logo
Democrats are still lost but one year after Biden's exit, they're starting to follow a rival's roadmap

Democrats are still lost but one year after Biden's exit, they're starting to follow a rival's roadmap

Fox News6 days ago
It's been a year since President Joe Biden shocked the nation by stepping aside from the 2024 presidential race. At the time, many Democrats hoped this would be the moment the party found its footing—a chance to regroup, refresh, and reconnect with voters. Instead, what we've seen is a party more divided and confused than ever.
A Leadership Vacuum and Mixed Messages
When Biden withdrew, Vice President Kamala Harris quickly became the frontrunner. But instead of rallying around a clear message, the Democratic Party fell into a tug-of-war over what it should stand for. Harris's campaign team wanted to make the election all about Donald Trump—warning voters that Trump was a threat to democracy and that the stakes couldn't be higher. They talked about protecting our institutions, our rights, and the very soul of America.
But at the same time, a powerful Democratic super PAC called Future Forward—armed with nearly a billion dollars—had a different idea. They thought the campaign should focus on everyday issues like jobs, inflation, and the cost of living. They wanted to show voters that Harris could bring real change and new ideas, not just more of the same.
Looking back, it seems Future Forward was right. Voters were desperate for answers on the economy, and they wanted to know how Democrats would make their lives better. But here's the problem: Kamala Harris never delivered a message that convinced people she had a real plan for jobs, inflation, or the cost of living. She certainly didn't deliver on policies. And she never answered the question that was on everyone's mind: How would she be different from Joe Biden? Apart from the obvious fact that she wasn't Joe Biden, voters never got a clear sense of what she would actually do differently.
The result? Voters got a confusing mix of messages. Some ads and speeches were about saving democracy; others were about fixing the economy. Instead of reinforcing each other, these messages clashed. Voters were left wondering: What do Democrats really stand for? What's the main reason to vote for Harris?
This is the lesson Democrats need to learn if they want to win back trust: Stop making every election about the other guy. Start making it about the people you want to represent.
The Mamdani Model: Trump's Playbook, Democratic Edition
If the party wants to find its way, it should look at what's actually resonating with voters right now. Enter Zohran Mamdani, whose upset win in the New York City mayoral primary wasn't just about being progressive—it was about being clear, direct, and relentlessly focused on the issues that matter most to everyday people.
Here's the twist: Mamdani is, in many ways, following the same playbook that made Donald Trump a political force in 2016. Trump didn't win by offering a laundry list of policies or by focusing on his opponents. He won by hammering a few signature ideas—build the wall, bring back jobs, drain the swamp—and by positioning himself as the champion of the forgotten American, fighting against a rigged system.
Mamdani's approach is strikingly similar. He didn't spend his campaign warning about the existential threat of his opponents. He didn't make the race about personalities or abstract threats to democracy. Instead, he picked a handful of bold, signature policies—affordability, free public transit, city-owned grocery stores, universal childcare—and repeated them everywhere. He offered solutions, no matter how outlandish they sounded to critics. And most importantly, he made it clear he was fighting for the people against a system that's broken and out of touch.
While some in the Democratic establishment rolled their eyes at Mamdani's proposals, voters responded to his willingness to address their real, everyday concerns. He didn't hide behind vague promises or focus on defeating a villain. He focused on making life better for the people he hoped to serve. Sound familiar? It should—because it's the same "for the people, against the system" message that powered Trump's rise.
A Stark Contrast—and a Lesson for Democrats
The contrast couldn't be clearer. Kamala Harris ran a campaign about defeating Trump and saving democracy, but never gave voters a reason to believe she had a plan for their paychecks, their rent, or their grocery bills. Mamdani, on the other hand, ran a campaign about solutions—however bold or controversial—and made sure voters knew he was listening to them, not just talking at them.
This is the lesson Democrats need to learn if they want to win back trust: Stop making every election about the other guy. Start making it about the people you want to represent. Offer real solutions, even if they're ambitious. Show up, listen, and talk about what matters most to voters. And don't be afraid to take a page from Trump's playbook: a few clear promises, a message of fighting for the people, and a willingness to take on the establishment.
A New Strategy: Democrats Enter the Lion's Den
There's another shift happening, too. In a striking move, prominent Democrats are increasingly appearing on MAGA-friendly podcasts and platforms—think Joe Rogan, Breaking Points and others. This isn't just about expanding their media footprint; it's a calculated move to break out of the liberal echo chamber and engage directly with skeptical, even hostile, audiences.
For years, both sides have talked past each other, stuck in their own echo chambers. Now, Democrats are stepping into what many see as enemy territory—not just to defend their ideas, but to actually listen and engage. It's risky. Their base is nervous, MAGA listeners are skeptical, and the rest of America is asking, 'What changed?' But in a country this divided, real persuasion starts with real conversation—even if it means sitting down with your harshest critics. This isn't about surrendering principles; it's about showing up, being authentic, and proving you're willing to have the tough conversations that move us forward.
A Path Forward: Learn from Mamdani—and Trump
The Democratic Party's path forward is clear if it's willing to learn from its own—and from its greatest rival. Mamdani's grassroots clarity and focus on real issues, echoing Trump's original formula, offer a blueprint for success.
The party needs to pick a message and stick to it, talk like real people, and show up for voters where they are—online, at their doors, and yes, even on podcasts where they might not get a warm welcome.
The lesson is simple: Americans don't want to be lectured or scared—they want to be heard and helped. Until Democrats trade their echo chamber for a kitchen table, and their talking points for real talk, they'll keep losing ground.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump considers skipping G20 summit, slams South Africa's 'very bad' policies
Trump considers skipping G20 summit, slams South Africa's 'very bad' policies

Business Insider

time23 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Trump considers skipping G20 summit, slams South Africa's 'very bad' policies

United States President Donald Trump has indicated he may not attend the upcoming G20 summit scheduled to take place in South Africa this November, citing his disapproval of the country's policies. President Trump may skip the upcoming G20 summit in South Africa due to policy disagreements. Tensions between the U.S. and South Africa have escalated over issues including land reform laws, foreign policy stances, and relations with BRICS nations. Trump's potential absence highlights growing diplomatic friction, which could impact U.S.–Africa relations long-term. Trump's remarks come amid a deepening strain in U.S.–South Africa relations, fueled by long-standing disagreements over a range of issues including South Africa's land reform laws, its pro-Palestinian stance in the Israel–Gaza conflict, and its growing alignment with BRICS nations. These tensions have prompted the Trump administration to impose multiple sanctions on South Africa, including a 30% tariff on selected South African goods, a move that has further deteriorated bilateral relations. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump said, 'I think maybe I'll send somebody else because I've had a lot of problems with South Africa. They have some very bad policies.' South African officials have yet to issue a formal response to the statement. However, analysts warn that Trump's comments could escalate diplomatic friction ahead of the summit, which many see as a pivotal opportunity for developing countries to press for more inclusive global governance. Trump's policy dispute with South Africa Since the start of his second term in 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump has intensified tensions with South Africa, reviving a diplomatic chill driven by ideological rifts and competing global alliances. His administration has openly criticized South Africa's growing ties with Russia and China, its opposition to Western foreign policy, and its leadership role in BRICS and the Global South. The strain deepened earlier this year when US Secretary of State, Senator Marco Rubio declined an invitation to a G20 preparatory meeting in Johannesburg, citing South Africa's alignment with anti-Western regimes. Soon after, the White House instructed the U.S. Embassy in Pretoria to avoid making logistical arrangements for the G20 summit, signaling a potential boycott unless South Africa altered its stance. The friction reflects Washington's broader frustration with Pretoria's increasingly independent foreign policy, including support for Palestine, resistance to U.S.-backed sanctions, and its decision to host Russian President Vladimir Putin despite an ICC warrant. With the G20 summit now in focus, Trump's administration sees South Africa as part of a rising bloc challenging U.S. influence. What began as diplomatic friction has grown into a full-blown policy standoff that could redefine U.S.–Africa relations for years to come. Trump's potential absence from the summit could have diplomatic implications, as it would mark a rare snub of a major global economic forum hosted on African soil.

Trump plans to open 401(k) and IRA markets to crypto
Trump plans to open 401(k) and IRA markets to crypto

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump plans to open 401(k) and IRA markets to crypto

Trump plans to open 401(k) and IRA markets to crypto originally appeared on TheStreet. President Donald Trump is preparing to open up the $9 trillion U.S. retirement market to cryptocurrencies, gold, private equity, and other alternative assets — a move that could fundamentally change how millions of Americans save for retirement. According to the Financial Times, Trump is expected to sign an executive order as early as this week that would allow professionally managed 401(k) plans to include non-traditional assets. The order would direct regulatory agencies to assess and remove existing barriers to such investments, potentially bringing digital assets and private markets into the mainstream of U.S. retirement planning. 'President Trump is committed to restoring prosperity for everyday Americans and safeguarding their economic future,' the White House told the Financial Times, while adding that no decision is final unless announced directly by Trump FT reports that this executive action builds on Trump's broader effort to embrace digital assets, following his campaign promise to 'free crypto' from what he called overly harsh regulations. His administration has already withdrawn a Biden-era Labor Department warning discouraging crypto exposure in retirement accounts. This latest push would go further — offering not just digital assets, but also access to private equity, infrastructure funds, and metals like gold through retirement savings vehicles. The report also noted that asset managers like Blackstone, Apollo, and BlackRock could be major beneficiaries. These firms have long lobbied for access to 401(k) funds and are already striking deals with major retirement plan providers, including Vanguard and Empower. On July 17, the U.S. House of Representatives passed three major crypto bills. The CLARITY Act lays out clear rules for classifying digital assets as securities or commodities. The GENIUS Act, already approved by the Senate, regulates stablecoins and is heading to the President's desk. The Anti-CBDC Act bans the Federal Reserve from launching a digital dollar without Congressional approval. Trump plans to open 401(k) and IRA markets to crypto first appeared on TheStreet on Jul 17, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jul 17, 2025, where it first appeared.

US and China prepare to extend tariff pause after Stockholm talks
US and China prepare to extend tariff pause after Stockholm talks

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

US and China prepare to extend tariff pause after Stockholm talks

The United States and China have agreed to work on extending a deadline for new tariffs on each other after two days of trade talks in Stockholm concluded on Tuesday, according to Beijing's lead negotiator. The US side said the extension was discussed, but still required approval from President Donald Trump. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent claimed "our Chinese counterparts have jumped the gun a little" when announcing a pause, although he described the talks as 'very fulsome two days with the Chinese delegation". China said the two sides had 'in-depth, candid and constructive' discussions and agreed to work on extending a pause in tariffs beyond a 12 August deadline for a trade deal for another 90 days. 'A stable, healthy and sustainable China-US economic and trade relationship serves not only the two countries' respective development goals but also contributes to global economic growth and stability,' said China's Vice Premier He Lifeng, who led the Chinese side, according to a statement from China's Ministry of Commerce. He did not say how the extension would work. Bessent added that the two sides touched on US concerns over China's purchase of Iranian oil, supply of dual-use tech to Russia that could be used on the battlefield, and the manufacturing of goods at a rate beyond what is sustained by global demand. 'We just need to de-risk with certain, strategic industries, whether it's the rare earths, semiconductors, medicines, and we talked about what we could do together to get into balance within the relationship,' Bessent said. He stressed that the US seeks to restore domestic manufacturing, secure purchase agreements of US agricultural and energy products, and reduce trade deficits. Meeting in the Swedish capital The latest round of talks opened Monday in Stockholm to try to break a logjam over tariffs that have skewed the pivotal commercial ties between the world's two largest economies. The two sides previously met in Geneva and London to address specific issues — triple-digit tariffs that amounted to a trade embargo and export controls on critical products — China's chokehold on rare earth magnets, and US restrictions on semiconductors. Monday's discussions lasted nearly five hours behind closed doors at the office of Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson. Before the talks resumed Tuesday, Kristersson met with Bessent and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer over breakfast. A possible Trump-Xi meeting The talks in Stockholm unfolded as President Donald Trump is mulling plans to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping, a summit that could be a crucial step toward locking in any major agreements between their two countries. 'I would say before the end of the year,' Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Tuesday. On his Truth Social media platform, Trump insisted late Monday that he was not 'seeking' a summit with Xi, but may go to China at the Chinese leader's invitation, 'which has been extended". "Otherwise, no interest!' he added. Bessent told reporters the summit was not discussed in Stockholm but that they did talk about 'the desire of the two presidents for the trade team and the Treasury team to have trade negotiations with our Chinese counterparts". Greer said the American team would head back to Washington and 'talk to the president about' the extension of the August deadline and see 'whether that's something that he wants to do". Striking tariff deals The US has struck deals over tariffs with some of its key trading partners — including Britain, Japan and the European Union — since Trump announced earlier in July elevated tariff rates against dozens of countries. China remains perhaps the biggest challenge. 'The Chinese have been very pragmatic,' Greer said in comments posted on social media by his office late Monday. 'We have tensions now, but the fact that we are regularly meeting with them to address these issues gives us a good footing for these negotiations.' Related US and China push for breakthrough in Sweden as tariff talks enter day two China announces child subsidy programme as births hit historic lows Many analysts had expected that the Stockholm talks would result in an extension of current tariff levels, which are far lower than the triple-digit percentage rates proposed as the US-China tariff tiff reached a crescendo in April, sending world markets into a temporary tailspin. The two sides deescalated tensions during bilateral talks in Geneva in May and agreed to a 90-day pause on sky-high tariffs — which ends 12 August. The US duties currently stand at 30% on Chinese goods, while China is placing a 10% tariff on US products. The long view While China has offered few specifics of its goals in the Stockholm talks, Bessent has suggested that the situation has stabilised to the point that Beijing and Washington can start looking toward longer-term balance between their economies. Since China vaulted into the global trading system more than two decades ago, Washington has sought to press Beijing to encourage more consumption at home and offer greater market access to foreign, including American-made goods. Wendy Cutler, a former US trade negotiator and now vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute, said Trump's team would today face challenges from 'a large and confident partner that is more than willing to retaliate against US interests". Rollover of tariff rates 'should be the easy part', she said, warning that Beijing has learned lessons since the first Trump administration and 'will not buy into a one-sided deal this time around". Goodbye Stockholm Bessent said the 'overall tone of the meetings was very constructive" while Li said the two sides agreed in Stockholm to keep close contact and to 'communicate with each other in a timely manner on trade and economic issues". On Monday, police cordoned off a security zone along Stockholm's vast waterfront as curious tourists and locals sought a glimpse of the top-tier officials through a phalanx of TV news cameras lined up behind metal barriers. Flagpoles at the prime minister's office were festooned with the American and Chinese flags.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store