
Paper checks ending! 500,000 seniors must act fast as social security goes digital this fall
For the roughly half a million Americans who still walk out to their mailbox each month for a Social Security check, big changes are coming—and fast.
Starting September 30, 2025, the Social Security Administration (SSA) will stop mailing paper checks altogether. That means all federal benefit payments, including Social Security, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), and others, will be delivered electronically only—either via direct deposit or through a government-issued debit card. This shift was ordered by President Trump in March 2025 as part of a broader federal push to modernize and secure government payments.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Select a Course Category
Data Science
Data Science
Leadership
Others
Artificial Intelligence
Healthcare
CXO
others
Cybersecurity
Degree
Data Analytics
Management
PGDM
MCA
healthcare
Operations Management
Digital Marketing
Design Thinking
Project Management
Product Management
Technology
Public Policy
MBA
Finance
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
11 Months
IIT Madras
CERT-IITM Advanced Cert Prog in AI and ML India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
11 Months
E&ICT Academy, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati
CERT-IITG Postgraduate Cert in AI and ML India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
30 Weeks
IIM Kozhikode
SEPO - IIMK-AI for Senior Executives India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
10 Months
E&ICT Academy, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati
CERT-IITG Prof Cert in DS & BA with GenAI India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
10 Months
IIM Kozhikode
CERT-IIMK DABS India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Who is affected by the end of paper Social Security checks?
Although more than 73 million Americans receive Social Security benefits today, less than 1%—roughly 520,000 people—still get paper checks in the mail. This group includes:
Seniors over 80
Those living in rural or tribal areas
Live Events
Individuals without bank accounts
People with disabilities or limited digital access
SSA says it's already reaching out directly to these beneficiaries to ensure they know about the change and have time to switch to an electronic option.
Why is this change happening now?
This move to go fully paperless isn't just about convenience—it's about security and savings. According to the U.S. Treasury:
Paper checks are 16 times more likely to be lost or stolen than electronic payments.
Switching to digital methods could save the government up to $750 million annually.
Plus, electronic payments are faster and more reliable, arriving directly in beneficiaries' bank accounts or on prepaid debit cards like Direct Express®.
What do you need to do before the September 30 deadline?
If you're still receiving a paper check, you need to take action now to avoid a payment delay—or worse, a disruption in benefits.
Here are your options:
Set up direct deposit:
You can link your Social Security benefits to your checking or savings account. This is the fastest and most secure option.
Enroll in the Direct Express® card program:
If you don't have a bank account, the government offers a prepaid debit card that automatically loads your benefits each month. It's a great option for the unbanked.
Apply for a waiver:
If switching to electronic payments poses a serious hardship—for example, if you live in a remote area without banking access—you may be eligible for a Treasury Department waiver. But you must apply before September 30.
You can make these changes by:
Visiting GoDirect.gov
Logging into your mySocialSecurity account
Calling 1-800-772-1213
Or stopping by your local SSA office
What happens if you don't switch in time?
If you miss the September 30 deadline and don't apply for a waiver, your Social Security payments may be delayed, held, or temporarily suspended until you set up an approved electronic option. SSA has warned that high call volumes and in-person visits could create long wait times as the deadline approaches, so it's best to act early.
Is anyone concerned about this transition?
While the change promises savings and security, advocates are concerned about vulnerable groups:
Seniors who aren't tech-savvy
Individuals without internet or smartphone access
Residents in rural or tribal areas with limited infrastructure
Organizations are urging the SSA to ensure a smooth transition and offer adequate support for those most at risk of losing access to benefits.
Don't wait to act
The shift away from paper checks marks a major milestone in how Social Security benefits are delivered. But for the 500,000+ Americans still relying on their mailboxes, the message is clear: September 30 is your deadline.
Make sure you're set up for direct deposit or get your Direct Express® card soon. If you or someone you care about might struggle with this transition, now's the time to help them take action.
Need help walking through the process or finding the right option? I can assist with that—just ask.
FAQs:
Q1: When will Social Security paper checks stop?
A1:
Paper checks for Social Security will end on
September 30, 2025
.
Q2: What if I don't have a bank account for my Social Security benefits?
A2:
You can use the
Direct Express® debit card
to receive your payments.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump, EU's Von Der Leyen cite conflicting details on trade deal
President Trump and European Commission President Von der Leyen's new trade agreement reveals discrepancies in key details, highlighting the challenges in its implementation. The EU agreed to a 15% tariff on most exports to the US, but disagreements persist regarding pharmaceuticals, steel, and aluminum. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen appear to differ on some key details in their new trade agreement, underscoring the difficulty they may have in turning this deal into a European Union said it would accept a 15% tariff on nearly all its exports to the US. Trump told reporters that the bloc also agreed to open up its 'countries to trade at zero tariff.'After he met with von der Leyen Sunday, Trump said that the deal would not include pharmaceuticals, a contentious point in the negotiations, seeming to imply they would be subject to a higher a separate news conference, von der Leyen said, 'The EU agreed we have 15% for pharmaceuticals.' But she added, 'Whatever decisions later – by the president of the US – that's on a different sheet of paper.'Senior US officials later said that the two sides agreed on a 15% tariff level for the EU's pharmaceutical exports. A separate Section 232 probe on pharmaceuticals is still coming over the next three weeks, but the EU tariff level will remain at 15%, the officials US has initiated investigations into whether the import of certain products, such as aerospace and semiconductors, poses a national security threat to the country. This could lead to separate tariffs on some accords typically require years of negotiations and can run thousands of pages long. Talks on the preliminary agreement clinched on Sunday began in April and concrete details appear EU and US also diverged on another controversial sector, with Trump saying that the 50% tariff on steel and aluminum 'stays the way it is.' Von der Leyen said that metal 'tariffs will be cut and a quota system will be put in place.'The deal doesn't cover the EU's steel and aluminum exports, which will remain subject to 50% tariffs, according to senior US officials. Aerospace tariffs, meanwhile, will remain at 0% pending the outcome of a Section 232 probe, the officials der Leyen argued that she won certainty and stability for companies on both sides of the Atlantic. But it's far from clear that the EU and US will be able to iron out all their differences on the many contentious issues yet to deal with.'The focus will now turn to interpretation and implementation risk, posing a mix of political and technical questions,' Carsten Nickel, deputy director of research at Teneo, wrote in a note. 'Given the nature of the deal, major uncertainties are likely to persist.'
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
17 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Asian shares mixed as Wall Street rally lifts US stocks to fresh records
Stock markets in Asia were mixed on Monday after US stocks rose to more records as they closed out another winning week. US futures and oil prices were higher ahead of trade talks in Stockholm between US and Chinese officials. European futures rose after the European Union forged a deal with the Trump administration calling for 15 per cent tariffs on most exports to the US. The agreement announced after President Donald Trump and European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen met briefly at Trump's Turnberry golf course in Scotland staves off far higher import duties on both sides that might have sent shock waves through economies around the globe. Tokyo's Nikkei 225 index lost 1 per cent to 41,056.81 after doubts surfaced over what exactly the trade truce between Japan and US President Donald Trump, especially the $550 billion pledge of investment in the US by Japan, will entail. Terms of the deal are still being negotiated and nothing has been formalized in writing, said an official, who insisted on anonymity to detail the terms of the talks. The official suggested the goal was for a $550 billion fund to make investments at Trump's direction. Hong Kong's Hang Seng index gained 0.4 per cent to 25,490.45 while the Shanghai Composite index lost 0.2 per cent to 3,587.25. Taiwan's Taiex rose 0.3 per cent. CK Hutchison, a Hong Kong conglomerate that's selling ports at the Panama Canal, said it may seek a Chinese investor to join a consortium of buyers in a move that might please Beijing but could also bring more U.S. scrutiny to a geopolitically fraught deal. CK Hutchison's shares fell 0.6 per cent on Monday in Hong Kong. Elsewhere in Asia, South Korea's Kospi was little changed at 3,195.49, while Australia's S&P/ASX 200 rose 0.3 per cent to 8,688.40. India's Sensex slipped 0.1 per cent. Markets in Thailand were closed for a holiday. On Friday, the S&P 500 rose 0.4 per cent to 6,388.64, setting an all-time for the fifth time in a week. The Dow Jones Industrial Average climbed 0.5 per cent to 44,901.92, while the Nasdaq composite added 0.2 per cent, closing at 21,108.32 to top its own record. Deckers, the company behind Ugg boots and Hoka shoes, jumped 11.3 per cent after reporting stronger profit and revenue for the spring than analysts expected. Its growth was particularly strong outside the United States, where revenue soared nearly 50 per cent. But Intell fell 8.5 per cent after reporting a loss for the latest quarter, when analysts were looking for a profit. The struggling chipmaker also said it would cut thousands of jobs and eliminate other expenses as it tries to turn around its fortunes. Intel, which helped launch Silicon Valley as the U.S. technology hub, has fallen behind rivals like Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices while demand for artificial intelligence chips soars. Companies are under pressure to deliver solid growth in profits to justify big gains for their stock prices, which have rallied to record after record in recent weeks. Wall Street has zoomed higher on hopes that President Donald Trump will reach trade deals with other countries that will lower his stiff proposed tariffs, along with the risk that they could cause a recession and drive up inflation. Trump has recently announced deals with Japan and the Philippines, and the next big deadline is looming on Friday, Aug 1. Apart from trade talks, this week will also feature a meeting by the Federal Reserve on interest rates. Trump again on Thursday lobbied the Fed to cut rates, which he has implied could save the US government money on its debt repayments. Fed Chair Jerome Powell has said he is waiting for more data about how Trump's tariffs affect the economy and inflation before making a move. The widespread expectation on Wall Street is that the Fed will wait until September to resume cutting interest rates. In other dealings early Monday, US benchmark crude oil gained 24 cents to $65.40 per barrel. Brent crude, the international standard, also added 24 cents to $67.90 per barrel. The dollar rose to 147.72 Japanese yen from 147.71 yen. The euro slipped to $1.1755 from $1.1758. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)


Economic Times
17 minutes ago
- Economic Times
There is more scope for Indian investment in the UK than the other way around: Swaminathan Aiyar
Swaminathan Aiyar, Consulting Editor, ET Now, says India stands as a prominent investor in the UK, with the Tata Group leading as the largest private sector employer. Enhanced by relaxed social security deductions for IT workers, increased Indian investment in the UK's IT sector appears promising. Opportunities also exist for Indian professionals in finance, media, and sports, potentially fostering a beneficial two-way exchange of skills and remittances. ADVERTISEMENT But the list is long when it comes to some labour intensive sectors, be it from auto ancillary to leather to processed food. Which can be the biggest beneficiary according to you? Swaminathan Aiyar: The government is anxious to emphasise that there will be job creation in artisanal, labour-intensive sectors like leather or textiles or auto ancillaries. I would just say that in the long run, we need to look away from the labour-intensive field. Our comparative advantage is in skills. We are very competitive in skills. We are not competitive on labour costs for there are a large number of issues on the labour side. It includes the very large number of holidays we have in India compared with anybody else, and relatively short hours of work. Because of all this, I do not think India has a great advantage in the labour-intensive sector which the government claims it wants to promote as our labour laws do not really promote that. So that is the real problem, our own labour laws, not the trade barriers in Europe, not the trade barriers in the UK. And we would have to do something about that. In auto ancillaries, we can certainly have a move up. The British car industry has disappeared in terms of British names, but the multinationals of the world are there, certainly the Japanese and Korean companies and we can export there and hopefully at some point of time, we will even be able to export to Jaguar which is very high-end in terms of the auto parts, but Tata owns it. We are not competitive in large cars, but we are definitely competitive in small cars. For countries in Europe, and in England, small cars are preferable, whereas in the USA, it is large cars. Small cars are preferable because of very high prices of petrol and because of a lack of parking spaces. Americans have huge parking spaces for their large cars. Britain and Europe are much more constrained by space. So, our small car exports should have a chance of rising significantly. It will also depend of course on what happens to the tariffs of various rivals. Malaysia, Thailand, China, all of these are competitors in small car areas. So, I am not sure what will happen out there, but if we have a good deal, if we have a very low tariff regime and they do not, that will clearly give us a benefit in the UK. Does the FTA lay groundwork for wider cooperation in technology, green energy, and mobility? Will it also help boost investments in a meaningful way according to you? Swaminathan Aiyar: There are a number of issues. As far as investment is concerned, will this help mutual investment? Will this help Indian investment in the UK? Will it help British investment in India? I am not sure to what extent it will boost British investment in India. The reason is that Britain hardly produces many goods anymore. It used to be a large exporter of goods, but it has substantially deindustrialised and become a services sector. So, it will want to do something more on the services sector which we should allow because we are competitive in services, we should allow them to come in. But again, if somebody comes into the services with a GCC, it will not involve very much investment. It will certainly generate revenue. It will help generate skills. It will be skilling of the Indian workforce. There will be exports involved, but do not expect very heavy investment. It does not take a lot of heavy investment to start an R&D centre into artificial intelligence. So that is the kind of thing the British may be investing in India. ADVERTISEMENT India is one of the biggest investors in the UK. The Tata Group is the largest single employer in the private sector in the entire United Kingdom. I mean, it has TCS, it has Jaguar, and it has its steel plant out there and those together are a massive amount of investment, a massive amount of jobs. Will that trend increase? Yes, it could increase. But as I said, that is now fundamentally a services economy. It is no longer a large-scale producer of merchandise. So, can Indian companies like TCS which are already well established increase their footprint? Yes, I should think so, especially now that there is this freedom in terms of social security deductions. Earlier, if an IT worker went there, a significant part of his salary was cut saying this is a social security contribution although he would never get it back as a pension in his old age. Now that that is being waived for three years, we will be able to send lots more people for up to three years and this should induce much more Indian investment in the IT sector there. I hope that happens. It looks promising. Of course, the other thing is that will there be more Indian writers for Financial Times and The Economist or more Indian footballers going into the Premier League, some of these areas and of course, there is the stock market. I mean, Britain is a highly financialised market with a huge stock market. It already has a significant number of Indian names that are already well known. I imagine that number could go up. How many of them would retain a close connection with India? I am not sure. But you could hope that a significant number of people go there and they improve their skills, send home remittances, and later on perhaps come back and open businesses here, so that is what we look forward to, something happening two-way and on this frankly I see more scope for Indian investment in the UK than the other way around. (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)