logo
'You've been very brave': Final two women testify at trial of alleged serial rapist

'You've been very brave': Final two women testify at trial of alleged serial rapist

CBC24-05-2025
Social Sharing
WARNING: Court proceedings include allegations of sexual assault and might affect those who have experienced​ ​​​sexual violence or know someone who's been affected.
The trial for alleged serial rapist Richard Mantha heard from the final two women the Crown alleges were victimized by the 61-year-old who faces 20 charges, including sexual assault with a weapon, kidnapping and administering noxious substances.
Both women are extremely vulnerable; struggling with drug addiction, homelessness and poverty.
A publication ban protects their identities. CBC News will call them Sam and Anna.
The toll it took on both women to show up at court to testify was obvious.
'I didn't get to say yes or no'
On Friday, Sam sobbed as she made her way to the stand.
But she appeared to get stronger throughout the day.
Sam told Justice Judith Shriar she met Mantha, a man she knew as "Poncho," in Forest Lawn when he picked her up in a truck.
"He just said he would help me out, give me some dope," she told prosecutor Dominique Mathurin.
Mantha took her to his RV that was parked inside a Quonset hut on a rented property east of the city.
Sam said Mantha washed her and then began having sex with her.
"I was under the impression that he was just going to help me, I didn't think I had to do anything sexually," she said.
"I didn't get to choose that … I didn't get to say yes or no, it was happening."
'I didn't want it'
Sam said she tried to close her legs but "he just pulled me closer to him, he's a little more aggressive."
"I guess he liked the fact that I didn't want it and he was able to take it from me."
Sam said Mantha didn't speak to her "at all."
She said she was too afraid to say anything to Mantha.
"I didn't want to say the wrong thing and be another statistic ... like dead."
One day earlier, a 24-year-old Anna was called to the witness stand.
Anna takes the stand
Speaking barely above a whisper, Anna kept looking over at Mantha in the prisoner's box. Then, she shut down, unable to answer questions.
Court took a break.
"The goal here is not to make things worse for her," said Justice Shriar.
After a lengthy adjournment, Anna returned. Clerks had added a screen blocking Anna's view of Mantha.
She spoke in short sentences, often offering one or two word responses.
Photos shown to Anna
Prosecutor Dominique Mathurin showed Anna photos that she identified as herself.
They were screen grabs of a sex video found on one of Mantha's electronic devices.
Anna said she was "100 per cent" sure it was her face and tattoo in the image but she said, "these pictures, I don't remember them."
Then Mathurin asked Anna if she and Mantha had sex. Anna said they had.
"Did you want to?" asked the prosecutor.
Anna answered, "No."
'You've been very brave'
When defence lawyer Justin Dean cross-examined Anna, she confirmed she uses fentanyl every few hours and had done so before she testified.
Anna started crying.
"You've been very brave," said Shriar. "Do you need a rest?"
Anna declined. "I'm tired. I want to finish this so I can go home."
Dean continued, suggesting Anna had sex in Mantha's RV in exchange for drugs or money.
"Would you agree with that?" he asked.
She whispered, "Yes."
"Did you consent to have sex with Mr. Mantha?" asked Dean.
Again she whispered, "Yes."
The trial is expected to last one more week.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Everything you need to know about restraining orders in Alberta
Everything you need to know about restraining orders in Alberta

Calgary Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Calgary Herald

Everything you need to know about restraining orders in Alberta

Article content According to Daniel Wilson, senior associate lawyer at Calgary-based Mincher Koeman, the main difference between applying for a restraining order and for an EPO to deal with family-related violence is whether the situation is urgent enough to necessitate an order without giving the defendant advance notice. Article content A no-contact order, according to Niv, is a condition that can be encompassed in either a restraining or an EPO. 'Either a judge will decide or the parties, most likely, will agree on (mutual no-contact),' he said. 'Technically that's a restraining order on both people, but it's limited to a no-contact condition.' Article content A restraining order, according to Wilson, can 'apply to an infinite number of situations'. Article content Article content 'There has to be some kind of offending conduct, like an invasion of privacy, stalking, harassment, unwelcome communication,' he said. Article content The court would have to determine if the person seeking the restraining order has a 'sincere, subjective basis for believing the offending conduct is going to continue … and that the belief is objectively reasonable,' he added. Article content The evidence would have to be specific, not speculative. 'It's not enough to say that if I don't get a restraining order, this person might engage in this unwelcome behaviour,' he said. 'The claimant would have to show that there's a likelihood that it will continue based on faces, not based on belief or dislike for someone.' Article content To qualify for an EPO, the judge has to be satisfied that it is an emergency with three determinations, according to Wilson. Article content 'The first is that family violence has occurred,' he said, whether that be physical violence, damage to property or threats of violence to a family member. Article content Article content 'Then the claimant or alleged victim has to believe that the respondent will continue or resume carrying out the family violence. Third, by reason of seriousness or urgency, the order should be granted for the immediate protection of the claimant and other family members. Article content 'So EPOs are supposed to be reserved for situations of urgency.' Article content How is a restraining order or an EPO obtained? Article content In the case of a restraining order, the person filing the application would have to give the defendant — whom the application is being filed against — 20 days notice, to allow time to make a defence. Article content 'The default principle our justice system normally works on is one of fairness and the other side is to be given an opportunity to respond to the case that is made against them before the court makes an order that will affect their rights,' Wilson said. Article content However, the court can allow for wiggle room to shorten the period of notice, whereby the defendant is instead served with 10 days notice and on the 10th day, the claimant can ask the court to shorten the notice period. Article content The court can also grant an interim or a 'without prejudice restraining order' until the hearing to approve or reject a full restraining order or EPO. 'It's just to create or preserve status quo without deciding against anyone because there hasn't been a fair hearing as yet,' he said. Article content For a client concerned about violence during the interim period, Wilson said he would first discuss the possibility of applying without serving notice. 'No harm in doing that, if you lose, you just have to make the application again,' Wilson said. Article content However, the respondent should know that any criminal acts conducted during that period could be used as evidence against them at the hearing for the order, especially actions in the nature of conduct that led to the restraining order being applied for. Article content However, an emergency protection order is a much simpler, expedited matter. As it caters to situations of emergency, a claimant seeking an order can go to a courthouse and fill out an application for the order. An available staff lawyer who will make the application to the judge for them and the claimant would have to give a brief oral evidence on the stand. The judge would then make the order or refuse to make the order, he said, the whole process of which would only take up to a half hour. Article content Article content If court isn't sitting, then a claimant can make the application via a phone call to a justice of peace. Article content Hiring a lawyer isn't necessary to obtain a protection order. But Niv said he's often called by clients who find the process too complex, lengthy and/or are too victimized to be able to write the affidavit and serve the person whom the order is taken out against. Article content 'Unless you hire third parties to do some of these tasks for you, you're going to have some interaction with the person want to last deal with,' he said. Article content It depends on the nature of the order. Article content Conditions set out in a protection order can vary widely, depending on the parties involved. For some, it may mean that one party is not allowed to set foot within a certain distance of the other or have limited contact through specific means or no contact at all. It may mean that both parties are prohibited from contacting each other or talking about each other. Article content Article content 'It can impact the defendant severely,' according to Wilson, by preventing them from returning home, visiting their neighbourhood, church, their place of employment, family members, visiting their children or discussing children with another parent. Article content 'It can prevent them from coordinating a visit where a third party brings kids to the visit just because the order might be worded in an unfortunate way,' he added. Article content The wording of an order can sometimes have unintended adverse consequences for both parties. For example, if the parties are spouses going through a separation, an order may force them to only communicate through their lawyers, instead of texting — 'which is very expensive.' Article content It could also preclude the claimant from visiting places where the respondent might be. 'It makes things practically very difficult and expensive and slow,' he said. Article content What happens if an order is defied? Article content It depends on how the order was customized. 'Because civil restraining orders and emergency protective orders are more party-driven, it's up to the private individuals to decide what they're asking for and they can negotiate that with the other individual,' Wilson said. Article content An order, for example, can include police enforcement clauses. 'If a breach is reported, the police or any peace officer can arrest the party in breach' and bring them to a judge to be held in a contempt hearing, Wilson said. Article content Because it is a civil order, breaching it is not a criminal offense, but it can result in a fine or imprisonment, Wilson said. Article content In Niv's experience, most of the time, the person served with the order stays away. Article content 'The fact that one has been filed is usually enough to tell people who are doing the problem to stop,' he said. Article content Article content However, both Niv and Wilson emphasize that it does not guarantee a person's safety against an alleged perpetrator. Article content 'An EPO or a restraining order will at best create civil or criminal consequences for a respondent who breaches it,' Wilson said. 'But it will not protect a person from an assault or an attempt on the claimant's life. It's a piece of paper, so the only thing that will do that is incarceration of the respondent.' Article content However, by filing and obtaining an order, the hope is that it would keep the person whom the order is taken out against, from breaching conditions to avoid criminal charges or civil sanctions. Article content 'They won't want to be charged with an offence. They won't want to be charged with contempt. They won't want their behaviour to reflect poorly on them if there is a parenting dispute,' he said. Article content Article content When it does happen, it's usually because someone attempted communication with a former spouse via a family member to encourage them to drop the restraining order, he said. 'Or not respecting a condition of staying away 100 m or 50 m,' he added. Article content A 'blatant, wilful' disobedience of the order would result in 'immediate consequences' as the claimant would presumably call the police. 'And if they show they won't comply with court orders, especially if they have criminal charges against them, then they're going to have their judicial interim release revoked and they might be waiting in remand until their charges are dealt with,' he said. Article content

'Public narrative was one-sided': Hockey Canada sex assault defence lawyers respond to verdict
'Public narrative was one-sided': Hockey Canada sex assault defence lawyers respond to verdict

Edmonton Journal

time2 hours ago

  • Edmonton Journal

'Public narrative was one-sided': Hockey Canada sex assault defence lawyers respond to verdict

Five former Canadian world junior hockey players were found not guilty in a high-profile sexual assault trial related to a 2018 incident in London, Ont. The case had sparked a national reckoning over hockey culture, and what is and what isn't considered consent. Here's how the lawyers for Michael McLeod, Carter Hart, Alex Formenton, Dillon Dube and Callan Foote reacted to Ontario Superior Court Justice Maria Carroccia's verdict, which was delivered in a London courtroom on Thursday. Article content Article content Article content Mr. McLeod will not be speaking to the media, and I understand the other players will not be speaking to the media. I will not be taking questions and other counsel who come to address you, they will not be taking any questions. Article content Mr. McLeod had confidence in the Justice process, and he welcomes Justice Carrocia's decision, confirming that he and his co defendants are not guilty of sexual assault. Justice Carrocia's carefully reasoned decision represents a resounding vindication for Mr. McLeod and for his co defendants. Justice Carrocia's found that the complainant's testimony was incredible and was unreliable. Article content For years, public perception was shaped by a one-sided narrative from a civil lawsuit that went unchallenged. In large part because hockey Canada settled the claim without first informing or consulting the players. The decision was made unilaterally, and the players were only told of the lawsuit and the settlement after the fact. Had they been consulted, they would have refused to settle, and they would have vigorously contested EM's allegations. Article content Article content That version of events dominated headlines and created a lasting and, a false, a false impression of guilt. It was only through this criminal trial that the allegations were fully and finally tested. The court compared the complainant's 2018 statements to the police, which rightly resulted in no charges with the later conflicting civil claim. Key elements of EM's story were contradicted by the evidence, exposing serious falsehood and leading to today's clear and just verdict of not guilty. Justice Carrocia rejected EM's claims of fear and her claims of non consent. That should be the takeaway from today's judgment. Article content Article content The damage to Mr. McLeod's reputation and his career has been significant. But today's decision begins to restore what was very unfairly taken away from him. Mr. McLeod is deeply grateful to his family, friends, his agent, and everybody who stood by him.

Alberta watchdog's ruling on Winnipeg police fatal shooting of Nigerian student expected in August
Alberta watchdog's ruling on Winnipeg police fatal shooting of Nigerian student expected in August

CBC

time5 hours ago

  • CBC

Alberta watchdog's ruling on Winnipeg police fatal shooting of Nigerian student expected in August

A decision over whether Winnipeg police officers were justified in the fatal 2023 shooting of a Nigerian international student is expected by the end of August, the out-of-province police watchdog tapped to conduct the investigation says. Afolabi Stephen Opaso, 19, was shot dead by officers responding to a well-being call at a Winnipeg apartment building on Dec. 31, 2023, the Independent Investigation Unit (IIU) of Manitoba has said. The agency investigates all serious incidents involving police in Manitoba. Winnipeg police said the call involved a possibly armed man who was acting erratically. Opaso, a University of Manitoba student, was armed with two knives when officers shot him, then-police chief Danny Smyth told reporters a day after the shooting. In January 2024, the IIU tapped its Alberta-based counterpart to take over the investigation into Opaso's death to avoid any perceived conflict of interest, after it said a Manitoba Justice employee was found to be a "close relative" of a police officer involved in the shooting. Opaso's family has been vocal about their wait for answers over his death in the months since. Last December, the family released a statement expressing deep frustration as they continued to wait for the independent report into what led to Opaso's death. The family released another statement on Monday, urging the Alberta Serious Incident Response Team (ASIRT) to release a formal written update on the status of its investigation within seven days. "This continued delay is unjustified and quite disturbing for us, and we genuinely wonder if our beloved brother will ever get justice," said the most recent statement, provided to CBC News by the Opaso family's lawyer, Jean-René Dominique Kwilu. A decision is expected by the end of August, a spokesperson for the Alberta Serious Incident Response Team (ASIRT) told CBC News on Thursday. Kwilu says he didn't hear back from ASIRT after sending the family's most recent statement to the police watchdog. He said the watchdog's decision is "long overdue," as questions have swirled about alleged discrepancies between police's account of the shooting and Opaso's roommates, including whether Opaso was holding a weapon before his death. "We'll see what the investigation findings are, and then the family will know what their next steps are," Kwilu told CBC News on Thursday. He had not informed Opaso's family of the watchdog's update at that point. The family is considering whether to sue Winnipeg police over Opaso's death, Kwilu said. The family hopes the watchdog's final report will help them understand what information emergency dispatchers gave the officers who responded to the call, and how much time police had to talk to each other before providing their accounts of what happened, Kwilu said. The family also wants to know whether all the gunshots fired were necessary in the officers' response and whether there was a racial component to how the case was dealt with. Opaso's death disturbed Winnipeg's international student community, and it has broader implications for families with loved ones who struggle with mental health issues, he said. "Beyond just Afolabi, if there are some reforms that are needed, then those reforms must be tackled, especially in the areas of police and mental health, and how to respond to these calls," Kwilu said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store