Mamdani vows to lower costs but his ‘fix' is more lefty policies that drive them up
Zohran Mamdani drew support in Tuesday's primary for saying he'd make New York more affordable — yet he's mainly offering more of the policies that have made the city so expensive.
Gotham is unaffordable for many, but that's largely thanks to decades of Democratic policies that Mamdani wants to dramatically expand.
He promises 'to lower the cost of living for working-class New Yorkers,' offering free buses, CUNY tuition, child care, a freeze on rents and more.
That sounds great. Yet in reality, his free stuff would actually make the city worse, particularly for the people most desperate for relief.
Take his rent freeze. Owners of rent-regulated buildings can't keep up with their costs, thanks to lefty Mayor Bill de Blasio's years of rent freezes and restrictions by Albany progressives.
So they're holding apartments vacant rather than leasing them, because the rent they'd collect won't cover the cost of bringing them up to code.
Many landlords are poised to go under — or to walk away from their buildings.
Democrats have also opposed other efforts to boost the housing supply, like Mayor Eric Adams' City of Yes rezoning plan.
Yet Mamdani's rent freeze would only deepen the housing shortage. How will that help anyone seeking affordable housing?
Or take his free buses. The only way the MTA could even hope to run them would be to cut down on bus service and repairs.
Plus, buses would risk turning into mobile homeless shelters, as they have in other cities that tried this.
Riders would suffer big-time.
Are fares too high? Well, if Democrats would enforce farebeating, the MTA might be able to hold them down.
Yet Mamdani wants to defund the police. If he wins, expect farebeating to soar — and paying riders would have to pony up more to offset the lost fare revenue.
Dems are also known for their generous labor deals and regulatory burdens on businesses, which further drive up prices for consumers.
Count on Mamdani to accelerate that trend.
Does anyone truly think the cost of his proposed $30-an-hour wage minimum wage won't be passed along to consumers?
By his (likely lowball) estimates, his city-spending plans would cost a whopping $10 billion, money the city doesn't have and won't likely get.
Were Albany to hit businesses with his tax hikes, prices would rise further still.
Sure, Mamdani's promises of 'lower costs' will resonate in pricey New York if voters don't think through the consequences.
But if New Yorkers really want a more affordable city, they'll need leaders who oppose the Democratic policies that have only fueled Gotham's higher costs. The opposite of Mamdani, that is.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
Senate ekes out late-night win on Trump's "big, beautiful bill"
Senate Republicans voted 51-49 late Saturday to move forward with President Trump's " big, beautiful bill" — clearing a significant hurdle and setting up a lengthy weekend to pass the legislation. Why it matters: After days of heated debate and complaints, Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) is barreling forward to get Trump's priorities on taxes, the debt ceiling, border security and military funding passed by July 4. All Republicans but Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) ultimately voted yes, making the final tally 51-49. But GOP holdouts — notably Sens. Ron Johnson (Wisc.), Mike Lee (Utah), Rick Scott (Fla.) and Cynthia Lummis (Wyo.) — forced the vote to remain open for more than three hours while they negotiated with party leaders, including Vice President JD Vance. Johnson told reporters on Saturday that holdouts were promised a vote on an amendment that would reduce the federal matching share for some new Medicaid enrollees. Scott has been pushing the approach. What to watch: Democrats are forcing the entire 940-page bill to be read on the floor, a process that could take well over 10 hours. Hours of debate, followed by a series of unlimited amendment votes, known as a vote-a-rama, will happen before final passage can take place. Zoom in: Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) plans to offer an amendment to strike a temporary pause on states passing AI regulations. It is likely to be adopted, given that other Republicans, including Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), also are unhappy with the measure. Lee, as the vote was ongoing, announced he would withdraw his plan to sell off public lands to private housing developers. Several other GOP senators, including Sens. Steve Daines (R-Mont.) and Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), opposed Lee's provision. Between the lines: Trump ramped up pressure on Republicans on Saturday morning, circulating a statement of administration policy urging the bill's passage. "President Trump is committed to keeping his promises, and failure to pass this bill would be the ultimate betrayal," the statement read. Senators have been receiving phone calls, lunching and golfing with the president this weekend. The big picture: The new text would delay implementation of a reduced Medicaid provider tax in expansion states. It includes a compromise with the House to raise the cap on the state and local tax deduction to $40,000 for five years before reverting to the current $10,000 cap. It would create a $25 billion rural hospital fund, bumped up from $15 billion, an attempt to assuage concerns from some Republicans that bill's Medicaid cuts would devastate rural health providers.
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Trump, 3 GOP senators play golf ahead of push for megabill vote
As the Senate wrestled with whether to begin debate on President Donald Trump's megabill, a few key Republican allies spent part of the afternoon golfing with the president at his nearby club in Northern Virginia. Trump, CIA Director John Ratcliffe and GOP Sens. Eric Schmitt of Missouri, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina played golf a few hours before the Senate voted to debate the so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill.' Live updates: It's go time for Senate on Trump's megabill. Do they have the votes? Graham posted a photo of himself and Trump on social media as gave the camera a thumbs up. Graham said in a post that he partnered with Trump and Paul to beat Schmitt and Ratcliffe. "Proud to announce no casualties," Graham wrote. "A lot of fun! Big Beautiful Bill on the way." Schmitt posted a similar photo of himself and the president, writing "Big week for President Trump and he crushed it on the golf course this morning as well." Looking forward to beginning the One Big Beautiful Bill the day with @POTUS and thanked him for his Go! White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters around 2 p.m. that the president was wrapping up lunch and would soon depart the course, located about 25 miles from the White House. Senate Republican leaders launched the debate June 28 that is expected to culminate with a vote June 29 or 30 on the 990-page bill. While Democrats are all expected to vote no on the massive legislative package, the open question going into the debate is whether enough Republicans will end up supporting the Senate's version, which would send it back to the House. Trump has asked Congress to send him the completed bill to sign by July 4. The megabill is stuffed with tax cuts, Medicaid reforms and border security funding, containing several signature campaign promises from Trump and the Republican party. Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kapalmer@ and on X @KathrynPlmr.
Los Angeles Times
3 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump's tax and spending cuts bill clears key test vote in Senate
WASHINGTON — Senate Republicans voting in a dramatic late Saturday session narrowly cleared a key procedural step as they race to advance President Trump's package of tax breaks, spending cuts and bolstered deportation funds by his Fourth of July deadline. The 51-49 vote came after a tumultuous session with Vice President JD Vance on hand if needed to break a tie. Tense scenes played out in the chamber as voting came to a standstill, dragging on for hours as holdout senators huddled for negotiations. In the end, two Republicans opposed the motion to proceed to debate, joining all Democrats and independents. It's still a long weekend of work to come. Republicans are using their majorities in Congress to push aside Democratic opposition, but they have run into a series of political and policy setbacks. Not all GOP lawmakers are on board with proposals to reduce spending on Medicaid, food stamps and other programs as a way to help cover the cost of extending some $3.8 trillion in Trump tax breaks. Ahead of the expected roll call, the White House released a statement of administrative policy saying it 'strongly supports passage' of the bill that 'implements critical aspects' of the president's agenda. Trump was at his golf course in Virginia on Saturday with GOP senators posting about it on social media. 'It's time to get this legislation across the finish line,' said Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.). But as the day wore on, billionaire Elon Musk, a key Trump advisor for the first months of the administration, lashed out against the package — as he has in the past — calling it 'utterly insane and destructive.' 'The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country!' he said in a post. The 940-page bill was released shortly before midnight Friday, and senators are expected to grind through the hours of all-night debate and amendments in the days ahead. If the Senate is able to pass it, the bill would go back to the House for a final round of votes before it could reach the White House. With narrow Republican majorities in the House and Senate, leaders need almost every lawmaker on board in the face of essentially unified opposition from Democrats. GOP Sens. Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Rand Paul of Kentucky voted against. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York said Republicans unveiled the bill 'in the dead of night' and are rushing to finish the vote before the public fully knows what's in it. He was expected to call for a full reading of the text in the Senate overnight, which would take hours. The weekend session could be a make-or-break moment for Trump's party, which has invested much of its political capital on his signature domestic policy plan. The president is pushing Congress to wrap it up and has admonished the 'grandstanders' among GOP holdouts to fall in line. The legislation is an ambitious but complicated series of GOP priorities. At its core, it would make permanent many of the tax breaks from Trump's first term that would otherwise expire by year's end if Congress fails to act, resulting in a potential tax increase on Americans. The bill would add new breaks, including no taxes on tips, and commit $350 billion to national security, including for Trump's mass deportation agenda. But the cutbacks to Medicaid, food stamps and green energy investments, which a top Democrat, Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, said would be a 'death sentence' for America's wind and solar industries, are also causing dissent within GOP ranks. The Republicans are relying on the reductions to offset the lost tax revenues, but some lawmakers say the cuts go too far, particularly for people receiving healthcare through Medicaid. Meanwhile, conservatives, worried about the nation's debt, are pushing for steeper cuts. Tillis, who said he spoke with Trump late Friday explaining his concerns, announced Saturday he cannot support the package as is, largely because he said the healthcare changes would force his state to 'make painful decisions like eliminating Medicaid coverage for hundreds of thousands.' The release of that draft had been delayed as the Senate parliamentarian reviewed the bill to ensure it complied with the chamber's strict 'Byrd rule,' named for the late Sen. Robert C. Byrd ( It largely bars policy matters from inclusion in budget bills unless a provision can get 60 votes to overcome objections. That would be a tall order in a Senate with a 53-47 Republican edge and Democrats unified against Trump's bill. Republicans suffered a series of setbacks after several proposals, including shifting food stamp costs from the federal government to the states or gutting the funding structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, were deemed out of compliance with the rules. But over the past few days, Republicans have quickly revised those proposals and reinstated them. The final text includes a proposal for cuts to the Medicaid provider tax that had run into parliamentary hurdles and objections from several senators worried about the fate of rural hospitals. The new version extends the start date for those cuts and establishes a $25-billion fund to aid rural hospitals and providers. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), who had opposed the cuts, vowed 'to do everything I can' to make sure the reductions never go into effect. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has said that under the House-passed version of the bill, some 10.9 million people would lose their healthcare coverage and at least 3 million fewer would qualify for food aid. The CBO has not yet publicly assessed the Senate draft, which proposes steeper reductions. Top income-earners would see about a $12,000 tax cut under the House bill, while the package would cost the poorest Americans an additional $1,600, the CBO said. The Senate included a compromise over the so-called SALT provision, a deduction for state and local taxes that has been a top priority of lawmakers from California, New York and other high-tax states, but the issue remains unsettled. The current SALT cap is $10,000 a year, and a few Republicans wanted to boost it to $40,000 a year. The final draft includes a $40,000 cap, but limits it to five years. Many Republican senators say that is still too generous. At least one House GOP holdout, Rep. Nick LaLota of New York, has said that would be insufficient. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) sent his colleagues home for the weekend with plans to be on call to return to Washington. But as the Senate draft was revealed, House GOP support was uncertain. One Republican, Rep. David Valadao of Hanford, said he was opposed. Mascaro, Freking and Cappelletti write for the Associated Press. AP writers Ali Swenson and Matthew Daly contributed to this report.
