Agricultural output price index up 20.7% in the 12 months to May
In the CSO's (Central Statistics Office) latest report, despite the rise over the past 12 months to May, compared to every month, the output price index dropped by 0.8% in the month since April.
The most significant output price increases in the 12 months to May 2025 were in wool, milk and cattle.
Wool has experienced an annual increase of 31.9%. However, this figure solely rides on the increase experienced from April to May of this year within the index. The wool output price index remained static at 106.3 for the last 11 months, only to jump to 140.2 in May 2025, contributing to an almost 32% increase.
The IFA (Irish Farmers' Association) has said the sudden uptick occurring in May is the result of improved wool demand, with auction prices also up compared to previous months. These higher prices secured by farmers are only returning to them in recent months, in line with normal selling time and payment arrangements in place for some sellers.
IFA Sheep Chair Adrian Gallagher said: 'The increase in wool prices is a welcome move in the right direction, but there is still a journey for wool prices to travel to cover the shearing costs and leave a margin for the farmer.'
Sheep have also received a 7% drop in the output price index in the 12 months leading up to May of this year.
Cattle saw an annual increase of 48% in the output price. Cattle excluding calves increased by 47.5% and calves secured an increase of 123.9% with the output price index sitting at 116.7 in May 2024 and 261.2 in May of this year.
Milk has also seen an annual increase of 14.2% in the output price index despite experiencing a 0.8% drop when comparing April and May of this year.
Potatoes have received the most significant drop in the output price index, with potatoes (including seeds) dropping by 15.1%. Amongst other crops, cereals (with seeds) experienced an annual drop of 0.2%, vegetables a drop of 1% and 'industrial and forage' an increase of 3.4%.
The agricultural input price index rose slightly by 0.1% in the 12 months to May but dropped by 0.2% when compared monthly to April.
Commenting on the release, Senior Statistician in the Agriculture Division, Sam Scriven, said: 'Within the Input Price Index, Fertilisers rose by 10.2% while Motor Fuels (-8.0%), and Feeding Stuffs (-2.3%) were lower than in May 2024."
Breaking down the fertiliser index further, straight fertilisers experienced the largest annual increase in the input price index, with a jump of 14%. On an annual basis, NPK fertilisers rose by 9.8%, compound fertilisers rose by 9.4%, NP and PK fertilisers rose by 3.8% and 'other' fertilisers experienced an increase of 1%.
Veterinary expenses also rose by 4.7% in the 12 months to May. Although the input price for veterinary expenses has risen in the last 12 months, the price index has remained stationary at 120.3 since January.
Terms of Trade fell by 0.6% in May 2025 when compared with the previous month and were 20.6% higher when compared with May 2024.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
11 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Jim Power: Budget countdown begins with big promises
The publication of the summer economic statement has set the budgetary process in motion, and the destination will be reached in early October. The two relevant ministers have outlined a budget package of €9.4bn, with a net tax package of €1.5bn, and an expenditure package of €7.9bn. This expenditure package will be comprised of current expenditure increases of €5.9bn or almost 75% of the total; and capital spending of €2bn or just over 25% of the total. Proposed Vat cut On the tax side, the Government has given a commitment to reduce the Vat rate for part of the hospitality sector — the food element — to 9% and this would cost around €580m in foregone taxes. If this is delivered and applies from January 1 next, it means that effectively less than €1bn would be available for personal tax changes. To put this in context, it is estimated that a 1% indexation of the employee tax credit would cost around €230m in a full year, so to index for projected inflation in 2026 would cost somewhere in the region of €460m; or a 1% decrease in the 40% tax rate would cost around €540m. If the government delivers the Vat cut from the beginning of 2026, which it has committed to, the tax package will be small. So not surprisingly, there are suggestions that the cut might be delayed until July, thereby significantly reducing the cost in 2026. If this transpires, the hospitality sector would have every right to be aggrieved. Restaurants and food businesses are the most crucial element of our tourism product, and many businesses are struggling to stay afloat. Inflation Data released by the CSO last week show that in 2024, Irish food prices are the third highest in the EU-27 and are 12% above the EU average. In the year to May, agricultural output prices increased by 20.7%, with cattle prices up by 48%. These prices obviously feed into restaurant input costs, but the pressures are compounded by labour costs, insurance, water charges, commercial rates etc. I am a supporter of the reduced Vat rate, and I think it is now more appropriate to provide some limited support to a key employer of people all over the country, and a vital part of the tourism offering, rather than to pump money through excessive expenditure into an economy that is still doing quite well. Does the Irish economic cycle need a continuation of out-of-control current expenditure now? I think not. Even if the Vat cut is pushed out, the extent of the easing of the personal tax burden will be miniscule. We should have learned from the past We should have learned our lessons from the pro-cyclical policies of the past. The summer economic statement projects planned expenditure of €108.7bn this year, which is €3.3bn higher than planned in Budget 2025, and it is likely to turn out even higher than this latest projection. Not surprisingly, the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council is not happy and has justifiably accused the Government of 'poor planning and budgeting.' Obviously, the ability of the two ministers to deliver the proposed budgetary package, and indeed to deliver the ambitious, but detail lacking, revised National Development Plan, will be heavily contingent on the future performance of the economy, and especially the actions of Donald Trump. Downward creep in projections There is not a lot of detail in relation to economic assumptions in the summer economic statement, but it is interesting to note that for 2025 the Department of Finance is projecting growth of 2% in modified domestic demand (MDD), down from 2.5% in April, and 2.9% in Budget 2025 last October. For 2026, MDD is projected to grow by 1.8%, down from 2.8% in April, and 3% in Budget 2025. There is downward creep occurring in Ireland's economic projections, which seems logical in the context of Trump-induced uncertainty. In relation to the National Development Plan, it is quite amazing that we must await detail on the projected spend until close to budget time. What in the name of God has been happening since January? The aspirations outlined in the revised plan — such as energy, water, housing, transport infrastructure, and climate change — are difficult to argue with, but delivery on time and on budget will be essential. One hopes there will be greater control, transparency and accountability in relation to National Development Plan delivery than we have seen with major infrastructure projects such as the children's hospital and the infamous bicycle shed.
Irish Independent
a day ago
- Irish Independent
Value of Ireland's exports to Russia soars to new heights not seen since 2015, prompting Ukraine censure
The value of Irish goods exported to Russia hit almost €397.9m over the first five months of the year, according to the latest export figures from the Central Statistics Office (CSO). The export figures available on the CSO's website only go back to 2015 – but the level of goods being sold to Russia is higher now than at any time since then. Selling to Russia destabilises not only Ukraine but the entire European continent Asked about the surge in exports to Russia, the Embassy of Ukraine in Ireland said there was no 'moral, political, or economic' justification for continuing to trade with Russia as it wages a 'brutal and illegal war of aggression against our country'. 'Every euro and every product sent to Russia strengthens its capacity to kill, destroy, and destabilise not only Ukraine but the entire European continent,' it said. 'It is indefensible to supply money and goods to a regime that openly defies the rules-based international order. 'Continuing business as usual, particularly in sensitive sectors, undermines the integrity of the sanctions regime and weakens our collective response to Russian aggression.' The jump in export value was driven by a surge in medicinal and pharmaceutical products, which reached almost €113.5m. Pharmaceuticals and medicines are exempt from sanctions for humanitarian reasons. Sales of metalliferous ores and metal scrap also surged, to over €183.4m. Essential oils, perfume materials, and toilet preparation exports also experienced a year-on-year increase, nearly doubling to over €60m.
Irish Examiner
3 days ago
- Irish Examiner
Farming organisations call for more aid for the ‘forgotten farmers'
Following the announcement of the long-established young farmers scheme, farming organisations say more aid is needed. The scheme aims to help the 'forgotten farmers', a group defined as young farmers who were under the age of 40 in 2015, who were not eligible for young farmer supports under the CAP from 2015 due to the date they had first set up in agriculture. The IFA and ICMSA have both said the Department of Agriculture needs to do more. IFA rural development chair John Curran said: "The forgotten farmer scheme is long overdue, but what the department is currently offering falls far short of what the installation aid was in the past.' 'The €5m was allocated in the last budget, with commitments that more would be secured if needed. The minister needs to follow through on this, secure the necessary funding and ensure all forgotten farmers are not forgotten again,' he said. 'All eligible farmers, including those starting out in 2008 and thereafter, should get at least the equivalent amount as they would have received under the installation aid,' Mr Curran said. The ICMSA's deputy president, and chairperson of the farm and rural affairs committee, Eamon Carroll, noted the ICMSA had advocated for such a scheme for many years. 'This initiative is a long time coming and will be appreciated by those who qualify. However, the eligibility criteria are disappointingly narrow and there will be many obviously deserving cases that will not qualify, as presently set out,' he stated. Mr Carroll said a significant concern was the cut-off date of December 31, 2007, which will exclude many farmers who did not previously benefit, and are now in their late 40s or early 50s. 'These were people who began farming during a period of economic hardship and who had limited access to any kind of young farmer supports. ICMSA is calling on the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine to extend eligibility to include all farmers who entered the sector before 2015 and who never received young farmer payments. "The minister can make this important change and ICMSA urges him to do so in the interests of basic fairness', Mr Carroll said. Read More Free farmer health checks to be provided nationwide over next 14 weeks
