Psychologist tries to back-track child abuse admissions
The 59-year-old, who cannot be legally named, is on trial in the NSW District Court for raping and molesting a 15-year-old boy in his office on the state's north coast in mid-2017.
The teen attended two counselling sessions with the clinical psychologist who has been accused of watching pornography on his phone and suggesting the youth attend a nudist beach to relieve stress.
Prosecutors have shown jurors alleged admissions made by the man to sexually abusing eight other patients, attempting to prove he had a tendency to act in a certain way.
However, the 59-year-old claims he was coerced into making the admissions in 2019 by his former lawyers at Sydney-based firm Nyman Gibson Miralis and his former barrister Michael Gleeson.
The court heard evidence on Thursday by former Nyman Gibson Miralis solicitor Penelope Baker about her then client's decision to plead guilty and sign a statement of agreed facts relating to the eight complainants.
The psychologist claimed Mr Gleeson advised that he would get a maximum jail term of eight years with a non-parole period of four-and-a-half years because of the pleas, the jury heard.
A file note from a 2020 conference with Ms Baker revealed the psychologist was "gobsmacked" that estimates for his non-parole period had been expanded to five to seven years instead.
"I was very disappointed," he said, according to the note.
"I'm feeling that he has let me down, I'm doubting everything he's done."
The psychologist was swiftly advised that if he pleaded not guilty and went to trial, he would have a very high risk of losing and receiving 10 years' minimum in prison, the jury was told.
After he requested to reverse his pleas, Ms Baker said this would be a terrible idea.
The psychologist told his lawyer he had been put into a "bad position".
"I don't appreciate being misled," he said.
After changing his legal team, he told his new barrister Nancy Mikhaiel the day before a 2020 sentence hearing that he had been "seriously misled," jurors were told.
"I can't do 10 years, it's not in me," he said, according to a legal note read to the court.
Ms Mikhaiel testified under questioning by defence barrister Anita Betts that a non-parole period of under five years was not realistic because of the admissions and number of complainants.
She said the sentence hearing was postponed and she withdrew as his counsel due to the concerns raised about the integrity of his plea.
The trial continues on Friday.
1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732)
National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028
A former psychologist says he was misled into pleading guilty to sexually abusing eight male patients after his lawyers told him he'd be jailed for less than five years by doing so.
The 59-year-old, who cannot be legally named, is on trial in the NSW District Court for raping and molesting a 15-year-old boy in his office on the state's north coast in mid-2017.
The teen attended two counselling sessions with the clinical psychologist who has been accused of watching pornography on his phone and suggesting the youth attend a nudist beach to relieve stress.
Prosecutors have shown jurors alleged admissions made by the man to sexually abusing eight other patients, attempting to prove he had a tendency to act in a certain way.
However, the 59-year-old claims he was coerced into making the admissions in 2019 by his former lawyers at Sydney-based firm Nyman Gibson Miralis and his former barrister Michael Gleeson.
The court heard evidence on Thursday by former Nyman Gibson Miralis solicitor Penelope Baker about her then client's decision to plead guilty and sign a statement of agreed facts relating to the eight complainants.
The psychologist claimed Mr Gleeson advised that he would get a maximum jail term of eight years with a non-parole period of four-and-a-half years because of the pleas, the jury heard.
A file note from a 2020 conference with Ms Baker revealed the psychologist was "gobsmacked" that estimates for his non-parole period had been expanded to five to seven years instead.
"I was very disappointed," he said, according to the note.
"I'm feeling that he has let me down, I'm doubting everything he's done."
The psychologist was swiftly advised that if he pleaded not guilty and went to trial, he would have a very high risk of losing and receiving 10 years' minimum in prison, the jury was told.
After he requested to reverse his pleas, Ms Baker said this would be a terrible idea.
The psychologist told his lawyer he had been put into a "bad position".
"I don't appreciate being misled," he said.
After changing his legal team, he told his new barrister Nancy Mikhaiel the day before a 2020 sentence hearing that he had been "seriously misled," jurors were told.
"I can't do 10 years, it's not in me," he said, according to a legal note read to the court.
Ms Mikhaiel testified under questioning by defence barrister Anita Betts that a non-parole period of under five years was not realistic because of the admissions and number of complainants.
She said the sentence hearing was postponed and she withdrew as his counsel due to the concerns raised about the integrity of his plea.
The trial continues on Friday.
1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732)
National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028
A former psychologist says he was misled into pleading guilty to sexually abusing eight male patients after his lawyers told him he'd be jailed for less than five years by doing so.
The 59-year-old, who cannot be legally named, is on trial in the NSW District Court for raping and molesting a 15-year-old boy in his office on the state's north coast in mid-2017.
The teen attended two counselling sessions with the clinical psychologist who has been accused of watching pornography on his phone and suggesting the youth attend a nudist beach to relieve stress.
Prosecutors have shown jurors alleged admissions made by the man to sexually abusing eight other patients, attempting to prove he had a tendency to act in a certain way.
However, the 59-year-old claims he was coerced into making the admissions in 2019 by his former lawyers at Sydney-based firm Nyman Gibson Miralis and his former barrister Michael Gleeson.
The court heard evidence on Thursday by former Nyman Gibson Miralis solicitor Penelope Baker about her then client's decision to plead guilty and sign a statement of agreed facts relating to the eight complainants.
The psychologist claimed Mr Gleeson advised that he would get a maximum jail term of eight years with a non-parole period of four-and-a-half years because of the pleas, the jury heard.
A file note from a 2020 conference with Ms Baker revealed the psychologist was "gobsmacked" that estimates for his non-parole period had been expanded to five to seven years instead.
"I was very disappointed," he said, according to the note.
"I'm feeling that he has let me down, I'm doubting everything he's done."
The psychologist was swiftly advised that if he pleaded not guilty and went to trial, he would have a very high risk of losing and receiving 10 years' minimum in prison, the jury was told.
After he requested to reverse his pleas, Ms Baker said this would be a terrible idea.
The psychologist told his lawyer he had been put into a "bad position".
"I don't appreciate being misled," he said.
After changing his legal team, he told his new barrister Nancy Mikhaiel the day before a 2020 sentence hearing that he had been "seriously misled," jurors were told.
"I can't do 10 years, it's not in me," he said, according to a legal note read to the court.
Ms Mikhaiel testified under questioning by defence barrister Anita Betts that a non-parole period of under five years was not realistic because of the admissions and number of complainants.
She said the sentence hearing was postponed and she withdrew as his counsel due to the concerns raised about the integrity of his plea.
The trial continues on Friday.
1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732)
National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028
A former psychologist says he was misled into pleading guilty to sexually abusing eight male patients after his lawyers told him he'd be jailed for less than five years by doing so.
The 59-year-old, who cannot be legally named, is on trial in the NSW District Court for raping and molesting a 15-year-old boy in his office on the state's north coast in mid-2017.
The teen attended two counselling sessions with the clinical psychologist who has been accused of watching pornography on his phone and suggesting the youth attend a nudist beach to relieve stress.
Prosecutors have shown jurors alleged admissions made by the man to sexually abusing eight other patients, attempting to prove he had a tendency to act in a certain way.
However, the 59-year-old claims he was coerced into making the admissions in 2019 by his former lawyers at Sydney-based firm Nyman Gibson Miralis and his former barrister Michael Gleeson.
The court heard evidence on Thursday by former Nyman Gibson Miralis solicitor Penelope Baker about her then client's decision to plead guilty and sign a statement of agreed facts relating to the eight complainants.
The psychologist claimed Mr Gleeson advised that he would get a maximum jail term of eight years with a non-parole period of four-and-a-half years because of the pleas, the jury heard.
A file note from a 2020 conference with Ms Baker revealed the psychologist was "gobsmacked" that estimates for his non-parole period had been expanded to five to seven years instead.
"I was very disappointed," he said, according to the note.
"I'm feeling that he has let me down, I'm doubting everything he's done."
The psychologist was swiftly advised that if he pleaded not guilty and went to trial, he would have a very high risk of losing and receiving 10 years' minimum in prison, the jury was told.
After he requested to reverse his pleas, Ms Baker said this would be a terrible idea.
The psychologist told his lawyer he had been put into a "bad position".
"I don't appreciate being misled," he said.
After changing his legal team, he told his new barrister Nancy Mikhaiel the day before a 2020 sentence hearing that he had been "seriously misled," jurors were told.
"I can't do 10 years, it's not in me," he said, according to a legal note read to the court.
Ms Mikhaiel testified under questioning by defence barrister Anita Betts that a non-parole period of under five years was not realistic because of the admissions and number of complainants.
She said the sentence hearing was postponed and she withdrew as his counsel due to the concerns raised about the integrity of his plea.
The trial continues on Friday.
1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732)
National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
SBS Australia
3 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Two charged in spiritual blessing scams
Two charged in spiritual blessing scams Published 4 July 2025, 7:08 am Two people have been charged after allegedly targeting people of Asian background in spiritual blessing scams. New South Wales Police set up Strike Force Sentinel in April following reports the scams had been taking place across parts of Sydney since July 2023. The scammers are accused of exploiting the community's cultural fears before tricking them into handing over money and valuables.
ABC News
6 hours ago
- ABC News
Antisemitism inquiry told Jewish school students subject to abuse and threats
School children have had eggs thrown at them, been chased down streets, and subjected to Nazi salutes and death threats amid a surge of racism targeted at Sydney's Jewish community, a parliamentary inquiry has heard. The upper house inquiry is examining the prevalence and severity of racist incidents targeted at the NSW Jewish community — known as antisemitism — and what measures could help combat it. Miriam Hasofer is the principal of Sydney's Moriah College, a Jewish independent school, and told the inquiry the hate directed at her community had become "crude, vile and targeted" and was designed to intimidate. "Last week a year 9 girl was chased up Queens Park Road by a woman shouting, 'F*** the Jews', 'f****** c-word', 'free Palestine', over and over," Ms Hasofer told the inquiry. "This was a child walking to school; she was terrified." Ms Hasofer also described receiving an anonymous message stating: "I hope all the children, parents and staff get cancer and die a slow, painful death. Praise Hitler." She also recounted incidents of people driving past the college and giving the Nazi salute or yelling "f*** the Jews". Ms Hasofer said security had been stepped up at Moriah College in response. "In 2025 we are averaging nearly one incident a week; that's nearly two years of relentless, targeted abuse," she said. "Our leaders are operating like a counterterrorism unit and this has become our new normal." Emanuel School board member Bassina Farbenblum told the inquiry Jewish students were "genuinely fearful" for their safety. "There were kids in my son's year who had raw eggs thrown at them at Westfield because they were in school uniform," she said. It is not just students at Jewish independent schools being targeted. Avishai Conyer is the head of youth and young adult engagement at Sydney's Emanuel Synagogue. He told the inquiry most of the students who were part of his synagogue attended non-Jewish schools and often reported trying to avoid conflict over their identity. "They make an active choice to take off their Star of David necklace … or not wanting to make a fuss when someone draws a swastika on the locker," he said. NSW Police Deputy Commissioner Dave Hudson said the rate of "hate incidents" recorded against the Jewish community was increasing year on year. Deputy Commissioner Hudson was questioned by the inquiry about the spate of graffiti and arson attacks on the Jewish community over summer and whether they constituted antisemitism. "Whilst the catalyst of those incidents was a manipulation of the criminal justice system by an individual … the Jewish community was targeted; they were putting lives in danger," he said. "I don't think we would consider it anything but antisemitic in nature." Several members of the inquiry also questioned whether the incidents targeted at the community were anti-Jewish or anti-Israel attacks. "You can have this argument day and night in this committee around what the definition is, what the intent is," Nathalie Samia from the National Council of Jewish Women of Australia said. "We can only talk to the impact on our families and that is what I think you need to have in mind when you have this discussion." Emanuel School principal Linda Emms was also unequivocal when she described hate directed towards her students. "The references are Nazis, Hitler, gas chambers — to me there is no question, this is antisemitism." The inquiry is set to hand down its findings by September.
Sky News AU
6 hours ago
- Sky News AU
ABC announces true crime drama focused on Erin Patterson's mushroom case as nation awaits verdict in murder trial
The ABC has announced it will air a television series about Erin Patterson, who is currently facing murder charges. The project, named Toxic, is helmed by screenwriter Elise McCredie and producer Tony Ayres, whose previous works include Stateless, Clickbait, and The Clearing. According to Tony Ayres Productions, the team is collaborating closely with ABC journalist Rachael Brown to ensure accuracy and depth in portraying the events surrounding the case. The creators said the series will tell the story through multiple timelines and perspectives, avoiding judgement and focusing on complexity. Ayres, the Managing Director and Executive Producer at Tony Ayres Productions, said making the drama was about pushing beyond the headlines and working out what was happening beneath the surface. "True stories ask storytellers to probe the complexities of human behaviour. What really lies beneath the headlines? It's both a challenge and a responsibility to go beyond the surface - to reveal, not just sensationalise," he said. Head of ABC Scripted Rachel Okine said she is "excited to be partnering" with Tony Ayres Productions on the "powerful new project". "This investigation has already captivated audiences across Australia and we're eager to dive deeper into the complexities behind the headlines to bring this story to life with the team," she said. The drama comes amid international attention on the case and Ms Patterson, who is accused of murdering three relatives of her estranged husband by serving them a poisonous beef wellington lunch on July 29, 2023. The ABC says 'There's currently no indication of casting or when the series will begin filming.' Ms Patterson has been charged with the murders of her former in-laws Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson. The 50-year-old has also been charged with the attempted murder of Heather's husband and local church pastor Ian Wilkinson, who survived the meal after a lengthy stint in hospital. Prosecutors allege Ms Patterson's beef wellington lunch, which was held at her house in Leongatha, was intentionally laced with death cap mushrooms. It is alleged Ms Patterson concocted a cancer diagnosis to lure her guests over for lunch as she needed advice on how to break the medical news to her children. Ms Patterson has pleaded not guilty to three counts of murder and one count of attempted murder. The jury retired on Monday, and at time of publication, a verdict had not been returned.
