Fact Check: Unpacking claims video shows over 500 construction workers detained by ICE in Texas
Claim:
A video shared on social media claimed that over 500 construction workers being detained by ICE agents at Texas job sites in late June 2025.
Rating:
In late June 2025, a 10-second video circulated online purportedly showing a mass detention of construction workers by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents gained traction on social media.
For example, on June 25, 2025, one Instagram post (archived), which accumulated over 449,000 views as of this writing, stated: "BREAKING: Over 500+ construction workers — mostly Hispanic — have been detained by federal agents in Texas while simply showing up to work. Workers are reportedly being rounded up at job sites and taken to holding camps. This all happened in just the last 48 hours."
(occupydemocrats/Instagram)
Snopes readers contacted us about the claim, with one reader emailing to ask whether the "video of construction workers detained by ICE" was "accurate or not."
The video accompanying the post showed a large number of workers gathered in what appeared to be a temporary tent structure at a construction site. A caption embedded in the video asked: "so, if all these construction workers are detained by ICE, who's doing the construction?"
The same video had been circulating on other social media platforms including TikTok (archived) and Threads (archived).
However, Snopes' investigation found that while the video appeared to be authentic footage of a construction site gathering, it was miscaptioned and did not show an ICE detention operation in late June 2025.
Snopes has not yet been able to confirm who filmed the footage, but there was no evidence the clip was the product of artificial intelligence (AI) software or other digital manipulation.
The same video had been circulating on Instagram prior to the June 25 claim. For example, one Instagram account posted (archived) the identical footage on June 8, 2025, with a Spanish-language caption that translated to "Here are the workers detained by ICE."
(usalatinnews/Instagram)
That earlier post received over 531,000 views, predating the recent posts by more than two weeks and indicating that the video was not tied to any verified enforcement action within the past 48 hours, as recently claimed.
Snopes found no publicly available evidence supporting the claim that a mass ICE raid involving more than 500 workers took place in Texas during the time period described in the post. While ICE has carried out workplace enforcement actions at construction sites in recent months, the largest confirmed (archived) operation occurred in Tallahassee, Florida, where "100+" workers were arrested on May 29, 2025, according to the agency. In Texas, the largest publicly documented (archived) construction-site raid involved 25 arrests at job sites in South Padre Island and Brownsville on June 4.
We reached out to ICE to ask whether its agents had conducted any operation involving the detention of 500 or more construction workers in Texas during late June 2025.
An ICE spokesperson responded directly to Snopes via email: "The video is not related to any activity by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement."
Based on visual clues in the video—such as safety signage, worker attire, and the industrial scale of the operation—the footage may have been recorded at the Port Arthur LNG construction site in Texas. This liquefied natural gas export terminal, being built by Bechtel Construction Service for Sempra Infrastructure, regularly holds large safety meetings and worker gatherings that could account for the scene shown. Photos shared on Facebook by both Bechtel (archived) and Sempra (archived) show similar large tented structures used for events and meetings at the Port Arthur LNG site as well as the exact same safety signage, supporting the likelihood that the video was filmed there.
Snopes reached out to Sempra Infrastructure and Bechtel to confirm whether the video was filmed at the Port Arthur LNG site and whether any immigration enforcement actions took place at or near the site during the relevant period. As of this writing, neither company has responded to our inquiry.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. "ICE arrests more than 100 illegal aliens during targeted enforcement operation in Tallahassee." ICE News Releases, https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/ice-arrests-100-illegal-aliens-during-targeted-enforcement-operation-tallahassee. Accessed June 26, 2025.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. "ICE Rio Grande Valley conducts worksite enforcement operation resulting in 25 arrests." ICE News Releases, https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/ice-rio-grande-valley-conducts-worksite-enforcement-operation-resulting-25-arrests. Accessed June 26, 2025.
Bechtel Corporation. "Sempra Infrastructure announces EPC contract with Bechtel for Port Arthur LNG Phase 2." Bechtel Press Releases, https://www.bechtel.com/press-releases/sempra-infrastructure-announces-epc-contract-with-bechtel-for-port-arthur-lng-phase-2/. Accessed June 26, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Atlantic
27 minutes ago
- Atlantic
The Anniversary That Democrats Would Be Wise to Forget
Yesterday marked one year since Joe Biden's debate meltdown against Donald Trump. Happy anniversary to those who observe such things, or are triggered by such things. Please celebrate responsibly. For Democrats, the debacle was a harsh awakening and the start of an ongoing spiral. Prior to that night, they could hold on to the delusion that the party might somehow eke out one last victory from Biden's degraded capacity and ward off another four-year assault from Donald Trump. But that all exploded into the gruesome reality of June 27, 2024. Every interested viewer that night remembers where they were, their various feelings (depending on their perspectives) of revulsion, grief, glee, or disbelief. I was watching at home, thinking for some reason that Biden might exceed his humble expectations. He had managed to do this periodically on big stages during his presidency—including the feisty State of the Union address he'd turned in a few months earlier. But by the time Biden walked to his podium in Atlanta, it was clear that was not happening. Something was off. The elderly president looked visibly stiffer than usual, like he was wrapped in cardboard. As co-moderator Jake Tapper of CNN unfurled his opening question—about rising grocery and home prices—Biden's eyes bugged out, as if he was stunned. His face was a drab gray color. I remember thinking there was something wrong with my TV, until the texts started rolling in. A friend observed that Biden looked 'mummified' on the stage. 'Is he sick?' my wife asked as she entered the room. Not a great start. And this was before Biden had even said a word. Then he spoke—or tried to. Biden's voice didn't really work at first. It was raspy; he kept stopping, starting, dry-coughing. After a few sentences, everything was worse. 'Oh my god,' came another text, which was representative of the early returns. 'My mother told me she's crying,' read another. (This person's mother is evidently not a Trump supporter.) My wife left the room. Mark Leibovich: Where is Barack Obama? Now here we are a year later. Democrats have been battered by events since. First among them was Trump's victory in November, in which traditional Democratic constituencies such as Black, Hispanic, and young voters defected to the GOP in large numbers. This was followed by the onslaught of Trump's second administration. Democrats keep getting described (or describing themselves) as being 'in the wilderness,' though at this point 'the wilderness' might be a generous description; it at least offers peace and quiet—as opposed to, say, your average Democratic National Committee meeting in 2025. Or, for that matter, the aftermath of this week's Democratic primary in the New York City mayor's race. Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist state assemblyman from Queens, became an instant It Boy with his upset of scandal-soiled former Governor Andrew Cuomo. As happens with many progressive sensations these days, Mamdani's victory was immediately polarizing. New York Democrats seem split over the result: On one side are lukewarm establishment titans such as Senate and House Minority Leaders Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries; on the other are progressive demigods such as Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Senator Bernie Sanders. The usual Democratic divides revealed themselves: insurgent versus establishment, socialist-adjacent versus moderate, young versus old (except for Bernie, the ageless octogenarian forever big with the kids). The deeply unpopular incumbent, Eric Adams, who was elected as a Democrat in 2021, is running for reelection as an independent; despite getting trounced in the primary, Cuomo plans to stay in the race—running on something called the 'Fight and Deliver' ballot line. Mamdani is the clear favorite to prevail in November. But no one knows anything for sure, except that everything feels like a muddled mess, which has pretty much been the Democrats' default posture since the Abomination in Atlanta a year ago. The party's grass roots are showing genuine energy these days. Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez drew five-figure crowds at their 'Fighting Oligarchy' rallies this spring. The nationwide 'No Kings' protests two weekends ago were indicative of a galvanized protest movement eager to be led. Yet these signs of Trump resistance are mostly happening separate from the Democratic apparatus. As my colleague David Graham recently wrote, the 'No Kings' spectacles were themselves, paradoxically, a sign of how rudderless the party now finds itself. With a few exceptions, the Democratic leadership ranks have been largely AWOL. They toggle and flail between quiet paralysis and loud frustration, especially with one another. Mark Leibovich: The week that changed everything for Gavin Newsom Democrats have spent an inordinate amount of time and energy relitigating Biden's tenure in the White House—whether he was fit to be there and how frail he had become. The phrase cognitive decline still comes up a lot, for obvious reasons, none of them fun or especially constructive. The 2024 campaign has also come in for a spirited rehash —especially among factions of Biden world, the Kamala Harris–Tim Walz campaign, and the various PACs and outside groups ostensibly designed to support them. Republicans have of course relished every chance to revisit Biden's deterioration. The media have hammered this theme as well, most notably Tapper and his co-author, Alex Thompson of Axios, whose blockbuster autopsy, Original Sin, has been at or near the top of The New York Times ' nonfiction best-seller list for several weeks. The surest way for Democrats to move on would be to jump straight to the future: Look to 2028, as quickly as possible. Presidential campaigns at their best can be forward-looking, wide-open, and aspirational. Yes, local elections—and certainly the 2026 midterms—are important, and maybe even promising for the party. But not as important as picking a new national leader, something the Democrats have not really done since Barack Obama was first elected in 2008. Among the many tragedies of Biden's last act was that he delayed his party, indefinitely, from anointing its next generation. Trump himself might not be on the ballot in 2028, but he's still giving his opposition plenty to run against. So Democrats might as well take the show national and start now, if for no other reason than to escape from fractures of the present and circular nightmares of the recent past. Which began, more or less, on June 27 of last year. When Democrats stop dwelling on that disaster and what followed, that might signal that they're finally getting somewhere.
Newsweek
35 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Approval Rating Falls To All-Time Low
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Donald Trump's approval rating has dropped to an all-time low, according to Newsweek's latest poll tracker. The tracker shows that 43 percent of Americans currently approve of Trump's performance, while 53 percent disapprove—giving him a net approval rating of -10 points. That marks a three-point decline from the previous day, when his net approval stood at -7. It also matches his lowest net rating since April 29, when he last hit -10—which was, at the time, his lowest on record. Why It Matters Trump's poll numbers initially plunged after he announced his "Liberation Day" tariffs back in April. Although his approval ratings recovered somewhat soon after, his recent actions appear to have reignited public frustration with the White House. This includes his decision to deploy the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles to suppress anti-ICE protests, as well as ordering air strikes on three nuclear facilities in Iran last weekend—strikes that polls show most voters oppose. In response, Iran retaliated by launching missiles at a U.S. military base in Qatar on Monday. Since then, surveys have shown Trump's popularity has fallen to its lowest point on record. President Donald Trump listens during a briefing with the media, Friday, June 27, 2025, at the White House in Washington. President Donald Trump listens during a briefing with the media, Friday, June 27, 2025, at the White House in Washington. Jacquelyn Martin/AP What To Know Several polls show that Trump's approval rating has fallen to new lows for his second term. The latest YouGov/Economist poll, conducted between June 20-23 among 1,590 adults, shows Trump with a net approval rating of -14 points, with 40 percent approving and 54 percent disapproving—down slightly from -13 last week. The poll had a margin of error of ± 3.5 percent. Similarly, a new Bullfinch Group poll, conducted between June 17-20 among 1,223 adults, puts his net approval at -13 points, with 41 percent approval and 54 percent disapproval. That marks a sharp drop from -5 in May. The poll's margin of error was ± 3.1 percent. The latest Ipsos/Reuters, and American Research Group polls also show Trump's net approval rating at record lows for his second term. In the Ipsos/Reuters poll, conducted between June 21-23 among 1,139 registered voters, Trump's net approval rating stood at -16 points, with 41 percent approving and 57 percent disapproving. That is down from a previous low of -12 points in last week's poll. The poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. In the latest American Research Group poll, conducted June 17-20 among 1,100 adults, Trump's net approval rating hit -21 points, with 38 percent approving and 59 percent disapproving, down from a low of -14 points in the previous poll conducted in May. The latest Morning Consult poll, conducted between June 20-22 among 2,205 registered voters, did not show Trump's approval rating at an all-time low. But it did show a notable decline, with 45 percent approving and 53 percent disapproving, for a net approval rating of -8 points. That is down from -6 in the previous poll. The margin of error is plus or minus 2 points. Other polls have also shown a downward trend in Trump's approval rating in recent days. That includes the latest Quantus Insights poll, conducted between June 23-25 among 1,000 registered voters, which shows Trump's approval slipping slightly to 47 percent, down from 48 percent. His disapproval rating rose to 50 percent, up from 49 percent in the previous poll. Meanwhile, a Tyson Group poll, conducted between June 25-26 among 1,027 U.S. adults, showed Trump's net approval rating 6 points underwater, with 45 percent approving and 51 percent disapproving. It comes as polling has shown Trump deep underwater on almost every issue. The latest Quinnipiac poll showed that Trump was underwater on at least seven key issues. His lowest marks concerned his handling of deportations, where his net approval rating stood at -20, down from -16 in early June. That was followed closely by trade and the economy, both at -17. On immigration—an issue long central to his political brand—Trump hit a new low in his second term, with a net approval of -16, down from -11 earlier in the month. The survey also showed that 56 percent of voters disapproved of the way Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) did its job, compared to 39 percent who approved. Nearly two-thirds of voters (64 percent), when given two choices, said they preferred giving most undocumented immigrants in the United States a pathway to legal status, while 31 percent said they preferred deporting most undocumented immigrants. He also received negative ratings on foreign policy (-14), military affairs (-4), and his handling of the Israel-Iran conflict (-14), highlighting broad concerns over his approach to international crises. The latest Emerson poll showed similar results. When asked whether Trump's economic policies are making the economy better or worse, 46 percent of respondents said his policies are making things worse, compared to just 28 percent who said they are making the economy better. Another 26 percent said they believe it's too soon to tell or that his actions have had no effect. The poll also found that nearly half of voters disapprove of Trump's overall handling of the U.S. economy. Forty-eight percent said they disapprove of the way he is managing economic issues, while only 37 percent approve. On immigration—historically one of Trump's signature issues—the public remains deeply divided. The survey shows that 48 percent approve of his approach to immigration policy and undocumented immigrants, while 40 percent disapprove. Just under 12 percent said they have no opinion. Foreign policy appears to be another area of concern for voters. On key international conflicts, Trump's ratings skew negative. Regarding the war between Russia and Ukraine, 45 percent of respondents disapprove of his handling, while 41 percent approve. On the war between Israel and Hamas, 41 percent disapprove and 38 percent approve. Meanwhile, the Tyson Group poll showed more positive results for the president, who is 4 points above the water on immigration, with 48 percent approving and 44 percent disapproving. On foreign policy, voters were evenly split, with 45 percent approving and the same amount disapproving. But on the issue of inflation, Trump is still deep underwater by 16 points, with 37 percent approving and 53 percent disapproving. Poll Date Approve Disapprove The Tyson Group June 25-26 45 51 Emerson College June 24-25 45 46 Quantus Insights June 23-25 47 50 American Pulse June 23-25 50 49 Quinnipiac June 22-24 41 54 YouGov/Economist June 20-23 40 54 Ipsos/Reuters June 21-23 41 57 Morning Consult June20-22 45 53 Bullfinch Group June 17-20 41 54 American Research Group June 17-20 38 59 Still, a handful of polls recorded slight gains for Trump, though largely within the margin of error. Quinnipiac's latest poll, conducted between June 22-24 among 979 self-identified registered voters, shows Trump's approval rating at 41 percent, a 3-point increase from the previous survey earlier this month. His disapproval rating remains unchanged at 54 percent. The most recent RMG Research poll, conducted between June 11-19, put his approval rating up one at 53 percent, while his disapproval rating remained the same at 46 percent. And in the latest Trafalgar Group poll, conducted between June 18-20, 54 percent approved of Trump's job performance, while 45 percent disapproved, giving him a net approval of +9 points. That is up from +8 in last month's poll, when 54 percent approved and 46 percent disapproved. The latest Emerson College poll, conducted between June 24-25 showed Trump's approval rating largely unchanged from April, with 45 percent approving and 46 percent disapproving, giving him a net approval rating of -1.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
P'Nut the Squirrel was executed -- not euthanized, his owner claims in bombshell lawsuit
P'Nut wants payback. The beloved pet squirrel and his raccoon sidekick, Fred, were not euthanized – they were viciously executed by New York authorities, according to a blistering new lawsuit. On Oct. 30, a swarm of cops and agents from the state Environmental Conservation and Health departments descended on Mark Longo's upstate Pine City animal sanctuary. Advertisement The two animals were living peacefully inside Longo's home, but it is illegal to keep squirrels and raccoons as pets in New York, where they're classified as wild animals. 4 P'Nut was slaughtered 'not due to a fear of rabies' – but as a 'senseless act of violence' and 'obscene demonstration of government abuse,' the lawsuit charges. PNut the Squirrel/ Instagram During the raid, DEC officials claimed, P'Nut bit one of its agents through thick leather gloves, which required the state to euthanize and decapitate the animals in order to test their brain tissue for rabies. Advertisement Later, the state admitted the rabies tests were both negative – but it has never apologized nor returned the bodies of either pet. The episode, which occurred just before the presidential election, was decried by outraged animal lovers and conservatives alike as a vicious example of governmental overreach. Longo and his wife, Daniela Bittner, doubled down in a 40-page lawsuit filed Friday in Chemung County Supreme Court. 4 Mark Longo and his wife, Daniela Bittner, doubled down in a 40-page lawsuit filed Friday in Chemung County Supreme Court. LP Media Advertisement P'Nut and Fred were slaughtered 'not due to a fear of rabies' – but as a 'senseless act of violence' and 'obscene demonstration of government abuse,' the documents charge. The suit alleges the bite never happened – and if it did, the agent should have been vaccinated against the disease, and trained in the safe handling of animals. 'The fact that none of these factors came into play demonstrates one of two things – that there was in fact no bite, and this story was fabricated, or, if there was a bite, that it was due strictly to the defendants' own incompetence,' the court filing states. 4 'This is our opportunity to make change and seek justice for P'Nut and Fred,' Longo told The Post. PNut the Squirrel/ Instagram Advertisement Longo and Bittner said their demands for the animals' remains have been ignored, and that their killings exceeded the scope of the search warrant executed that day. The couple has suffered emotional trauma and financial losses since losing their star squirrel, who had become an Internet celebrity, appearing in social media posts, OnlyFans content, Cameos and other monetized media, according to the lawsuit. The suit names defendants spanning every level of local and state government, including state DEC agents Erick Dalecki, Richard McNamara, Matthew Baker, Steven Farrand, John Lifrieri and Joshua Crain — who executed the search warrant — along with 20 unidentified DEC investigators. Also named are Chemung County, its sheriff's office and health department, plus 10 unnamed county officials. The City of Elmira, its police department and Elmira Animal Control are also listed, alongside 10 additional unidentified city agents. 4 The lawsuit names state DEC agent Joshua Crain, who executed the search warrant for Longo's Pine City home on Oct. 30. NY State Dept of Environmental Conservation The suit seeks unspecified damages to be determined by a jury trial. 'This is our opportunity to make change and seek justice for P'Nut and Fred,' Longo told The Post. Advertisement 'I hope justice is done, not just for my clients, but for our civil rights, P'Nut and Fred, and all animals,' said his lawyer, Nora Constance Marino. The defendants did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
