
Former Trump Ambassador Scott Brown launches bid to flip key battleground Senate seat from blue to red
"My life has been the American story, but I worry about what America is going to look like for my four grandchildren — and all of yours," Brown said in a campaign video announcement, which was shared first nationally with Fox News.
Brown is a former senator from neighboring Massachusetts and the 2014 GOP Senate nominee in New Hampshire who later served as U.S. ambassador to New Zealand in President Donald Trump's first administration. He becomes the first major Republican to jump into the 2026 battle to succeed retiring longtime Democratic Sen. Jeanne Shaheen.
It's expected to be a competitive and expensive race for a seat the GOP is working to flip from blue to red. New Hampshire, along with Georgia and Michigan, are the three top targets for Senate Republicans as they aim to expand their 53-47 majority in the chamber.
While Republicans enjoy total control of New Hampshire's state government, the Granite State, for nearly a decade, has had an all-Democratic congressional delegation.
And Brown took aim at them in an interview with Fox News Digital, arguing that "they're just really out of touch with the values of New Hampshire. … I think we can do better.
"I'm looking to help save America and help protect our New Hampshire advantage," Brown added, referring to the state's economic and social characteristics, which have long made it attractive for businesses and residents.
In his campaign launch video, Brown criticized former President Joe Biden and Rep. Chris Pappas of New Hampshire, who at this early date appears to have cleared the field in the race for the Democratic Party Senate nomination.
Pointing to what he charged was "the soaring inflation, open borders, rising crime and extreme-left policies" of the Biden administration, Brown argued, "Chris Pappas has stood with Joe Biden every step of the way, from opening the border to driving up the cost of everything. It's time for a change."
Brown has made a handful of trips to the nation's capital to meet with GOP leaders and officials, including National Republican Senatorial Committee Chair Tim Scott of South Carolina.
And Brown told Fox News he's been dealing with the Trump political team.
"I support him. I would love his support," Brown said of his former boss, whom he noted he voted for in the 2016, 2020 and 2024 presidential elections.
In his announcement video, he added that "President Trump is fighting every day to right the ship."
Pointing to the military strike the president launched on Iran's nuclear sites over the weekend weekend, Brown said Trump's decision was "brilliant, and he should be commended."
And he criticized Pappas for saying in a statement, "I am monitoring the situation in Iran closely."
"There's nothing to monitor. The president did the right thing," Brown argued.
On the eve of Brown's campaign launch, the New Hampshire Democratic Party pilloried Brown as a "Trump loyalist" and charged that he "has a decade-long, extreme record on abortion."
While Brown is the first major Republican in the race, he may not have the GOP primary field to himself.
Republican businessman and attorney Phil Taub, best known for his Swim with a Mission charity supporting veterans, is considering a run. Among the others mulling a bid are state Sen. Dan Innis and businessman Walter McFarlane.
Brown made headlines in 2010 as a state senator in blue state Massachusetts when he won a special U.S. Senate election to serve the remainder of the term of the late longtime Democratic Sen. Ted Kennedy.
After losing re-election in 2012 to Elizabeth Warren, Brown eventually moved to New Hampshire, the state where he had spent the first years of his childhood and where his family had roots dating back to the colonial era. He launched a Senate campaign months later and narrowly lost to Shaheen in the 2014 election.
After hosting nearly all the Republican presidential candidates in the 2016 cycle at speaking events he called "No BS backyard BBQs," Brown eventually endorsed Trump in the weeks ahead of New Hampshire's first-in-the-nation primary. After Trump was elected president, he nominated Brown as U.S. ambassador to New Zealand, where the former senator served for four years.
Returning to New Hampshire at the end of the first Trump administration, Brown supported his wife Gail, a former television news reporter and anchor, as she ran for Congress in 2022.
And the Browns also stayed politically active in other ways, once again hosting many of the Republican presidential candidates at their "Backyard BBQs" during the 2024 presidential cycle.
Asked in May 2023 if he'd consider another Senate run, Brown told Fox News Digital, "Of course."
Brown jumped in late in the 2014 campaign, just seven months before Election Day.
This time around, the 65-year-old Brown, who competed in nine triathlons last year and who, on average, performs around 40–50 gigs a year as lead singer and guitarist with the rock band Scott Brown and the Diplomats, is giving himself plenty of political runway.
Brown has been crisscrossing New Hampshire since late last year, meeting with Republican and conservative groups.
"It's different than when I ran before,," Brown told Fox News. "I've now had the opportunity to go to places that, quite frankly, I didn't have time to do [in his 2014 campaign]. I've been meeting with people, meeting with everybody."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Adam Schiff Talks Of Donald Trump's 'Climate Of Fear' In ‘Late Show' Guest Appearance; Senate Democrats Raise Questions Of CBS Cancellation — Update
UPDATED, with Sen. Ed Markey sending letter: The Late Show with Stephen Colbert started out on Thursday with the host making the bombshell announcement that CBS was canceling the show, effective next May. That wasn't addressed in his interview with Sen. Adam Schiff (D-CA), even though the Trump nemesis did address the president's success in creating what he called a 'climate of fear.' More from Deadline Donald Trump Files Suit Against Rupert Murdoch, Dow Jones Over Wall Street Journal's Jeffrey Epstein Story Former 'Late Show' EP Rob Burnett Reflects On Stephen Colbert Cancellation: "Never Threaten A Corporate Merger" Late-Night TV Is On The Precipice After CBS Axes Stephen Colbert; Insiders Lament "End Of An Era" 'He wants to make the law firms afraid,' Schiff told Colbert. 'He wants to make universities afraid. He wants to make immigrants afraid. he wants to make citizens afraid. He wants to make news organizations, CBS and Paramount afraid. He wants to make ABC afraid. And he is succeeding.' Later, Schiff did address CBS' decision to cancel Late Show, writing on X, 'Just finished taping with Stephen Colbert who announced his show was cancelled. If Paramount and CBS ended the Late Show for political reasons, the public deserves to know. And deserves better.' CBS said that the show was being canceled for financial reasons. But very soon after the announcement, there were quickly suspicions that it could have been connected to parent Paramount Global's pending merger with Skydance. The transaction needs regulatory approval from the Trump administration, and Colbert's humor is frequently directed at the president. Already, a number of Democrats on Capitol Hill have criticized Paramount Global for reaching a settlement with Trump over his 60 Minutes lawsuit against CBS for $16 million. Colbert joined them earlier this week, riffing in a monologue earlier this week on what he called Paramout's 'big fat bribe' to the president. Following Colbert's announcement that his show was getting the ax, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) linked to the host's earlier monologue and wrote on X, 'CBS canceled Colbert's show just THREE DAYS after Colbert called out CBS parent company Paramount for its $16M settlement with Trump – a deal that looks like bribery. America deserves to know if his show was canceled for political reasons.' Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) posted a similar note. On Friday, Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) sent a letter to Paramount's controlling shareholder, Shari Redstone, asking her 'if any official in the Trump administration, including the President or an official atthe FCC, contacted your company about Colbert's monologue on Monday night.' If so, Markey asked if they asked 'Paramount or CBS take any action in response to Colbert's monologue, including the cancellation of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. In the Colbert interview, Schiff also criticized the package of spending cuts — known as rescissions — as a sign that congressional Republicans were giving up their power to Trump. The final passage of the package, which rolls back funding for foreign aid and NPR, just as the interview was airing. 'They're worried about losing their own personal power, that is their own personal office,' Schiff said of the GOP lawmakers. 'Some of them have said they're worried about their own personal safety,' Colbert said. 'That too, that too,' Schiff said. 'You can't find a member of the House or Senate that hasn't gotten death threats,' Schiff said. You probably can't find many that haven't gotten death threats against their spouses, against their children.' Schiff said that those threats have greatly accelerated under Trump, but he suggested a way to respond. 'This is all part of a deliberate campaign to frighten people into submission,' Schiff said. 'And the only way to pish back on that is to say, 'Piss off. Piss off.'' [youtube Best of Deadline Streamer Subscription Prices And Tiers – Everything To Know As Costs Rise And Ads Abound (Hello, Peacock) - Update 'Stick' Release Guide: When Do New Episodes Come Out? 'Stick' Soundtrack: All The Songs You'll Hear In The Apple TV+ Golf Series
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Donald Trump Files Suit Against Rupert Murdoch, Dow Jones Over Wall Street Journal's Jeffrey Epstein Story
UPDATED: Donald Trump has followed through on his threat to sue Rupert Murdoch and his media companies over the Wall Street Journal's report on a bawdy letter in his name that was included in an album given to Jeffrey Epstein for his 50th birthday in 2003. A defamation lawsuit (read it here) was filed in a Florida federal court Friday seeing damages 'not less than $10 billion' and a jury trial. It names Murdoch, Journal publisher Dow Jones, parent company News Corp and its CEO Robert Thomson and the reporters on the story, Khadeeja Safdar and Joseph Palazzolo. More from Deadline Donald Trump Says He Plans To Sue Rupert Murdoch, And The Wall Street Journal Over Jeffrey Epstein Story — Update Donald Trump Celebrates CBS' Cancellation Of Stephen Colbert's 'The Late Show' Adam Schiff Talks Of Donald Trump's "Climate Of Fear" In 'Late Show' Guest Appearance; Senate Democrats Raise Questions Of CBS Cancellation - Update Trump confirmed the filing in a Truth Social post, writing in part, 'This lawsuit is filed not only on behalf of your favorite President, ME, but also in order to continue standing up for ALL Americans who will no longer tolerate the abusive wrongdoings of the Fake News Media.' He added, 'I hope Rupert and his 'friends' are looking forward to the many hours of depositions and testimonies they will have to provide in this case.' The WSJ story published on Thursday included Trump's denials that he ever wrote the letter, as well as his legal threat. A spokesperson for the Journal said, 'We have full confidence in the rigor and accuracy of our reporting, and will vigorously defend against any lawsuit.' The WSJ report centered on a birthday album that was given to Epstein in 2003, featured collected letters from some of his friends. Among the letters was one bearing Trump's name that 'contains several lines of typewritten text framed by the outline of a naked woman, which appears to be hand-drawn with a heavy marker,' the Journal reported, adding that a 'pair of small arcs denotes the woman's breasts, and the future president's signature is a squiggly 'Donald' below her waist, mimicking pubic hair.' The letter text included an imaginary conversation between Trump and Epstein, according to the Journal, that concluded with the line, 'A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.' In the president's lawsuit, he claimed that the reporters 'falsely pass off as fact that President Trump, in 2003, wrote, drew, and signed this letter. And on the other hand, Defendants Safdar and Palazzolo failed to attach the letter, failed to attach the alleged drawing, failed to show proof that President Trump authored or signed any such letter, and failed to explain how this purported letter was obtained. The reason for those failures is because no authentic letter or drawing exists. Defendants concocted this story to malign President Trump's character and integrity and deceptively portray him in a false light.' The Journal reported that it was Ghislaine Maxwell who collected the letters from Trump and dozens of Epstein's other associates. The story described the letter as one 'bearing Trump's name.' Trump's lawsuit stated that the letter 'does not explain whether Defendants have obtained a copy of the letter, have seen it, have had it described to them, or any other circumstances that would otherwise lend credibility to the Article.' The lawsuit claimed that Murdoch and Thomson 'authorized the publication of the Article after President Trump put them both on notice that the letter was fake and nonexistent.' In a Truth Social post on Thursday, Trump wrote that he 'told Rupert Murdoch it was a Scam, that he shouldn't print this Fake Story.' To prevail in a defamation case, Trump would have to show not only that the article's statements were false, but that they were done with malice or reckless disregard for the truth. He claimed in the lawsuit that the defendants acted with 'actual malice, oppression and fraud in that they were aware at the time of the falsity of the publication and thus, made said publications in bad faith, out of disdain and ill-will directed towards Plaintiff without any regard for the truth.' Trump wrote on Truth Social earlier on Friday, 'I look forward to getting Rupert Murdoch to testify in my lawsuit against him and his 'pile of garbage' newspaper, the WSJ. That will be an interesting experience!!!' Best of Deadline Streamer Subscription Prices And Tiers – Everything To Know As Costs Rise And Ads Abound (Hello, Peacock) - Update 'Stick' Release Guide: When Do New Episodes Come Out? 'Stick' Soundtrack: All The Songs You'll Hear In The Apple TV+ Golf Series
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Gavin Newsom Sues Fox News For Defamation, Seeking $787 Million In Damages
UPDATED, with Fox News response: California Gov. Gavin Newsom filed a $787 million lawsuit against Fox News on Friday, seeking $787 million in damages and citing, among other things, host Jesse Watters' claim that he lied about a phone call the governor made with Donald Trump. 'No more lies,' Newsom wrote on X, announcing the lawsuit. More from Deadline Mediator In Trump's CBS Lawsuit Proposes $20 Million Settlement – Report Inside Gavin Newsom & Alex Padilla's Media Blitz Of Trump & JD Vance: 'Is He Confused Again?' Governor Mocks POTUS Sean "Diddy" Combs' Defense Insists It's All About The Benjamins In Sex-Trafficking Trial Closing Argument: "We're Here Because Of Money" The damages figure is, at the very least, symbolic. That is about the same amount that the network settled Dominion Voting Systems' lawsuit two years ago. The election systems company had sued for defamation over the network's amplification of false claims it rigged 2020 election results. Read Gavin Newsom's lawsuit against Fox News. In the lawsuit, Newsom's legal team wrote that the litigation 'concerns Fox's willingness to protect President Trump from his own false statements by smearing his political opponent Governor Newsom in a dispute over when the two last spoke during a period of national strife.' RELATED: The lawsuit concerns a call that Newsom had with Trump late on June 6, the day before the president federalized the National Guard to respond to protests following ICE raids in the Los Angeles region. Newsom opposed that move, and said that the president didn't raise the issue of the demonstrations or the National Guard in their phone call. Days later, on June 10, Trump claimed to reporters that he had spoken to Newsom 'a day ago' about the demonstrations in Los Angeles, the lawsuit noted. But Newsom quickly challenged that claim, writing in a post on X, 'There was no call. Not even a voicemail. Americans should be alarmed that a President deploying Marines onto our streets doesn't even know who he's talking to.' Per the lawsuit, Trump then reached out to Fox News anchor John Roberts with a screenshot of his call log, showing a 16-minute call on June 6/7. Roberts then wrote on X, 'President Trump just contacted me from Air Force 1 to say this: 'First call was not picked up. Second call, Gavin Picked up, we spoke for 16 minutes. I told him to, essentially, 'get his ass in gear,' and stop the Riots, which were out of control. More than anything else, this shows what a liar he is — said I never called. Here is the evidence.' RELATED: Newsom's legal team wrote that Roberts' post 'did not provide the critical fact that on June 10, President Trump had stated that he had spoken to Governor Newsom 'a day ago.' Nor did Mr. Roberts note that on June 6 — or June 7 at 1:23 am — is not 'a day ago' when one is speaking on June 10.' Roberts then went on air and 'intentionally altered how he presented President Trump's comment, stating that President Trump had said that he had called Governor Newsom 'yesterday or the other day,'' Newsom's lawsuit stated. 'Mr. Roberts chose to present a factually incorrect picture to Fox viewers to obscure President Trump's false statement of fact,' Newsom's legal team argued. On June 10, Watters played a clip of Trump's statement about the call, but removed the president saying that the call occurred 'a day ago,' per the lawsuit. RELATED: Watters told viewers, 'Newsom responded, and he said there wasn't a phone call. He said Trump never called him. Not even a voicemail, he said. But John Roberts got Trump's call logs, and it shows Trump called him late Friday night and they talked for 16 minutes. Why would Newsom lie and claim Trump never called him? Why would he do that?' As Watters spoke, the Fox News chyron read, 'Gavin Lied About Trump's Call.' 'Recognizing that President Trump was not correct, yet wanting to curry favor with the President, Fox News willfully distorted the facts,' the lawsuit claimed. 'Instead of accurately presenting President Trump's words—that he had spoken to Governor Newsom 'a day ago' —Mr. Roberts told viewers that President Trump had said that he spoke to Governor Newsom 'yesterday or the other day.' On his nightly program, Mr. Watters also purposefully presented a false picture of President Trump's statement.' RELATED: The lawsuit was filed in Delaware Superior Court, but was accompanied by a legal demand letter from Newsom's lawyers to Fox News' general counsel. They wrote that the lawsuit would be withdrawn if the network retracts the claim and issues an apology from Watters and the network. A Fox News said in response to the lawsuit, 'Gov. Newsom's transparent publicity stunt is frivolous and designed to chill free speech critical of him. We will defend this case vigorously and look forward to it being dismissed.' The network noted that Roberts made it clear that the call was from June 6-7. Roberts said, 'Now, granted, this was on Saturday. But look, there is one twenty two o'clock in the morning, which would have been ten o'clock at night, ten twenty two at night, California time. There was an outgoing call for four seconds and then there was an outgoing call for 16 minutes.' Newsom's legal team noted that the report has been 'amplified by far-right activists on social media,' and claimed that the network 'advanced this lie about Governor Newsom out of a desire to harm him politically.' 'The issue is about more than just President Trump misremembering a day or two about routine phone calls,' according to the lawsuit. 'The period of June 6 to June 10, 2025 in California was unprecedented—with the President of the United States illegally commandeering the California National Guard and deploying uniformed military onto the streets of Los Angeles over the objections of the state's governor. Every hour, every Truth Social post, and every presidential utterance mattered. History was happening in real time. It is the exact reason why reporters asked President Trump when he had last spoken to Governor Newsom. In response, he lied. And when his own 'receipts' showed that, Fox, true to form, carried his water and sought to cover up his lies by defaming Governor Newsom.' The lawsuit claimed defamation per se, and California's unfair competition law, typically used in false advertising claims. The latter claim has similarities to Trump's lawsuit against CBS over the way that 60 Minutes edited an interview with Kamala Harris, claiming that they edited the interview to make her answers sound better just weeks before the election. While a number of legal experts have called Trump's lawsuit meritless, given First Amendment protections for newsgathering, Newsom's lawsuit appeared to be a way of using Fox News commentator's words against them. The lawsuit stated, 'As Mr. Watters has himself said, when a news organization falsely presents an elected official's words to make them appear in a better light, it constitutes 'an extraordinary breach of journalistic ethics…Someone has to be fired.' The bar for Newsom's defamation claim is high: As a public figure, he must prove that the network didn't just falsely report on the call, but did so with malice toward him. Best of Deadline 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery 2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery 2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Tonys, Emmys, Oscars & More