Ukraine won't recognize ‘occupied territories'
Kiev still claims Crimea, the Donetsk, and Lugansk People's Republics, as well as Kherson and Zaporozhye Regions as its own. The territories officially became part of Russia after referendums in 2014 and 2022. Moscow has maintained that their status cannot be a matter of any future negotiations.
When asked about Kiev's 'red lines' during an interview with RBK-Ukraine media outlet on Monday, Sibiga said that 'there are fundamental things that are non-negotiable,' mentioning 'Ukraine's territorial integrity and sovereignty' as the prime example of such issues.
'Ukraine will never recognize the occupied territories,' the diplomat clarified.
The minister also pointed out that Kiev will not accept any third parties dictating to it which blocs it can join and which it cannot. While acknowledging that there is no consensus on Ukraine's potential accession to NATO among the bloc's current members, the official still argued that these aspirations 'cannot be taken off the agenda.'When launching military action against the neighboring country in February 2022, Russian President Vladimir Putin cited the prospect of Ukraine joining NATO as one of the prime reasons behind the conflict.The third point on which Ukraine is not prepared to budge, according to Sibiga, is the number of personnel in its armed forces, and its capabilities.Sibiga stated that the recent US-Ukrainian negotiations in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, indicated Kiev's willingness to accept a 30-day ceasefire proposed by Washington. However, he stressed that Ukraine seeks a comprehensive peace agreement with Moscow rather than just freezing the conflict.
The Kremlin has consistently spoken out against the prospect of a frozen conflict.
Speaking to ABC News on Sunday, US National Security Adviser Mike Waltz dismissed Ukraine's NATO membership as 'incredibly unlikely,' while adding that a within potential settlement to the conflict there 'is going to be some type of territory for future security guarantees' for Kiev.
A report from the British outlet The Independent on Sunday, citing anonymous Ukrainian officials, indicated that Kiev has accepted the current static battle lines, with Russia retaining some territory, for now. However, officials stressed to the outlet that Ukraine will not concede any additional land, particularly in the Zaporozhye and Kherson regions, which Russia claims but are under Ukrainian control.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Poland cautions Ukraine over anti-corruption crackdown
Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski has cautioned Ukraine that halting the fight against corruption would be 'the worst' step the government could take, amid a growing backlash over Kiev's efforts to rein in two key watchdogs. On Tuesday, Ukraine's parliament passed legislation granting the Prosecutor General, a political appointee, direct oversight over the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) and the Special Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO). The law has triggered mass protests at home and a storm of criticism in the West, forcing Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky to take steps to restore the independence of the two organizations. Speaking to Polsat earlier this week, Sikorski stated that Zelensky had been warned 'the worst thing he could do now is to turn away from the fight against corruption.' The Polish Foreign Ministry later echoed his statement on its official X account. The government's attempt to directly control NABU and SAPO has sparked protests in Kiev, Odessa, Dnepr, Lviv and other cities. The country's Western supporters, including the EU and G7 nations, have sharply criticized the move, warning that it undermines Ukraine's commitment to fighting corruption and jeopardizes its path toward European integration. On Thursday, Zelensky submitted a bill to the legislature, the Rada, aimed at restoring the agencies' independence by scaling back the prosecutor general's powers. He insisted the proposal would preserve the independence of anti-corruption institutions while ensuring the strength of the law enforcement system. The Rada is expected to review the proposed measure on July 31. However, FT reported on Friday, citing sources, that up to 70 MPs from Zelensky's Servant of the People party are hesitant to support the bill, fearing it could lead to politically motivated prosecutions against them. NABU and SAPO were created following the US-backed 2014 coup in Kiev as part of sweeping reforms to align Ukraine with Western governance standards. Their establishment was a key condition set by Brussels and the International Monetary Fund in exchange for financial assistance. Both agencies have led high-profile investigations, including some involving figures close to Zelensky.
Russia Today
9 hours ago
- Russia Today
Tehran's new war plan: Build an anti-NATO
What if the next global security pact wasn't forged in Brussels or Washington – but in Beijing, with Iran at the table? This is no longer a theoretical question. At the mid-July meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) Council of Foreign Ministers in China, Iran made it clear: Tehran now views the SCO not just as a regional forum, but as a potential counterweight to NATO. In doing so, it signaled a profound strategic pivot – away from an outdated Western-dominated system and toward an emerging Eurasian order. The summit highlighted the increasing resilience of multilateral Eurasian cooperation in the face of growing global turbulence. Russia was represented by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, who also met with Chinese leader Xi Jinping – an encounter that underscored the strength of the Moscow-Beijing axis. On the sidelines, Lavrov held bilateral meetings with the foreign ministers of China, Pakistan, India, and notably, Iran. His talks with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi focused on diplomatic solutions to the nuclear issue and emphasized deepening strategic coordination. The Iranian side used the platform with purpose. Araghchi expressed his appreciation for the SCO's solidarity amid Israeli aggression and stressed that Iran views the organization not as symbolic, but as a practical mechanism for regional unity and global positioning. India's full participation also contradicted predictions in Western circles that geopolitical tensions would paralyze the SCO. Instead, New Delhi reaffirmed its commitment to the platform. The implication is clear: unlike NATO, where unity depends on compliance with a central authority, the SCO has proven flexible enough to accommodate diverse interests while building consensus. For Russia, the SCO remains a cornerstone of its Eurasian strategy. Moscow serves as a balancing force – linking China with South and Central Asia, and now, with an assertive Iran. Russia's approach is pragmatic, multi-vector, and geared toward creating a new geopolitical equilibrium. The heart of the summit was Abbas Araghchi's speech – an assertive and legally grounded critique of Israeli and American actions. He cited Article 2, Section 4 of the UN Charter, denounced attacks on Iran's IAEA-monitored nuclear facilities, and invoked Resolution 487 of the UN Security Council. His message: Western aggression has no legal cover, and no amount of narrative control can change that. But beyond condemnation, Araghchi delivered a concrete roadmap to strengthen the SCO as a vehicle for collective security and sovereignty: A collective security body to respond to external aggression, sabotage, and terrorism A permanent coordination mechanism for documenting and countering subversive acts A Center for Sanctions Resistance, to shield member economies from unilateral Western measures A Shanghai Security Forum for defense and intelligence coordination Enhanced cultural and media cooperation to counter cognitive and information warfare These are not rhetorical gestures – they are blueprints for institutional transformation. Iran is operationalizing a new security doctrine built on multipolarity, mutual defense, and resistance to hybrid threats. While NATO is structured around a rigid hierarchy dominated by Washington, the SCO embodies a post-hegemonic vision: sovereignty, equality, and civilizational plurality. Its member states represent over 40% of the global population, possess vast industrial capacities, and share a collective desire to break the unipolar mold. Tehran's bet is clear: the SCO offers not just a geopolitical shelter, but a platform for advancing a new global logic – one rooted in strategic autonomy, not dependency. The sophistication and clarity of Araghchi's initiatives suggest that Tehran is preparing for the long game. Behind closed doors, the summit likely featured discussions – formal and informal – about deepening SCO institutionalism, perhaps even rethinking the organization's mandate. Araghchi made that vision explicit: 'The SCO is gradually strengthening its position on the world stage... It must adopt a more active, independent, and structured role.' That's diplomatic code for institutional realignment. The Western response was immediate. Within days of Iran's proposals, the EU imposed new sanctions on eight individuals and one Iranian organization – citing vague claims of 'serious human rights violations.' Israel, by contrast, faced no new penalties. It is geopolitical signaling. Tehran's push to turn the SCO into an action-oriented bloc is seen in Brussels and Washington as a direct threat to the current order. The more coherent and proactive the SCO becomes, the harsher the pressure will grow. But that pressure proves Iran's point. The rules-based order is no longer rules-based – it is power-based. For countries like Iran, the only path to sovereignty is through multilateral defiance and integration on their own terms. Iran is not improvising. It is positioning itself as a co-architect of a post-Western security order. Its vision for the SCO goes beyond survival – it is about shaping an international system where no single bloc can dominate through sanctions, information warfare, or coercive diplomacy. This strategy has implications far beyond Tehran. If the SCO embraces Iran's proposals and begins to institutionalize them, we could be witnessing the early formation of the 21st-century's first true alternative to NATO. The West may dismiss this as fantasy – but in Eurasia, the future is already being drafted. And this time, it's not happening in English.
Russia Today
9 hours ago
- Russia Today
Austria may abandon neutrality for NATO
Austria should be ready to discuss its potential membership in NATO, Foreign Minister Beate Meinl-Reisinger has said. She acknowledged, however, that joining is unlikely to gain major public or parliamentary support at this stage. In an interview with Die Welt published on Saturday, Meinl-Reisinger spoke about what she described as 'an increasingly aggressive Russia,' which she claims is reluctant to conclude a peace deal with Ukraine. Moscow has maintained it is open to dialogue, but insisted that any settlement must take into account its key security concerns, including that Kiev agree to permanently stay out of NATO. According to Meinl-Reisinger, 'neutrality alone does not protect us.' She explained that Austria should invest not only in 'defense capabilities,' but also in military partnerships. 'I am fundamentally very open to a public debate' about Austria's future in this field, she said, adding: 'While there is currently no majority in parliament or among the population for NATO membership, such a debate can nevertheless be very fruitful.' DETAILS TO FOLLOW
