Third Tacoma teen charged in fatal shooting that occurred during suspected vehicle prowl
Prosecutors charged Dominick Blair Byrd, 18, with two counts of second-degree murder on Friday, according to court documents. Byrd is accused of fatally shooting James Marsh, 53, outside the victim's home.
A plea of not guilty was entered on Byrd's behalf during his arraignment. Pierce County Superior Court Commissioner Barbara McInvaille set his bail at $1 million, records show.
Elijah Alexander Andrews, 18, was charged in Pierce County Superior Court Jan. 15 with two counts of second-degree murder, The News Tribune reported. A plea of not guilty was entered on his behalf. The judge in the case ordered that the name of the third defendant, 17-year-old boy, not be publicly released while the investigation is ongoing.
Detectives identified Byrd as the third suspect in Marsh's death through a witness statement, phone logs and a jail phone call between the teen and Andrews.
Police were dispatched at 2:21 a.m. to the 4800 block of North 18th Street for reports of shots fired. Marsh was lying in the street in front of his home when officers arrived. He was injured from several gunshot wounds and was later declared dead at 2:37 a.m., according to a probable cause document.
Officers spoke to 911 callers who reported seeing an older silver vehicle drive away on North 18th Street. There was also a vehicle across the street parked in front of another home with its driver's side door open, documents show.
Marsh's girlfriend told detectives she was asleep before police arrived, prosecutors wrote. When she woke up to the police pounding on her door, she realized Marsh was no longer inside the home.
Through their investigation, detectives learned from surveillance footage that three people were in the middle of a vehicle prowl in the neighborhood. Two people were looking into Marsh's Land Rover Range Rover and a vehicle across the street, prosecutors wrote. Footage showed Marsh coming out towards the street where two people were, and lights flashed between the cars.
The people ran back to their vehicle and drove off. Footage allegedly showed there was also a third person involved.
Following the unnamed teen's arrest on Jan. 10, detectives reviewed a jail call between him and Andrews where they discuss someone named 'Dom' turning himself in, prosecutors wrote. The teen and Andrews alleged during the call that three of them were there during the shooting.
Through a police database, detectives learned Andrews was listed in a police report with Byrd, prosecutors wrote. A witness who was close to Andrews told detectives that 'Dom Byrd' was the third person involved in the homicide and was the person to 'fire the gun.'
Byrd's phone records also allegedly showed that his phone was in the area of where Marsh lived right before police were dispatched to the scene. His phone was also in the area where another vehicle prowl occurred prior to the shooting, prosecutors wrote.
Officers arrested Byrd on Wednesday after he left his apartment, prosecutors wrote.
Byrd has not been previously convicted with a crime, records show.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
2 days ago
- Chicago Tribune
Animals running loose continue to be a challenge in Winfield
The town of Winfield continues to be dogged by complaints of animals running at large and attacking people or pets. Winfield Town Marshal Robert Byrd at the Winfield Town Council meeting said because of the continued complaints, the town is stepping up its enforcement and fines, including putting an animal down upon a third complaint. First-time offenders, when a complaint is filed through the town's code enforcement, will receive a written warning, then be issued a $250 fine if a second warning is issued. The dog could be euthanized, according to town code enforcement, if the owner is issued a third warning. 'In other words, the third strike and they are out,' Byrd said. Byrd last month reported dangerous dog bite complaints have been on the rise in town, including one in which a bitten dog died. Most recently, a resident who was out jogging was attacked by a German Shepherd, he said. 'The guy would have been mauled if he didn't have pepper spray, which he used against the dog,' he said. Another resident who was chased by a dog had to jump into a lake to avoid being attacked. Other reports have been of pit bulls attacking other pit bulls. 'We're trying to get the message out that animal owners have to maintain their dogs so that residents, including children, don't get bitten,' he said. Complaints that will be investigated include dogs knowingly or negligently running at large; in the event of further offenses, chasing persons or vehicles, barking, howling, yelping or making noise which disturbs the peace and quiet of a neighborhood, according to the Town of Winfield Code of Ordinances, Chapter 92. In other business, Byrd said the newly relocated Winfield Police Station, at 10688 Randolph St., across from the Government Center, maintains a Safe Exchange Zone. Byrd said the police parking lot is equipped with a videotaping system and police phone number so officials can provide a secure setting. Those who might use the Safe Exchange Zone would include those with child custody situations or even residents who want to meet someone with items to sell or exchange on such computer sites such as eBay.
Miami Herald
7 days ago
- Miami Herald
Texas school shooter was fueled by Instagram and ‘Call of Duty,' LA lawsuit alleges
Tess Mata's parents were once enthusiastic about social media. The 10-year-old from Uvalde, Texas, wanted to be TikTok famous. She used to dance, sing and imitate popular trends on her videos, with mom Veronica and dad Jerry keeping a watchful eye on her online habits. But then Tess was gunned down at Robb Elementary School in 2022, one of 19 children and two teachers killed by a former student. Since then, as details of the shooter's personal life have become public, the Matas and a handful of other Uvalde families have come to believe that his exposure to gun content online and in video games led to the tragedy. They are now suing three companies they allege profited off the violent fantasies that led to their children's deaths. The defendants include the maker of 'Call of Duty,' a first-person military shooter game where they say 18-year-old Salvador Ramos encountered a virtual version of a Daniel Defense-branded AR-15 he used in the attack. They are also suing Meta, alleging Ramos encountered ads for the gun that promoted violence on Instagram. The Matas and three other families from Uvalde will travel more than 1,200 miles this week to confront the companies in L.A. County Superior Court, where they have filed claims for negligence, aiding and abetting and wrongful death. 'They glorify these weapons. They made it enticing for young kids to want to purchase these guns, and kids that young are so receptive to these types of things,' Veronica Mata told The Times. Activision, the Santa Monica-based video game developer, has filed for dismissal, arguing that the 1st Amendment protects 'Call of Duty' as a work of art. Meta has also fought to have the case tossed, pointing to well-established case law that shields social media platforms from liability for third-party content posted by users and advertisers. Whether the case proceeds could be decided at a hearing Friday in downtown L.A. The families allege 'Call of Duty,' one of the top-grossing video game franchises in the world, encouraged violence by catching Ramos in a repeated gameplay loop with real-world weapons. And they claim Instagram equipped him with the knowledge of how, when and where to buy the gun he used. 'To put a finer point on it: Defendants are chewing up alienated teenage boys and spitting out mass shooters,' the complaint claims, noting that the three most deadly K-12 school shootings in American history - Uvalde, Parkland and Sandy Hook - were all committed by young men who played 'Call of Duty' and used an AR-15. 'Call of Duty is a simulation, not a game. It teaches players how to aim, reload, and fire accurately, while habituating the teenage nervous system to inflict repeated, graphic violence. And though the killing is virtual, the weapons are authentic,' the complaint alleges. Ramos' choice of the Daniel Defense AR-15 was intentional, the lawsuit said. The small weapons manufacturer has a market share of less than 1%, but a specific rail displayed on a popular 'Call of Duty' gun made it easily identifiable to players online despite a lack of branding inside the game. 'It is the Defendants who gave Daniel Defense a direct line into children's homes and heads, who wrote a playbook for how to peddle firearms while circumventing parents and the law, and who created a simulation with real-life weapons and applauded children for their proficiency at killing,' the complaint said. Meta did not immediately respond to The Times' request for comment, nor did Daniel Defense, another defendant in the lawsuit. Courts have long rejected the idea that violent video games like 'Call of Duty' are responsible for the actions of those who play them despite the moral panic surrounding the issue, and have also overturned efforts to restrict minors' access to them. Most modern 'Call of Duty' games are rated for mature audiences over 17 by the Entertainment Software Ratings Board, but are available to minors through online marketplaces that don't meaningfully verify someone's age before purchase. 'Any adolescent that wants to download Call of Duty can do that,' Josh Koskoff, a lawyer for the Uvalde families, told The Times. A 2011 Supreme Court case, Brown vs. Entertainment Merchants Assn., struck down a 2005 California law that banned the sale of violent video games to minors. There was 'no tradition in this country of specially restricting children's access to depictions of violence. ... Grimm's Fairy Tales, for example, are grim indeed,' the late Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in the 7-2 majority opinion. Activision has long defended its games as protected artistic expression despite criticism of its extreme violence, which sometimes involves players killing other combatants - almost never allowing civilian casualties - in combat simulations, sometimes in public arenas like airports and urban sprawls. 'Call of Duty tells complex stories that explore the real-world combat scenarios that soldiers face in modern warfare. There can be no doubt Call of Duty is expressive and fully protected by the First Amendment,' the company said in a court filing. The families still mourning their children say challenging the institutions that failed to protect them has been an ongoing fight. The new case is another chapter which feels like taking on giants, Veronica Mata said. The city of Uvalde approved in May a $2-million settlement for a flawed police response to the shooting, and a Texas appeals court Wednesday ordered the release of documents from the school board and county about the shooting, local news reported. 'We can step forward, and we can make that change and make them understand that what they've done and what they continue to do is not benefiting them or anybody else,' Mata said. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Los Angeles Times
18-07-2025
- Los Angeles Times
Uvalde school shooter was fueled by Instagram and ‘Call of Duty,' L.A. lawsuit alleges
Tess Mata's parents were once enthusiastic about social media. The 10-year-old from Uvalde, Texas, wanted to be TikTok famous. She used to dance, sing and imitate popular trends on her videos, with mom Veronica and dad Jerry keeping a watchful eye on her online habits. But then Tess was gunned down at Robb Elementary School in 2022, one of 19 children and two teachers killed by a former student. Since then, as details of the shooter's personal life have become public, the Matas and a handful of other Uvalde families have come to believe that his exposure to gun content online and in video games led to the tragedy. They are now suing three companies they allege profited off the violent fantasies that led to their children's deaths. The defendants include the maker of 'Call of Duty,' a first-person military shooter game where they say 18-year-old Salvador Ramos encountered a virtual version of a Daniel Defense-branded AR-15 he used in the attack. They are also suing Meta, alleging Ramos encountered ads for the gun that promoted violence on Instagram. The Matas and three other families from Uvalde will travel more than 1,200 miles this week to confront the companies in L.A. County Superior Court, where they have filed claims for negligence, aiding and abetting and wrongful death. 'They glorify these weapons. They made it enticing for young kids to want to purchase these guns, and kids that young are so receptive to these types of things,' Veronica Mata told The Times. Activision, the Santa Monica-based video game developer, has filed for dismissal, arguing that the 1st Amendment protects 'Call of Duty' as a work of art. Meta has also fought to have the case tossed, pointing to well-established case law that shields social media platforms from liability for third-party content posted by users and advertisers. Whether the case proceeds could be decided at a hearing Friday in downtown L.A. The families allege 'Call of Duty,' one of the top-grossing video game franchises in the world, encouraged violence by catching Ramos in a repeated gameplay loop with real-world weapons. And they claim Instagram equipped him with the knowledge of how, when and where to buy the gun he used. 'To put a finer point on it: Defendants are chewing up alienated teenage boys and spitting out mass shooters,' the complaint claims, noting that the three most deadly K-12 school shootings in American history — Uvalde, Parkland and Sandy Hook — were all committed by young men who played 'Call of Duty' and used an AR-15. 'Call of Duty is a simulation, not a game. It teaches players how to aim, reload, and fire accurately, while habituating the teenage nervous system to inflict repeated, graphic violence. And though the killing is virtual, the weapons are authentic,' the complaint alleges. Ramos' choice of the Daniel Defense AR-15 was intentional, the lawsuit said. The small weapons manufacturer has a market share of less than 1%, but a specific rail displayed on a popular 'Call of Duty' gun made it easily identifiable to players online despite a lack of branding inside the game. 'It is the Defendants who gave Daniel Defense a direct line into children's homes and heads, who wrote a playbook for how to peddle firearms while circumventing parents and the law, and who created a simulation with real-life weapons and applauded children for their proficiency at killing,' the complaint said. Meta did not immediately respond to The Times' request for comment, nor did Daniel Defense, another defendant in the lawsuit. Courts have long rejected the idea that violent video games like 'Call of Duty' are responsible for the actions of those who play them despite the moral panic surrounding the issue, and have also overturned efforts to restrict minors' access to them. Most modern 'Call of Duty' games are rated for mature audiences over 17 by the Entertainment Software Ratings Board, but are available to minors through online marketplaces that don't meaningfully verify someone's age before purchase. 'Any adolescent that wants to download Call of Duty can do that,' Josh Koskoff, a lawyer for the Uvalde families, told The Times. A 2011 Supreme Court case, Brown vs. Entertainment Merchants Assn., struck down a 2005 California law that banned the sale of violent video games to minors. There was 'no tradition in this country of specially restricting children's access to depictions of violence. ... Grimm's Fairy Tales, for example, are grim indeed,' the late Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in the 7-2 majority opinion. Activision has long defended its games as protected artistic expression despite criticism of its extreme violence, which sometimes involves players killing other combatants — almost never allowing civilian casualties — in combat simulations, sometimes in public arenas like airports and urban sprawls. 'Call of Duty tells complex stories that explore the real-world combat scenarios that soldiers face in modern warfare. There can be no doubt Call of Duty is expressive and fully protected by the First Amendment,' the company said in a court filing. The families still mourning their children say challenging the institutions that failed to protect them has been an ongoing fight. The new case is another chapter which feels like taking on giants, Veronica Mata said. The city of Uvalde approved in May a $2-million settlement for a flawed police response to the shooting, and a Texas appeals court Wednesday ordered the release of documents from the school board and county about the shooting, local news reported. 'We can step forward, and we can make that change and make them understand that what they've done and what they continue to do is not benefiting them or anybody else,' Mata said.
