An embarrassment for Starmer on migrant return hubs?
Formal discussions are under way, he said, with various countries. We don't know which these are, but we know which aren't keen - rather awkwardly, Albania.
Their prime minister, Edi Rama, said he remained "loyal" to their "marriage" with Italy - relations with other countries are "simply love".
The Conservatives say the trip is therefore an embarrassment for Sir Keir. His team say this was never on the agenda for this trip, which is about joint policing and intelligence sharing.
First of all, what are return hubs?
Essentially, return hubs are processing centres for people who have exhausted all their options to stay in the UK - including asylum applications, appeals and attempts to claim certain work or study visas.
They will be sent back to their home country, and while that happens, they can go to these return hubs - to prevent them absconding.
Officials said it would also prevent them starting a family, for example, and using that as part of their claim to stay in the UK.
Italy has one already but it's not used
Georgia Meloni's government has been keen on these for some time, and has built two in Albania - at the port of Shengjin, and the village of Gjader - big enough for 36,000 people a year.
But both, which Sky News visited last year, are currently empty. The courts in Rome say they can't be used until the European Court of Justice rules them safe. A ruling is expected next month.
Although, in a boost to the UK government's plans, the UN's refugee agency, has backed the principle of return hubs, if they meet human rights standards.
1:30
Is this like the Rwanda plan?
Spending millions on housing for migrants that then lies empty may sound familiar- but this is different to the Rwanda plan.
Agreed by the Conservatives, Rwanda was scrapped by Sir Keir when Labour won office - he said it was "unethical, unworkable and extortionate".
The key difference is that under the Rwanda plan, asylum seekers would not be able to claim to stay in the UK - they would be deported and could only apply to stay in Rwanda. This was ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court.
Why did Albania say no?
The UK hasn't always endeared itself to Albania, with comments by former home secretary Suella Braverman about an "invasion" of "Albanian criminals" causing anger here.
David Cameron cut short a much-anticipated visit, as foreign secretary, to just 89 minutes, when the 2024 general election was called - causing offence.
And Mr Rama pointedly talked about the "stigmatising" of Albanians living legally in the UK.
Andi Hoxhaj, a Balkan expert at Kings' College London, told me: "The UK just hasn't put in the work. It's the first visit by a UK prime minister 103 years after diplomatic relations were established. Starmer and Yvette Cooper understand this and want warmer relations. But it was wishful thinking that a return hub would be agreed."
So who else might have one?
The government has been concentrating their efforts to "smash the gangs" on the Western Balkans.
The joint enforcement in Albania, has - according to the National Crime Agency - been a model which other countries could follow.
There are likely to be discussions at the European Political Community summit on Friday with countries such as Serbia, North Macedonia and Montenegro to scope out their interest, and the UK is hosting a Western Balkans summit in London in autumn 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
34 minutes ago
- The Guardian
US completes deportation of eight men to South Sudan after legal wrangling
Eight men deported from the US in May and held under guard for weeks at an American military base in the African nation of Djibouti while their legal challenges played out in court have reached the Trump administration's intended destination, war-torn South Sudan, a country the state department advises against travel to due to 'crime, kidnapping and armed conflict'. The men from Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, Vietnam and South Sudan arrived in South Sudan on Friday after a federal judge cleared the way for the Trump administration to relocate them in a case that had gone to the supreme court, which had permitted their removal from the US. Administration officials said the men had been convicted of violent crimes in the US. 'This was a win for the rule of law, safety and security of the American people,' Tricia McLaughlin, a Homeland Security spokesperson, said in a statement on Saturday announcing the men's arrival in South Sudan. The supreme court cleared the way for the transfer of the men last Thursday. The men had been put on a flight in May bound for South Sudan but which was diverted to a base in Djibouti, where they were held in a converted shipping container. The flight was diverted after a federal judge found that the administration had violated his order by failing to allow the men a chance to challenge the removal. The supreme court's conservative majority had ruled in June that immigration officials could quickly deport people to third countries. The majority halted an order that had allowed immigrants to challenge any removals to countries outside their homeland where they could be in danger. A flurry of court hearings on4 July resulted in a temporary hold on the deportations while a judge evaluated a last-ditch appeal, before the judge decided he was powerless to halt their removals and that the person best positioned to rule on the request was a Boston judge whose rulings had led to the initial halt of the administration's effort to begin deportations to South Sudan. By Friday evening, that judge had issued a brief ruling concluding that the supreme court had tied his hands. US authorities have reached agreements with other countries to house immigrants who cannot quickly be send back to their homelands.
Daily Record
35 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Tories set to call for PIP face-to-face assessments on all claims as part of new DWP reforms
The Conservatives also want anxiety, mild depression and ADHD exempt from being classed as a 'severe condition' for Universal Credit. Reasons your Universal Credit may be cut by DWP The Conservatives will try to change the Labour Government's welfare Bill this week to tighten up access to Personal Independence Payments (PIP) and Universal Credit. Kemi Badenoch will pledge that the Tories are 'now the only party committed to serious welfare reform' after Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer shelved plans to restrict eligibility for PIP in the face of a backbench revolt last week. The Tories will look to lay amendments to the legislation - renamed the Universal Credit Bill - and party leader Mrs Badenoch is due to deliver a speech on welfare on Thursday. Among the amendments the Conservatives will propose is a requirement for eligibility for PIP to be determined by a face-to-face assessment only, rather than remotely by telephone or video call. As part of the UK Government's reforms, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has proposed a new 'severe conditions criteria' for Universal Credit. Claimants in this category will be entitled to a higher rate of the benefit, and will not be routinely reassessed to receive payments. Another of the Conservatives' amendments would prevent somebody from being classed as having a severe condition for the purpose of universal credit only by having anxiety, mild depression, or ADHD. The third amendment would block the increase in Universal Credit and restrict PIP for some people who are not British citizens. In her welfare speech, Mrs Badenoch is expected to say that the Conservatives are 'the only party that is prepared to take the tough decisions to get spending under control'. 'I have no doubt that, emboldened by their success in forcing Starmer to U-turn last week, Labour's backbench MPs will now be eyeing up more concessions,' she will say. The original welfare proposals had been part of a package that ministers expected would save up to £5 billion a year, and economists are now warning that tax rises are likely to plug the gap left by the concessions to rebels. On Friday, Chancellor Rachel Reeves admitted that the fallout over the UK Government's welfare Bill had been 'damaging' and did not rule out tax rises in the Autumn Budget. The DWP confirmed no changes will be made to PIP until a review of the current assessment process has been completed. Minister for Social Security and Disability Sir Stephen Timms will co-produce the review with disabled groups and charities, which is expected to be completed next year. Sir Stephen announced the climbdown in the middle of the debate on the legislation in Parliament on July 1. He acknowledged 'concerns that the changes to PIP are coming ahead of the conclusions of the review of the assessment that I will be leading'. Sir Stephen said the UK Government would now 'only make changes to PIP eligibility activities and descriptors following that review', which is due to conclude in the Autumn of 2026. The Scottish government has said people on Adult Disability Payment will not be affected by changes to PIP.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
US trade deal makes Britain top investment destination in the world
Britain has become the most attractive place to invest in the world after Sir Keir Starmer struck a trade deal with Donald Trump. A survey of the finance chiefs of some of Britain's biggest listed businesses found that the UK was now their preferred country to invest in, overtaking the US, Japan and the Middle East. The UK has leapt up the rankings since the end of last year, when it came in at sixth spot. Deloitte, which conducted the survey, said the boost was 'in the light of the UK-US trade deal announced in early May.' Conflict in the Middle East has also weakened that region's relative appeal as a destination for investment. Ian Stewart, chief economist at Deloitte UK, said: 'Despite conflict in the Middle East and volatility in oil prices, levels of concern about geopolitical risk fell slightly in the second quarter. This may reflect an easing of concerns around trade in the light of the UK-US trade deal announced in early May.' It comes as the world braces for the return of US tariffs on trading partners when a 90-day pause on Mr Trump's 'liberation day' levies expires this Wednesday. The president said be would notifying about a dozen countries on Monday of the new tariff level on their shipments to the US. Treasury secretary Scott Bessent said on Sunday that the new tariffs would take effect from August 1. He said several trade deals were close to completion. 'We're going to be very busy over the next 72 hours, ' Mr Bessent said Sunday on CNN's State of the Union. 'If you don't move things along, then on Aug 1, you will boomerang back to your April 2 tariff level.' In the latest Deloitte survey, a net 13pc of UK finance chiefs described Britain as very or somewhat attractive for investment. Only India ranked as highly, with the two countries sharing the top position. Meanwhile, more finance bosses said they were open to expanding, with 17pc saying now was a good time to take risks. The survey covered finance chiefs for both public and private businesses, including FTSE 100 companies. While they are UK-based, a majority of the companies surveyed have international operations. Richard Houston, chief executive of Deloitte UK, said: 'This renewed confidence, coupled with a rise in risk appetite, is welcome and underscores the considerable investment potential the UK offers.' Britain was the first country to secure a trade pact with the US in May. Mr Trump at the time hailed the UK as 'truly one of our great allies' and said it was a 'great honour' to have Britain sign the first deal with the United States. Under the terms of the agreement, the Prime Minister secured lower tariffs on UK car imports into the US, while the aerospace sector was shielded from levies. The Government called it a 'landmark' deal that would save thousands of jobs and make it easier for British companies to do business across the Atlantic. The findings will be a welcome boost for the Government, which has been battling to convince companies to invest in Britain. Last year, foreign investment into Britain plunged to a record low. Official figures showed the number of inbound foreign direct investment (FDI) projects dropped to 1,375 last year, down 12pc from the 1,555 in 2023-24. Deloitte's positive findings also come after a torrid week for Labour that has seen Sir Keir's authority significantly weakened by a rebellion on cuts to welfare spending. Ms Reeves said: 'Finance leaders see the UK as the best place in the world to invest. Under this Government we are open for business, delivering more investment, more jobs and putting more money in people's pockets across Britain.'
