Why a Teacher of the Year Is Giving His Prize Money Away
Good morning. It's Tuesday. We'll meet a Bronx high school teacher who just won a $25,000 award — and decided to put the money toward a teaching prize in Gambia when his hopes for a State Department grant fell through. We'll also find out about Senator Robert Menendez's 11-year prison sentence, which starts today.
Alhassan Susso is a teacher at a high school in the Mott Haven section of the Bronx who has won numerous awards, including a national teacher-of-the-year prize in 2020. He has just been recognized again, this time with an award of $25,000.
That money will now go to self-funding a project he is passionate about — a teacher-of-the-year prize in Gambia, where he is from — because his hopes for a grant from the State Department appear to have been dashed.
For months, Susso had been preparing to submit an application for something called a public diplomacy grant through the U.S. Embassy in Banjul, the Gambian capital. Then, last month, the webpage with information about the grant program disappeared, Susso said.
He had heard about the Trump administration's plans to lay off nearly the entire staff of the U.S. Agency for International Development, more than 9,700 employees. He figured that U.S.A.I.D. had something to do with administering the public diplomacy grants.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
4 hours ago
- Bloomberg
The Supreme Court Is Right to Respect Parents' Faith
The ruling in Mahmoud v. Taylor should remind public schools that they're working with parents, not competing against them. Save Here's why I think the Supreme Court might be on to something in its Friday decision allowing a group of Muslim and Christian parents to opt their young children out of public-school lessons that feature 'LGBTQ+-inclusive texts': my wife and I sent our kids to private school. How does B lead to A? Let me explain. Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
As a teacher, Supreme Court siding with parents' religious freedom concerns me
My first day as a high school teacher, kids were opting out of pretty much everything I asked them to do. Too tired to read, they said. Writing made their heads ache. They had beefs with whoever I partnered them with on a project and they sure weren't about to get up in front of the class. Most teachers quickly become accustomed to all the opting out. We wise up and toughen up to help kids toughen up. We also figure out how to know when, for the moment, it is better to leave them be. We also get used to the exceptions that kids and their parents ask for. The first year I assigned James Baldwin's "If Beale Street Could Talk," a girl told me her parents wouldn't let her read it. Her brother had found all the f-bombs and showed their parents. The novel also contains critiques of Christian piety and hypocrisy. It was on the district approved reading list, but I didn't want to give that girl any more grief than her brother and parents already were so I let her read something else. Even so, I am concerned about the Supreme Court's ruling in Mahmoud v. Taylor, validating an assertion of religious freedom over a school district's reading program. The case was brought by a group of Maryland parents against Montgomery County's school board, which refused to allow the parents to opt their kids out of the reading and/or discussion of books that depicted people married to same-sex spouses, dramatized a dog at a pride parade, and told other stories whose settings included the recognition and normalization of LGBTQ+ people. In general, I have always tried to honor the beliefs of parents ‒ not just about what to read but also about how they choose to raise their children ‒ whether or not I agree with them. I do this out of respect and also for the sake of kids who are better off without being in the middle of ideological conflict. There are limits, however. The most serious of these is that if I believe a parent's idea of discipline rises (or descends) to the level of physical abuse, I am compelled by law, as are all teachers, to report it to the authorities. Teachers are also mandated to report emotional abuse, elusive as it may be to detect. The students whose emotional abuse has often been the most obvious to me are gay teenagers whose parents have shunned or humiliated them. Some of this abuse is instigated by religious beliefs and influences that make their child's sexuality a source of torment. Another view: Schools are pushing LGBTQ+ books on kids. Supreme Court should side with parents. | Opinion I feel for those parents, but I am far more sympathetic to the young men and women who are the subject of the condemnation and alienation. Even in cases where the level of emotional abuse isn't sufficient to file a report, and with all due respect to the parents, I am compelled to offer emotional support and a voice of acceptance. If narrowing a child's educational experience in that way is a pillar of religious freedom, does that 'freedom' also prevent me or any other teacher from telling an LGBTQ+ student they need not be ashamed of who they are? Perhaps not ‒ not yet ‒ but I worry, as should all educators. It has been nearly 100 years since the Tennessee Supreme Court ruled in John Scopes' case that the state may not criminalize the teaching of human evolution, though Darwin's theory was at odds with the Judeo-Christian Bible's version of human inception. The parallels between Scopes and Mahmoud are far from perfect. The former challenged the academic freedom to teach science when science contradicted religious beliefs. The latter challenges the authority of a school district to override the religious beliefs (or interpretations, anyway) of parents on curricular decisions about their kids. Even so, it doesn't take much of a leap to get from opt-outs for LGBTQ+ book references to opt-outs for the study or even mention of human evolution. Evolution is foundational to anthropology, human history and civilization, and human biology. Preventing a student from learning about it could set the student behind their peers in their knowledge and understanding of science. Preventing a child from understanding the world beyond their own family and experience is potentially more crippling. The world in which today's children are growing up is diverse. An inability to comprehend it and navigate it can limit their academic and professional horizons. Some kids have two moms and some have two dads. Some kids have a transgender parent. Some are being raised by a single parent or grandparent(s) or in a blended family, some kids are being raised by someone with whom they are not related, and still others are being raised by no one at all. Refusing to allow a child to understand and normalize this diversity marginalizes those kids ‒ many of whom are already marginalized by circumstances. This is what educators think about. We try to look out for all kids, but especially the ones who might otherwise feel out of place. Opinion: If you had a teacher who changed your life, 'find that person, tell that person' More urgently, books that validate all families and all kids can save the life of a child who realizes they are gay or trans and feels alone and terrified by that realization. The imposition of those books to someone's faith seems, by comparison, trivial. Pushing back against that imposition seems utterly selfish ‒ ironic for people of faith. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. At the core of this issue are two fundamental questions: How much power and authority should parents legally have over their children? Are we, as a nation, willing to fully recognize the humanity and dignity of all people, regardless of race, creed, color, or sexual orientation or identity ‒ and regardless of our own comfort level? To the first question I can tell you, as a high school teacher and a parent, that parental power is ultimately mostly illusory, and quite often the tighter the parental grip the stronger the children's resistance. I do not have the answer to the second question, but I do know that on this day, Supreme Court justices tilted us toward no. Larry Strauss, a high school English teacher in South Los Angeles since 1992, is the author of 'Students First and Other Lies: Straight Talk From a Veteran Teacher' and "A Lasting Impact in the Classroom and Beyond," a book for new and struggling teachers. You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Supreme Court ruling on LGBTQ books worries me as a teacher | Opinion
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Louisville has abandoned its most vulnerable youth while pretending to care
Louisville is a city full of heart, but heart alone isn't saving our kids. In neighborhoods like the West End and downtown, it feels like the city has made a decision — whether consciously or not — to abandon its most vulnerable youth. I've lived it. I've worked in it. And it burns watching the system pretend to care while offering scraps. One change that could truly strengthen our community is the creation and expansion of real, consistent youth development programs in these redlined and marginalized districts. Not a one-time grant. Not a PR-friendly event. Real programs, run by people who get it, for kids who desperately need more than survival. This change isn't optional — it's critical. If we don't build our kids, the streets will. And they won't be merciful. These communities are not broken — they've been broken into. Decades of redlining, divestment and policy failure have drained opportunity and left behind a trail of boarded-up buildings and untapped potential. Meanwhile, politicians and community leaders show up for photo ops, but never for roll call. There are hardly any after-school programs. Job training is a joke. Mentorship is rare. What you get instead are liquor stores, police presence and funerals. I've seen kids with brilliance in their eyes get swallowed whole by a system that would rather cage them than coach them. Opinion | Displacing NIA Center businesses for Goodwill housing project is unacceptable But it doesn't have to be this way. Youth development programs aren't some radical new idea — they're a proven path forward. We need programs that teach leadership, literacy, tech skills, trades, art and emotional intelligence. We need community centers that feel like sanctuaries, not warehouses. We need mentors who don't judge but understand. And we need it consistently — not just when grant money rolls in. When kids are seen, challenged and guided, they grow. When they're ignored, they disappear — into jails, into graves, or into lives defined by what they never got a chance to become. I say this not as an observer, but as someone who has stood in the very shoes these kids wear. I've seen how quickly hope dies in a place where nothing grows. So let me be clear: to Louisville's community leaders and organizers — your inaction is violence. Every year you delay is another year you gamble with a child's future. If you are not creating opportunity, then you are maintaining the machine that destroys it. I am demanding — not suggesting — that you make this change. Because these kids don't need more words. They need war-chest funding. They need urgency. They need love that looks like investment. Opinion | Joe Creason Park tennis complex, Oldham County data center show secretive pattern Enough is enough. The next generation deserves more than trauma, excuses and forgotten promises. Youth development in marginalized districts is not a favor — it's a debt. A moral obligation long past due. If you really want to see this city thrive, stop writing off the West End and downtown. Start funding the future, or step aside for those of us who will. Build the kids before the streets do. Because the streets are always hiring — and they don't care what's written in your mission statement. Agree or disagree? Submit a letter to the editor. Benjamin Shaun Wright lives in Louisville and is an Operation Iraqi Freedom veteran. A full-time student and small business owner, he brings a sharp eye for injustice — shaped by both his military background and life experience. This article originally appeared on Louisville Courier Journal: If Louisville doesn't build West End kids, the streets will | Opinion
