Kiwi inside attacked Melbourne synagogue fears slide from 'hate speech into violence'
Photo:
WILLIAM WEST / AFP
A New Zealander inside a Melbourne synagogue subject to an alleged arson attack on Friday says it is a worrying escalation from "hate speech into violence".
Flammable liquid was poured over a door and set alight on Friday. About 20 people were in the East Melbourne Synagogue at the time of the attack.
Counter terrorism police have arrested a 34-year-old man.
Also in Melbourne, on the same night, about 20 masked protesters harassed diners at an Israeli-owned restaurant. Three cars were also set on fire outside a Melbourne business.
One of those inside the Melbourne synagogue on Friday evening was New Zealander Murray Meltzer.
He told RNZ's
Morning Report
it was a "very tranquil" service before the attack.
"Congregants meet there every week on a Friday around sunset for the Shabbat services, and, regularly a handful of us meet for dinner afterwards - that's what was happening on Friday night."
Shortly before 8pm, soon after dinner began, the synagogue's bell began ringing "repeatedly, which is unusual".
"One of the children, around age 13, was playing at the front of the building," Meltzer said.
They glanced at the CCTV monitor - which Meltzer called an "unfortunate sign of the times [with] concern about rising anti-Semitism" - and ran towards the back.
"By then there was smoke starting to creep under the front entrance and find its way into the central synagogue sanctuary area, and as a result of that, we obviously ran to the front initially to try and put out the fire. Everyone else was at the back of the building.
"And by then we had a couple of passersby that had spotted the flames developing at the front of the building called the fire brigade, which is located fairly close by, so fortunately, the fire brigade was there very quickly, thank goodness."
The gravity of what had happened - not just at the synagogue, but elsewhere - "hit home the next day" when people showed up for the Saturday morning service and there was a "large press crowd there".
There has been
a rise in the number of anti-Jewish and Islamophobic incidents in Australia
since the outbreak of the Israel-Gaza war in 2023.
In December last year,
another synagogue in Melbourne was set alight
.
Australia in early 2024 banned Nazi salutes and the public display of symbols associated with designated terror groups like Islamic State and Hamas. Last week it
cancelled American rapper Kanye West's visa
after he released a song 'Heil Hitler', praising the genocidal Nazi Party leader.
A synagogue in Sydney earlier this year was
graffitied with swastikas
, while in December
anti-Islamic graffiti appeared in the city's west
.
Meltzer said whoever lit the latest fire in Melbourne would have known there were people inside as all the lights were on.
"It's shifted the sort of activity we've seen in recent times from, from just a bit of hate speech and people's right to protest and stand up and say what their views are - just sort of, kind of shifted it quite dramaticallt. It's been left to fester and develop and I guess the speech has moved from just a bit of hate speech into violence.
"And that's a real, that's a real, that's a real concern for us as a community."
People wearing flags of Israel and Australia listen to speeches at a rally in Melbourne on 6 July, 2025, after the front door of a synagogue was set ablaze.
Photo:
WILLIAM WEST / AFP
Meltzer praised politicians from both sides of the Australian political divide for condemning the incidents.
The Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu said he viewed the incidents with "utmost gravity", and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said they "have no place in our country".
"Australians have every right to be able to conduct their faith, to engage with each other in peace and harmony. That is the Australia that we cherish."
Australian Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke, speaking from the scene on Sunday, called it an "attack on Australia".
"There's been some reporting that no one was physically injured - that doesn't mean no one was harmed. The community here was harmed. The Jewish community in Australia was harmed, and we were harmed as a nation."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter
curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
15 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Qantas 'contacted by potential cybercriminal' after attack on data of up to 6 million customers
Qantas says it takes matters of cybersecurity "incredibly seriously". Photo: AFP Qantas says it has been contacted by "a potential cybercriminal" less than a week after revealing a "significant" breach and theft of data on up to 6 million of its customers from its records during a cyber attack. The airline said in a statement on Monday that it is working to verify the legitimacy of the contact and have contacted the Australian Federal Police (AFP). It has not confirmed the nature of the contact or whether a ransom was sought. A spokesperson for the AFP told the ABC that it was investigating the contact. "The airline has been highly engaged in assisting authorities and the AFP with investigating this incident," a statement said. The update comes after the airline detected unusual activity on a third-party platform used by a Qantas contact centre. Qantas said last week that it was investigating the proportion of the data that had been stolen, though it expected it would be "significant". The airline said that it was continuing to work with "specialist cybersecurity experts to forensically analyse the impacted system". That investigation has determined that the system was now secure and no credit card details, personal financial information or passport details were accessed in the breach. "We want to reassure all of our customers that there is no impact to Qantas' operations or the safety of our airline," Qantas said in a statement. On Friday Qantas chief executive Vanessa Hudson issued an apology to the airline's customers, saying the business takes matters of cybersecurity "incredibly seriously". "What I would first like to say is acknowledge the impact to all our customers and, first and foremost, I'd like to apologise to them," she said in an interview with Channel Seven in Athens. "I know this data breach is a serious concern. I know the stress that it has created for many, many millions of customers. "And so, right up front, I want to say we take this seriously and we are going to do everything that we can to communicate transparently." - ABC
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Guilty verdict in mushroom murder trial: What happens if there's an appeal?
By Mikaela Ortolan for ABC Erin Patterson arriving in the back of a prison transport vehicle at Latrobe Valley Magistrate's Court in Morwell, Australia. Photo: AFP / MARTIN KEEP After a marathon trial involving more than 50 witnesses, Erin Patterson has been found guilty by a jury of murdering three relatives by lacing their meals with death cap mushrooms. The high-profile case has captured a global audience, with seats at Morwell's Latrobe Valley Law Courts in regional Victoria filling each day for more than two months. After about a week of deliberations, a Supreme Court jury on Monday delivered its verdict, finding the 50-year-old guilty of murdering Don and Gail Patterson and Heather Wilkinson. It also found her guilty of the attempted murder of Ian Wilkinson, the only surviving guest of the lunch. But the case's time in the courts may not be over, with the possibility Patterson could appeal the decision. Patterson will have 28 days from the date of her sentence to begin the process of lodging an appeal, according to the Supreme Court of Victoria. Her legal team can appeal either the guilty verdict itself, the sentence handed down or both of those things together. Outside of this window, convicted people must file for an extension of time which may or may not be accepted by the courts. University of Newcastle criminology researcher Xanthe Mallett said the prosecution would also have the opportunity to appeal a sentence once that had been handed down. "If in cases where the sentence is considered to be too lenient, the prosecution can appeal that - the severity of the sentence, but they can't appeal a not-guilty verdict," she said. Erin Patterson was found guilty on three counts of murder and one of attempted murder today. Photo: ABC News There are a number of grounds the defence can appeal on. High-profile barrister Robert Richter KC said the most common ground was that the verdict was unsatisfactory and unreasonable. "The Court of Appeal might find that it isn't sufficient to justify a conviction," he said. "But that on its own is a very difficult ground to get home, because it sort of does not usurp the function of the jury, but what it does is it looks at what a jury ought to have concluded or should have concluded." Richter said if any of the directions given to the jury had misstated the law, it could be grounds for an appeal, but noted the judge presiding over the high-profile case had been "very careful". Mallett said the defence would need to demonstrate that there was some error of law or some problem that was sufficient to be granted grounds of appeal. "Every case is obviously unique," Mallett said. "If [the defence] appeal ... or want to appeal, they would look at every part of the case, looking for anything that they felt was a legal justification." If an application to appeal is granted, the matter will go before the Court of Appeal but it could take months before a court date is set. Richter said if the appeal succeeded in front of a panel of three judges in the Court of Appeal, there were two possibilities. "One is to say the evidence was not sufficient to produce a verdict beyond reasonable doubt," he said. "Or alternatively there have been errors and so the verdict has to be quashed." If the verdict is quashed a retrial could be ordered. If an application for leave to appeal is rejected in the first instance by the Court of Appeal, relevant parties could apply for leave to appeal in the High Court. "That requires demonstrating particular problems that have a special application in the criminal law that the High Court would accept as important enough to give leave to appeal," Richter said. "But the percentage of cases that get special leave to appeal in criminal matters is very, very low." If leave to appeal is not granted, the verdict or sentence stands and the matter does not continue further. - ABC
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Erin Patterson guilty of all charges in mushroom murder trial
Erin Patterson has been found guilty of murdering three of her estranged husband's relatives, by serving them beef Wellingtons containing death cap mushrooms. The jury also found Patterson guilty of attempting to murder Heather's husband Ian, who survived the mushroom poisoning but spent months in hospital. Michael Giles of the South Gippsland Sentinel-Times has been covering the trial and spoke to Lisa Owen. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
