's obituary.
As the New Orleans NBC affiliate WDSU reported on Friday, Richards' email garnered him sympathy from many parents at the school which ousted him. A parent-organized petition supporting Richards, calling his firing 'unjust' and exalting him as 'a beacon of kindness and understanding in [students'] lives', had collected about 1,500 signatures, the station and the Louisiana news outlet nola.com each noted.
One mother, Katheryn Lee, told WDSU: 'I would like to see the morality clause change.'
'I would like the line regarding homosexuality in the morality clause that educators sign to be removed,' Lee said. 'Your identity is not your morality. I hope we have a voice in this.'
A father named Rick English told the station he believed the morality clause at the center of Richards' dismissal is 'a violation of human rights' that needed to be reviewed. 'To me, it's a social injustice at this point,' he remarked.
Both nola.com and WDSU reported that school administrators sent an email to the St Francis community confirming it had not renewed Richards' employment contract while claiming, too, that he had not provided 'a fully accurate description of the employment situation'. But administrators said they could not elaborate, making a reference to unspecified legal considerations.
'This decision is final and will not be revisited,' school officials' email also said, in part. 'We strive to always make decisions that uphold the teachings of the Catholic faith that are in the best interest of our school.'
Richards, meanwhile, had written to St Francis parents: 'Teaching your children has been one of the joys of my life, and I treasure the memories.'
Still, as he put it to WDSU, Richards felt betrayed by those who opted to fire him.
'It's just a stab in the back,' Richards reportedly said. 'It's just time for this to stop. The rest of the free world does not think homosexuality is a big deal.'
St Francis is one of numerous archdiocese of New Orleans affiliates that are being counted on to contribute to what is expected to be a nine-figure settlement resolving a bankruptcy protection case filed by archdiocesan leaders in 2020. Those officials made that chapter 11 bankruptcy filing mainly in an attempt to dispense with hundreds of clergy molestation claims dating back decades as affordably as possible.
As of Sunday, the most recent settlement offer was for the archdiocese, its affiliates and its insurers to pay between $180m and $230m to about 600 abuse survivors. But attorneys representing hundreds of those survivors oppose that deal, saying it is far less than the $323m settlement approved in late 2024 in a similar case pitting about 600 clergy abuse claimants against the archdiocese of Rockville Centre on Long Island, New York.
Any proposed settlement would need support from two-thirds of survivors who vote on it for it to gain approval.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
11 hours ago
- NBC News
Budapest mayor says probe of banned Pride march sees him as a 'suspect'
BUDAPEST — The mayor of Budapest said on Thursday he had become a 'suspect' in a police investigation targeting the organizers of an LGBTQ rights rally that turned into an anti-government protest last month. Tens of thousands of protesters marched through Hungary's capital city on June 28 as a banned Pride march swelled into a mass anti-government demonstration in one of the biggest shows of opposition to nationalist Prime Minister Viktor Orban. 'I have become a suspect, and if in this country this is the price we have to pay for standing up for our own and others' freedom, then I am even proud of it,' Mayor Gergely Karacsony said in a post on his Facebook page. Police did not reply to emailed Reuters questions seeking comment. The mayor's office told Reuters that Karacsony would be questioned by police as a suspect next week. Orban's conservative nationalist government has gradually curtailed the rights of the LGBTQ community in the past decade, and lawmakers passed a law in March that allowed for the banning of Pride marches, citing the need to protect children. The mayor tried to circumvent the law by organizing Pride as a municipal event, which he said did not need a permit. Police, however, banned the event, arguing that it fell under the scope of the child protection law. Orban had warned of 'legal consequences' for organizing and attending the march. Police said earlier that they would not investigate those who attended the event. But there is an investigation under way against an unknown perpetrator, news site said on Thursday. Orban's critics have regarded the move to ban Pride as part of a wider crackdown on democratic freedoms ahead of an election next year when the Hungarian leader, whose Fidesz party has swept elections in the past 15 years, will face a strong opposition challenger.
The Guardian
14 hours ago
- The Guardian
Late Jesuit global leader didn't stop known child molester from becoming priest
Pedro Arrupe, the late, former worldwide leader of the Jesuit religious order and a candidate for Catholic sainthood, acknowledged in records produced as part of a New Orleans court case that he was warned about how one of the group's aspiring priests had been accused of sexually molesting two minors and acknowledged making sexual advances on a third. The man was ultimately ordained, and there is no indication in records in the court case in Louisiana state court that Arrupe – who coined the Jesuits' slogan 'men for others' – took steps to prevent him from becoming a priest. The man was later accused of molesting other minors he met through his ministry. Arrupe's involvement in the case of Donald Barkley Dickerson – who died in 2016 and two years later was confirmed by the Jesuits to be one of hundreds of their members faced with substantial claims of child molestation – began toward the end of the 1970s. But it has drawn new scrutiny in a lawsuit that accuses Dickerson of raping a 17-year-old student at a Jesuit-run university in New Orleans. The case in New Orleans civil district court raises questions about whether Arrupe, a beloved figure whose name is on numerous prestigious awards and buildings at Jesuit institutions around the world, did as much as he could to protect those who trusted in his order. Church officials in Rome in 2019 initiated the process to canonize Arrupe, who is known for having ministered to survivors of the US's atomic bombing of Hiroshima at the end of the second world war. The first stage of that process has thrust Arrupe one step closer to becoming a saint, as the Jesuits themselves described it. The new concerns about Arrupe come at a time when the broader global Catholic church has been sending mixed signals about the urgency of addressing the clergy abuse scandal that has roiled it for decades. Pope Leo XIV in June said the church must 'not tolerate any … abuse', sexual or otherwise, and earlier in July the pontiff appointed French bishop Thibault Verny to lead the Vatican's child protection advisory commission. However, also in June but in another part of France, the archdiocese of Toulouse gave the high-ranking position of chancellor to a priest who had been imprisoned after being convicted of raping a 16-year-old boy in 1993. And a former Vatican diplomat who was convicted of possessing and distributing child abuse imagery reportedly has been allowed to continue working as one of several clerks at the Vatican's secretariat of state. At least one Jesuit official who testified under oath as part of the lawsuit accusing Dickerson of raping a minor on the campus of Loyola University New Orleans said he was horrified by the way the order admitted the suspected pederast into its clerical ranks. 'I think the whole thing is appalling,' said John Armstrong, a priest who described himself as secretary of the Jesuits' US central and southern province – which includes New Orleans – while an attorney for the plaintiff questioned him in early June. Meanwhile, a statement from attorneys representing the plaintiff who describes having survived being raped by Dickerson at a Loyola dormitory issued a statement saying Arrupe 'shouldn't … be canonized a saint'. His name also 'should be stripped from every building, award or anything else it currently graces', reads the statement from attorneys Richard Trahant, John Denenea and Soren Gisleson, all lawyers for numerous people who reported being sexually abused by clergy assigned to Catholic institutions in New Orleans, which is the church's second-oldest diocese in the US. A spokesperson at the Jesuit central and southern province declined to comment, citing a policy against discussing pending litigation. Neither Loyola nor the Shreveport diocese in north-west Louisiana where Dickerson was assigned during the alleged campus rape immediately responded to requests for comment. Arrupe spent 18 years as the Jesuits' superior general beginning in 1965. He was mailed a 20 December 1977 letter detailing concerns regarding part of Dickerson's abusive past, about four years after he was credited with conceiving the order's enduring 'men for others' mantra – encapsulating the Jesuits' zeal for community service – during an address to members in his native Spain. The letter from Thomas Stahel, Arrupe's fellow Jesuit and at the time the top official – or provincial – in the region including New Orleans, recounts how Dickerson had just gone on a retreat where he 'made sexual advances on [a] 14-year-old boy'. The boy, a student at the Jesuit-run Brebeuf college preparatory school in Indianapolis, told his parents – who in turn reported Dickerson to Stahel. Stahel's letter made clear that he believed the boy because he was at least the third child on whom Dickerson had been accused of inflicting abuse. By then, Dickerson had amassed a history 'of overt homosexual encounters with two high school boys whom he masturbated', Stahel's letter said. As their client pursued a lawsuit against the Jesuits decades later, Trahant, Gisleson and Denenea obtained records from the order's regional archives through legal discovery showing Dickerson had admitted abuse which occurred while he was studying to become a priest and was assigned to the order's high school in New Orleans. The Jesuits sent him to psychiatric treatment from February to June in 1975 without reporting him to civil authorities to be investigated as a criminal child molester. That was the Catholic church's custom at the time, though it has acknowledged that that practice was misguided and has sought to reform its protocols in such cases, including by urging its leaders to be transparent and report offenders to law enforcement. Dickerson completed the treatment and gained a recommendation from a Jesuit official named Louis Lambert to be ordained as a priest. As Stahel put it, Lambert excused Dickerson as only behaving abusively whenever he 'got nervous'. Yet, having learned of a third abusive incident attributed to Dickerson at the time he wrote his letter, Stahel implored Arrupe to at least hold off on the ordination, which had been scheduled for two days after Christmas that year. 'Dickerson seems to me a poor risk for ordination,' Stahel – who was also known for being a longtime editor at the Jesuits' America magazine – told Arrupe. 'I do not think we can in conscience present Dickerson … as ready for ordination.' The Jesuits subsequently postponed Dickerson's ordination – 'till further study of his suitability,' with Arrupe's approval, according to Stahel's December 1977 letter – and once again sent him to psychiatric treatment in 1978. In September 1978, Arrupe wrote to Lambert, saying he had gotten the psychiatric report on Dickerson. 'I shall await further information on the case from Father Stahel,' Arrupe wrote. Arrupe does not appear in any other documents so far reviewed by the Guardian and WWL Louisiana. In June 1979 and January 1980, Stahel wrote a pair of memos describing conversations with Dickerson, who had been a brother with the Sacred Heart order before joining the Jesuits, according to the website Dickerson in the first conversation said that 'the incident of December, 1977' was 'relatively insignificant' and that the doctor who treated him agreed, Stahel wrote. In the second conversation, Dickerson again asserted his belief that the same incident was 'relatively insignificant', Stahel wrote. But, Stahel continued, Dickerson understood 'such incidents have far reaching consequences, can cause scandal and in short must be regarded as serious'. Dickerson was ordained as a priest in 1980, according to information published by the Jesuits. It wouldn't be until 1983 that Arrupe stepped down as the superior general of the Society of Jesus, as the order is formally known. He had suffered a debilitating stroke in 1981. After his ordination, Dickerson was assigned to the order's college preparatory high school in Dallas. Jesuit officials did not alert leaders at the campus about their knowledge that Dickerson was a child molester, according to the Dallas Morning News. The newspaper attributed that fact to a deposition given by an order official in charge of schools in the region, Philip Postell, amid clergy abuse-related litigation many years later. By July 1981, Stahel received a letter from Postell informing him that Dickerson had been removed from Dallas's Jesuit college preparatory school. The parents of a child had reported an accusation against Dickerson to the school, whose principal discovered the various prior abusive episodes, the Dallas Morning News reported. The parents' accusation was one of multiple reports of child abuse made against Dickerson while at the school. Postell – who was president of the Dallas Jesuit college preparatory school from 1992 to 2011 – eventually conceded under oath that he should have reported Dickerson to law enforcement at that point, according to the Morning News. But Jesuit leaders simply transferred Dickerson about 200 miles east to the Cathedral of St John Berchmans in Shreveport, Louisiana. While assigned to St John, Dickerson frequently visited Loyola New Orleans, where he had gone for his undergraduate and post-graduate studies, the plaintiff represented by Trahant, Gisleson and Denenea would later assert in court. The plaintiff recounted gaining early admission into Loyola in August 1984 at age 17 and meeting Dickerson shortly after beginning his freshman year. Dickerson soon began inviting the plaintiff to dinner weekly alongside other priests. That allegedly escalated into groping and oral rape, including behind a sacristy. The plaintiff would later say in his lawsuit that he was eventually raped by Dickerson in a dorm room. The Jesuits at last got rid of Dickerson after the Shreveport church to which he was assigned received a letter in 1986 from a family reporting him for 'feeling and touching' their son inappropriately, as the Dallas Morning News noted. It was by then at least the seventh documented allegation against Dickerson – not counting the underage Loyola New Orleans student, who came forward after many years had passed. A Jesuit official handling that seventh known complaint against Dickerson drafted a memo to colleagues in which he insisted that the accused clergyman deserved 'to be given the benefit of the doubt'. 'We should proceed on something like this very cautiously,' the official, Edmundo Rodriguez, wrote in the memo. 'On the possibility of a set up, however remote', the memo added, deliberation about Dickerson should be limited only to 'this particular case'. Nothing should be discussed publicly either given 'the sensitivity of the material', Rodriguez added. Rodriguez also suggested the Jesuits provide $10,000 to Dickerson in living expenses over the next year, especially while the matter was pending. Dickerson, for his part, resigned less than a week later, saying it was for his 'own peace and the good of the Society of Jesus'. 'I am grateful to the society for what it has done to try to help me,' including sending him to 'extensive psychological therapy' at Foundation House in Jemez Spring, New Mexico, Dickerson wrote in his resignation. 'It is clear now that these measures have not been enough to prevent my falling into problems which become public and have the potential of harming the Society of Jesus and the church seriously. 'I appreciate your willingness to suspend judgment on the question of moral culpability and to acknowledge my genuine efforts to overcome my tendencies.' The Jesuits revealed in December 2018 that Dickerson was a credibly accused child predator. That year, it included him on a published list of more than 40 order priests and other members who had been the subject of child molestation claims deemed credible while working in what is now considered the order's central and southern province in the US. Jesuit officials released that list within months of a Pennsylvania grand jury report which established Catholic clergy abuse in that state had been more widespread than originally thought, creating pressure for groups such as the Jesuits to be transparent about molesters in their employ. Dickerson – who spent time in Nebraska after his Jesuit career, according to public records – died at age 80 in August 2016. That was about 25 years after Arrupe had died. In June 2024, the former Loyola New Orleans student who was allegedly abused by Dickerson sued the university, the Jesuits and the Shreveport Catholic diocese for damages. He did so almost immediately after Louisiana's supreme court upheld a law temporarily allowing people in the state to sue for compensation over sexual abuse no matter how long ago it had occurred. The lawsuit was unresolved as of Thursday, with the defendants generally trying to attack the validity of the law which enabled the plaintiff to file against them for damages. They also have contended that the allegations against Dickerson were outside the scope and course of his ministry. Nonetheless, at least one Jesuit has made it clear that he was not proud of how the order managed Dickerson. That official is John Armstrong, the assistant secretary of the Jesuit central and southern province, which disclosed that Dickerson was a child predator. Armstrong recounted how he once participated in a meeting about Dickerson in 1976, after the order realized he was a problem. He said he then had to work in Dickerson's proximity in New Orleans in the mid-1980s and loathed it, even though they interacted only once as far as he could remember. Under oath, Armstrong confirmed the Jesuits would not have needed to let Dickerson be present at any of their institutions – such as Loyola, where Dickerson purportedly abused the plaintiff – if they had ousted him or turned him over to law enforcement. Referring to how the Jesuits dealt with Dickerson throughout his career, Armstrong said he believed it was 'appalling that it was handled that way'. It was 'appalling that it happened,' Armstrong said. '[I] feel terrible for the people that were victims of [Dickerson's], and it is beyond my understanding how after that first incident … he was allowed to go any further.' This article was amended on 24 July 2025. A previous version said that Pedro Arrupe died 15 years before Donald Dickerson, but it was actually 25 years.
Reuters
14 hours ago
- Reuters
Budapest mayor says probe of banned Pride march sees him as a 'suspect'
BUDAPEST, July 24 (Reuters) - The mayor of Budapest said on Thursday he had become a "suspect" in a police investigation targeting the organisers of an LGBTQ+ rights rally that turned into an anti-government protest last month. Tens of thousands of protesters marched through Hungary's capital city on June 28 as a banned Pride march swelled into a mass anti-government demonstration in one of the biggest shows of opposition to nationalist Prime Minister Viktor Orban. "I have become a suspect, and if in this country this is the price we have to pay for standing up for our own and others' freedom, then I am even proud of it," Mayor Gergely Karacsony said in a post on his Facebook page. Police did not reply to emailed Reuters questions seeking comment. The mayor's office told Reuters that Karacsony would be questioned by police as a suspect next week. Orban's conservative nationalist government has gradually curtailed the rights of the LGBTQ+ community in the past decade, and lawmakers passed a law in March that allowed for the banning of Pride marches, citing the need to protect children. The mayor tried to circumvent the law by organising Pride as a municipal event, which he said did not need a permit. Police, however, banned the event, arguing that it fell under the scope of the child protection law. Orban had warned of "legal consequences" for organising and attending the march. Police said earlier that they would not investigate those who attended the event. But there is an investigation under way against an unknown perpetrator, news site said on Thursday. Orban's critics have regarded the move to ban Pride as part of a wider crackdown on democratic freedoms ahead of an election next year when the Hungarian leader, whose Fidesz party has swept elections in the past 15 years, will face a strong opposition challenger.
