Trans and LGBTQ+ community take to streets to protest gender-affirming care ban
'It was like my depression was magically cured after struggling with it my entire life — going to therapy, being on other medications,' they said. 'Gender-affirming care is what made me happy.'
When the U.S. Supreme Court upheld Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for minors on Wednesday, McCreight said they were unsurprised, but sad and angry nonetheless.
McCreight, 37, joined about 200 others who braved the Saturday afternoon heat to protest the court's decision in U.S. v. Skrmetti. Demonstrators started the 12:30 p.m. rally in Federal Plaza in the Loop to the tunes of Chappell Roan's 'Pink Pony Club' and Nipsey Hussle's 'FDT' from loudspeakers. Under the blistering sun, protesters demanded equal rights for trans and gender-nonconforming people.
They pointed to the importance of gender-affirming care in helping trans youth who face higher rates of mental health issues, including depression and suicide.
'We need to show up for our youth,' said Asher McMaher, executive director of Trans Up Front Illinois and one of the protest's organizers. 'Because they deserve to be the incredible human beings that they're meant to be, and we need every single one of them to grow up.'
Advocates blasted the court's decision in the Skrmetti case, where families and a doctor challenged Tennessee's ban on puberty blockers and hormones to help minors transition. They argued the law deprived them of their constitutional right to equal protection under the law, but the state contended it was necessary to protect children.
For Keerthi Nan, a trans Chicago schoolteacher, the decision 'further dehumanized' young trans and gender-diverse people.
'It sucks to be a trans adult right now,' Nan told the crowd. 'But it is so much harder, so much scarier, to be a trans kid, a trans adolescent in this moment.'
Nan added that though Illinois and Chicago appear to be safe places for trans youth, they still hear Chicago Public School students calling their peers slurs for gay and trans people. They called on protesters to raise continued attention for trans rights.
'Show up to the school board meeting,' she said. 'Show up when people aren't watching. Fight like our students' futures depend on it because they do.'
State Rep. Kelly Cassidy, D-Chicago, the only openly lesbian member of the Illinois House, also called for more action from the broader LGBTQ+ community. She said not only were trans rights and abortion rights at risk — other liberties for LGBTQ+ people could also be in danger.
'You don't get to take your wedding cake and go home, boys,' Kelly said. 'They are not just coming for trans kids.'
At the rally, the parents of trans children stressed the importance of accepting their kids for their identities. Evanston Mayor Daniel Biss, who has two children who have received gender-affirming care, said letting his kids lead their treatment in consultation with medical professionals wasn't 'hard' nor 'emotionally complicated.'
'At no moment in that process did it make a bit of sense for a politician to insert themselves,' he said.
After speeches from trans and LGBTQ+ rights' advocates and local politicians, protesters marched for about a half hour, circling downtown, from Dearborn Street to Michigan Avenue and Adams Street to Washington Street.
The crowd chanted slogans including 'Health care is a human right' and 'Trans rights are human rights' for about half an hour as it moved. Onlookers on the sidewalks stopped to cheer, clap and record the march.
McCreight said they felt 'reinvigorated' by the event.
'You're seeing your rights being stripped away and wondering, 'Am I going to lose access to my health care next as an adult, the thing that I know has literally saved my life?'' they said. 'But I come out here and I know that people aren't going to give up, and honestly, I feel like we're going to eventually win.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
3 days ago
- The Hill
Texas lawsuit challenges telehealth abortions, citing Comstock Act
A Texas man is suing a California doctor for allegedly providing his girlfriend with abortion medication. The lawsuit—a civil complaint filed in the federal court for the Southern District of Texas—accuses a physician named Remy Coeytaux of violating state and federal laws by mailing abortion pills to 'murder' the 'unborn child' of the plaintiff, Jerry Rodriguez. This is the first individual complaint concerning abortion pills mailed via a telehealth provider to be filed in federal court, meaning it could eventually be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court. Coeytaux did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Hill. In the lawsuits, Rodriguez claims that Coeytaux mailed his girlfriend's ex-partner abortion medication, which she then took to terminate two pregnancies in 2024. Rodriguez's girlfriend, Kendal Garza, is currently two months pregnant, and he fears that her ex-partner, Adam Garza, will try to pressure her to 'kill his unborn child' again and obtain abortion pills from Coeytaux to 'commit the murder,' according to the lawsuit. He alleges that the doctor is responsible for the wrongful death of an 'unborn child' and is asking a judge for $75,000 in damages. The lawsuit also alleges that Coyetaux is guilty of violating the Comstock Act, an anti-obscenity law passed in 1873 that bans the mailing of 'obscene' materials, which has not been enforced in over 100 years. The lawsuit is similar to the case filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton late last year, which has tested the power of abortion-related shield laws meant to protect providers in states like New York, California and Washington where the procedure is legal from being extradited or forced to pay penalties for providing care to people in states with restrictive abortion laws. Paxton filed a civil suit against a New York doctor Margaret Daley Carpenter for allegedly prescribing and mailing abortion medication to a 20-year-old woman in Collin County, Texas which later resulted in a medical abortion. A Texas judge ordered Carpenter to pay more than $100,000 in penalties for allegedly prescribing the drugs but neither Carpenter nor her lawyer attended a court hearing related to the charge or responded to the lawsuit. Texas officials have tried twice to force New York courts to recognize its ruling, but they have been unsuccessful with a county clerk citing the state's shield law. 'The rejection stands. Resubmitting the same materials does not alter the outcome,' the clerk said in a statement. 'While I'm not entirely sure how things work in Texas, here in New York, a rejection means the matter is closed.'
Axios
4 days ago
- Axios
Texas is one of most restrictive states for birth control access
Texas is among states with the most restrictive access to contraception, a new scorecard from the Population Reference Bureau shows. Why it matters: Contraception access has become a political flashpoint since the U.S. Supreme Court ended Roe v. Wade, with Democrats unsuccessfully pressing to codify contraceptive access nationwide and some patients concerned that conservative state legislatures could enact new curbs. Zoom in: While Texas expanded Medicaid coverage for family-planning services through the Healthy Texas Women waiver, it hasn't adopted a broader expansion of the health insurance program for low-income residents. That has left gaps in coverage for men and people under 18, per the scorecard. The state requires insurers to cover prescription birth control if they cover other prescription drugs but doesn't mandate coverage of over-the-counter methods. Texas allows minors to consent to contraceptive services only if they're married or meet narrow exceptions. Texas also doesn't require sex education in schools, per the report. The big picture: Nearly 35% of Americans, or 121 million people, live in a state that actively restricts access. The most protective states included California, Washington, Connecticut, New York, New Mexico, Maryland and Oregon. What they're saying:"Reproductive health care access depends on where you live," said Cathryn Streifel, senior program director at PRB and co-author of the scorecard.
Yahoo
16-07-2025
- Yahoo
Donald Trump's election triggered transgender people to contemplate DIY hormones & suicide: study
Even before executive orders were signed in January or court decisions handed down, fear was already surging through transgender communities across the United States. A new study from the University of Vermont, appearing in JAMA Network Open, captures that fear in stark detail. Titled 'Access to Gender-Affirming Care and Alternatives to That Care Among Transgender Adults,' the research found that every single one of 489 transgender, nonbinary, and intersex respondents believed they could lose access to gender-affirming medical care under the shifting political climate. Keep up with the latest in + news and politics. 'This is a population that already feels that their access to care is constantly under threat,' said Teresa Graziano, the study's lead author, who uses they/them pronouns. 'It was startling.' Related: What does Donald Trump's 'shocking and devastating' victory and a second term mean for the LGBTQ+ community? The survey, conducted between the 2024 election and Inauguration Day 2025, revealed a level of distress that transcended fear and entered the realm of survival. More than 21 percent of participants reported that they would feel suicidal if their access to care were cut off. Graziano said one participant explicitly told them, 'killing myself is easier than living without my hormones and my gender affirming care.' Particularly alarming to Graziano was how many respondents described preparing for life without medical support. Nearly a third said they would turn to black-market hormones or attempt to synthesize hormones at home if care were banned. 'My concern as a health care provider is that they do not necessarily know that they are receiving sterile products or the products that they think they're receiving,' Graziano said. 'They may not be using doses that are safe or appropriate for them because it may not translate one-to-one with what they've been using in the past.' The Trump administration has moved quickly to implement policies redefining sex as strictly male or female and directing federal agencies to explore limits on gender-affirming care, particularly for minors. While no federal ban on adult care is currently in place, the U.S. Supreme Court's June decision in Skrmetti upholding Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for minors has fueled deep anxieties that similar laws could spread across the country. Related: Trump administration announces end to gender-affirming care for transgender veterans National advocates say the Vermont study confirms broader trends. A spokesperson for Advocates for Trans Equality told The Advocate, 'This new study echoes what we found in our 2022 U.S. Trans Survey health report that we released last month, which captures the experiences of 84,170 trans adults across the country, and what millions across our country who are losing access to their health care thanks to Trump's budget reconciliation bill are saying: Trump's policies have consequences—all of us are less healthy and less safe, and many trans people will die without the transition-related care they need.' For Rep. Becca Balint, Vermont's first out lesbian member of Congress, the study's findings reflect conversations happening at home. 'It mirrors what I am hearing directly from trans, nonbinary, gender nonconforming folks, intersex people in Vermont and their families,' Balint said in an interview with The Advocate. 'This level of anxiety about not being able to get the care that they need and that they deserve and that will keep them alive is something that I'm hearing from a lot of my constituents.' Related: Supreme Court rules states can ban gender-affirming care for youth in U.S. v. Skrmetti 'In the last few months, when I am back in Vermont and I am at an event, inevitably, either someone who identifies as trans or nonbinary or their family will come up to me and they will tell me just how scared they are that they're not going to be able to get health care,' she said. 'And more broadly, just deep despondency that their own government is coming after them.' While Balint called it 'of course, a shocking statistic that over 20 percent would consider taking their own lives,' she said the finding was, tragically, not surprising. 'They have been told now for two and a half years in earnest by the Republican party and by Trump that they don't matter,' she said. 'That they don't care about the lives of these people, that they will say anything and do anything, and they will scapegoat them.' Balint said many constituents have expressed what it feels like 'to have your government weaponized against you,' and warned that political rhetoric has real consequences for mental health and safety. 'When they don't see us as elected officials standing with their civil rights, standing with their right to the health care that they need and deserve, of course, it looks bleak,' she said. Related: LGBTQ+ mental health crisis center says calls have surged with Donald Trump's inauguration She sees a strong connection between today's threats to transgender people's access to health care and the fight for reproductive freedom. 'I link those all the time, especially for constituents who might have a hard time understanding the lives of trans people because they don't necessarily have somebody in their family or within their close social circle,' Balint said. 'I always say it's the same thing: you're talking about people having control over their own bodies.' Balint emphasized that cutting off access to care won't make transgender people disappear; it simply pushes them into unsafe, underground options. She said, 'transgender people have always existed and always will, as part of humanity itself.' People, she noted, will go to great lengths to obtain the care they need, even if that means risking black-market treatments. Instead of forcing people into such dangerous paths, Balint urged, 'We need to stop demonizing this population who is just trying to live their lives.' If you or someone you know needs mental health resources and support, please call, text, or chat with the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline or visit for 24/7 access to free and confidential services. Trans Lifeline, designed for transgender or gender-nonconforming people, can be reached at (877) 565-8860. The lifeline also provides resources to help with other crises, such as domestic violence situations. The Trevor Project Lifeline, for LGBTQ+ youth (ages 24 and younger), can be reached at (866) 488-7386. Users can also access chat services at or text START to 678678. This article originally appeared on Advocate: Donald Trump's election triggered transgender people to contemplate DIY hormones & suicide: study RELATED Montana court strikes down ban on gender-affirming care for trans minors Hundreds protest Pittsburgh hospital for caving to Trump and denying trans youth gender-affirming care Supreme Court rules states can ban gender-affirming care for youth in U.S. v. Skrmetti
