Union boss appointed to $15b government fund board without checks
Before the audit, the fund required conflict of interest declarations for its staff and board and since the review has extended that to suppliers.
'ANAO has recommended that we also require such declarations for external experts used as part of due diligence processes. NRFC has accepted that recommendation. No conflict of this kind was identified by the audit,' a spokesperson for the fund said.
Board members were found to have been appointed appropriately, except that 'due diligence checks were not documented for one member appointed to the NRFC Board in October 2023', referring to Thompson. There is no suggestion that Thompson is not qualified for the role. He was contacted for comment.
The fund itself does not make board appointments, the Department of Industry, Science and Resources makes them.
Husic announced Thompson's appointment in October 2023. The long-time unionist had previously been on the boards of Cbus, the Coal Mining Industry Corporation and the Construction Industry and Property Services Industry Skills Council.
Coalition spokesman for industry Alex Hawke said there were 'serious concerns' about the auditor-general's findings.
'I have requested an urgent briefing from the auditor-general and will formally raise these issues when parliament resumes,' he said.
Upon the release of the audit, the fund agreed with and began to implement all recommended changes. A spokesperson said the organisation welcomed the findings.
'Some of the areas identified for improvement have already been addressed, and others are currently being addressed,' they said.
Loading
'While it is important to make sure we are continuously improving in these areas, as an organisation we are focused on delivering impactful investments on behalf of all Australians. We are on track to meet our investment targets and are getting on with the job.'
Husic's successor as industry minister, Tim Ayres, a former official with the same union as Thompson, defended his former colleague's appointment.
'Mr Thompson has experience that has been recognised by both sides of government,' a spokesperson for Ayres said. 'Appointments will be made throughout the life of the corporation to suit the needs of the NRFC and their functions. A well-balanced board with the right expertise is vital to ensuring that the NRFC can successfully fulfil its investment mandate.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
2 hours ago
- West Australian
Cassandra Winzar: Time to axe inefficient stamp duty with much-needed tax reform
The recent WA Budget was big on ambition for our infrastructure build but showed little ambition for much-needed tax reform. With Federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers increasingly talking up his desire for bold tax reform at his August productivity roundtable, the States will need to get on board, and that includes us here in the West. Chalmers wants any tax changes coming out of this roundtable to boost productivity. That means State-based taxes — primarily stamp duty and payroll tax — will need to be part of the conversation. They are two of our most inefficient taxes, meaning that for the amount of money they raise, they cause a fair degree of economic harm. WA is not alone on this. All States and Territories face the same challenge. That's why we must use this moment to engage with the reform agenda and come up with proposals that serve both the State's interests and the broader national interest. All taxes distort economic activity to some extent. Stamp duty and payroll tax are particularly inefficient because they significantly change how people and companies act relative to the amount of revenue they raise. Stamp duty does this by discouraging property transactions, and payroll tax reduces the incentive to hire employees. In contrast, taxes like the GST and land tax are more efficient, as they have a much smaller impact on economic decisions and activity. Stamp duty, which you pay when buying a home, adds to the dysfunction of our housing markets, making it more expensive for homeowners to move house even if they want to. The cost of paying stamp duty on a home purchase can mean that people are staying in houses that no longer meet their needs, such as older Australians and empty nesters staying in homes that are too big for them — even if they would prefer to move. It also can make people reluctant to move to access better employment opportunities. Economists are in furious agreement that States should remove stamp duty and change to a broad-based land tax. Importantly for State governments, this shift could be revenue neutral over the longer term but would require a long transition period to give households and markets time to adjust. Careful planning is also needed to ensure recent purchasers aren't unfairly hit with land tax just after paying stamp duty. If we get it right, this change could improve our housing system and boost productivity at the same time. Payroll tax is another important revenue source for States that needs to change. While it's not inherently a bad tax, it has been implemented in a complex and inefficient manner. Exemptions for small businesses encourage even successful businesses to stay small. There is evidence of firms 'bunching' just under the thresholds for this tax. That's where firms deliberately limit hiring new staff to stay under the exempt threshold. This can stop productive firms from investing and taking up opportunities to grow. There are also vast differences in rules and implementation across the states, making it difficult for business operating nationally. A good starting point in reform would be to harmonise payroll tax arrangements across the states and simplify the system. It's easy to see why states are hesitant to change. Payroll tax and stamp duty are their main sources of revenue to fund vital services like health and education, which are their responsibility to fund. They simply don't have as many options to raise revenue as the Federal Government has. And with rising house prices and employment rates in recent years, state governments have benefited through higher stamp duty and payroll tax takes. Here in WA, we benefit from a slightly different revenue mix, with substantial royalty revenues that have been particularly high in recent years. But stamp duty and payroll tax still make a large contribution, meaning reform has so far been off the table. It's disappointing the State Government hasn't used our recent run of surpluses to set us up for the longer term with some much-needed reform. But there's no longer any excuse. With a national conversation about to start, and all States and Territories likely to come to the party, WA must play its part and seize this moment. With this in mind, there is a real role for the Federal Government to help the states with the transition. Smoothing the path of tax reform is an ideal use of its new $900 million National Productivity Fund, although it will arguably need more than $900 million to tackle reform at this scale. To do this right, Federal and State governments will need to have a comprehensive look at the tax-and-transfer system and resolve questions over who pays for what. Demand for largely State-funded government services is rising, and this will only become more acute as the population ages. Real reform requires co-ordination and compromise between multiple levels of government. With everyone coming together in August, we now have a rare opportunity to get this right. It won't be easy, but we must have ambition. Cassandra Winzar is chief economist at the Committee for Economic Development of Australia.
West Australian
4 hours ago
- West Australian
ASIC urges consumers to guard superannuation from promoters flogging quick switches to precarious funds
The nation's corporate cop is trying to arm consumers against high-pressure sales tactics intended to lure them into moving their life savings into knotty, high-risk investments. The alert represents another push by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission to protect the country's multi-trillion dollar superannuation pool from falling into the wrong hands. ASIC said the end of another financial year was the trigger for many Australians to check how their super investments have performed, providing an opportune time for promoters to try and flog products claiming to deliver better returns. These sorts of calls or the true motivations can often be difficult for the average investor to pick up on, according to ASIC deputy chair Sarah Court, who is spearheading the awareness campaign. Based on ASIC's reconnaissance, many of the calls don't have the usual 'hallmarks of a typical scam', with many callers professing to have an investor's best interests at heart, offering ways to track lost super or to help find a better-returning product. 'They may also involve referrals to financial advisers during the call to create a sense of comfort and legitimacy,' Ms Court said. Asking questions about a salesperson's connection to the fund to establish whether there is a commissioning arrangement was a good way to establish the caller's motivations, she said. Pressure to make a decision quickly, calls out of the blue and promises of unrealistic returns were among the red flags to keep in mind, according to ASIC. 'The initial salespeople can be very persuasive, often the underlying schemes are complex or not made clear to the consumer, and it may be very difficult for even experienced investors to spot problems,' the ASIC lieutenant said. 'If you are unsure or are feeling pressured, just hang up.'
Sydney Morning Herald
6 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Alert issued over ‘industrial-scale misconduct' in super-switching schemes
Australians should be on the lookout for rogue superannuation schemes amid fears tens of thousands of people have lost a total of more than $1 billion in retirement savings as the result of 'industrial scale' misconduct. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission took the unusual step on Thursday of issuing a public warning about the risk of these schemes and the tactics used by call centre staff and financial planners to pressure people into changing their super to a new fund. It cautioned that some of these schemes would appear to consumers as legitimate because they were being promoted by ASIC-registered financial planners and were being offered to investors through large and highly respected financial institutions like Macquarie or Equity Trustees. Over the past two years, ASIC has commenced investigations into five of these superannuation funds that promised lower fees and similar investments to regular funds – such as the sharemarket. The warnings follow revelations in this masthead that two of the schemes being probed by ASIC – the $500 million Shield Master Fund, operated by Keystone Asset Management, and the $480 million First Guardian Fund, overseen by Falcon Capital – had allegedly misused vast sums of investor savings to bankroll pet projects of their founders. This allegedly included Keystone hosting events featuring appearances from celebrity sportsmen including NBA star Josh Giddey and boxer Floyd Mayweather. Loading The allegations are being contested, having been described as unfounded and unfair. ASIC has alleged in court proceedings that both groups sourced investment leads from Melbourne cafe owner Rashid Alshakshir, who is suspected of earning more than $35 million promoting the schemes to investors. He has denied any wrongdoing or having any knowledge that the schemes were being inappropriately overseen.
