Business leaders urge Chancellor to back carbon capture project
They have written to Chancellor Rachel Reeves calling on her to progress the Acorn Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) project in Aberdeenshire.
In the letter they warn that without the project 'there is no route for Scottish industry to decarbonise, threatening jobs and investment'.
Signatories to the letter include the CBI, Prosper, the Institute of Directors, Scottish Financial Enterprise, Scottish Chambers of Commerce and Sir Ian Wood, chairman of ETZ Ltd.
An economic impact study estimates that accelerating Acorn will add £17.7 billion to UK GDP by 2050, create more than 10,800 jobs during construction, and sustain 4,700 long-term operational roles.
Sir Ian said: 'Acorn CCS is a crucial catalyst needed to protect skilled jobs and unlock billions of pounds in investment.
'The UK Government must act now to develop this transformational opportunity that will support industrial decarbonisation across the UK as well as much-needed economic growth.'
The letter suggests a decision to fast-track Acorn now could quickly enable SSE's plans for carbon capture at its Peterhead site via a proposed new power station with a generating capacity of up to 900MW.
It says that 'critically, getting CCS under way at Peterhead will unlock the next phase of industrial decarbonisation for Grangemouth'.
It warns that without CCS rising carbon costs will place Grangemouth at a competitive disadvantage, threatening further job losses and industrial decline.
The refinery at Grangemouth is due to transition into an import terminal in the coming months, with the loss of 400 jobs.
Dr Liz Cameron, chief executive of the Scottish Chambers of Commerce, said: ' Scotland cannot afford further delays on Acorn CCS. The Government has pledged a just transition for our workforce, but those promises must now be matched with decisive investment.
'This is a pivotal moment for Scotland's economy, and we need clear signals that Westminster is serious about delivering a net-zero future that includes industrial communities like ours.'
The UK Government has already provided funding for two similar carbon capture clusters, in Merseyside and Teesside.
The UK Government has been asked for comment about the letter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
3 hours ago
- Times
Tuition fee rise would be better than a stealth tax
Saddling a generation of young earners with a sharp tax by stealth is a cowardly political trick that harms universities too ALAMY B ritain's universities are an uneasy mix of contradictions. Many are operating near the brink of financial insolvency, despite the fact that, Luxembourg and America aside, UK universities bring in more money per student than anywhere. A number are among the world's most esteemed institutions; yet, there is a growing perception that the labour-market premium of even elite British undergraduate degrees has declined in recent years. In 2025 a record number of domestic 18-year-olds applied for places at college but despite this robust internal demand, higher education has become hooked on a supply of lucrative overseas students. In fact, so many universities are negligently allowing their degree courses to be used by foreign nationals as a back door into the UK asylum system that the government is now cracking down. Universities will be penalised if more than 5 per cent of their international students, many of whom take advantage of taxpayer-funded accommodation and loans, drop out of study having secured their student visa. That is an appropriate step but it will not fix the underlying financial precarity that makes universities desperate for foreign students in the first place. That is the fault of the ill-conceived student loan system, which seems no longer fit for purpose. It is an irony that when MPs voted in 2010 to increase tuition fees to £9,000, a key concern of the ensuing debate was that poorer students would be put off studying by the prospect of acquiring vast debts. In fact, the reverse happened. The number of young people pursuing higher education boomed. And the proportion of university-bound students from disadvantaged groups, for instance those eligible for free school meals, has risen robustly in parallel with their peer group. Still, although the present student loan system has thankfully not deterred poorer students from entering education, it has had other, less foreseeable, but clearly damaging effects. Chief among them is that the student loan system has become a graduate tax in all but name. While back in 2010, it was taken for granted that a large proportion of debt held by low-earning graduates would inevitably be forgiven by the state, changes to the repayment scheme effective from 2023 have fundamentally altered that model. Graduates in England now begin paying off their loans on any earnings over £25,000. The interest on these loans, calculated by reference to the unorthodox RPI measure of inflation, is eye-watering: it stood at 8 per cent in August 2024. The time-frame over which repayment takes place has also been extended, from 30 years to 40. The result is that the average student in England, who leaves university £53,000 in debt, faces a steep additional tax on most of their earnings over their working lives. Because of the steep interest rates, low earners are most likely to be shackled with repayments that never even make a dent in the debt's principal sum. These graduates will find it comparatively difficult to buy a house, become economically mobile, save into pensions and start families. Saddling a generation of young earners with a sharp tax by stealth is a cowardly political trick that harms universities too. Instead of trying to recover the true cost of education, there is a strong case that headline tuition fees should simply be allowed to rise. That they have been kept artificially low, at close to their 2010 level for over a decade, is one reason many universities now face financial ruin. As well as increasing internal competition and making the sector more dynamic, uncapping tuition fees would help to make students more immediately sensitive to the financial trade-offs involved in pursuing further education. At 18, students are young, their whole adult lives still ahead of them: all the more reason to inform them honestly of the costs and benefits of the first truly consequential financial choice they will make.
Reuters
4 hours ago
- Reuters
Korean equity surge risks stuttering without stronger reform push: Raychaudhuri
HONG KONG, August 4 (Reuters) - The Korean equity market, which went from being among the worst performers in Asia last year to the best regional performer in 2025, stumbled over the past week. The rally has fundamental support, but it could sputter if expected shareholder-friendly reforms don't materialize. The well-known 'Korea discount' afflicting the country's stocks has narrowed considerably this year. Korean equities typically trade at a sharp valuation discount to Asian stocks excluding Japan, with the exception of a brief period of AI-fuelled euphoria in 2023. But this discount fell from around 40% at the peak of political upheaval last year to under 30% in mid-July, thanks largely to expectations of shareholder-friendly reforms and greater clarity around the shape of the new government. However, Korean equities hit a hurdle in late July. The market corrected 4% in the last two trading days of the month after President Lee's government raised the peak corporate tax rate from 24% to 25% and the securities transaction tax from 0.15% to 0.20%. The announcement of a Korea-U.S. trade deal removed some uncertainties, but ambiguities about execution remain, and, overall, disappointment regarding the tax tweak overshadowed the trade truce relief. Korean equity performance in 2025 has been driven not just by political shifts but by several fundamental factors in a few large sectors. Financials, which constitute 13% of Korea's equity market, appreciated by 57% in the year through July 25, benefitting from investors' preference for high dividend yields and expectations of increased loan growth after a stream of rate cuts by the Bank of Korea. Meanwhile, industrials, representing 17% of Korea's market, have been lifted 54% over that period, thanks to the global defence and infrastructure spending boom. Technology, the country's largest sector at almost 30% of the market, has seen share prices rise by 45% in this time. The flagship technology stocks Samsung and SK Hynix are up 24% and 55%, respectively, as they continue to be propelled by AI optimism and the success of some specific new products, most notably Hynix's High Bandwidth Memory chip, an essential input to advanced AI servers and Nvidia's GPUs. Beyond these sector-specific catalysts, one of the most significant trends spurring investor enthusiasm for Korea this year has been the expectation of regulatory changes designed to protect minority shareholders. Korea's 'Value Up' program, initiated in February 2024 by the country's previous government led by former President Yoon Suk Yeol, began to tackle key issues plaguing Korean corporate governance, but many investors believe it did not go far enough. The unaddressed concerns include the prevalence of cross-holding structures that give founding families disproportionate control over companies and, relatedly, companies' reluctance to distribute excess cash to shareholders. Former President Yoon's declaration of martial law in December 2024 and his subsequent impeachment led to presidential elections in June 2025, and the formation of a seemingly stable government under President Lee Jae Myung. Soon after, on July 3, the National Assembly passed, opens new tab a corporate governance reform bill, which, among other things, requires company directors to act in the best interest of shareholders, limits large shareholders' voting rights when appointing audit committee members, mandates that hybrid virtual shareholder meetings must be held by publicly traded firms above a certain size, and raises the required proportion of independent directors on boards from one-quarter to one-third. Even before these measures were taken, corporate behaviour was already changing in anticipation of government pressure. Korean dividend payouts have been rising since 2022, and so have buybacks, according to FactSet. Indeed, buybacks in the first half of 2025 are higher than in all of 2024. These positive changes may have helped spur the rush of foreign capital flows into the country's equity market since April. Foreign institutions sold a net $28 billion of Korean equities from August 2024 to April 2025, and bought back a net $6 billion over the next three months. The currency has also been supportive of inflows. The Korean won has appreciated 7% against the U.S. dollar in 2025, second only to the Taiwanese dollar in the Asian leaderboard. Valuations remain attractive in Korea's market despite the sharp rally. Korean equities trade at a forward price-to-earnings multiple of 12.3x, far lower than its Asian peers that have similar earnings growth profiles. Of course, Korea's PE ratio is based on an 18% earnings growth forecast in 2026, the FactSet consensus expectation, and some investors may be sceptical about this figure. But such scepticism seems unjustified, as Korea's consensus EPS forecasts have been rising since March, a period marked by significant geopolitical and economic uncertainties that are, in many cases, now being resolved. Can the Korean rally regain its momentum? While the market's response to the U.S.-Korea trade deal may not have been overly positive, the outcome – a 15% tariff for many Korean goods versus the 25% rate feared – removes a massive risk, given that 15% of Korean companies' aggregate revenue comes directly from the U.S., according to FactSet. Investors, however, would be well-advised to keep an eye on the country's reform calendar, as several governance-enhancing reforms are still not finalized, most notably a tax amendment to incentivize higher dividend payouts. Moving forward, the fate of the Korean equity rally could depend, to a large extent, on what happens in government. (The views expressed here are those of Manishi Raychaudhuri, the founder and CEO of Emmer Capital Partners Ltd. and the former Head of Asia-Pacific Equity Research at BNP Paribas Securities). Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI),, opens new tab your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI,, opens new tab can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn,, opens new tab and X., opens new tab
The Sun
5 hours ago
- The Sun
Business chiefs are demanding Rachel Reeves offers tax incentives to help a million young people into workplace
BUSINESS chiefs are demanding Rachel Reeves offers tax incentives to help a million young people into the workplace. More than 100 industry bosses, including Toyota and JCB, have written to the Chancellor demanding help to avoid youths ending up on the scrapheap. 2 Demands are being laid out for a Skills Tax Relief at the Budget with claims it could save £10 billion over five years in welfare savings. The calls come as the talent of one million NEETs – Not in Education, Employment or Training – is going to waste. Georgina Bristol, of the Jobs Foundation, said: 'We know that businesses are the best engine for providing that vital first step on the career ladder for young people. 'But businesses are facing too many additional costs, which is stopping them from fulfilling this vital role. 'We are not short of young people with ambition. We are short of clear routes into real work. A Skills Tax Relief could give business the tools to offer that hope.' Young people who were in this category before the pandemic stood at 10.7 per cent but this then hit a peak of 13.2 per cent – representing 987,000 not earning or even learning a skill. The joint letter from 125 business leaders wants Ms Reeves to bring in some form of tax incentive to enable funding in young people. Prominent signatories include chairman of JCB Lord Anthony Bamford, Labour Peer Lord Jon Mendelsohn and sports promoter Barry Hearn. The Jobs Foundation also highlights that that the number of apprenticeships has fallen by 40 per cent since 2016. The Chancellor last month told a House of Lords committee that getting young people back into work is where 'the biggest crisis exists'. Raising taxes will kill off growth, Reeves warned as she pledges to rip up business red tape 2
