
The Top Black Colleges in the Country Are Still Living in Internet Deserts. Here's What to Know
'It is my prayer that Claflin's passion for education aligns with its compassion.'
'I am currently typing my senior research paper at the local McDonald's that I drive to nine miles every day to do this work because my town doesn't have Wi-Fi bandwidth,' the student wrote. She said she would sit in the parking lot for four hours daily to work on her senior thesis.
Shortly after receiving this email, Claflin University partnered with the Student Freedom Initiative to help provide students with broadband access.
Broadband programs aimed at closing the digital divide in the US are currently in retreat but according to a 2021 McKinsey report, the 82% of Historically Black Colleges and Universities situated in broadband deserts aren't going anywhere. Broadband deserts are areas that either severely lack access to adequate or have no internet.
Locating local internet providers
In May, President Donald Trump announced the termination of the Digital Equity Act (DEA), calling it 'racist' and 'unconstitutional.' This $2.75 billion program was part of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law from 2021. It was established to help close the digital divide by increasing broadband adoption. This program was also essential to funding digital literacy initiatives for public schools and colleges, with some states and local governments already beginning to receive grant rewards. With the untimely end of the DEA, those funds never reached their destination.
In 2020, students at Claflin University and the surrounding areas in Orangeburg, South Carolina, struggled with inadequate internet access because they lived in a broadband desert.
'The only way for students to actually get access to content was to come together in areas that provided [broadband] access, which created a problem,' said Keith Shoates, the president and CEO of the Student Freedom Initiative. He highlighted that at a time when students were supposed to be in quarantine, they were forced to come out of isolation and put themselves and their peers at risk, just to do their schoolwork.
The Student Freedom Initiative is a nonprofit organization that seeks to reduce the wealth gap through education. In 2023, SFI partnered with technology company Cisco, providing 5G internet service across campus. While the Orangeburg community still faces challenges from being in a broadband desert, Claflin University has since transformed its broadband desert into a thriving space for students.
A long history of HBCUs in broadband deserts
Access to an adequate internet connection equips students to do better in the classroom and beyond. But many HBCUs are in broadband deserts.
These broadband deserts are located primarily in the Black Rural South of the US. According to a report from the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, the Black Rural South consists of more than 152 counties in 10 states: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia. This information pretty much matches data from the Student Freedom Initiative.
As seen from the map above, the Student Freedom Initiative currently works with more than 25 HBCUs in broadband deserts, all located along the Black Rural South in the US. These include Tuskegee University, Florida A&M University, Xavier University of Louisiana and Hampton University. Knowing the history of HBCUs helps one better understand these broadband deserts and how they exist.
HBCUs are among the most underfunded institutions in the country, because of the effects of historical and present-day systemic racism and practices like digital redlining. The term redlining dates back to the New Deal era in the 1930s when banks denied residents from 'at-risk' neighborhoods, predominantly from Black communities, to qualify for loans. During this era, government agencies created color-coded maps, highlighting which neighborhoods are least to most risky in terms of loan-worthiness.
Digital redlining is a discriminatory practice that involves internet providers excluding their services in certain locations. If you take a look at a map, you can see the distinction between areas with broadband and those without. According to data from the US Census Bureau (PDF), residents in urban areas were more likely than those in rural areas to have broadband internet subscriptions. Moreover, more than 90% of households in the urban south had broadband access in 2021, versus 85% in the rural south. For example, Mississippi, New Mexico and West Virginia ranked the lowest in broadband access.
US Census Bureau
Although redlining has been illegal for quite some time, a form of digital redlining still exists, as seen by the lack of competition among internet providers in the Black Rural South.
HBCUs are located in areas with inadequate broadband infrastructure and it doesn't help that these institutions are severely underfunded by at least $12 million in more than 15 states. According to a Brookings Metro report (PDF), 'HBCUs are chronically underfunded due to state underinvestment, lower alumni contributions (related to lower Black incomes and Black wealth), and lower endowments.'
Plenty of studies have shown that low-income communities often lack access to adequate home broadband connections. The McKinsey report noted earlier also shows that more than 81% of HBCUs are in counties where the median wage is below the national average and, compared to non-HBCUs, are in areas where the projected job growth is below the national average. Why does this matter? Improving broadband infrastructure would not just benefit HBCUs or the millions of disconnected Americans in rural communities but could help the US economy at large.
Broadband access for HBCUs could mobilize the economy
There seems to be a wave of uncertainty regarding the country's current state of broadband programs. The Affordable Connectivity Program ended in May 2024, leaving more than 23 million households without access to affordable home internet and, with the recent news about the Digital Equity Act, disconnected Americans may rely on federal funds primarily from the Broadband Equity, Access and Deployment program. But states have run into delays in receiving those funds because of bureaucratic changes. Additionally, there could be further holdups in light of potential changes to the program from the new administration. According to some estimates, most states may not hear back on a timeline until June or July.
Shoates emphasized SFI's commitment to helping students, regardless of where federal broadband programs stand in this country.
'We're still moving forward because the problem still exists,' Shoates said.
He emphasized the significance of moving forward with non-federal sources to address the broadband gap for students. In addition to their partnership with Cisco in deploying 5G internet hotspots for Claflin University, SFI also connects these HBCUs to high-net-worth individuals, organizations and other philanthropists in their network.
The Student Freedom Initiative was founded after Robert F. Smith, a philanthropist and Founder, Chairman and CEO of Vista Equity Partners, gave nearly $34 million to the graduating class of Morehouse College in 2019, paying off their student loans. Smith currently serves as SFI's chairman.
Without the federal backbone support, nonprofit groups such as SFI will work with state legislatures and their corporate partners to keep the wheels moving. Still, eliminating or stalling federal funding from this equation will slow the reduction of the broadband gap.
Warmack, Claflin's president, conveyed that federal broadband funding can really help, especially for severely underfunded institutions such as HBCUs. For example, Claflin University received a $2.9 million grant from the Connecting Minority Community Project through the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, which helped provide wireless internet on campus and in the surrounding areas.
Shoates maintains that investing in HBCUs and improving their broadband infrastructure could potentially increase economic activity by half a trillion dollars, which would be reflected in the country's GDP.
McKinsey
According to data from McKinsey, a strong HBCU network could increase Black worker incomes by about $10 million, contribute at least $1.2 billion in incremental business profit, reduce student loan debt by $300 million and provide $1 billion in additional consumer expenditures.
Broadband access and future student outcomes
According to a 2021 report from the Institute for Higher Education Policy (PDF), 13% of Black students primarily use a tablet or cellphone to complete their coursework, compared to 8% of college students who do not. More than half of Black students who reported having unreliable internet connections complained about being able to access only some content online and or that it's difficult because of slow internet.
From the 2021 report, Online Isn't Optional. Student Polling on Access to Internet and Devices.
Institute of Higher Education Policy
Yvette Thomas, SFI's program director of Institutional Transformation, said that HBCUs face persisting challenges because of the lack of high-speed broadband and the digital gap, which restricts students from accessing resources and online professional opportunities.
Thomas spearheads the execution of HBCU capacity building, including modernizing the Information Technology infrastructure.
'When kids come to college, they usually come with at least five to six devices for the network and it slows the network down,' Thomas said.
Without access to a high-speed internet connection, students can fall behind in the digital landscape, especially in the new era of artificial intelligence.
'There's gonna be this 26-mile marathon and they're gonna be on mile two … and that puts them at a competitive disadvantage,' Shoates said.
He added that broadband access is imperative to students as it equips them with the proper digital literacy skills they need in the workforce.
Claflin University has since transformed its broadband desert into a space that provides 5G internet for students but what about the other 82% of HBCUs still living in these internet deserts? Who's to say that there aren't others with similar experiences to that Claflin student driving to a McDonald's parking lot for Wi-Fi just to complete work? Without the federal backbone support, the work of SFI, its corporate partners and generous donations from philanthropists are vital to help reduce the broadband gap in the meantime.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Breaking Down the $2.5 Billion Price Tag of the Fed's HQ Renovation
Amid Donald Trump's anger over the Fed's resistance to cutting interest rates the year, allies of the president have seized on a new way to criticize — and potentially oust — Fed Chair Jerome Powell. White House officials are pushing for an investigation into the ongoing restoration of the Federal Reserve's 1930s headquarters, costs for which have ballooned to $2.5 billion. But the price tag has less to do with mismanagement or the ' ostentatious overhaul ' that officials are alleging, and more to do with the challenges of building — particularly underground — in what was once a swamp in Washington, DC. Part of the job requires excavating deep beneath the Fed's campus, a task so difficult that contractors recently won an award for 'excellence in the face of adversity.' Today on CityLab: Why the Federal Reserve's Building Renovation Costs $2.5 Billion
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Taxes on Social Security benefits were not eliminated despite what you've heard
All the misleading buzz about Social Security and tax cuts for seniors in "One Big Beautiful Bill" foreshadows one ugly scene after another at tax preparation offices next year. It's not going to be pretty when many ill-informed retirees file 2025 tax returns. "What do you mean I'm paying taxes on my Social Security benefits?" some will no doubt ask. Already in July, I've spotted social media posts by tax professionals who dread the day when they will have to say "welcome to reality" to clients. "'Yes, your Social Security is still 85% taxable. Yes, I know that's what Trump's still saying. But pay attention to what he signed, not what he says,' he yelled for the 792,682,314th time into the void," posted Adam Markowitz, an enrolled agent in Florida, on X. What's sparking confusion for retirees about taxes The White House proclaimed, once again, "NO tax on Social Security" on July 4 when President Donald Trump signed what he calls "The One Big Beautiful Bill" into law. It's not an accurate statement. He also sent a mass email on July 12 making the same point. The Social Security Administration sent a gushy, questionable email July 4 to millions of people collecting Social Security benefits and others. Soon afterward, I heard from some retirees who couldn't believe how a federal agency was doing a hard sell about the supposed benefits and creating even more confusion. "The bill ensures that nearly 90% of Social Security beneficiaries will no longer pay federal income taxes on their benefits, providing meaningful and immediate relief to seniors who have spent a lifetime contributing to our nation's economy," Social Security stated in its email and online. Ninety percent, really? More on that one later. At one point, the email seemed to suggest that retirees were getting two tax breaks. "The new law includes a provision that eliminates federal income taxes on Social Security benefits for most beneficiaries, providing relief to individuals and couples. Additionally, it provides an enhanced deduction for taxpayers aged 65 and older, ensuring that retirees can keep more of what they have earned," according to a copy of the email forwarded to me. Additionally? There is no "additionally." The tax cut is an enhanced deduction for taxpayers aged 65 and older. That's it. The law doesn't eliminate the risk that some will pay taxes on their Social Security benefits. Trump taxes in 2025: Gamblers will pay more taxes in 2026 and beyond when Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' hits The Social Security blog online now refers to a correction without saying what was wrong. "Correction Notice: This blog was updated on July 7, 2025. The second sentence of the fourth paragraph originally read, 'Additionally, it provides an enhanced deduction for taxpayers aged 65 and older, ensuring that retirees can keep more of what they have earned.'' The word "additionally" is no longer in the copy. Instead, the paragraph in the online blog at now reads: "The new law includes a provision that eliminates federal income taxes on Social Security benefits for most beneficiaries, providing relief to individuals and couples. It does so by providing an enhanced deduction for taxpayers aged 65 and older, ensuring that retirees can keep more of what they earned." Clear as mud, as one of my relatives might say. How does the 'senior bonus' work? A new, temporary "senior bonus" deduction of up to $6,000 will apply to taxpayers who are 65 and older in 2025, 2026, 2027 and 2028. It ends after that without congressional action. Tax professionals call this a "special personal exemption" that aims to reduce the tax bill for many seniors. In general, seniors with high incomes would not qualify; lower income seniors who do not pay taxes would not benefit, either. "As a deduction and not a refundable credit, it will not help seniors who already owe no income taxes," said Mark Luscombe, principal analyst for Wolters Kluwer Tax & Accounting in Riverwoods, Illinois. Luscombe explained that higher income seniors receive a smaller tax break or no tax break because the deduction starts phasing out for those with a modified adjusted gross income of $75,000 for singles and $150,000 for joint filers. And, yes, there are plenty of other rules but, oddly enough, you do not have to be receiving Social Security benefits each month to qualify. It will not pay to be young — no matter what your income. Taxpayers who are 62, 63 and 64 at the end of a tax year do not qualify for the "senior bonus" deduction. They could still pay income taxes on Social Security benefits, if they're collecting benefits and hit certain income thresholds, without any offsetting bonus deduction. Here's a breakdown of some more rules that you'll need to know when filing a 2025 return: Some married couples can get a better deal: If both spouses are 65 or older, each could receive up to $6,000 or up to $12,000 total for the senior bonus deduction in a given tax year. Married couples face another rule: Married couples must file jointly to claim the senior deduction. If you opt for "married filing separately," you will not qualify for the senior bonus deduction, according to Tom O'Saben, enrolled agent and director of tax content and government relations for the National Association of Tax Professionals. Social Security number required: To claim the deduction, the senior must have a valid Social Security number. Those with higher incomes face limits: The tax break would phase out entirely for single taxpayers 65 and older with a modified adjusted gross income at $175,000. It would phase out entirely for married taxpayers 65 and older with a modified adjusted gross income at $250,000. 6% is the phase out number. When your income climbs above the threshold, the deduction phases out at a rate of 6%. The National Association of Tax Professionals, which has 23,000 members, offered an example for a 70-year-old retiree who is single and has a modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) of $90,000. In this example, $15,000 of MAGI exceeds the $75,000 threshold for a single tax filer. Take out your calculator and multiple $15,000 by 6% to hit $900. The maximum $6,000 senior bonus deduction is then reduced by $900 in this example to reach a senior deduction of $5,100. Tax relief for parents: How the Child and Dependent Care Credit can cut summer camp costs in 2025 Taxes on Social Security were never eliminated Believe me, you're not doing your friends any favors now by insisting that there are no taxes on Social Security benefits. Some people still need to withhold taxes on their Social Security benefits, if they have other significant sources of income. At no point did the House bill or Senate version, which was later passed by the House and signed into law by Trump, ever include a provision to eliminate the tax on Social Security or provide a deduction for Social Security income, according to a summary of the massive reconciliation bill provided by Wolters Kluwer, an information services company. Trump famously proposed making Social Security income tax-free during his 2024 campaign. But such a change could not be part of the budget reconciliation process. One provision of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 prohibits Senate reconciliation bills from including any measure that changes Social Security benefits or taxes. "It's fair to frame this new deduction as an attempt to fulfill the spirit of the president's campaign proposal consistent with the limits imposed in the reconciliation process," said Garrett Watson, director of policy analysis at the nonpartisan Tax Foundation. "But selling this politically as exempting Social Security from income tax is not accurate and will confuse or upset the seniors who end up paying tax on some benefits," Watson said. The senior bonus deduction, Watson points out, applies to any source of taxable income that a taxpayer who is 65 or older has and may not necessarily eliminate all tax on Social Security benefits. Social Security benefits began being taxed at the federal level in 1984 to shore up the Social Security trust fund, which was facing insolvency. At best, the new tax break means many seniors will save some money on taxes over four years. "Despite the SSA claims, most would see their income taxes on Social Security benefits reduced, not eliminated," wrote Howard Gleckman, a senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. In an online report July 9, Gleckman wrote that the biggest beneficiaries are seniors making between about $80,000 and $130,000. The senior bonus deduction would for that group would amount to an average tax cut of about $1,100 or roughly 1% of their after-tax income, he said. The tax deduction of up to $6,000 would benefit fewer than half of older adults, according to the Tax Policy Center estimates. How much a senior who qualifies for the "senior bonus" will save on taxes will depend on their taxable income, which determines your marginal tax rate. At a 12% marginal tax rate, for example, the $6,000 deduction for a single taxpayer who is 65 or older would result in $720 in tax savings, according to Watson. For a single taxpayer, the 12% tax rate applied on taxable income from $11,926 through $48,475 in 2025. Annual inflation adjustments can be made to marginal tax brackets. Hype, complexities and more can get your head spinning All this begs the question: How can Trump say there will be no taxes on Social Security benefits? Well, retirees will need to treat this one as one of those Trumpisms where, maybe, you need to study the fine print first. "The president often seems to try to put as positive a spin as possible on an issue without being totally consistent with the facts," Luscombe said. The 90% number used in the email sent by the Social Security Administration appears to track a 90% figure used by the White House. It is misleading. Many people did not have to pay taxes on Social Security benefits based on their income before the mega tax bill was signed into law July 4. About 40% of people who get Social Security currently pay income taxes on their benefits, according to an earlier report issued by the Social Security Administration in 2025. Other estimates, though, suggest that a bit more than 50% currently pay taxes. The Tax Foundation did not estimate the portion of seniors who would not pay tax on benefits under the new deduction. But noted that roughly half of all Social Security beneficiaries did not pay federal income tax on their Social Security benefits before the new tax law. Gleckman, at the Tax Policy Center, told the Detroit Free Press — part of the USA TODAY Network — that the 90% figure being used by the Social Security Administration isn't close to reality. In his online blog, Gleckman said the administration apparently came up with its 90% estimate by "assuming all tax deductions, including the new senior deduction, are used only to reduce Social Security benefit taxes." "But, of course, older adults pay taxes on all their taxable income, including from sources other than Social Security," Gleckman wrote. The Tax Policy Center's estimate is that about half of all recipients will pay at least some income taxes on their Social Security benefits, Gleckman wrote. "That is, they face higher tax liability than they would if benefits were not taxable. "The Social Security system is complicated, and, in many ways, its complexity is terrifying for older adults, many of whom rely on its benefits to pay living expenses in old age. The latest SSA communication does not help and indeed may make matters worse," Gleckman wrote. How Social Security benefits are taxed will remain a complex headache for many people aged 62 and up. Based on Social Security data, nearly 23% of men and 24.5% of women who claimed retirement benefits in 2022 were age 62. The earliest age that you can claim Social Security retirement benefits is 62. By collecting as early as possible, though, you'd receive a reduced monthly retirement benefit that is cut by a small percentage for each month before your full retirement age. The full retirement age is 67 now for those born in 1960 and after. For those born earlier, the full retirement age varies and is less than 67 based on when you were born. How Social Security benefits are taxed Unfortunately, it doesn't take much extra income to get hit with some taxes because income thresholds that trigger the tax on Social Security benefits do not adjust for inflation. For single filers, the threshold for paying taxes on up to 50% of Social Security benefits applies when your combined income is between $25,000 and $34,000 a year. Once the combined income is higher, up to 85% of benefits may be taxable. Couples filing a joint return face taxes on up to 50% of their Social Security benefits if their combined income is between $32,000 and $44,000. If the couple's combined income is higher than that, up to 85% of benefits would be taxable. Combined income is your adjusted gross income, plus nontaxable interest, such as interest on certain bonds, plus half of your Social Security benefits received that year. As a result, someone who is working while collecting Social Security benefits would need to take their earnings from a job into account. The same's true for someone who is retired and taking taxable withdrawals from traditional 401(k) plans. All that tax complexity isn't going to vanish. O'Saben, of the National Association of Tax Professionals, said he's frustrated by how the senior bonus deduction is being marketed. He heard a news story on the radio that implied that Social Security benefits were no longer taxable and he found himself yelling at the radio while driving. "There is no provision making Social Security benefits tax free," O'Saben said. Contact personal finance columnist Susan Tompor: stompor@ Follow her on X @tompor. This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Trump didn't kill taxes on Social Security, despite what you've heard Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
This chart shows how stocks are now ignoring Trump's tariff threats
The stock market is taking President Donald Trump's tariff threats in stride as investors expect milder duties on U.S. trading partners than initially feared. Goldman Sachs looked at the first day performance in the S & P 500 as well as a basket of stocks with high tariff exposure on dates of key trade developments, such as Liberation Day on April 2 and a hike in China duties on April 7. The Wall Street firm found that the market seems to be reacting less and less to the headlines. "The equity market appears to be unconcerned by the recent tariff hike announcements," David Kostin, Goldman's head of U.S. equity strategy, said in a note to clients. "Our client conversations indicate that many investors believe tariff rates will eventually settle lower than what the recent announcements have indicated." The broad equity benchmark plunged 5% on Liberation Day when Trump announced "reciprocal tariffs" on more than 180 countries and territories. On April 7 when Trump raised China levies to a whopping 145%, the S & P 500 dropped another 3%. In contrast, stocks have largely ignored the most recent tariff announcements on July 7 when Trump started to send out tariff letters as well as news of a potential 30% levy on European Union on July 13. The S & P 500 notched a new record high last week, while Goldman Sachs's tariff risk basket is just 4% off its record high. .SPX YTD mountain S & P 500 year to date Goldman said investors have shifted focus on the outlook for economic and earnings growth in 2026. "Consensus earnings revision breadth has recently jumped to the highest level since 2022, and the outperformance of cyclical industries suggests the equity market is pricing an outlook for solid GDP growth despite consensus expectations for sluggish growth in coming quarters," Kostin said. The firm also noted that the recent dollar weakness should provide a small tailwind to S & P 500 earnings. International sales account for 28% of S & P 500 companies' revenue, so a 10% decline in the greenback could give a 2%-3% boost to S & P 500 earnings, Goldman said.