Madhya Pradesh High Court To Hear Nursing College Scam Case Daily From July 3
Bhopal:
Four years after NDTV first exposed a massive fraud in Madhya Pradesh's nursing colleges, the case has taken a critical turn. The Madhya Pradesh High Court will now hold daily hearings in the case starting July 3, underlining the gravity of what the court has called a "sensitive issue in the health sector."
A division bench of Justice Atul Sreedharan and Justice DK Paliwal made the decision during a hearing earlier this week. The court is now treating the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Vishal Baghel, as the lead case, which is also under investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).
"Capital Punishment Should Be Given"
In a dramatic moment during the hearing, Justice Sreedharan was visibly shocked after going through the photos and order sheets, revealing the condition of some nursing colleges. "Oh my god," he exclaimed and asked, "Has the court seen these photos before? What is happening?"
One photograph showed how the same campus had different boards put up - Engineering, BEd, and Nursing College - changed as per convenience. Another revealed colleges that existed only on plastic boards, without any infrastructure.
"There should be capital punishment for people doing this. We forgive them for murders because that's a crime of passion, but these are premeditated offences," Justice Sreedharan said sternly.
The bench expressed deep concern, calling the scam a systemic rot that threatens the future of healthcare in the state.
The court rebuked officials of the Indian Nursing Council and Madhya Pradesh Nursing Council for repeated non-compliance. Despite 48 hearings and 96 exemptions granted to the officials so far, key records have still not been submitted.
The bench observed that this kind of deliberate delay would be treated as "interference in the judicial process." In a previous hearing, too, the court had expressed displeasure over the absence of council representatives.
The petitioner has alleged that officials are deliberately obstructing the investigation and shielding those responsible for running fake institutions.
After the CBI stepped in, the number of recognised nursing colleges in Madhya Pradesh reportedly dropped from over 600 to around 200, raising serious questions about how these institutions were ever allowed to operate in the first place.
"This is not just about education; it's about the quality of health services in the country. We are heading towards destruction," Justice Sreedharan warned.
Petitioner Mr Baghel told NDTV, "For the first time this matter was heard by the new bench, and when we presented a complete briefing of three years, the court was
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
‘Abuse of process of law', Telangana HC quashes dowry harassment charges against in-laws of Hyderabad woman in absence of specific details
The Telangana High Court Friday quashed criminal proceedings against the aged parents and married sister of a man accused of dowry harassment and cheating. Justice Juvvadi Sridevi noted that the allegations against the in-laws were vague and lacked specific details, amounting to an 'abuse of process of law'. However, the primary accused, the husband, will face trial for the alleged offences. The case pertains to a wife's complaint alleging offences under Sections 498-A (cruelty by husband or relatives of husband), and 420 (cheating) of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 4 and 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The couple has been married since 2009 and has two children. According to the wife, the husband subjected her to physical and mental harassment at the instigation of his family members. The wife alleged that the children were taken away from her to Gurgaon without her knowledge or consent by the husband. The petitioners (the husband, his parents, and sister) sought to quash the proceedings against them in a case on the file of XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate in Hyderabad. The counsel for the petitioners argued that there were no specific allegations against them, and they never interfered in the marital issues or demanded dowry. They also highlighted that the parents are aged (70 and 60 years) and that the in-laws reside in Gurgaon, Haryana, away from the couple's home. Referencing a Supreme Court decision in 'Dara Lakshmi Narayana and others versus State of Telangana and another', the high court stated, 'Making vague and generalised allegations during matrimonial conflicts, if not scrutinized, will lead to the misuse of legal processes and an encouragement for use of arm twisting tactics by a wife and/or her family.' The court noted that 'Sometimes, recourse is taken to invoke Section 498-A of the IPC against the husband and his family in order to seek compliance with the unreasonable demands of a wife.' The Court stated that there are no specific allegations of dowry demand, dishonesty, or fraudulent intention attributable to the parents and sister. It noted that the primary allegation revolved around the husband's conduct of taking the children, which the court stated does not fall under Sections 420 or 498-A of the IPC. The court further observed that despite allegations of physical assault by the husband, there was no medical evidence or statement from a competent medical practitioner to substantiate the claims. Rahul V Pisharody is an Assistant Editor with the Indian Express Online and has been reporting from Telangana on various issues since 2019. Besides a focused approach to big news developments, Rahul has a keen interest in stories about Hyderabad and its inhabitants and looks out for interesting features on the city's heritage, environment, history culture etc. His articles are straightforward and simple reads in sync with the context. Rahul started his career as a journalist in 2011 with The New Indian Express and worked in different roles at the Hyderabad bureau for over 8 years. As Deputy Metro Editor, he was in charge of the Hyderabad bureau of the newspaper and coordinated with the team of district correspondents, centres and internet desk for over three years. A native of Palakkad in Kerala, Rahul has a Master's degree in Communication (Print and New Media) from the University of Hyderabad and a Bachelor's degree in Business Management from PSG College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore. Long motorcycle rides and travel photography are among his other interests. ... Read More
The Print
3 hours ago
- The Print
Indians charged by CBI for 2008 & 2011 murders in UAE & Bahrain—the cases & law barring extradition
These are among unique cases investigated by the CBI, based on recommendations from the government and material evidence shared with the agency by the Ministry of External Affairs as provided by the foreign authorities. More than 14 years later, on 10 June 2025, India's Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed a chargesheet against Mahla for the alleged murder. A week before that, the agency filed a chargesheet against another Indian national for a 2008 murder in Abu Dhabi. New Delhi: On the morning of 31 January 2011, Bahraini national Mohammed Sultan Al-Motawa was killed allegedly by his driver, an Indian citizen. Bahraini courts found evidence conclusive enough to order life imprisonment for Subhash Chander Mahla in absentia. He had fled the kingdom after committing the alleged offence. The agency has charged Mahla under section 302 (murder) and 404 (dishonest misappropriation of property possessed by a deceased person at the time of their death) of the Indian Penal Code based on forensic evidence and other related material shared by the Bahraini authorities with the Government of India. An agency spokesperson said Friday the investigation revealed that Mahla was aggrieved by his employer's continued misbehaviour and planned to kill him. On 31 January 2011 when his boss was alone, the accused assaulted him with a solid, traumatising tool, leaving him dead. After Al-Motawa's death, Mahla also stole the money from his slain employer, the spokesperson further said. In the second case, the agency filed a chargesheet against Inder Jit Singh on 17 June 2025 for allegedly murdering another Indian citizen, Rama Lingam Natesan, in Abu Dhabi in August 2008. Natesan used to sell international SIM cards in Abu Dhabi and Singh would purchase them from him on a credit basis, the CBI spokesperson said, 'Over a period of time, the debt of Inder Jit Singh reached AED (Arab Emirates dirham) 300. Due to this, a dispute broke out between them. When Rama Lingam Natesan asked the employer of Inder Jit Singh to deduct his outstanding dues from his salary, Inder Jit Singh hatched a plan to kill Rama Lingam Natesan. On 28.08.2008, finding Rama Lingam Natesan alone, Inder Jit Singh assaulted him with a sharp knife causing grievous injuries to him, to which he later succumbed,' the spokesperson said. CBI FILES CHARGE SHEETS AGAINST TWO INDIAN NATIONALS FOR MURDER IN UAE AND BAHRAIN — Central Bureau of Investigation (India) (@CBIHeadquarters) June 27, 2025 Before filing the chargesheets, the agency obtained sanctions from the central government after the conclusion of investigations and examined the accused based on evidence shared by U.A.E. and Bahraini authorities, officials said. However, neither was arrested as they never evaded examination by the agency, ThePrint has learnt. Trials of crimes committed abroad Investigation into crimes committed by foreign nationals in a country are covered by the extradition treaties signed between the nationalities involved. In the instant cases, the need for local prosecution arose from the treaties India has signed with the U.A.E. and Bahrain. The treaties bar extradition. In Singh's case, the Abu Dhabi trial court-Criminal Circuit handed him the death penalty in April 2009, and ordered him to pay the blood money (monetary support for the victim's kin) of 200 AED. UAE authorities reached out to their Indian counterparts for extradition, which is barred by Article 5 of the treaty between the two countries. So, the public prosecution in Abu Dhabi requested its counterparts in New Delhi in September 2012 to try the accused in a competent court. 'The nationals of the Contracting States shall not be extradited to the other Contracting State, provided that the requested State shall submit the case to its competent authorities for prosecution if the act committed is considered as an offence under the laws of both Contracting States,' says the Article 5 of the India-UAE extradition treaty signed in 1999. Following on, the UAE embassy in New Delhi issued a note verbale in May 2016 seeking Singh's prosecution in India. A month later, the Ministry of External Affairs responded to the note, seeking additional information beyond the dossier shared by the UAE authorities to establish the identity of the accused. It had sought a certified copy of the accused's passport, as well as his photograph, to verify identity, fulfilling a total of four requirements. Diplomatic exchanges flew back and forth between the MEA and the UAE embassy in New Delhi until November 2016, when the ministry wrote to the CBI to launch local prosecution in the matter. The agency was mandated to perform this task earlier in May of that year by the Ministry of Personnel and Public Grievances, and to seek sanction for it from the MHA under Section 188 of the CrPC, which deals with offences committed outside India. Based on the letter from the MEA, the agency finally booked Inder Jit Singh, a resident of Punjab's Jalandhar, on 22 January 2020, under Section 302 of the IPC. A similar provision was applied in the case of Mahla, who hails from Rajasthan's Sikar district. A Bahraini court handed him life sentence in his absence. As his extradition was not possible under the terms of the treaty, the Bahraini authorities sought to prosecute him locally. 'Extradition shall be refused if the person wanted is a national of the requested State. For the purpose of this Treaty, nationality of the person sought for extradition shall be determined to be that at the time of the commission of the offence,' says the Article 6 of the India-Bahrain treaty signed in January 2004. Based on material evidence shared with the Ministry of External Affairs, Mahla was booked under sections 302 and 404 of the IPC on 28 April 2022. 'The available information and documents as received from Kingdom of Bahrain through Ministry of External Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi are self-explanatory and disclose that there is sufficient evidence against Mr. Subhash Chandar Mahla to charge him for committing murder of Mohammed Sultan Al-Motawa at Bahrain on 31/01/2011,' the FIR stated. It also revealed that Mahla fled to India immediately after committing the murder. 'In view of the Extradition Agreement dt. 13/01/2004 between Republic of India and Kingdom of Bahrain, Local Prosecution against Mr. Subhash Chandar Mahla is being launched and he is charged for committing murder of Mohammed Sultan Al-Motawa at Bahrain on 31/01/2011 and also for committing Criminal Misappropriation of property possessed by deceased at the time of death which is an offence u/s 302 and 404 of IPC,' the FIR adds. (Edited by Ajeet Tiwari) Also Read: Prioritising extradition requests, speeding up legal assistance — high-level UK delegation visits CBI
NDTV
5 hours ago
- NDTV
Watch: Parag Tyagi Inconsolable After Immersing Shefali Jariwala's Ashes
New Delhi: Shefali Jariwala's untimely demise on Friday night has been difficult for her and her loved ones to accept. Her last rites were performed in Mumbai on Saturday evening, with close family members and friends in attendance. A video of Shefali Jariwala's husband Parag Tyagi breaking down during the rituals was making the rounds online. He could be seen struggling to hold back tears as he performed her last rites. Now a new video has surfaced online where Parag Tyagi is seen immersing Shefali Jariwala's ashes. Surrounded by his family and friends for support, he was seen bidding a final farewell to his beloved. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Viral Bhayani (@viralbhayani) He was later seen exiting the crematorium ground. He was inconsolable as he wiped his tears and made his way towards the exit. What We Know So Far The investigation into the sudden death of actor Shefali Jariwala is currently underway, with two teams from the Amboli Police Station handling the case, according to sources close to the actress. The source told NDTV, "Shefali's post-mortem was conducted at Cooper Hospital. Officials confirmed that the post-mortem was video-recorded." "The post-mortem report is being prepared by a team of 5 doctors. Its preliminary report is likely to come tomorrow," said Amboli police. Initially, the case was examined on the suspicion of food poisoning. Later, the investigation also considered whether Shefali may have died due to any form of poisoning. Police are now looking into all aspects of Shefali's medical history. "Which doctors was Shefali in contact with within the last 8 years, which medicines were prescribed to her, and whether she take some medicines on her own without consulting a doctor? All these aspects are being investigated," the source added. So far, the police have collected seven CCTV footage samples and recorded the statements of 14 people, including family members, domestic staff and those who interacted with Shefali regularly. In A Nutshell Parag Tyagi was seen leaving the crematorium ground in tears, after a final farewell to his wife, actor-model Shefali Shah. Her ashes were immersed today.
