logo
How does govt spending work?

How does govt spending work?

By Susan Edmunds of RNZ
With Budget 2025 set to be delivered on Thursday, you are going to hear a lot about government spending this week.
But how does it actually work? Where does the money come from, and where does it go?
The government pulls in money in a few different ways.
Tax revenue is the big one. The government brings in about $120 billion in tax revenue every year.
For the 2025 financial year, that was about $22,613 per person. It gets another $7833 per person from ''other income'' from things such as ACC levies, the emissions trading revenue, and fines.
Just under half the tax it collects comes from individuals paying tax on their income.
Simplicity chief economist Shamubeel Eaqub said while our total tax bill was roughly ''middle of the pack'' for the OECD, we were a bit unique in that our taxes were heavily paid by workers.
We do not have the capital gains or inheritance taxes that some other countries have.
Another 22% of tax collected comes from the GST we pay on things we buy, then 13% is from corporate tax, 6% from ''sin taxes'' such as tax on tobacco and alcohol, and 4% is from tax on interest and dividends.
The money collected in tax is used to pay for the services the government provides.
Social security and welfare is top of the list. Not including NZ Super, that's $6486 per person a year in the latest year.
''People think welfare is just poor people,'' Mr Eaqub said.
''It includes the working poor, things like Working for Families, the accommodation supplement.''
Health is next, at $5804 per person, then NZ Super at $4352 per person a year. Education is in fourth place, at $4197 based on 2025 financial year numbers.
The government also spends $1400 per person per year on law and order, $3061 on transport and communications, $3153 on economic and industrial services, $592 on defence and $536 on environmental protection, among other things.
Spending can be classified as operational activities (sometimes called opex) and investment activities (sometimes called capex).
If you think about the way a household is run, opex might be things such as paying your power bill or doing your grocery shopping.
Capex might be buying a house.
Mr Eaqub said the government would earn about $30,446 for every New Zealander each year, but would spend $37,480.
So it has to cover that $7000 from somewhere, usually through borrowing or selling assets.
Half the shortfall borrowing is funding operating deficit - so that's your power bill or supermarket shopping.
The other 47% is for money that has been used for infrastructure investments.
Provided these were a good investment, this should pay off over time and the borrowing is less of a concern.
The net interest payment made by the government - the difference between the interest on assets such as bonds the government sells to investors and the money it borrows - is about $550 per person per year.
''It's not the borrowing per se that's the problem, it's when you're borrowing for groceries. The last few years, we've done that repeatedly,'' Mr Eaqub said.
''It's not that debt is bad. Debt for stupid things is bad. Debt for high-quality infrastructure is good.''
But the government could not increase spending without increasing either borrowing or tax revenue, he said.
''We can't have it all - we've got to choose. The trick in the coming Budget is that there is no money for new purchases.
''All announcements are funded by cutting something else, a shuffling of the deck chairs.
''We can all agree there is a whole heap of waste in a lot of things but rather than doing a once-over lightly on every line of spend, we've got to pick things we are doing to stop. What are you going to stop? What are you going to start? What are you going to keep?
"If there's a reduced envelope of taxes we've got to make stopping decisions really carefully but also really precisely.''
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NZ 'back on course', govt says
NZ 'back on course', govt says

Otago Daily Times

time3 hours ago

  • Otago Daily Times

NZ 'back on course', govt says

By Russell Palmer of RNZ The government has launched a defence of its record on tackling the cost of living. Finance Minister Nicola Willis joined Prime Minister Christopher Luxon at the Beehive Theatrette for the weekly post-Cabinet briefing. She spent much of the previous week facing questions about her meeting with Fonterra chief executive Miles Hurrell. Luxon said this week marked a full year since the tax bracket changes National campaigned on had come into effect. "It's only through a strong economy that wages rise faster than inflation, that Kiwis can get ahead of their daily costs and our businesses can take risks that can mean that they can invest, grow, and create more jobs," he said. He directly targeted National's main rival in opposition. "Other parties in Parliament believe that raising taxes, growing the public sector, and giving more handouts to those who refuse to work is the answer. Taxing more, spending more, and borrowing more as Labour and others advocate for didn't work in the past and it won't work in the future." The government's decision to increase fees paid to board members on Crown entities - in some cases up to 80 percent - may undercut the messaging that National is prioritising low and middle-income New Zealanders' interests. But Luxon today pointed to the building products changes announced over the weekend, and the proposed ban on payment surcharges as recent examples. He then pointed to other items in the government's agenda, including: the current pipeline of infrastructure projects, Roads of National Significance, completing the City Rail Link, signing trade deals with the United Arab Emirates and Gulf Cooperation Council, starting negotiations with India, the digital nomads visa, and the Investment Boost policy. Willis soon picked up the baton, rattling off her own list of changes the government had made which she said had helped lower costs, including: the Family Boost policy, ending the Reserve Bank's secondary mandate to account for unemployment, curbing government spending, changing residential tenancy laws, tax deductability changes for landlords, delaying the previous government's petrol excise increases, scrapping the Auckland Regional Fuel Tax, increasing rates rebates for seniors, increasing Working for Families support, and extending maximum subscription lengths. She said National had campaigned on tackling the cost of living crisis, and pointed to rising GDP per capita and wages rising faster than inflation as a result of the government's interventions. "Taking the pressure off inflation - that is the general level of price increases across the economy - helps with the cost side of the cost-of-living equation. Lower inflation means less pressure on prices... it's pleasing to say that wages are now growing faster than inflation and forecasts show this trend continuing over the next few years." She said the government's tax changes meant "households have benefited by an average of $60 a fortnight". The change to interest deductibility for landlords had helped to take the heat out of the rental market, she said, noting "the 2.6 increase for the year to June was the lowest since 2011". She said the government was also making big structural changes, saying "the last government conclusively proved that band aids are not enough" and pointing to a series of policies yet to come to fruition: the Going for Housing Growth policy, Fast-tracking renewable energy consenting, work to address supermarket competition, and to curb council rates increases. "Economies are like oil tankers, you can't turn them around on a dime. But New Zealand is back on course," Willis said. The lists of government achievements kept coming, with Willis also pointing to: education reform, the investment boost (again), promoting global trade and investment, changes to the research and development sector, and "delivering infrastructure projects faster and better". Meanwhile, a Cabinet Office Circular reveals the government signed off on increases to fees available to board members of Crown entities. This includes increases of 30 percent for Group 2 and 4 boards and Audit and Risk committees, and an increase of 80 percent for Group 3 bodies. Luxon said the public sector director fees "have got completely out of whack compared to private sector fees". "Obviously we will never pay as much as someone in the private sector but when you are spending $32 billion on healthcare for example, it's important that we are actually able to attract really good governors for the Health NZ board, for example," he said. The changes took effect at the start of July.

Government proposes scaffolding rules change to align with risk level
Government proposes scaffolding rules change to align with risk level

RNZ News

time7 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Government proposes scaffolding rules change to align with risk level

Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver The government wants to streamline "complex" scaffolding rules to cut costs and boost building time. Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden will begin consulting with builders and construction professionals on how to simplify scaffolding rules and the prequalification process. Prequalification checks are done before a company or contractor can bid on or start work, to verify whether they can do a job safely. In a statement, van Velden said there are concerns from the sector scaffolding rules are too complex and have led to a view that scaffolding should be used in all situations, regardless of risk. "Over-compliance needlessly drags down construction productivity, increasing building time and costs for the sector, and impacting new builds and Kiwi homeowners." she said. Photo: 123rf Officials will consult on some proposed new rules, which would let people choose safety options based on how dangerous the job was. "Changes will ensure scaffolding use is better aligned with the level of risk. If it's not very risky, they will not need to use expensive scaffolding. For example, they will be considering whether a ladder could be used instead of scaffolding for a simple roof gutter repair or minor electrical maintenance when working at height. She said many in the industry were frustrated with the time and money prequalifications took to complete. "Businesses feel like they have to jump through hoops to tick a compliance box when getting prequalified, even though the prequalification often involves little reflection of the real-world risks workers face. Some have said they have walked away from clients as the cost of getting prequalified is not worth the value of the work." "A lack of consistency across providers means that suppliers need to get a new prequalification for every job they tender for, with one submitter saying they completed 76 in a year." Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone WorkSafe will work with the industry to revise its prequalification guidance and develop an Approved Code of Practice (ACOP) to cut down on their over-use. The inister said work was also underway to update scaffolding certificate of competence categories, with a review of certificate fees set to follow. "Concerns have been raised about the distinction between qualifications and actual competency. Many feel that on-the-job experience should be better recognised. There's also confusion about what constitutes sufficient training, and frustration with inconsistent advice from regulators," van Velden said. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero], a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Luxon defends voting changes
Luxon defends voting changes

Otago Daily Times

time11 hours ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Luxon defends voting changes

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon. The Prime Minister says the public still have plenty of time to get enrolled to vote despite scrapping same-day enrolment for elections. Last week the government announced legislation to overhaul electoral laws it said had become "unsustainable". The government agreed to close enrolment before advance voting begins, with people needing to enrol or update their details by midnight on the Sunday before advance voting starts on the Monday morning (in other words, 13 days before election day). The legislation sets a requirement of 12 days advance voting at each election, and the changes would mean special vote processing could get underway sooner. On Monday morning, Newsroom reported Attorney-General Judith Collins, had said the proposed law changes clashed with constitutional rights in a report. She indicated 100,000 or more people could be directly or indirectly disenfranchised by rules banning enrolment in the final 13 days before an election. Collins declined an interview with RNZ on the issue. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said Collins had a statutory responsibility to review legislation to make sure it was consistent with the bill of rights. "As a government we think enrolment should happen before early voting starts," he said. Luxon pointed to Australia as an example of a country that does not allow enrolment on the same day as voting. "We want everyone to participate but it's just done two weeks before elections day. It's not uncommon, it gives people plenty of time to get enrolled and get sorted. "All we're saying is we want everybody to participate in our democracy... not an unreasonable request." On Election Day 2023 110,000 people enrolled to vote or updated their details.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store