Starmer says government 'will look at' scrapping two-child benefits limit
In his strongest hint yet that he will perform a U-turn - when asked if he would scrap the two-child benefit cap, Sir Keir said: "We'll look at all options of driving down child poverty."
The cap means families can only claim child tax credit and universal credit for their first two children, if they were born after April 2017.
It was introduced in 2017 by the Conservative government, and in 2023, Sir Keir ruled out scrapping it.
However, as Labour came to power last year, he said the party wanted to remove the cap but only when fiscal conditions allowed.
But he then doubled down on refusing to lift it, suspending seven Labour MPs shortly after the election victory for voting with the SNP to remove the cap.
1:01
Ministers had toed the party line for months, but the narrative started to shift in May, with Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson telling Sky News on Tuesday lifting the cap is "not off the table" - and "it's certainly something that we're considering".
Sir Keir was also reported to have asked the Treasury to see how scrapping it could be funded.
His words on Thursday are his strongest indication yet, that he could lift the cap soon.
1:01
It would mean a second benefits U-turn after he made a shock announcement last week that he was going to relax the winter fuel payment cut.
The policy, announced soon after Labour won the election, has caused anger among Sir Keir's own MPs as it restricted the previously universal payment to those who receive pension credit.
It will now be available to "more pensioners", but details of who and when have not been revealed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
22 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Alan Turing Institute scraps diversity drive under pressure from ministers
Britain's leading artificial intelligence (AI) institute has scrapped a key diversity scheme after coming under pressure from ministers. The initiative from The Alan Turing Institute, which last year was handed £100m in taxpayer funding, had aimed to get more women into science and promote 'equity in the data science and AI fields'. However, the programme has now been axed following a review by the organisation's board amid calls for it to focus increasingly on defence. The decision means the institute will no longer have a mandate to investigate 'diversity and inclusion in online and physical workplace cultures', while it will also end inquiries into how 'social bias' risks being built into machine learning systems. It comes just days after Peter Kyle, the Technology Secretary, urged the institute to 'reform'. In a letter to Doug Gurr, the former Amazon executive who is now chairman of the organisation's board of trustees, Mr Kyle said it must 'evolve and adapt' to 'prioritise its defence, national security and sovereign capabilities'. Drift from core mission Originally launched by David Cameron in 2015, the institute has come under growing scrutiny after it was awarded the £100m government funding. This week, a report from British Progress argued the organisation had 'lost its way' and needed 'major reform'. The think tank said the institute had a 'fragmented and thinly spread research portfolio' and that it had been 'susceptible to mission creep'. The report added: 'The most significant example of this has been its drift away from its core technical mission toward work rooted in social and political critique.' British Progress warned that, if it failed to reform, there would be grounds to 'decommission the institute entirely'. While the institute has made moves towards reforming its research, its staff have also criticised its allegedly chaotic management and a lack of diversity in senior roles. Last year, more than 180 staff signed a letter questioning its decision to hire four top male academics, as they criticised a 'trend of limited diversity within the institute's senior scientific leadership'. In December, The Telegraph reported that external consultants had raised concerns from staff about 'tokenism' and 'nepotism' at the institute, warning of 'pervasive issues of low morale'. That month, staff also sent a no-confidence letter to its leadership team and board, warning it had been left 'rudderless'. The scrapping of the gender representation scheme comes amid a wider retreat across the technology sector, with many businesses rowing back on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies after Donald Trump's return to the White House. The institute was named after the Second World War computer scientist Alan Turing, who was persecuted for his homosexuality. The mathematician, who died in 1954, led Britain's codebreakers at Bletchley Park and helped to design a machine to crack Nazi Germany's Enigma messages. Yet in recent years, the institute has been dogged by concerns that it missed out on the emergence of a new wave of technology. In 2023, a report from the Tony Blair Institute argued it had 'not kept the UK at the cutting edge of international AI developments '. A spokesman for the institute said it was in the process of reviewing 100 projects, two of which had been axed. They added: 'We're shaping a new phase for the institute focused on delivering real-world impact against society's biggest challenges and will respond to the national need to double down on our work in defence, national security and sovereign capabilities.'
BBC News
22 minutes ago
- BBC News
Africa to be hit hard as foreign aid cuts revealed
The government has revealed details of its plans to cut foreign aid, with support for children's education and women's health in Africa facing the biggest government said in February it would slash foreign aid spending by 40% - from 0.5% of gross national income to 0.3% - to increase defence spending to 2.5% after pressure from the US. A Foreign Office report and impact assessment show the biggest cuts this year will come in Africa, with less spent on women's health and water sanitation with increased risks, it says, of disease and death. Bond, a UK network of aid organisations, said women and children in the most marginalised communities would pay the highest price. As well as less support for Africa, including big cuts in children's education, funding for the Occupied Palestinian Territories will fall by 21% despite promises to the the government said spending on multilateral aid bodies - money given to international organisations like the World Bank - would be protected, including the Gavi vaccine alliance, and it said the UK would also continue to play a key humanitarian role in hotspots such as Gaza, Ukraine and Sudan. Baroness Chapman, minister for development, said: "Every pound must work harder for UK taxpayers and the people we help around the world and these figures show how we are starting to do just that through having a clear focus and priorities."The government said the cuts follow "a line-by-line strategic review of aid" by the minister, which focused on "prioritisation, efficiency, protecting planned humanitarian support and live contracts while ensuring responsible exit from programming where necessary".The Foreign Office said bilateral support - aid going directly to the recipient country - for some countries would decrease and multilateral organisations deemed to be underperforming would face future funding cuts. It has not yet announced which countries will be said it was clear the government was "deprioritising" funding "for education, gender and countries experiencing humanitarian crises such as South Sudan, Ethiopia and Somalia, and surprisingly the Occupied Palestinian Territories and Sudan, which the government said would be protected"."It is concerning that bilateral funding for Africa, gender, education and health programmes will drop," Bond policy director Gideon Rabinowitz said."The world's most marginalised communities, particularly those experiencing conflict and women and girls, will pay the highest price for these political choices."At a time when the US has gutted all gender programming, the UK should be stepping up, not stepping back."Foreign aid has come under intense scrutiny in recent years, with the one cabinet minister admitting the public no longer supports spending on it. One organisation that escaped the cuts was the World Bank. The Foreign Office confirmed that the International Development Association (IDA), the World Bank's fund for the world's lowest income countries, would receive £1.98bn in funding from the UK over the next three years, helping the organisation benefit 1.9 billion Labour governments under Sir Tony Blair and Gordon Brown committed to increasing the overseas aid budget to 0.7% of national target was reached in 2013 under David Cameron's Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition government, before being enshrined in law in aid spending was cut to 0.5% of national income in 2021 under the Conservatives, blaming the economic pressures of Covid.
Telegraph
22 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The great British public keeps being forced to bail out our incompetent political class
To the surprise of nobody, our water industry has been found wanting. An ineffective regulator allowed self-serving companies to enrich shareholders and directors at the expense of the public interest for decades. Instead of investing in our creaking Victorian infrastructure, water companies were saddled with debt by their private owners to pay out dividends. Billions of pounds were funnelled from Thames Water alone, funded largely through then-owner, Macquarie, which more than tripled the utility provider's debt burden to £10.8bn in just 11 years. Most recently, the firm paid 21 senior staff £2.5m in bonuses in April as a reward for taking on an eye-watering loan, partly to plug the gaps of said wealth extraction. Thames Water is not alone in this. Over the past decade, more than £112m has been paid in bonuses to senior staff at water utility firms, despite their consistent failures as either public good or private enterprise. These businesses dumped raw sewage into the nation's waterways for 3.6 million hours in 2024 because their ancient systems, left unimproved for decades, are overwhelmed by modern requirements. But of course it is we, the British public, who are being charged for cleaning up someone else's mess yet again. The eternal mugs, and doormats for the incompetent, we will be saddled with a hefty increase in our water bills to fund the ever-worsening services we enjoy. Don't forget, this comes on the back of a roughly 30-50pc rise three months ago, depending on your provider. But we can't be surprised they've taken us for fools again. This is just the latest kick in the teeth in a dense history of tooth-kicking. If there's one thing the British public can rely upon, it's paying for the privilege of decline. Draw an infrastructure project out of the hat, and you'll find a spiralling bill and a bumbling bunch of executives soon to be called in front of a committee hearing explaining why there's no sign of what was promised – and why they couldn't possibly return their fee. Promised to open in 2026 for a cost of £31bn, HS2 was set to connect London to Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds on high speed rail. Now, it will open no earlier than 2036 for a cost of more than £100bn, and will only run from London to Birmingham. If we're lucky. For more than triple the cost, we're set for a third of the railway to be delivered in double the time. And who'll be footing the bill? You guessed it. Even on our current tracks, we're being taken for a ride. Rail fares rose yet again this year, but only 68pc of services depart on time. We're finally set for a new nuclear power plant a decade from now in the form of Sizewell C at a bargain cost of just £38bn. Excellent news, but nobody mention the fact it was supposed to be operational by now for a total cost of £20bn. Don't forget our crumbling services. Councils continue to raise taxes while they shift our bin collections to once every three weeks. Yes, the burden of funding care costs leaves a large dent in local authority finances, but pouring £665m into an (alleged) sham can't help. It's not just the failed investments and obscene borrowing that our local councillors are learning from the water sector. They also enjoy golden parachutes for bankrupting their organisations, and saddling us with the bill. Not to mention how difficult it is to get a GP appointment (no wonder record numbers now use private healthcare) or an NHS dentist, find a local school or have the police investigate a burglary. At some point, the gravy train of incompetence will come to a juddering halt. Whether that's because we start to hold those responsible to account or simply run out of money to burn in its engines is anybody's guess.
