
Hope Gas Morgantown pipeline suits: Landowners share their stories
The 30-mile pipeline is intended to increase natural gas supply to Morgantown. Hope filed 31 separate condemnation suits in Monongalia County Circuit Court, and eight of those have been settled and closed.
Not all of the remaining landowners are happy with their dealings with Hope and four of them approached The Dominion Post to tell their stories.
First, though, we again offered Hope a chance to comment on the progress on the project and the suits. Hope does not comment on active litigation but said, "We do understand the concerns of landowners and continue to work toward voluntary agreements."
Hope said, "American energy and infrastructure are important parts of West Virginia's future. This project will build connections allowing north-central West Virginia to access more local energy. Hope's Morgantown Connector is creating much needed system resiliency for the hospitals, businesses, and homes in Morgantown. This project is building critical infrastructure needed for the region's future growth and development.
"The project also offers immediate benefits to many people throughout the state, " Hope said. "Hope has a commitment to work with local contractors and suppliers on this project. Many of the dollars spent to build the Morgantown Connector will remain in the Mountain State. The project is also creating hundreds of local family-sustaining jobs for West Virginians and economic development opportunities for the Morgantown area."
Hope is asking the court to grant entry and easements in order to undertake construction of the project.
There are conditions. The landowner retains full right to own, use, enjoy and occupy the land that does not interfere with or is inconsistent with the rights of way and easements sought. But the landowner "shall not construct or permit to be constructed any house, structure or obstruction on, over or through said right of way that will interfere with the construction, maintenance or operation of the natural gas pipeline or appurtenances constructed therein."
In a number of cases, the court is holding Hope's petitions in abeyance pending Hope's provision of proposed fair market valuations of the properties in question.
In others, the court found that Hope is a West Virginia public service corporation that provides public services in the state and is authorized to exercise the right of eminent domain "to take private property for the public purpose stated ... upon payment of just compensation."
In this last group of cases, the court permits Hope to deposit with the court clerk the amount that Hope estimates as just compensation.
The Kerns case Ralph and Mary Jane Kerns have a farm along Sugar Grove Road west of Westover. Hope has deposited a bond in this case. Mary Jane told their story.
"Their contract's ridiculous, " she said. "Everything's for Hope. They're going to take our land, whether we want them to or not, that we've worked all of our life for. And at no fair price. ... They tie us up forever, and all we do is pay the taxes on the land that we can't possibly use. ... We've been here since 1968, and our grandfather was here before then."
Like others who spoke to The Dominion Post, the Kernses are concerned about the proximity of the line to homes. "The ramifications, God forbid, if this pipeline would explode, because it's a high-pressure one, are catastrophic, and it's all around our family."
While they don't care for Hope's offer, she said, "It's not really about the money, it's about taking our rights away."
The Six case George Six is one of several family members who have neighboring farms along W.Va. 7 totaling about 500 acres. They raise livestock on the farms.
One day, he said, they saw some flags and learned Hope surveyors were on their land. "They claimed that they had given us notice, but they had not given anyone notice — our neighbors or anyone — and decided that that was OK, just to go ahead and survey through. Well, me being a licensed surveyor, that's not the case. You just don't have that right."
So Hope representatives came and talked with them, saying they were planning a pipeline route. They let Hope go ahead, having long experience with pipelines under their land.
Hope told them, "Well, once we get our routing done, we'll come back and try and work out some details as to where we go and everything else, which was fine with us."
But Hope came back with a lowball offer, he said, and told them, "If you don't like it, we're going to use our right of condemnation."
The route was right through the middle of one of their properties that included a stream, Six said, cutting off access. Talks failed and the told the land man never to return. Hope filed its condemnation suit.
"We have tried to work a deal with Hope. any way that we could, and have been unsuccessful there." He's sold rights of way for eight times the amount Hope offered, he said.
One of his concerns is that the pipeline doesn't serve anybody along its route ; it's just a transmission line. "It's not going to benefit us as landowners."
The Sixes are in the timber business, he said. "We'll never have timber on our property. We will never be able to use that section of our property." But they'll keep paying property taxes on it.
"Some of the best building sites on the property they're going through, they're going right through the center of it. And we've asked them to just adjust the line and to work with us and all that. [But Hope says ] 'That's where it goes or else.' That's not right. That isn't right."
The Tennant case Marion Tennant lives in a hollow just outside Wadestown. We joined Tennant and his neighbor, Danny Thomas, for a tour of his property: the meadow where contractors were placing warning signs and unloading lumber that day for a bridge to cross his creek, and up onto the ridge behind his house where downed timber he'd like to sell, but won't be able too, lay thick along the route.
"They just dropped all the trees, " he said. "I'm 71 years old. I've lived here all my life. I grew up here. I wasn't interested in selling. And we didn't sell. They're putting their pipe in. They're going to maintain a 50-foot swath of our property that we have to pay tax on."
As with Six, Hope offered him the same low figure, and when he didn't accept, took it off the table for a far lower figure. "Now that's kicking the teeth brother. ... The property's been in my family for almost a hundred years. I wasn't interested in selling when people came to me."
Hope's timber cutting, he said, cut off all his access to harvesting it, including his timber on the other side of his ridge. Hope won't even move it to a spot where he can get to it. They just plan to burn it where it lies.
"They offered me less than $3, 000 for my timber. I've been informed that I've got one log up there that's worth $3, 000. I can't get to it. I don't have the equipment to get to it."
They want him to sign a waiver, he said, so they can come onto his other property and stack it. They will only move it 500 feet.
"They've never once came and sat down to negotiate a price. They just come in and said, 'We're going to put a high-pressure gas line through here. It's going to be a transmission line. It's going to feed Morgantown. Morgantown's low on gas."
The relationship with Hope got so bad he won't let their representative step off the easement. "You can go on this 75-foot easement here. I can't stop you because you've got that. But the rest of it, I own. Don't step on it. You're trespassing. From there, I'll call the law."
As with Six, he was never told Hope was surveying. "We found out through the grapevine why they were surveying. The surveyor showed up and all of a sudden you're seeing ribbons hanging." A coal mine longwall is going under his land and he thought that's what the ribbons were for.
We asked Tennant what kind of timber he's losing. He said walnut, oak, cherry, maple, poplar, locust. Trunks 16 inches to 24 inches across. "I've got a list of it."
He said, "It's time for me to just buckle down and fight. There's nothing I can do to stop it. And I can be a thorn in their side while it's going on."
Case background The Morgantown Connector Project will run a total 30 miles from Wadestown in western Monongalia County eastward to the edge of Morgantown and then northwest to site near Osage.
Hope wants to build the pipeline because it is experiencing a decline in supply capacity above its peak-day requirements. Also, Morgantown Energy Associates and other Morgantown-area customers want to increase their supply levels. In order to meet the demand, Hope proposed to enter into a 15-year contract with Columbia Gas for gas to be supplied to a new Hope-Columbia interconnection near Wadestown.
The pipeline is estimated to cost $177, 437, 169. Hope estimates that the project will generate about 600 jobs, which will make up about half the project cost. Other major costs are the 30 miles of pipeline and five measurement and regulation stations.
The new line would begin at Hope's interconnect with a Columbia Gas line near Wadestown. Using new and existing Hope right of way, it would run 25 miles to the Western edge of Morgantown to connect with other proposed Hope facilities (called Black Night) west of I-79 and Harmony Grove. Hope says about 5.5 miles of that right of way is in northern Marion County.
From Black Night, the line would use existing and new third-party rights of way to go five miles northwest of Granville to a station called Mineral northwest of Osage.
Hope is not proposing any rate hikes at this time for the pipeline but says it intends to recover costs in future base rate and purchased gas adjustment cases.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Elon Musk says he will start a new political party
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Musk has spoken with friends in recent days about his plan for a political party and what it would take to accomplish it, according to a person briefed on those conversations. The discussions have been more conceptual than pragmatic, the person said. Advertisement Even as Musk has proved that he is willing to use his resources to move quickly and dramatically, he also has a long history of not following through on promises. Musk, who helped slash government programs and funding by leading the Department of Government Efficiency before publicly feuding with Trump, had grown incensed by the president's sweeping domestic policy bill. Last month, on social media, he called it a 'disgusting abomination,' adding that it would 'massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit' and that 'Congress is making America bankrupt.' Advertisement For weeks, Musk teased that he would start a new political party if the legislation passed, but he had not explicitly stated his intention to do so until Saturday. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The two-party system has been a defining feature of modern American politics, and plenty of moderate billionaires have dreamed of a successful third-party effort for decades. But the barriers to creating a new, influential political party are plentiful, including heavily gerrymandered districts, deep political polarization and onerous state laws, some of which require expensive and complicated ballot-qualification procedures that would most likely challenge even Musk. Musk donated nearly $300 million to Republican candidates in the 2024 election, and his super political action committee led Trump's get-out-the-vote operation in battleground states. But the tech billionaire failed to deliver the GOP a Wisconsin Supreme Court seat this year, even after putting over $20 million into that race. On Friday, Musk wrote on X that an initial approach could be to back America Party candidates in just two or three Senate races and between eight and 10 congressional races in next year's midterm elections. He reiterated a version of that plan Saturday, saying on X that he would 'crack the uniparty system' through 'extremely concentrated force at a precise location on the battlefield.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times.


Buzz Feed
2 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
32 American Cultural Quirks That Irritate The World
Reddit user Butterfly-girl19 recently asked, "What elements of US culture annoy you?" Americans and non-Americans alike flooded the replies with the American qualities, habits, and pieces of culture they find the most frustrating. Here's what they shared: "Constantly saying the US is the 'best country in the world.' It's usually said by people who don't even own a passport. And best for what? Medical bankruptcy rates? Incarceration rates? National debt?" "Everything is so bloody commercial. You have a baby coming? Throw a party. You know what the baby's sex is gonna be? Another party! Hey, it's early November, let's start broadcasting Christmas specials already! Sorry, I don't get it." "Not understanding that what many Americans perceive to be far-left is center or center-right everywhere else on earth. The politics of the US is so skewed rightward that anything that isn't effectively 'grind up the poors for meat' is considered communism." "The drinking age. At 18, you can legally go to jail, join the army, and vote on who will run the entire country, but you can't have a beer." "The degree to which so-called 'trickle down economics' still pervades the general approach to the economic and legal systems. Everyone is sitting here being robbed blind by corporations 24/7, and then patting each other on the backs about all the sacrifices we make so that our employers, banks, favorite online retailers, etc. can hit their revenue targets." "The lack of community that is due to dominant car culture. A lot of Americans are very badly socially adjusted because of this atomization. Extremely performative culture. Many Americans act like what they see on TV/internet media. It's tiresome and inhumane. I think this leads to an unacceptably high number of people treating others like sources of entertainment/products. Anti-urbanism, anti-intellectualism, and anti-progressive attitudes are very common. Being reactionary as opposed to critical political discourse due to media overexposure. A lot of Americans, including pretty much all conservatives/MAGA, only care about making the 'other guy' look bad. There are no other thoughts there. That's exactly how our political entertainment networks prime people to think, and it works. As such, there is very little room for critical analysis of our society and how we can improve it. We're totally stymied." "I'm a pretty friendly and sociable dude, but I have genuine disdain for the way Americans will just walk up to you and start a conversation out of the blue. I'm good with small talk and meeting new people, but I couldn't walk two blocks in the US without getting pulled into some kind of interaction. After a dozen conversations, it gets kinda tiring. The worst is when people use you as their captive audience while you're pumping gas or waiting in line. Political freaks are especially fond of this." "I don't know if it's the culture, but people using personal freedom as a reason to ignore social responsibility, e.g., refusing to mask up when they are sick with COVID-19." "Expensive healthcare for life-threatening conditions and insurance companies running loops around why they shouldn't pay your bill, even though they take money out of your check every fuckin' month. And if you're not full-time or work as a contractor, freelancer, or gig fucking luck paying $357 a month for the lowest tier of healthcare insurance. I spent more on health insurance when I was part-time and had to decide between health and car insurance. I ended up going with health, and got into a car accident that I had to pay out-of-pocket for. Then I switched to car insurance and then sprained my ankle, which I also had to pay out of pocket for, in the same fucking year." "Treating political parties like sports teams." "The two-party system." "The 'pull yourself up by your bootstraps' mentality and the entire culture around work while we all work our asses off for people who don't work." "Materialism and the constant advertisements. Buy, buy, buy more crap that really will not make you much happier." "(Many) Universities are associated with athletic programs before academics." "Car dependence. More specifically, designing car-dependent cities, then gaslighting the next generation into thinking car dependence is their choice. We can still have cars. We can still not charge out the ass for gasoline. But we can also create transportation networks that don't punish you for being blind, a child, or broke." "Performative Christianity." "The adulation of billionaires who treat common people like garbage." "The assumption that a tip is required and starts at 18% now." "The obsession with oversized trucks." "Nothing other than complete domination of an industry is seen as success. God forbid a company is run to have reasonable profits for the sake of filling a need in a community and providing for its workers and owners. It must extract every cent possible for maximum profits at all times." "The obsession with 'hustle culture.' Sometimes rest is just rest, not failure." "Teachers are supposed to be the most respected profession in a functioning society, alongside doctors and the people who keep us safe. It is unreal to me how flippant we are towards the people who spend more time with children than parents." "Affordable health insurance being tied to employment." "The idea that parents are no longer responsible for their kids after they turn 18, and that anything but moving out as soon as you can is being a loser." "As a non-American, the obsession with guns while kids are constantly getting killed by guns in schools." "That minimum wage is not tied to the cost of living. I mean, WTF?" "Pharmaceutical ads." "How uptight everyone is about nudity. I have been around the world, and Americans just have this thing that nudity is bad." "The whole emphasis on 'independence' and 'self-reliance', to the point where people who need/want help are shamed." "Using AI in place of imagination and knowledge. There's actually a new study showing that people who relied on AI to write essays had lower brain activity than people who didn't. Literally less intelligent for doing it." "The blending (especially recently) of politics and religion, and enforcing your religious beliefs on others via policy. It's fine to not get an abortion or be against it if your religious beliefs dictate it, but it's not okay to be against it and remove it as a choice for others. Or, in a less 'controversial' topic: I can't buy hard liquor on a Sunday in my state from a liquor store because it's 'God's Day,' but I can sit down at the bar next door and take shot after shot. If you don't want to drink/buy alcohol on Sundays, don't. It's not up to you to determine if others do." And: "Misguided patriotism and supporting destructive policies that go against everything the country was founded on. Proud ignorance kind of goes hand-in-hand with the aforementioned, but it's another problem as well. The belief in exceptionalism — that there's no way any other country or idea could be better than we are, so there's no need to continue to improve. Denial of hard truths. This effort to hide our past because it makes people uncomfortable. Of course it does. That's what makes us great — to LEARN from it, not hide it. No one is supposed to feel good about slavery. It was very bad. We fought a damn war over it and killed each other in the hundreds of thousands. It should be damn well remembered." What's an aspect of American culture that you find annoying or frustrating? Tell us in the comments or share anonymously using this form. Note: Submissions have been edited for length and/or clarity.


Business Upturn
3 hours ago
- Business Upturn
On Eve of Massive Spending Proposal, Resurfacing Presentation from Former Pentagon Advisor Suggests Untapped U.S. Asset Could Quietly Balance the Books
Washington, D.C., July 05, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — As President Trump prepares to introduce a sweeping legislative package—described by insiders as a 'Big Beautiful Bill' with trillion-dollar implications—a released presentation by former White House advisor Jim Rickards may offer a surprising counterbalance. According to Rickards, the U.S. already controls a little-known national asset capable of offsetting many of the bill's fiscal demands—without borrowing, taxing, or printing new dollars. 'The nature of this 'trust' as I call it, is such that politicians haven't been able to raid it… which has allowed it to grow untouched… for decades' . 'This is not some kind of government program like those COVID relief checks,' he adds. 'But it is a chance for the average American to become richer than they ever imagined' . A Resource Base Hidden in Plain Sight The presentation points to a vast store of natural resources—buried beneath federally owned land—stretching across the United States. These include copper, lithium, uranium, and other strategic minerals essential to infrastructure, defense, and energy systems. '$516 billion is here in the Salton Sea area of California… $3.1 trillion in Nome, Alaska. And $7.35 trillion in Midland, Texas…' . Rickards notes that these reserves have been known to government agencies for decades, but effectively off-limits due to environmental red tape and political inertia. 'For the past 50 years, fake-experts have strangled us from within the government,' he says. 'They tied us down with reams of regulation' . Trump's Pivot to Domestic Wealth With the introduction of this new bill—which some expect to prioritize military modernization, industrial revitalization, and energy security—Rickards believes the shift toward using domestic assets isn't just philosophical, it's practical. 'Trump is re-opening our mineral-rich Federal Lands. And fast-tracking companies that could recover trillions of dollars' worth of resources, right here in America'. 'There are certain areas where we have great, raw earth… and we're not allowed to use it because of the environment. I'm going to open them up,' Trump said . Decades of Delay. Days from Decision. The presentation references several high-value resource projects that have been stuck in limbo for years: 'Resolution Copper Mine… 29 years' 'Pebble Mine… since 1990' 'Thacker Pass Lithium Mine… since 1978' Now, Rickards says, the clock may finally be ticking in the other direction. 'We know exactly where these minerals are. We know they're worth trillions of dollars. And now—for the first time in half a century—we can go get them' . A New Path Forward? Rickards argues this isn't a question of what to create—but whether we'll finally use what's already ours. 'It's not earmarked for any specific individual,' he clarifies. 'I'm just trying to use terminology that will make the most sense to viewers' . 'We've had this rich endowment right under our feet… yet for years, we refused to touch it' . As Congress prepares for a new budget cycle, the presentation adds fuel to a growing conversation: Can America build the future… with what it already owns? About Jim Rickards Jim Rickards is a former advisor to the CIA, Pentagon, and U.S. Treasury. He played a key role in the Petrodollar Accord in the 1970s, has counseled the U.S. government through major financial and geopolitical events, and is the author of seven New York Times bestselling books. He now serves as a strategic analyst focused on national resilience, resource policy, and economic forecasting. Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same. Ahmedabad Plane Crash