Meta fighting Nigerian fines, warns could shut Facebook, Instagram
The social media juggernaut last week lost its latest legal bid when a Nigerian tribunal rejected its appeal against a $220 million fine imposed by the country's consumer protection agency, the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC).
In appeals court papers cited by various media, including the BBC and The Africa Report, Meta said it "may be forced to effectively shut down the Facebook and Instagram services in Nigeria in order to mitigate the risk of enforcement measures".
Meta's social media platforms — WhatsApp, Facebook and Instagram — are among the most popular in the country.
Meta has until the end of June to pay the fine, Nigerian media reported.
"We disagree with the NDPC's (Nigerian Data Protection Commission (NDPC) decision, which fails to take into account the wide range of settings and tools that allow everyone using Facebook and Instagram in Nigeria to control how their information is used," a Meta spokesperson told AFP.
"We're committed to protecting user privacy and have appealed the decision," the company spokesperson said in an email response.
Nigeria had accused Meta of violating the country's data protection and consumer rights laws on Facebook and WhatsApp.
FCCPC chief executive officer Adamu Abdullahi had said investigations carried out in conjunction with the NDPC between May 2021 and December 2023 revealed "invasive practices against data subjects/consumers in Nigeria".
A WhatsApp spokesperson told AFP on Saturday that: "The FCCPC order contains multiple inaccuracies and misrepresents how WhatsApp works, and we are urgently applying to stay the order and appeal the Tribunal's decision to avoid any impact to users."
Nigeria had some 164.3 million internet subscriptions as of March, according to figures published on the National Communication Commission's website.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
31 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
From Miranda Kerr to Karlie Kloss: Celebrities who tied the knot with billionaires
While celebrities often enjoy wealth from their fame, some have taken it a step further by marrying billionaires. From Snapchat founder to luxury fashion moguls, a select group of stars have said 'I do' to some of the richest individuals in the world. However, not all of these relationships have been fairy tales; many turned into dramatic divorces, massive settlements, and even headline-hitting courtroom battles. Miranda Kerr married Snapchat CEO Evan Spiegel in 2017.(Instagram/mirandakerr) Miranda Kerr and Evan Spiegel Model Miranda Kerr began dating Snapchat co-founder Evan Spiegel in 2014 after meeting at a Louis Vuitton event. Even though the relationship moved slowly in the beginning, they got engaged in 2016 and married in an intimate ceremony. Spiegel, with a net worth of $2.9 billion, has brought Kerr into the tech elite, according to Too Fab. Karlie Kloss & Josh Kushner Supermodel Karlie Kloss met investor Josh Kushner in 2012. While Kloss was the more successful at the time, Kushner's venture capital firm, Thrive Capital, has since skyrocketed, investing in companies like Instagram and Instacart. His estimated worth is $3.8 billion. Also read: From Rihanna and Vanessa Hudgens to Pete Davidson: Celebrities set to become parents in 2025 Salma Hayek & François-Henri Pinault Actor Salma Hayek married French luxury tycoon Francois-Henri Pinault, the head of Kering, which owns Gucci, Balenciaga, and more. With a net worth of $40.6 billion, Pinault is one of the richest men in fashion. Hayek, according to Business Insider, resisted the marriage initially, but the couple has now been together for over 15 years. She said she did not pay heed to critics who claimed she married for money. Jerry Hall & Rupert Murdoch Model Jerry Hall was married to media mogul Rupert Murdoch, who is worth an estimated $24.1 billion. However, the couple's marriage came to an abrupt end after six years in 2022 via an email. Hall, according to the BI report, was barred from sharing family secrets with the creators of Succession and was given 30 days to vacate their Bel Air estate. Elle Macpherson & Jeffrey Soffer Following a dramatic reunion after his helicopter tragedy, model Elle Macpherson married rich real estate entrepreneur Jeffrey Soffer. According to reports, Macpherson left with $53 million and a $26 million mansion when their marriage ended in 2017. Janet Jackson & Wissam Al Mana In 2012, Janet Jackson wed Wissam Al Mana, a businessman from Qatar. He manages a multinational empire of 55 businesses, yet it is debatable how much money he is worth. Eissa, their son, is currently being co-parented by the couple, who separated in 2017. Ellen Barkin & Ronald Perelman In the year 2000, actress Ellen Barkin wed businessman Ronald Perelman. After suing Perelman over a botched investment in her production firm, Barkin was granted $44 million in their contentious 2006 divorce, reported TooFab. FAQs Q1: Which celebrity married the wealthiest billionaire? A: Salma Hayek's husband, François-Henri Pinault, is worth around $40.6 billion. Q2: Did any of these relationships end in divorce? A: Yes. Elle Macpherson, Jerry Hall, Ellen Barkin, and Janet Jackson all divorced their billionaire spouses. Q3: Are these marriages based on love or wealth? A: Many of the celebs insist love was the foundation despite public skepticism about their partners' fortunes. Q4: Which billionaire had the most dramatic breakup? A: Rupert Murdoch reportedly dumped Jerry Hall by email and enforced strict divorce terms.
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
Who is Matt Deitke? 24-year-old genius who rejected Rs 1000 crore salary offer of Mark Zuckerberg, Meta boss went to meet him and then...
New Delhi: To make Meta the king of the AI world, Mark Zuckerberg is on a hiring spree, for which he has given lucrative offers to the employees of Thinking Machines Lab, an American startup. During this recruitment process, Zuckerberg himself became a fan of a young man and offered him 125 million dollars, i.e. about Rs 1000 crores. The surprising thing was that the man turned down his offer of Rs 1000 crores, after which Zuckerberg himself went to meet him. Who is the man who refused Mark Zuckerberg's Rs 1000 crore job offer? According to American media, Meta had offered Rs 1000 crore to Matt Deitke, a 24-year-old Artificial Intelligence researcher, but he turned down the offer. Then Zuckerberg himself reached out to him and offered him $250 million, i.e. about Rs 2200 crore. Deitke still did not accept the offer immediately but asked to consult his friends. Eventually, Deitke accepted that offer. This is being said to be one of the most substantial salary packages in the history of AI. Who is Matt Deitke, and why has Zuckerberg become his fan? Let us tell you that Matt Deitke is a famous name in the world of AI. After taking admission in a PhD in Computer Science from Washington University, he left it midway and then started working at the Allen Institute for AI in Seattle. During this time, he also contributed significantly to creating an AI chatbot 'Molmo'. Not only this, Deitke received the Outstanding Paper Award at NeurIPS 2022, which is one of the most prestigious AI conferences in the world. What is Vercept, which is run by Matt Deitke? Matt Deitke also runs a startup called Vercept, which he started in November 2023. His startup has 10 employees, one of the investors in which is former Google CEO Eric Schmidt. Matt Ditke's increasing repute led to the top tech companies trying to get him on the board, and in 2024, Meta approached Ditke to join its Superintelligence Lab.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
UPSC Ethics Simplified: Why is work-life balance vital for a healthy work culture?
Work as a duty has ethical foundations. Work is worship, and it has been taught to all of us. Lord Krishna advised Arjuna to work not for personal gain but with a sense of duty. That moral intention can be seen as both Kantian and Utilitarian. But what about the modern day work-life? It is true, and one shouldn't wait till the end of this article to accept that health, happiness, and a caring attitude towards life can keep the quality of life and productivity positive. Suicide or depression should never be the outcome of any work culture. When the news headlines reported that the Chief Manager of Bank of Baroda died by suicide, what it read in sub-texts was that an important 'balance' was missing from his life. A few months ago, when Infosys founder, Narayan Murthy talked about working seventy hours a week to fulfill the dream of a developed India, a debate erupted across the country about working hours. The chairman of Larsen & Toubro, SN Subrahmanyan, even said that if it were up to him, he would like to see his employees in the office even on Sundays—and not just for seventy hours, but for ninety hours a week. This debate has impacted the work-life balance of every employee who leaves for the office at 8 a.m. and returns home around 8 or 9 p.m.—a twelve-hour workday. And even at home, WhatsApp and phone calls keep him connected to the office. Let's self reflect through questions. In the age of AI and cut-throat competition, is man being treated as a machine? That God-like customer always demands an emotional and balanced employee — but isn't that employee also a social being? Does productivity depend only on the number of hours worked, or also on the motivation of the employee? Do organizations not play a role in the happiness or family responsibilities of their employees? If family relationships are a source of happiness, then why is it not considered necessary for an employee to spend time with their family? Does institutional commitment or productivity depend only on the number of hours worked? Even when we advocate ethics in governance, do we realize that ethics itself requires mental, spiritual, emotional, and physical understanding, grounded in significant values? Under such work pressure, what kind of culture will be practiced? There can be many versions of the definition of work-life balance. Simply put, however, the Cambridge Dictionary defines it as the amount of time you spend doing your job compared to the amount of time you spend with your family and doing things you enjoy. So, the ability to divide one's time and energy between work and other important aspects of life (family, personal life, recreation) is a step towards healthy work-life balance. While it might not seem very important at first, work-life balance is essential for a healthy work culture — one built on meaningful work, open communication, and core values, and characterized by an atmosphere of respect, inclusivity, and trust between employees and management. So, healthy work culture expands the definition of work-life balance from just time management. Traditionally, work ethics is defined as a set of values that guide an individual's behaviour at work. They are considered the foundation of a productive professional life, incorporating values such as responsibility, integrity, punctuality, hard work, and accountability. However, an important value that lies at the core of work ethics is respect — respect for oneself, one's time, and one's life outside of work (including health and recreation). Maintaining a balanced approach to work and personal life is a reflection of this respect. The question is one of quantity vs. quality, of balance — both toward work and toward the life of the person doing that work. Is the quantity of working hours the most important factor, or should we also debate the quality of work? Do we need only a productive workforce, or a happy one as well? Can an imbalance in work-life balance endanger life itself? It is about achieving equilibrium. And in achieving so what needs to be ensured is that work demands are met without negatively affecting personal happiness, relationships, and overall health. It involves setting priorities in a manner that personal life does not become insignificant in front of professional life. How can we forget the death of Table Space CEO Amith Banerji, who died of cardiac arrest at the age of just forty-five? In Bangalore, there have also been reports of other young founders dying prematurely. Let's revisit working hours at the global level after the COVID pandemic. We find that many countries have moved towards a four-day work week, inspired by the work-life balance experienced by employees during that time. Germany, for example, began a six-month trial of a four-day work week on February 1, 2024. They sought to understand how such a work culture makes employees happier, healthier, and more productive. Many labor unions supported the initiative. Countries like the Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, Australia, and Japan also emphasized the importance of work-life balance. Japan believes that it reduces karoshi, or 'death by overwork.' An anecdote shared by Steve Jobs in his 2005 Stanford commencement speech is worth mentioning. He quoted something he had read in his adolescence: If you live each day as if it were your last, you will surely be right someday. Jobs explained: 'For the past thirty-three years, I have looked in the mirror every morning and asked myself, 'If today were the last day of my life, would I want to do what I am about to do today?' And whenever the answer has been 'No' for too many days in a row, I know I need to change something.' If one interprets Jobs' quote, it emphasizes the importance of self-reflection and ethical self-awareness. It makes a strong ethical case for a value-based work culture that isn't just about performance but also about the human behind that output. A significant aspect of employees fulfilling their duties successfully involves taking care of their mental and physical health. Employees who maintain a good work-life balance are more likely to stay healthy. How does it help? This enables them to stay committed to their roles, have a clear mind, and remain enthusiastic most of the time. Why wouldn't an employer want that? But in order to cultivate such a work culture, organizations have a moral responsibility to provide an environment that encourages a balance between life and work. A work environment that respects employees' need for time off is an important component of work ethic. Imbalance in work-life can lead to stress and can be fatal. Dr. Ranjan Shetty, a cardiologist at Manipal Hospital, writes in his article that imbalance in work-life is a major cause of untimely deaths. If people do not take a break from work, stress will inevitably increase. Pressure at work, combined with less time to rest, may lead to dishonesty, misrepresentation of results, neglect of tasks due to fatigue, or unprecedented losses. However, maintaining a work-life balance encourages honesty and accountability among employees. Here comes the role of motivation which is an important part of employee management. In Douglas McGregor's Theory X and Theory Y, Theory Y emphasizes that if employees are properly motivated and the workplace atmosphere is positive, people will do their work happily. A point to remember: the salary and responsibilities of senior management differ significantly from those of middle and junior management. This imbalance also needs to be acknowledged. Work-life balance enables individuals to focus on their assigned job effectively without burning out. Therefore, employers must remember that for long-term efficiency, sustainability, and productivity, this crucial aspect of work ethics must be respected. As Bajaj Auto's MD Rahul Bajaj once said, 'The leadership of any company needs to understand why, even after spending twelve hours a day, the desired level of productivity is not achieved.' He further warned, 'The bottleneck is always at the top of the bottle.' In today's fast moving world, integrating work-life balance into daily practices is essential. Work-life balance must be taken seriously by both leaders and employees. It is in fact part of the basic work ethic. It goes beyond just time management. It involves valuing the humans. Efficiency, productivity, integrity, and honesty are all linked to a positive work culture that demands a work-life balance. If work becomes life (purpose), and life becomes work (family), balance can be achieved. And that balance depends on mindfulness, purpose, and principles that define both work and life. What is the link between work-life balance and work ethics? (The writer is the author of 'Being Good', 'Aaiye, Insaan Banaen', 'Kyon' and 'Ethikos: Stories Searching Happiness'. He teaches courses on and offers training in ethics, values and behaviour. He has been the expert/consultant to UPSC, SAARC countries, Civil services Academy, National Centre for Good Governance, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Competition Commission of India (CCI), etc. He has PhD in two disciplines and has been a Doctoral Fellow in Gandhian Studies from ICSSR. His second PhD is from IIT Delhi on Ethical Decision Making among Indian Bureaucrats. He writes for the UPSC Ethics Simplified (concepts and caselets) fortnightly.) Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter and stay updated with the news cues from the past week. Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – Indian Express UPSC Hub, and follow us on UPSC section of The Indian Express on Instagram and X. For your queries and suggestions write at
