
Juror's cocaine conviction upends attempted murder trial in Georgia
In a unanimous ruling published Thursday, three judges of the Georgia Court of Appeals granted Darren Mills' request for a new trial in the criminal case accusing him of attempting to kill a drug dealer during an armed robbery in Atlanta. Mills is serving a 30-year sentence in Calhoun State Prison on several convictions including attempted murder, armed robbery and participation in criminal street gang activity.
The judges said one of the jurors in Mills' 2017 trial, referred to in the ruling as 'C.L.L.,' said nothing when the trial judge asked prospective jurors if they had been convicted of a felony and not had their rights restored. Georgia law generally prohibits convicted felons from serving on juries.
In a posttrial hearing, the juror testified she had never been pardoned for her crime, according to the ruling. It shows the juror was initially sentenced under Georgia's First Offender Act, which gives defendants the opportunity to have the record of their conviction erased. The juror's conviction remained because she violated her probation by possessing cocaine, case records show.
'We are obviously happy about it,' Mills' lawyer, Matthew Winchester, said Friday about the ruling. 'We think that's the right result.'
Winchester said he'll seek Mills' release from custody on bond as soon as the case is returned to the trial court. He said prosecutors from the Fulton County district attorney's office have indicated they will seek review by the Georgia Supreme Court.
The ruling, if upheld, should mean that Mills' two co-defendants, Dominique Carter and Quatez White, can also get a new trial, Winchester said. Carter and White were not involved in Mills' appeal.
Representatives of the Fulton DA's office did not immediately respond to questions about the ruling.
Attempts to contact the juror Friday were not immediately successful.
'Overall, I thought it was a clear-cut result that needed to be imposed,' Winchester said of the court's decision. 'The law is unequivocal.'
Case records show the juror pleaded guilty to cocaine possession and was sentenced under the First Offender Act in 1995, the year Mills was born. Her first offender status was revoked in 1997, court filings show.
The crime in which Mills, Carter and White were accused happened in 2015 outside a home on Cooper Street in Atlanta, according to court records.
Mills said in a recent filing the victim was a self-proclaimed drug dealer who was robbed and shot several times. Mills maintains that prosecutors mistakenly identified him as a suspect, Winchester said.
Court records show Mills, Carter and White were indicted in 2016 and pleaded not guilty to participation in criminal street gang activity, attempted murder, aggravated assault, aggravated battery, armed robbery, hijacking a motor vehicle, possession of a firearm and arson. They were each acquitted of the firearm charge and found guilty of the other charges.
Mills, who was sentenced to 30 years in prison, said on appeal his counsel learned of the juror's conviction after the trial while investigating some 'inflammatory statements' made by an alternate juror.
In June 2023, Fulton County Superior Court Judge Eric Dunaway denied Mills' new trial request, saying the juror's felony conviction did not impact the case in a way that was unfair to Mills. Dunaway said the juror's testimony indicated she either did not hear or misunderstood the question about felony convictions during jury selection.
'(Mills) has not demonstrated that any juror misconduct occurred here or that he was harmed by any such conduct,' Dunaway wrote in an order.
Fulton prosecutors told the appellate court the juror may have actually shown favor toward Mills because she had heard of gang members who participated in positive activities, knew at least one person who socialized with or spent time with a gang and had at least one child or friend who took pictures with guns, money and drugs.
The juror's great-nephew was affiliated with a gang and had been convicted and sentenced for it, prosecutors wrote in a recent filing.
'(The juror) believed sometimes you fall victim to the streets, that sometimes you don't have a choice, and that everyone deserves a second chance,' prosecutors wrote. 'Mills failed to show (the juror) deliberately concealed information about her status as a convicted felon and Mills failed to show actual bias on her part towards Mills.'
The appellate judges said they were not persuaded by prosecutors' arguments in the case.
___
© 2025 The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
3 days ago
- CBS News
1 dead after trench rescue at Baltimore County construction site
One person is dead after Baltimore County Fire crews were called for a trench rescue Tuesday morning at a construction site, officials said. Crews responded to the 9800 block of Lyons Mills Road in Owings Mills around 9:30 a.m. Once on the scene, officials found a person critically injured. While fire officials referred to the call as a "trench accident," the exact nature of the incident is currently unclear. A similar trench incident in Catonsville left two construction workers dead in February. The workers were trapped for nearly seven hours after a brick wall fell onto them as they were reinforcing it. They became trapped in a six-foot trench while in critical condition. Fire crews worked to support the trench to prevent the dirt from caving in before they were able to get the workers out. "It's a calculated method and it does take time, but they want to make sure that they are doing so in the safest measures," Baltimore County Fire Lt. Twana Allen said at the time. Following the seven-hour rescue effort, 24-year-old Emerson Amestica and 32-year-old Wilmer Barzallo were both pronounced dead. In October 2024, a similar rescue was carried out after a man fell 30 feet into a well in Catonsville. The man was rescued after nearly 24 hours in the confined space. Officials said he was taken to a hospital with serious injuries.


New York Post
17-06-2025
- New York Post
Masks mean mayhem — time to ban the Klan hood of the 21st century
Who is that masked man? Well, there's some chance he's an antisemitic rioter. New York City and other jurisdictions are debating mask bans after face coverings have become associated with acts of mayhem committed by people who hope to avoid recognition and evade criminal responsibility. The most iconic image of the Los Angeles riots involves a man on a dirt bike waving a Mexican flag . . . in a mask. It's not surprising that he was wearing a mask. At this point, failing to wear a mask when engaging in lawless activity is a major faux pas — like wearing white before Memorial Day, or showing up at LA's upscale restaurant, 71Above, in flip-flops. Embattled New York City Mayor Eric Adams has been emphatic that there needs to be a return to the broad ban on masks that was repealed during the pandemic (the state just passed a more limited measure creating enhanced penalties for people wearing masks to conceal their identities while committing crimes). The meaning of the mask has changed in recent years. Prior to COVID, wearing a surgical mask in public likely meant someone had a compromised immune system; during COVID, it usually meant someone was complying with the pandemic rules and associated social pressure. After COVID, it tends to indicate either someone is too neurotic to give up pandemic-era practices — or wants to harass Jews or throw rocks at the cops. In an era of ubiquitous facial-recognition technology, a face mask is a bid to foil efforts by police to track down lawless acts after the fact. It's not a get-out-of-jail-free card — masked rioters are sometimes arrested on the spot — but it's a layer of protection for the person hoping to break or burn something and melt away without consequence. This is why, prior to COVID, masks outside of a medical context tended to have a negative connotation in the popular imagination. The Lone Ranger was the exception that proved the rule. Otherwise, the masked man was going to hold up the stagecoach, rob a bank or burn a cross on someone's lawn. A 1990 Georgia Supreme Court ruling upholding that state's mask ban said, 'A nameless, faceless figure strikes terror in the human heart.' Certainly, after seeing what's gone down on the streets after the killing of George Floyd and on college campuses since Oct. 7, everyone should be on edge when encountering masked protesters. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters If nothing else, it's not a good sign when people are afraid of being associated with their own cause, or the means with which they are going to agitate for it. New York first banned masks in the 1840s in response to protesters harassing landlords. Later, in the 20th century, states prohibited face coverings to address the depredations of the KKK. The bans either went unenforced or were repealed during COVID. Masks went from being a symbol of outlaw behavior to the sine qua non of good citizenship, according to Dr. Anthony Fauci and other public-health authorities. The snugly fitted N-95, or even better an elastomeric respirator with replaceable filters, showed a heroic commitment to your own health and the well-being of others. The clashing perspective of New York's last two governors indicates how the debate on masks has turned. Then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo in 2020 urged protesters to mask up. 'You have a right to demonstrate,' he declared, 'You don't have a right to infect other people.' Cuomo's successor, Gov. Kathy Hochul, went in the opposite direction after seeing masked agitators menace Jewish riders on the subway last year. She came out in favor of restricting masks, and supported the watered-down change recently passed by the Legislature. The issue won't go away in New York, or elsewhere. The mask is now part of the kit of rioters, for whom the convenient concealment is as indispensable as a Klansman's white hood. Twitter: @RichLowry
Yahoo
13-06-2025
- Yahoo
Couple jailed after dangerous dog attacks child
A couple's Japanese Akita attacked a child and left them with a large wound to the face, a court has heard. Kayleigh Godbert, 39, and Thomas Moir, 38, admitted being in charge of a dangerously out of control dog called Nuqe which bit the youngster at least six times. Judge Simon Mills said the child was "lucky" to be alive and described one laceration as "absolutely awful". The couple, who appeared at Mold Crown Court in Flintshire, were jailed for 18 months and banned from keeping a dog for seven years. According to the prosecution, the dog had bitten someone previously. Judge Mills told the couple the injuries were "frightening" and said the attack was down to their "utter negligence". He added an image of the child's face before surgery was "breath-taking". "This incident should, and could, have been foreseen," Judge Mills said. Det Con James Grimwood of North Wales Police described the event as a "horrific incident" which has "tragically resulted in serious and lasting injuries to a vulnerable child". He added: "Both Moir and Godbert have shown little remorse throughout this investigation despite the lifelong consequences their actions have had on a young child. "The court outcome reflects the seriousness of this incident, and I hope that this sends a message to any dog owners to ensure that they do not leave their dogs alone with children." Det Con Grimwood said he urged anyone with information or concerns around a dangerous dog to report it to North Wales Police. 'Hero' saves mum and baby from triple dog attack 'My dog had to be put down after beach attack' Laws must change says owner of mauled small dog