logo
Carney will meet the House, where the little things will matter

Carney will meet the House, where the little things will matter

Globe and Mail25-05-2025
Mark Carney will meet the House of Commons for the first time this week, and his Liberals are a few votes shy of a majority. But it's not the survival of his government that he has to worry about – not yet. It's the little things.
Every party in the opposition he faces is returning bruised, weakened in one way or another.
The Conservatives are returning without their leader, Pierre Poilievre, who spent months demanding an election, then lost the vote and his seat. The Bloc Québécois, which last fall set deadlines for concessions from the government, is now chastened from the loss of a third of their caucus. The NDP are a leaderless, status-less, penniless corporal's guard of seven MPs who publicly disagreed on who should take temporary charge.
It would take all three of those parties banding together to bring down Mr. Carney's Liberals on a confidence vote. They won't be mustering that kind of moxie anytime soon.
Yet that doesn't mean Mr. Carney can be confident he will be able to govern like he has a majority. In a minority Parliament, the opposition will have the power to trip up the government in lots of little ways.
In the last Parliament, the Commons ground into gridlock. Legislation didn't move for two months because of a procedural tussle: The Conservatives moved a privilege motion over the government's refusal to cough up some documents and filibustered it, speaking day after day. With an election coming, the Bloc and the NDP didn't want to side with the Liberals to lift the siege.
There won't be that kind of scorched-earth tactic now. Mr. Poilievre has promised more collaboration, and there won't be as much public tolerance for obstructionist tactics when there's a newly-elected government promising crisis-atmosphere action.
But when opposition MPs control the Commons, they have the power to cause headaches and embarrassments for the government in power – taking up time, making headlines and sometimes eroding its reputation.
If opposition MPs outnumber Liberals on Commons committees, they could vote for the government to produce internal documents – such as the ones from the now-defunct Sustainable Technology Development Canada that led to last fall's Commons standoff.
They could also launch hearings into government missteps and scandals summoning senior civil servants and other witnesses.
In the last Parliament, opposition parties launched nearly two years of hearings into ballooning costs and contracting abuses in the development of the Canada Border Services Agency's ArriveCan app. They never got to the bottom of things but produced regular examples of government ineptitude.
Mr. Carney may be a new prime minister, but the Liberals have 10 years of tenure behind them, and past missteps could be unearthed to serve as future banana skins.
What's not yet clear is just how much power the opposition will have over the workings of Parliament.
With only seven seats, the NDP doesn't have the official status that bring a seat on the Commons' Board of Internal Economy, which allocates parliamentary resources and budgets. Without party status, the party could be cut out of seats on parliamentary committees, too.
But such questions about money and committee membership, and whether the Lliberals will retain a majority on some committees, will be up for negotiation. If the Liberals don't throw a bone to the NDP, the Conservatives and Bloc might – and Liberals must worry that the three parties could band together to rewrite the rules of the Commons to give the opposition more control.
Why does it matter? Governments don't win re-election in parliamentary committees. But they can take up time and attention, and they are a platform for the opposition to erode the government's popularity.
The fact that the opposition parties are licking wounds now means that there's a good chance that some, perhaps all, will feel stronger in a year or 18 months – and maybe willing to brave another election.
New Democrats might feel they could regain party status in another election. If the trade-war crisis dissipates, the Bloc might feel they're less likely to be squeezed out in an election that doesn't revolved around the question of which leader will handle U.S. President Donald Trump. And the Conservatives might eventually like their chances to wrest power.
In the meantime, it's the little things in a minority Parliament that could cause Mr. Carney a lot of trouble.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Digital contracts are the norm today. Is there still power in a written signature?
Digital contracts are the norm today. Is there still power in a written signature?

CBC

time13 minutes ago

  • CBC

Digital contracts are the norm today. Is there still power in a written signature?

Some of the most powerful people in the world can be recognized by their signatures. Prime Minister Mark Carney's signature adorns Canadian currency, from his time as head of the Bank of Canada. And U.S. President Donald Trump regularly displays his oversized, sloping signature for the cameras with each new executive order. But these days, it's far more common for most of us to sign our names on a touch screen, or to simply click a box on an online form, than to sign your name with a pen on paper. Author Christine Rosen isn't happy about it. "We're actively choosing to go back to a way of life where a mark is the same as a signature. So it's a devolution in terms of our skills as human beings," she told The Sunday Magazine's Peter Mitton. Rosen's book The Extinction of Experience looks at how the onslaught of digital life is hollowing out real-life experiences, like the act of physically signing your name. "I fear that our willingness to suspend that small, everyday action is sort of symbolic of some of the other important things we've discarded in our haste to embrace digitally mediated forms of communication," she said. Despite their relative rarity in most people's lives today — and the legal ambiguity that came with the introduction of electronic signatures — written signatures still carry power as a personal artistic expression, whether you've carefully designed your own or paid a professional to do it for you. E-signatures around for decades E-signatures are just over 25 years old in the U.S. In June 2000, then-U.S. president Bill Clinton signed the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act into law. The act allowed for electronic records, including digital versions of a signature, to be used for business transactions that earlier required a person's written signature for validation. In Canada, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, which became law in April 2000, outlines the use of e-signatures. Provinces and territories have followed suit with similar legislation. John Gregory, a retired lawyer in Toronto, says when Clinton signed that bill, some worried that the signature's "ceremonial function" might lose some of its power. "It makes you take it seriously. Oh, jeez, I'm signing this. This is important. I should know what I'm doing. Do I really agree to this?" said Gregory, who previously worked in the U.S. on developing government policies around what happens legally when paper trails become increasingly digital. While personal opinions on an e-signature's weight may vary, the law has since moved on. Gregory pointed to a 2017 case in Saskatchewan where a man who injured himself in a go-kart crash said a digital waiver he signed by checking a box shouldn't absolve the company who owned the track of any liability. The court ruled that, in fact, that check was as valid as a pen-and-paper signature. And, in 2024, Saskatchewan's Court of King's Bench upheld a decision that a thumbs-up emoji was confirmation of a contract between two agricultural companies. One of the companies involved asked the Supreme Court of Canada to rule on that decision; it's unclear if the Court will do so. Do young people care about signatures? Filomena Cozzolino, 27, styled her signature after her paternal grandmother, with whom she shares her name. "When I was maybe 12 or 13, I found one of her IDs and I wanted to try to copy her signature," said the publishing and creative writing student at Sheridan College in Mississauga, Ont. "Not only do we share a name, but we can share our signatures, since she's no longer here to share hers anymore." Some of her classmates had a more business-like approach to them. "I have very messy handwriting, actually, because I'm left-handed. So everything smudges and ... once I learned cursive, just went with the flow," said Mikayla Nicholls, 28. Zainab Bakjsh, 24, writes her signature in Arabic, which she says looks better and is easier to write than when she does it in English. But beyond that, she's not given it much thought. "It's just a signature. When I need to do something at the bank, or like renewing my health card, is probably the only time that I sign," she said. Boutique signature craft While the age of correspondence via fountain pen on parchment may be long gone, there's still a niche of people interested in using signatures as a personal flourish — and even a market if you're looking for a professional to craft one for you. "I believe that your signature is literally your face. I mean, regardless of your profession, you can impress people around you with this beautiful signature," said Elena Jovanovic, head calligrapher at Florida-based MySign Studio. The business crafts custom signatures for patrons, offering options in multiple script styles. Their calligraphers will then teach you how to draw them on your own. But it'll cost you, with services ranging from $100 to $200 US. "Many people around the world create their first signature during their teenage years and continue to use it throughout their lives. Typically, these signatures lack creativity and elegance," Jovanovic said. Sometimes patrons request certain artistic effects, such as adding a lion or butterfly to the signature. Other requests are more esoteric. Jovanovic recalled one customer who asked that they customize his signature by introducing a four-letter profanity into his surname — presumably only for the signature, and not as part of a legal name change. "And I was like, why not?" she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store