Beavers put to work saving two Utah rivers
The unique conservation effort is… beavers. In 2019, researchers began moving captured beavers who had become a nuisance to humans along stretches of the San Rafael and Price Rivers in Eastern Utah.
The idea is that beavers—often considered nature's engineers—reshape river landscapes by felling trees and building dams. All of this busy activity conserves water and creates wetlands that sustain countless other species. According to the US Fish and Wildlife Service, they are 'one of the most cost effective and sustainable solutions for ecological restoration and climate change resilience.'
And our desert rivers are indeed in need of ecological restoration. Human activities including the constructions of reservoirs, dams, and diversions have depleted their crucial water supplies and consequently degraded natural habitats of the local flora and fauna, as reported by Utah State Magazine.
Cue the beavers. Two years after they joined the small pre-existing population, Emma Doden, a then-Utah State University graduate student who participated in the conservation experiment, told the BBC that her team found dams in regions where they had previously never been observed.
While a number of the 47 total translocated beavers died or moved away from the target restoration area, 'a few of these beavers stuck where we put them. And even the ones that didn't – we had some move 20km [12 miles] downstream, which is pretty far for a small little animal – they are probably still helping the system, as the river is so degraded,' she said.
[ Related: Beavers, snails, and elephants are top grads from nature's college of engineering. ]
By 2023, the experiment was still working. The researchers saw more dams than before their study on beaver translocation, behavioral ecologist Julie Young at Utah State University told The Wildlife Society. Some beavers improved regions of pre-existing analog dams—or human-made beaver-like dams built for environmental restoration purposes.
'What heavy machinery and government programs couldn't do, a few rodents pulling sticks through the mud did better,' the National Parks and Forests Supporters post concludes.
While the post doesn't cite specific evidence backing their claim regarding government intervention, there's no arguing that beavers—like invasive-plant-eating goats—are a more natural solution.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
The hidden dangers of feeding wild animals
Feeding wild elephants might seem kind or exciting, but a new study warns it can lead to serious harm. Researchers at the University of California San Diego say that giving food to wild animals -- especially elephants -- can change their behavior in dangerous ways. "Many people, especially foreign tourists, think Asian elephants are tame and docile, like domestic pets," lead author Shermin de Silva, a conservation scientist and professor of biological sciences, said in a UCSD news release. "They don't realize these are formidable wild animals and try to get too close in order to take photographs or selfies, which can end badly for both parties," she added. The study, published in the journal Ecological Solutions and Evidence, looked at 18 years of data from elephant tourism areas in Sri Lanka and India. In Sri Lanka's Udawalawe National Park, researchers found that dozens of elephants had learned to "beg" for food near fences and tourist vehicles. One male elephant, nicknamed Rambo, became a local celebrity for this behavior. The impact? Tragic. Several people were killed or injured in elephant encounters, the news release said. At least three elephants were killed, and some animals ate plastic bags or other waste while trying to get food. In India's Sigur region, researchers tracked 11 male elephants who were fed by people. Four of animals later died, likely because of humans. "Food-conditioned animals can become dangerous, resulting in the injury and death of wildlife, people or both," the researchers wrote. "These negative impacts counteract potential benefits," they added. Feeding wild elephants may cause them to lose their natural foraging skills, especially if they start relying on sugary snacks or processed food, researchers said. It may also raise the risk of disease spreading between people and animals. While most tourists mean well, experts say the best thing to do is never feed wild animals, no matter how safe it seems. Feeding animals might feel like helping a friend, the researchers explained. "But this encourages wild animals to seek food from people, attracting them to areas that can put themselves or people at risk," de Silva said. "It can be a conduit for disease transfer between species," she said. "Such feeding can also cause animals to lose their ability to forage for themselves if the behavior becomes prevalent, especially with young animals." More information The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has more on the potential harm in feeding wildlife. Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Scientists stunned after discovering long-lost fish thriving in lake for decades: 'It's kind of like finding the missing link'
Scientists stunned after discovering long-lost fish thriving in lake for decades: 'It's kind of like finding the missing link' More than an estimated six decades after it vanished from Lake Erie, a long-lost native fish has resurfaced, the Pocono Record reported. Biologist Doug Fischer and colleagues with the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission recently confirmed the presence of shallow-water ciscoes thriving in northeastern Pennsylvania. The species hadn't been seen in Lake Erie since the 1950s or early 1960s, after it was wiped out thanks to pollution, overfishing, and competition from invasive species. But thanks to stocking efforts in the early 20th century, a population has quietly survived in the privately owned Crystal Lake — and researchers are wondering if it could be the key to bringing shallow-water ciscoes back to Lake Erie. "It's kind of like finding the missing link," said Fischer. "The Great Lake cisco are still present in the upper lakes and Lake Ontario, but there's no other place to get shallow-water cisco for Lake Erie to round out the community there," he said. Now, biologists from multiple states, universities, and federal agencies are collaborating to study the fish's genetics and evaluate whether ciscoes could be used in a carefully planned repopulation program. Fortunately, it's not the first comeback story to offer hope. Species such as the fisher in Ohio and the rare Southern California steelhead trout have survived near extinction. Returning ciscoes to Lake Erie could benefit both people and the lake. The fish was a major food source for native lake trout, and its return could help rebalance the cold-water ecosystem. That could give a boost to local fisheries if the population rebounds to sustainable levels. "If we can bring that back to what it used to be, that may be impossible, but I think even an attempt to do that is necessary," said Jerry Skrypzak, president of Save Our Native Species of Lake Erie. With stronger environmental protections in place, including improvements under the Clean Water Act, scientists are cautiously optimistic that conditions in Lake Erie are finally good enough to support a second chance. "We got to the point where we think things are good enough, recovered enough, that an effort like this would be fruitful," Fischer said. There's still a long road ahead, but the find could someday play a major role in reviving a critical component of Lake Erie's biodiversity. As Fischer said, "Maybe 50 years from now it might have been a key management decision that we had a part in." Do you think America does a good job of protecting its natural beauty? Definitely Only in some areas No way I'm not sure Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Beavers put to work saving two Utah rivers
National Parks are often referred to as 'America's best idea.' That's what followers of the National Parks and Forests Supporters believe, anyway (and they're probably not wrong). Earlier this month, the Facebook page highlighted another great idea, this one regarding a unique conservation effort. The unique conservation effort is… beavers. In 2019, researchers began moving captured beavers who had become a nuisance to humans along stretches of the San Rafael and Price Rivers in Eastern Utah. The idea is that beavers—often considered nature's engineers—reshape river landscapes by felling trees and building dams. All of this busy activity conserves water and creates wetlands that sustain countless other species. According to the US Fish and Wildlife Service, they are 'one of the most cost effective and sustainable solutions for ecological restoration and climate change resilience.' And our desert rivers are indeed in need of ecological restoration. Human activities including the constructions of reservoirs, dams, and diversions have depleted their crucial water supplies and consequently degraded natural habitats of the local flora and fauna, as reported by Utah State Magazine. Cue the beavers. Two years after they joined the small pre-existing population, Emma Doden, a then-Utah State University graduate student who participated in the conservation experiment, told the BBC that her team found dams in regions where they had previously never been observed. While a number of the 47 total translocated beavers died or moved away from the target restoration area, 'a few of these beavers stuck where we put them. And even the ones that didn't – we had some move 20km [12 miles] downstream, which is pretty far for a small little animal – they are probably still helping the system, as the river is so degraded,' she said. [ Related: Beavers, snails, and elephants are top grads from nature's college of engineering. ] By 2023, the experiment was still working. The researchers saw more dams than before their study on beaver translocation, behavioral ecologist Julie Young at Utah State University told The Wildlife Society. Some beavers improved regions of pre-existing analog dams—or human-made beaver-like dams built for environmental restoration purposes. 'What heavy machinery and government programs couldn't do, a few rodents pulling sticks through the mud did better,' the National Parks and Forests Supporters post concludes. While the post doesn't cite specific evidence backing their claim regarding government intervention, there's no arguing that beavers—like invasive-plant-eating goats—are a more natural solution. Solve the daily Crossword
