logo
Commentary: Trump's ‘Great Deal' with Vietnam is no trade agreement

Commentary: Trump's ‘Great Deal' with Vietnam is no trade agreement

CNA21 hours ago
SINGAPORE: Just days before his trade negotiation deadline, United States Donald Trump announced on Wednesday (Jul 2) a 'Great Deal of Cooperation' with Vietnam.
Trade agreements typically aim to eliminate trade barriers and to set rules that support high-standard, seamless trade that creates certainty for businesses. This US-Vietnam 'deal' does not come close to that standard.
At most, this provides a mechanism to allow for the extension of negotiations. Vietnamese media reported the joint statement as a trade agreement framework.
At this point, there are few details beyond Mr Trump's post on Truth Social. Vietnam looks set to receive a reduced tariff rate of 20 per cent, down from the threat of 46 per cent, in exchange for giving the US 'total access' to its markets.
Indeed, this 'deal' raises even more questions as to how far the US will go in requiring its trading partners (a word used loosely) to decouple themselves from China.
TARIFFS ARE RELATIVE
First things first. Did Vietnam negotiate a good deal by getting its tariffs reduced to 20 per cent?
It's impossible to know. Because the relative tariff rate – compared to an economy's neighbours and key competitors – counts most.
'Without knowing the tariff rates for Cambodia, Indonesia, Thailand, and especially India, we cannot assess the impact,' Travis Mitchell, executive director of the AmCham in Ho Chi Minh City told me. Future business plans and investment remain basically frozen, he added.
Furthermore, US tariffs on sectors deemed sensitive to national security are yet to come. If the US hits Vietnam with Section 232 tariffs on the wood and furniture sector, as well as the electronics, components and small household appliances sector, Vietnam's rate will effectively be back over 40 per cent.
WHAT DOES DONALD TRUMP CONSIDER TRANS-SHIPMENTS?
There's also a question of what Mr Trump considers 'trans-shipments', which he specified would attract a higher 40 per cent tariff rate. In a follow-up post on X, his Secretary of Commerce said trans-shipping meant 'if another country sells their content through products exported by Vietnam to us.'
Neither man is clear with how they define 'trans-shipping' in their social media posts.
Already, one cannot simply manufacture a product in China, send it to Vietnam, merely change the label and declare the certificate of origin to to be Vietnam, and export to the US. That is considered illegal.
However, taking a good manufactured in one place, sending it to another country, transforming into a new product and then exporting constitutes trade. At least for now.
'Without seeing the details of the agreement, assessing the pros and cons of the deal is not possible. For example, companies don't know what the definition of trans-shipping refers to in the social media posts,' Adam Sitkoff, head of AmCham in Hanoi, told me.
Has the US just made illegal trans-shipments permissible with a 40 per cent tariff?
Or are trans-shipments still not allowed, but will any product exported from Vietnam to the US which contains any Chinese content be slapped with a 40 per cent tariff?
And how will they define Chinese content? A good manufactured in China? Or what about a Chinese-owned factory in Vietnam which produces that good?
'I am concerned that most of Vietnam's exports will be assumed to be 'trans-shipped' unless they are wholly obtained such as being grown or harvested from Vietnam with zero foreign inputs,' said Deborah Elms, head of trade at the Heinrich Foundation. Vietnam cannot compete if that's the case.
FORCING A DECOUPLING FROM CHINA
This announcement marks a clear shift: The US pursues a strategic 'decoupling' (or 'de-risking', depending on the Trump administration official being quoted) from China – and demands its trading partners do the same.
Mr Trump's trade adviser Peter Navarro has called Vietnam a 'colony of China', claiming that as much as a third of its exports to the US were, in fact, Chinese goods rebranded as Vietnamese.
The US believes China poses a systemic challenge that cannot be addressed through bilateral restrictions.
Other governments share concerns about China's unfair trade practices and the impact of its excess capacity being dumped in their markets, and are looking at decoupling on its own terms.
The amount of goods flowing from China through Vietnam to India mirrors the US experience.
Echoing US sentiments, Indian Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal dismissed an ASEAN-India trade pact as 'silly', remarking: 'I am opening up my market to my competitors, many of whom have now become the B-team of China.'
For countries like Vietnam, which have thrived on Chinese-linked manufacturing, being caught in the middle will come at a great cost. If countries want meaningful access to the US market, they will be expected to disentangle themselves from China as well.
We don't yet know exactly what the US requested or what Vietnam agreed to behind closed doors. But when those details emerge, governments and businesses should assume this deal sets the floor – not the ceiling – for what Washington and others will expect from trading partners hoping to avoid reciprocal tariffs.
CLARITY NOWHERE IN SIGHT
The announcement suggests Vietnam has agreed to some form of decoupling from China.
As a result, Vietnam will take a direct economic hit given how much trade and investment it has with China, which supports its exports to the US. This will impact companies' bottom lines and investors' returns.
Also, how will China retaliate? The Chinese government explicitly warned other countries against curbing trade with them in exchange for lower US tariffs and promised to retaliate against countries that do so. That clearly applies here.
Businesses and investors need certainty. The real prize of foreign investment for the US and its trading partners will only come if the rules for trade are predictable and long-term.
What we have right now from the US and Vietnam does not achieve that.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump to sign tax-cut and spending bill in July 4 ceremony
Trump to sign tax-cut and spending bill in July 4 ceremony

Straits Times

time3 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Trump to sign tax-cut and spending bill in July 4 ceremony

FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a press conference in the Roosevelt Room at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 12, 2025. REUTERS/Nathan Howard/File Photo President Donald Trump is scheduled to sign a massive package of tax and spending cuts into law at a ceremony at the White House on Friday, one day after the Republican-controlled House of Representatives narrowly approved the legislation. The bill, which will fund Trump's immigration crackdown, make his 2017 tax cuts permanent, and is expected to knock millions of Americans off health insurance, was passed with a 218-214 vote after an emotional debate on the House floor. Trump is expected to sign the bill on Friday around 5 p.m. ET at a White House celebration for the July 4 Independence Day holiday. The ceremony is expected to include a flyover by stealth bombers and fighter jets that took part in the recent U.S. strikes on nuclear facilities in Iran. The bill's passage amounts to a big win for Trump and his Republican allies, who have argued it will boost economic growth while largely dismissing a nonpartisan analysis predicting it will add $3.4 trillion to the nation's $36.2 trillion debt. Vice President JD Vance, who cast the tie-breaking vote for the bill to clear the Senate, said on Friday that the legislation would support Trump's goal of making it easier to invest in the United States and harder to invest abroad. "We're going to look back on this, I really do think, as the beginning of the golden age of the United States of America," Vance told reporters during a visit to North Dakota. While some lawmakers in Trump's party expressed concerns over the bill's price tag and its hit to healthcare programs, in the end just two of the House's 220 Republicans voted against it, joining all 212 Democrats in opposition. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore PAP has begun search for new candidates; PM Wong hopes to deploy them earlier ahead of next GE Singapore 20 retired MPs spoke up on many issues in Parliament, helped successors prepare for new role: PM Wong Singapore $3b money laundering case: 9 financial institutions handed $27.45m in MAS penalties over breaches Singapore Banks tighten vigilance and processes following $3b money laundering case Asia JB petrol station shooting: Dead man with bullet wounds dumped at hospital Singapore Trilateral work group formed to address allegations of foreigners illegally taking on platform work Singapore Power distribution system in renewal project may be linked to Bukit Panjang LRT disruption: SMRT Singapore Rise in number of scam e-mails claiming to be from Cardinal William Goh: Catholic Church The tense standoff over the bill included a record-long floor speech by House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who spoke for eight hours and 46 minutes, blasting the bill as a giveaway to the wealthy that would strip low-income Americans of federally-backed health insurance and food aid benefits. REUTERS

Tariffs, geopolitics drag on European IPOs, even as funds flow in
Tariffs, geopolitics drag on European IPOs, even as funds flow in

CNA

time3 hours ago

  • CNA

Tariffs, geopolitics drag on European IPOs, even as funds flow in

(Refiles to add the name Kramer to the legal firm in paragraph 19) By Charlie Conchie and Emma-Victoria Farr LONDON/FRANKFURT :Tariffs and Middle East turmoil are spooking European companies and the investors weighing their initial public offerings even as volatility subsides and money flows back into equity markets, advisers told Reuters. President Donald Trump's announcement of sweeping tariffs targeting imports from nearly all U.S. trading partners in April and his subsequent U-turn pause on the levies sent shockwaves through the global economy. But markets, including those in Europe, have since bounced back. The VIX, Wall Street's "fear gauge", has fallen around 67 per cent from a peak touched following Trump's tariff announcement. And fund inflows into European stocks reached their second-highest level this century earlier this year. Still, investors remain wary of new listings. Topping their list of concerns, according to seven IPO advisers interviewed by Reuters, are the potential impact of conflicts like the Israel-Iran war and uncertainty regarding newly listed companies' aftermarket performance. "There's still a bit of nervousness in the network and a hangover from issues around tariffs and the war in the Middle East," said Scott McCubbin, head of EY's UK and Ireland IPO practice. Some companies, meanwhile, are unwilling to accept lower valuations than they had hoped for, the advisers said. SHELVED LISTINGS German medical technology firm Brainlab postponed its IPO this week, citing "geopolitical uncertainties". Pharmaceutical company Stada delayed its debut in March, citing market volatility, while another German firm, car parts seller Autodoc did the same last month without giving a reason. Glencore-backed metals investor Cobalt Holdings, which was planning London's biggest IPO of 2025, meanwhile failed to secure enough investor interest, a person familiar with the matter told Reuters previously. Cobalt Holdings declined to comment. The recent run of shelved listings is making things harder for firms attempting to reopen the IPO market, one person close to the Brainlab IPO process said. Investors could not agree a price for the offering with Brainlab, the person and a second source said. Existing shareholders were dissatisfied with the makeup of the order book, said one of the sources, both of whom spoke on condition of anonymity because the process was private. A spokesperson for Brainlab said interest from investors was "very strong" but the conditions were not optimal for an IPO. While more funds have flowed into European equities this year from investors seeking to reduce their exposure to U.S. assets, that money is going into the stocks of large companies rather than IPOs, said one equity capital markets banker. Some of the reticence stems from cases like German perfume retailer Douglas, which saw its shares drop more than 12 per cent on its listing debut. It subsequently cut its guidance this year. The number of companies that went public across the EMEA region in the first six months of this year fell to 44 from 59 in the same period last year, according to Dealogic data. The amount raised also fell sharply, to around $5.5 billion from $14.1 billion. In such a challenging environment, Naveen Mittel, head of equity capital markets syndicate for EMEA at Citi, said companies planning an IPO have little margin for error. "You need to be clean in terms of setup and structure, evaluation of price, and there needs to be no question marks around it," he said. A POST-SUMMER IPO REBOUND? There have been some success stories this year. Hacksaw, a developer and distributor of online betting games, successfully listed on Nasdaq Stockholm in June. "It's hard to draw any firm conclusions from a few deals when others like Hacksaw, are still getting away," said Michael Jacobs, a partner at law firm Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer. "But it does feel like the IPO window needs a summer break to reset." Advisers are hoping an array of bigger deals may help open the market in the second half. That could include a return of Stada, and possible listings of prosthetic manufacturer Ottobock, Deutsche Boerse's research and technology unit ISS Stoxx, and classifieds business Swiss Marketplace Group. Stada is evaluating all options for the further ownership of the company including a possible IPO, it said. Swiss Marketplace Group said it had recently taken initial steps to achieve a "high level of IPO readiness", but its shareholders had not yet made a decision on the possible timing of a float. And Ottobock said it is continually reviewing options including an IPO, but no decision has been made. Deutsche Boerse said it was considering an IPO of ISS Stoxx, but could also buy out private equity investor General Atlantic from the company. No decision had yet been made, it added. Despite the bleak year-to-date numbers, the big picture for European IPOs - positive funds inflows and a calming of market volatility - looks good, one equity capital markets banker said.

Trump to sign major tax-cut and spending bill into law on Friday
Trump to sign major tax-cut and spending bill into law on Friday

Straits Times

time3 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Trump to sign major tax-cut and spending bill into law on Friday

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a press conference in the Roosevelt Room at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 12, 2025. REUTERS/Nathan Howard/File Photo President Donald Trump is scheduled to sign a massive package of tax and spending cuts into law at a ceremony at the White House on Friday, one day after the Republican-controlled House of Representatives narrowly approved the legislation. The bill, which will fund Trump's immigration crackdown, make his 2017 tax cuts permanent, and is expected to knock millions of Americans off health insurance, was passed with a 218-214 vote after an emotional debate on the House floor. Trump is expected to sign the bill on Friday around 5 p.m. ET at a White House celebration for the July 4 Independence Day holiday. The ceremony is expected to include a flyover by stealth bombers and fighter jets that took part in the recent U.S. strikes on nuclear facilities in Iran. The bill's passage amounts to a big win for Trump and his Republican allies, who have argued it will boost economic growth while largely dismissing a nonpartisan analysis predicting it will add $3.4 trillion to the nation's $36.2 trillion debt. In a post to X on Thursday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt wrote, "The pro-growth policies within this historic legislation are going to fuel an economic boom like we've never seen before." While some lawmakers in Trump's party expressed concerns over the bill's price tag and its hit to healthcare programs, in the end just two of the House's 220 Republicans voted against it, joining all 212 Democrats in opposition. The tense standoff over the bill included a record-long floor speech by House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who spoke for eight hours and 46 minutes, blasting the bill as a giveaway to the wealthy that would strip low-income Americans of federally-backed health insurance and food aid benefits. REUTERS Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore PAP has begun search for new candidates; PM Wong hopes to deploy them earlier ahead of next GE Singapore 20 retired MPs spoke up on many issues in Parliament, helped successors prepare for new role: PM Wong Singapore $3b money laundering case: 9 financial institutions handed $27.45m in MAS penalties over breaches Singapore Banks tighten vigilance and processes following $3b money laundering case Asia JB petrol station shooting: Dead man with bullet wounds dumped at hospital Singapore Trilateral work group formed to address allegations of foreigners illegally taking on platform work Singapore Power distribution system in renewal project may be linked to Bukit Panjang LRT disruption: SMRT Singapore Rise in number of scam e-mails claiming to be from Cardinal William Goh: Catholic Church

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store