Thunder most to blame for loss to Pacers in NBA Finals Game 6
The post Thunder most to blame for loss to Pacers in NBA Finals Game 6 appeared first on ClutchPoints.
The Oklahoma City Thunder entered Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis on Thursday, hoping to hoist the Larry O'Brien Trophy as NBA Champions. Not only did they not win the game, but the Thunder were soundly beaten in Game 6 of the NBA Finals, 108-91. Even that final score is not truly indicative of how one-sided the game was.
Advertisement
The Pacers led by between 20 and 30 points throughout the entire second half. It was not until starters were pulled late in the fourth quarter that the Thunder made the score look respectable.
Early on, things were going Oklahoma City's way. They jumped out to a quick 10-2 lead, with the defense swarming. But that changed quickly as the Pacers began moving the ball. That also coincided with the Thunder turning the ball over time and again. But we'll get to that.
For the purposes of this article, we are going to visit the three Thunder players most to blame for the Game 6 blowout loss.
Thunder Most to Blame for NBA Finals Game 6 Loss
Chet Holmgren
The first culprit for OKC is their big man, Chet Holmgren. He flat-out played terribly in Game 6, racking up 24 of the most meaningless minutes you will ever see from someone his size.
Advertisement
In the first quarter, Holmgren was consistently fed the ball in the paint. The 7-foot-1 center was consistently made a fool of down low by smaller defenders from the Pacers. He finished the game with four points on 2-for-9 from the floor. He turned the ball over twice, missed all three shots from beyond the arc, and looked lost at times.
Through six NBA Finals games, the Thunder big man is shooting 35 percent from the field and 12 percent from downtown.
Basketball fans have rarely ever seen his combination of size, athleticism, and shooting. But once again, it was made painfully clear that until Holmgren can put on some muscle (and therefore weight), he will never live up to his potential.
Alex Caruso
I put Alex Caruso on this list for two reasons: He was an unmitigated disaster on both ends, and he represents a poor effort from the Thunder bench.
Advertisement
If you just look at the box score, you might think Oklahoma City's bench came to play Thursday night. Nothing could be further from the truth. Almost all of their scoring came when the game was out of hand in the final stanza.
Caruso, particularly though, woof. He played 22 minutes, finished with zero points, and had a plus/minus of -33. Only Jalen Williams' -40 was worse. The clock clearly struck midnight on this pumpkin. The Thunder's Game 4 hero was abused defensively seemingly every time down the court.
It wasn't even Pacers starters doing it to him, either. But hey, in the NBA Playoffs, the bench typically doesn't show up on the road. That brings us to the biggest problem on Thursday night.
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander
Oklahoma City's best player led the team in scoring with 21 points. They weren't even terribly inefficient either, sinking 7-for-15. Yet, Shai Gilgeous-Alexander would be the first to tell you he did not play well.
Advertisement
During the regular season, he shot better than 37 percent from three, attempting more than five per game. But that number has dropped drastically, and he only attempted one in Game 6, missing it.
He also tied a playoff career-high with eight turnovers. That also tied an NBA Finals Game 6 record, per Stat Muse.
Several times, he found himself in no man's land. Instead of passing out of double teams, SGA tried forcing it. He also had his pocket picked by Andrew Nembhard a few times. The Pacers thrived on Thursday night off of turnovers, turning 21 of them into 19 points.
Indiana loves to run, and turning the ball over sets the stage for that to happen.
Advertisement
Knowing bench and role players do not typically win road playoff games, it is incumbent upon the team's stars to bring it. Gilgeous-Alexander did not do that.
Now, the second youngest finals team in NBA history will host a Game 7 for all of the marbles.
Related: Thunder fans call fake news on Tyrese Haliburton injury
Related: Thunder's NBA Finals vs. Pacers eerily similar to Nuggets series
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oklahoma City's Game 7 victory over Indiana draws largest NBA Finals audience in six years
BRISTOL, Conn. (AP) — Oklahoma City's 103-91 victory over Indiana in Game 7 was the most-watched NBA Finals game in six years. Sunday night's game averaged 16.53 million on ABC and ESPN+ according to preliminary ratings data from Nielsen. The audience peaked at 19.28 million during the second half (9:45-10 p.m. EDT). Advertisement It is the first time since Toronto wrapped up its title in Game 6 against Golden State in 2019 (18.34 million) that the finals have had an audience over 16 million. The last Game 7, when Cleveland beat Golden State in 2016, averaged 31.02 million. The seven-game series averaged 10.27 million, down from the 11.31 million average for Boston's victory over Dallas in five games last year. The seven games were the most-watched television broadcasts since the first week of May. ESPN and ABC averaged 6.12 million for the 34 games they carried during the playoffs, a 10% increase over last year. ___ AP NBA: The Associated Press
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
5 NBA Players Who Could Be Traded This Summer
May 3, 2022; Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Boston Celtics guard Jaylen Brown (7) drives to the basket past Milwaukee Bucks forward Giannis Antetokounmpo (34) in the first half during game two of the second round for the 2022 NBA playoffs at TD Garden. Mandatory Credit: Bob DeChiara-USA TODAY Sports May 3, 2022; Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Boston Celtics guard Jaylen Brown (7) drives to the basket past Milwaukee Bucks forward Giannis Antetokounmpo (34) in the first half during game two of the second round for the 2022 NBA playoffs at TD Garden. Mandatory Credit: Bob DeChiara-USA TODAY Sports With the 2025 NBA season behind us, the trade market has already exploded with big names like Kevin Durant and Jrue Holiday heading to new teams. Here are 5 big-time players who could be next in line to hit the trade block. Check Out: 50 Best NBA players right now 1. Giannis Antetokounmpo, Bucks Credit: Benny Sieu-Imagn Images The best player left on the trade market by far, trade rumors about the 30-year-old, two-time MVP have been circulating for a while. Given the Milwaukee Bucks' lack of a legitimate young core and recent playoff underperformances, it's becoming increasingly likely that Giannis will want in on a team that's more competitive for a championship push. Advertisement Related: Top NBA free agents 2025: Top 20 NBA free agency rankings, NBA free agents this summer 2. Lauri Markkanen – Jazz Credit: Chris Nicoll-Imagn Images The Utah Jazz are rebuilding, and after another disappointing lottery result, they are nowhere near ready to compete for playoff contention. If the Jazz want to offload Markkanen's expensive contract and give the lottery one last try for a top-four pick, they should trade Lauri. 3. Trae Young – Hawks Credit: Kevin Jairaj-Imagn Images Trae Young's contract runs through the 2026 season, and he will be eligible for a contract extension this offseason, but not a supermax extension. If he decides to hold out until free agency, there is a good chance the Atlanta Hawks may trade the 26-year-old star. 4. Jaren Jackson Jr. – Grizzlies Credit: Cary Edmondson-Imagn Images Jackson Jr. is in the same situation as Young. With the end of his contract in sight, he could easily sign an extension with the Memphis Grizzlies. But that's only if Jaren wants to stay in Memphis. He just as easily can hold out and force the Grizzlies to trade him. Advertisement Also Read: NBA insider explains why Sacramento Kings traded Tyrese Haliburton to Indiana Pacers instead of De'Aaron Fox 5. Jaylen Brown – Celtics Credit: David Butler II-Imagn Images The Boston Celtics have already traded two significant contributors to their 2024 NBA Championship in Jrue Holiday and Kristaps Porzingis. It would be foolish to think Brown isn't also on the table, as given Boston's immense payroll, two supermax contracts with Brown and Tatum just aren't sustainable. Also Read: Top Golden State Warriors rival targeting Jonathan Kuminga in NBA free agency Related Headlines
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What dodging second apron means for Boston Celtics trade possibilities
The Celtics made a big first step in their offseason on Tuesday, dipping below the second apron threshold ($207 million) by trimming roughly $24 million from their payroll with the trades of Kristaps Porzingis and Jrue Holiday. There are many more moves to come for the Celtics this offseason, league sources tell MassLive as Boston looks to retool its roster for the future following Jayson Tatum's torn Achilles. However, Brad Stevens' prompt work of dumping money ahead of the NBA Draft now opens more doors for the franchise heading into the heart of the NBA offseason. So what exactly does getting under the second apron do for the Celtics when it comes to future trade and free agent possibilities? Let's examine where the roster is at and the benefits it provides for future dealing. Advertisement CELTICS 2025-26 ROSTER Jayson Tatum: $54.1 million Jaylen Brown: $53.1 million Derrick White: $28.1 million Anfernee Simons: $27.6 million Sam Hauser: $10 million Georges Niang: $8.2 million Payton Pritchard: $7.2 million Baylor Scheierman: $2.6 million Xavier Tillman: $2.5 million Neemias Queta: $2.3 million Jordan Walsh: $2.2 million (non-guaranteed) No. 28 pick: $2.5 million JD Davison: $2.2 million (team option) Total: $203 million to 13 players THINGS CELTICS CAN NOW DO BY GETTING UNDER SECOND APRON THRESHOLD Aggregate (combine) salaries in a trade: This is a simple but significant tool. Before, Boston could only send out one player at a time in a trade. Now, Boston can ship out multiple players in a deal simultaneously. Advertisement Send out cash in a trade: NBA teams are permitted to send up to $7.2 million in a trade during a season if they are below the second apron. This can become a valuable sweetener to convince a team to take on an unwanted contract. The Celtics did not have access to use this money at all in trades last season. Now, it's a weapon at their disposal again for deals in 2025. Access to 2033 first-round pick to trade: The Celtics will have to wait a couple of years (and stay under the second apron) to have access to trade their 2032 first-round pick after staying above the second apron last year. However, their 2033 first round pick has been unfrozen by dipping under the second apron now. RESTRICTIONS CELTICS STILL FACE WHILE ABOVE FIRST APRON ($195 MILLION) Access to smaller taxpayer mid-level exception ($5.7 million): The Celtics' usage of this MLE would trigger a hard cap at the second apron ($207 million). Given where Boston is with their repeater tax penalties, it would be surprising to see Boston use the MLE this offseason since getting under the tax line entirely could be a priority. Advertisement Can't take back more than 100 percent of salary sent out in trade: This is a simple restriction that was also in place for all second apron teams. Essentially, Boston can't send out a $30 million dollar player and take back one making $31 million. The salary matching rules get much easier to manage if the Celtics drop below the first apron ($195 million), which would require trimming another $8 million in salary. Can't use traded player exceptions (yet): The Celtics have created a pretty big TPE ($22 million) in the Kristaps Porzingis trade but don't have access to it if their payroll stays this high. That changes if they drop under the first apron. Final thoughts The Celtics' initial moves trimmed roughly $260 million in payroll and luxury tax penalties for the 2025-26 season. However, Boston is still facing a sizable tax bill ($68 million) with their current roster and has basketball incentives to keep trimming the payroll as well in order to open the door for more flexibility and team building tools moving forward. Advertisement Getting below the first apron ($195 million) is a logical next step for Boston and it would not be surprising at all to see Boston give themselves the option to get under the luxury tax threshold entirely ($187 million) for the 2025-26 season. More Celtics content Read the original article on MassLive.
