FBI investigating death on board Carnival Dream cruise ship
A spokesperson for the FBI's Houston Office told Fox News Digital that an incident happened around Wednesday, July 23, on board the ship. At the time, the Dream was in the area of Belize City during a 6-day Western Caribbean voyage. It returned to Galveston, Texas, on Saturday.
"An FBI maritime liaison agent, based out of the Texas City resident agency, is coordinating with the U.S. Coast Guard, Customs and Border Protection, and the cruise line regarding this incident," the spokesperson added, stating that they could not provide more information because of "the ongoing nature of the investigation."
A Carnival spokesperson confirmed to Fox News Digital on Monday that a death had occurred, noting that "It is standard practice for the FBI to review deaths that occur on cruise ships."
"This routine protocol ensures transparency. It does not automatically imply suspicious circumstances, and the facts of this matter do not suggest any such activity. We extend our heartfelt sympathy to our guest's family and loved ones in this difficult time," the spokesperson added.
The FBI spokesperson also said "the FBI is the primary federal agency authorized to investigate potential crimes on the high seas."
Passengers told KHOU that on the day of the incident, they were awoken around 3 or 4 a.m. to sirens, with one traveler claiming to have heard an announcement requesting medical assistance on the adults-only Serenity Deck.
The ship can carry up to 3,646 guests and also made two stops in Mexico during the trip during which the incident happened.
The Carnival Dream is scheduled to dock in Key West, Florida, on Monday as a stop on a trip to the Bahamas, according to the website Cruisemapper.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
19 minutes ago
- Fox News
WATCH: Trump says he is hopeful Hillary Clinton will be investigated for election fraud
Speaking with reporters on Friday afternoon, President Donald Trump expressed that he is hopeful former presidential opponent Hillary Clinton will finally be investigated for election fraud. Shortly before departing for New Jersey, Trump was asked by a reporter, "Will Hillary Clinton finally be investigated for election fraud?" Trump answered, "I hope so, I hope so. I don't know whether or not that'll happen, but I hope so." During his brief exchange with reporters outside the White House, Trump also repeatedly criticized Bureau of Labor Statistics Commissioner Erika McEntarfer, whom he recently removed. The president connected his recent decision to fire McEntarfer, whom he accused of falsifying jobs report numbers, to efforts to sway previous elections against him. "You have to have honest reports and when you look at those numbers or when you look at just before the election and then after the election, they corrected it by 8 or 900,000 jobs," he said. "Why should anybody trust numbers? You go back to election day. Look what happened 2 or 3 days before with massive, wonderful jobs numbers, trying to get him elected or her elected, trying to get whoever the hell was running because you go back and they came out with numbers that were very favorable to Kamala," he went on. "And then on the 15th of November or thereabouts, they added 8 or 900,000 overstatement reduction right after the election." Addressing a reporter directly, Trump added, "It didn't work because, you know who won, John? I won." Trump's comments regarding Clinton hearken back all the way to his first presidential campaign during which he warned that if he were president he would get his attorney general to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate her behavior. In one of the 2016 debates Trump famously quipped to Clinton that if he was president: "you'd be in jail." As president, however, Trump has not moved to prosecute Clinton, who served as former President Barack Obama's secretary of state from 2009 to 2013. This July, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard released evidence that she said suggest the Obama administration promoted a "contrived narrative" that Russia interfered in the 2016 election. "There is irrefutable evidence that details how President Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false," Gabbard said. "They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help President Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true. It wasn't." "We have referred and will continue to refer all of these documents to the Department of Justice and the FBI, to investigate the criminal implications of this for the evidence," Gabbard said. "The evidence that we have found, and that we have released, directly point to President Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment. There are multiple pieces of evidence and intelligence that confirm that fact." In a July interview, Trump described the Russiagate allegations against Obama and members of his administration as "serious treason." "What they've done is so bad for this country. And it really started right at the 2016 election," Trump claimed of Gabbard's findings. "And there's a difference when you know it — and when you know it, and it's all written down for you. I mean, it's all there. It's right there. The orders, the memos, the whole thing. It's right there."
New York Times
21 minutes ago
- New York Times
Durham's Debunking of the ‘Clinton Plan' Emails, Explained
Kash Patel, the F.B.I. director, and other Trump allies have declared that a newly declassified report on the Russia investigation provides 'evidence that the Clinton campaign plotted to frame President Trump and fabricate the Russia collusion hoax.' The reality is almost precisely the opposite. The report shows that a purported email that Trump supporters have long tried to portray as a smoking gun is instead most likely a fake. Russian spies appear to have tried to make it seem authentic by assembling passages lifted from actual emails by different hacking victims. Here is a closer look. What is the issue? In recent weeks, the Trump administration has declassified a series of reports and documents related to the origins of the Russia inquiry as it has sought to change the subject from its broken promise to release Jeffrey Epstein files. Mr. Trump and his aides have coupled those releases with wild and inaccurate claims about what they show, spinning the reports as proof of his long-running narrative that the investigation was a hoax instigated by enemies for political reasons. There are different versions of this narrative: blaming President Barack Obama and his appointees, a supposed cabal of career national security officials, Hillary Clinton and her 2016 presidential campaign, or some combination of them. The latest declassification centers on Mrs. Clinton. What is the 'Clinton Plan' theory? The theory posits that Mrs. Clinton and her campaign must have set out to frame Mr. Trump for collusion by putting forward information they knew to be false. It is a way to blame Mrs. Clinton for the fact that Mr. Trump's campaign came under suspicions that prompted the Russia investigation eventually led by Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel. In reality, the F.B.I. opened its investigation based on a lead it received from the Australian government in late July 2016, after WikiLeaks released Democratic emails stolen by Russian hackers and disrupted the Democratic convention. The tip involved a Trump campaign adviser suggesting, before the hacking had become public, that the campaign had received outreach from Russia and knew what it would do. Trump allies interested in blaming Mrs. Clinton's campaign have focused, as an origin story, on a purported July 27, 2016, email that said Mrs. Clinton had approved a plan by a campaign foreign policy adviser to link Mr. Trump to Russia as a way of distracting from the scandal over her use of a personal email server while secretary of state. When did the 'Clinton Plan' enter the discourse? It became a topic of discussion in late September 2020, as that year's presidential campaign neared an end. John Ratcliffe, a top intelligence official under Mr. Trump, declassified and made public that Russian intelligence analysis claimed Mrs. Clinton had 'approved a campaign plan to stir up a scandal' against Mr. Trump by tying him to President Vladimir V. Putin and Russian hacking. While acknowledging that the information might be inaccurate or a fabrication, Mr. Ratcliffe also revealed that John Brennan, the C.I.A. director in 2016, had mentioned this claim in Russian intelligence analysis in a briefing to Mr. Obama about Russia's election meddling in August of that year. Later, John H. Durham, the special counsel appointed by the Trump administration to scour the Russia investigation for wrongdoing, referred to the purported email in his 2023 final report as the 'Clinton Plan intelligence.' Where did the information come from? In 2016, a Dutch spy agency hacked a Russian spy agency and copied internal memos and messages by Russian intelligence analysts. The Russians were writing reports about various topics based on the emails of American victims of Russian hacking operations. The Dutch shared a copy of the trove with the United States. From the beginning, U.S. officials have said, they viewed the material with caution. Among other things, some reports were said to make inconsistent or false claims — raising the possibility that Russians had exaggerated things for their own purposes, or knew the server was compromised and deliberately mixed in disinformation. What is the new report? It is a 29-page annex to Mr. Durham's 2023 report. The annex, which was declassified on Thursday, quotes the purported July 27 email and reveals that there was a related one on July 25. The report also shows how Mr. Durham expended significant effort trying to prove that the emails were real, but gathered evidence that led him to conclude that Russian spies likely concocted them. What are the two purported emails? Both are attributed to Leonard Benardo of the Open Society Foundations network, the philanthropic arm of the liberal financier George Soros, whom Russian state media and some conservatives have vilified. The July 25 message contained two paragraphs about reporting on the hacking of the Democratic National Committee and its political impact. It then stated: 'Julie says it will be a long-term affair to demonize Putin and Trump. Now it is good for a post-convention bounce. Later the F.B.I. will put more oil into the fire.' The message dated July 27 opens by claiming that 'HRC approved Julia's idea about Trump and Russian hackers hampering U.S. elections. That should distract people from her own missing email, especially if the affair goes to the Olympic level.' An accompanying memo by Russian intelligence analysts identified the person who supposedly proposed the plan as neither Julie nor Julia, but Julianne Smith, a foreign policy adviser for the Clinton campaign who worked at a think tank called the Center for a New American Security. What did interviews show? Early in his scrutiny of the purported emails in 2020 and early 2021, Mr. Durham wrote, he interviewed several intelligence analysts who said that the emails appeared 'likely authentic.' But he described subsequently gathering evidence that pointed in the other direction. Some of the evidence was interviews that took place later in 2021 and in 2022. Mrs. Clinton and high-level campaign officials told Mr. Durham that the material Mr. Ratcliffe had declassified was ridiculous and looked like Russian disinformation. Ms. Smith said she had not seen the purported Benardo emails and had no memory of suggesting to campaign leaders that they should attack Mr. Trump over Russia. After Mr. Benardo saw the purported emails in May 2021, he said that they were unfamiliar, and that he did not recall drafting them, did not know who 'Julie' was and would not use the phrase 'put more oil into the fire.' What did think tank emails show? Mr. Durham did not identify the intended recipients of the emails supposedly from Mr. Benardo. But he gathered emails from four liberal-leaning think tanks, including Mr. Benardo's employer and Ms. Smith's, in an effort to find copies proving they were real. The organizations did not have copies of the purported emails on their servers. But in that process, Mr. Durham uncovered other 'emails, attachments and documents that contain language and references with the exact same or similar verbiage' to the two messages. Those included a July 25 email by a Carnegie Endowment cybersecurity expert that contained an extensive passage about Russian hacking that was echoed, verbatim, as the opening of the purported July 25 message attributed to Mr. Benardo. Was there any contrary evidence? Mr. Durham obtained text messages from Ms. Smith on July 25 showing that she had unsuccessfully tried to determine whether the F.B.I. had opened an investigation into the Democratic National Committee breach, although she did not mention Mr. Trump. That exchange, Mr. Durham wrote, 'supports the notion that the campaign might have wanted or expected F.B.I. or other agencies to aid that effort' by investigating the hacking. He also obtained a July 27 email from Ms. Smith asking her colleagues at the think tank to sign a bipartisan statement criticizing Mr. Trump's denunciations of NATO as reckless and too friendly to Russia. That email 'certainly lends at least some credence that such a plan existed,' Mr. Durham wrote. What else was in the trove of Russian memos? It included other evidence supporting doubts about whether the emails were real. There were two versions of the supposed July 25 email — one that contained a sentence referring to the Olympics doping scandal and one that did not have it. There were also messages between Russians reacting to material appearing in American news outlets about the Russian hacking. The Trump administration redacted some discussion and details about those messages, but Mr. Durham cited them directly in between reproducing the July 25 and July 27 messages. In one, Russians discussed creating something that would seem to come from 'some dark forces, like the F.B.I. for instance, or better yet, Clinton sympathizers in IC, Pentagon, Deep State,' using an apparent abbreviation for intelligence community. The other appeared to discuss making something to 'illuminate' how Mrs. Clinton was trying to vilify Moscow and discredit Mr. Putin and Mr. Trump. The purported July 27 email was attached to that message, Mr. Durham reported. What is the bottom line? The two crucial emails were most likely manufactured by Russian spies, who appear to have assembled them in part using passages lifted from various hacked messages written by people other than Mr. Benardo. 'The office's best assessment is that the July 25 and July 27 emails that purport to be from Benardo were ultimately a composite of several emails that were obtained through Russian intelligence hacking of the U.S.-based think tanks, including the Open Society Foundations, the Carnegie Endowment and others,' Mr. Durham's annex says.
Fox News
21 minutes ago
- Fox News
President Trump says he is hopeful Hillary Clinton will be investigated for election fraud
President Donald Trump expressed that he is hopeful former presidential opponent Hillary Clinton will finally be investigated for election fraud.
