Samsung Brought Back My Favorite Feature for Its Galaxy Watch 8 and Watch 8 Classic
But it's not just aesthetics that have changed in this year's revisions. The company is also stepping things up when it comes to health tools, including several features I've never seen on a smartwatch, like noninvasive skin analysis and AI-powered coaching for sleep and running. The Galaxy Watch 8 and Watch 8 Classic also have a smarter voice assistant and are the first smartwatches with Google's Gemini AI baked right inside, ready to handle complex tasks.
Watch this: The Rotating Bezel is Back! A Look at Samsung's New Galaxy Watch 8 and Classic
04:31
Pricing and availability
The Galaxy Watch 8 starts at $350 for the 40mm model and $380 for the 44mm one. The LTE versions are $50 more: $400 for the 40mm model and $430 for the 44mm watch.
The Galaxy Watch 8 Classic, with its rotating bezel and physical crown, comes in a single 46mm size and costs $500, or $550 for the LTE model.
The Titanium Blue version of the Galaxy Watch Ultra is $650, the same price as the original 2024 model. This version gets the same internal upgrades as the Watch 8 lineup, including a 64GB storage bump.
All models are available for preorder now with shipping starting July 25. If you reserve early from Samsung you can get $50 in Samsung credit; your wireless carrier may also have deals on the watches and Samsung's just-announced phones.
The 40mm version of the Galaxy Watch 8 has a new design with a circular screen and squircle frame.
Joseph Maldonado/CNET
Health and fitness features
Samsung continues to expand the Galaxy Watch's role as a health and wellness tool, building on existing features like ECG, SpO₂ (shorthand for peripheral capillary oxygen saturation), sleep tracking and its AGEs Index, which reflects your metabolic aging process. The headliner is a new Antioxidant Index, which measures carotene (one type of antioxidant) levels in your skin with a simple five-second press of your thumb on the sensor (no needle needed). Since antioxidants help clear toxins from the body, knowing your levels can offer actionable steps for improving your health. The watch will rate your levels on a scale from low to high and then offer generic recommendations on the Samsung Health app on how you can improve your levels if they're on the lower side.
It's important to note that this metric isn't clinically verified and isn't meant to replace a medical-grade test. It's designed to offer a baseline reading that may help you make real-time lifestyle adjustments, but it won't provide the detailed or precise results you'd get from a traditional blood test.
The Antioxidant Index on the new Galaxy Watches.
Joseph Maldonado/CNET
There's also a new metric called Vascular Load, which measures strain on your heart during sleep. These readings are translated into a low-to-high scale to help you understand how behaviors (like sodium or alcohol intake) may be contributing to long-term heart disease risk.
Sleep tracking gets a serious upgrade, too. A new Bedtime Guidance tool uses a three-day analysis of your circadian rhythm and sleep pressure (aka sleep debt) to recommend an ideal bedtime window. It factors in heart rate, HRV, skin temperature, and even environmental cues like room temperature or brightness (if you've got connected SmartThings devices). The goal: Improve your sleep quality, recovery and energy throughout the day.
The new Running Coach gives you a personalized training plan to help meet your goals.
Samsung
The coaching isn't just for sleep; the new Galaxy Watches are also debuting a Running Coach feature. It starts with a 12-minute running assessment that scores your fitness from level 0 (beginner) to level 10 (marathon-ready). From there, it builds a personalized four-to-six-week training plan tailored to your distance or performance goals.
Similar to Apple's new Workout Buddy, Samsung's Running Coach offers real-time, contextual feedback while you're running, like pointing out a major milestone. But unlike Apple's version, Samsung's tool goes a step further by actually adapting your future training plans based on your progress.
Design
The two new Galaxy Watches take a page out of the Galaxy Watch Ultra's playbook ditching the traditional circular watch face for a "cushion" design that has a round screen set inside a "squircle" frame (square with rounded edges). As someone who thought the Ultra looked too big and masculine for my wrist, I'm still not totally sold on the design shift. But I'm a sucker for that rotating bezel on the Classic (the Ultra's is static), so I can't help but love the look, even if it doesn't feel like it was made for me.
The Galaxy Watch 8 Classic brings back the rotating bezel in two color options: white or black.
Joseph Maldonado/CNET
The Classic also adopts the customizable quick-action button of the Ultra that also doubles as a crown wedges between the two navigation buttons.
Despite my preference for the sleeker, edgeless circular design of past Galaxy Watches, there may be some benefits to the new design, including a slimmer form factor. According to Samsung, the Galaxy Watch 8 is 11% slimmer and lighter than its predecessor. When trying it on, I was blown away by how light it felt on my wrist without the usual belly bump bulge of the body.
Pair that with a new band system, which reduces the gap between the watch and your wrist and you have a noticeably more comfortable fit. Thanks to the tighter sensor-to-skin contact, it's also more accurate at capturing heart rate data. This is still subject to testing, but if it holds up, it may be a justified design trade-off.
Width comparison between the Galaxy Watch 8, Galaxy Watch 8 Classic and Galaxy Watch Ultra. Both the Ultra and the Classic have the crown that doubles as an action button.
Joseph Maldonado/CNET
The Galaxy Watch 8 comes in silver and graphite with an aluminum frame, while the Classic opts for a stainless steel finish in just silver. Size-wise, the regular Watch 8 comes in 40mm and 44mm options, while the Classic is only available in 46mm, which looks pretty large on my 6-inch (15cm) wrist and definitely leans more masculine. I can't help but miss the days when Samsung offered more feminine options like rose gold or even just plain gold, though it's been a while since those were part of the lineup.
The new Galaxy Watches are the first smartwatches to debut Google's Gemini AI assistant out of the box.
Joseph Maldonado/CNET
Gemini on the watch
The new One UI 8 software brings a refreshed user experience that is easier to navigate. Notifications are separated by app and instant access to your six most-used apps. The Watches also takes a page from the Galaxy phone with a new "Now bar" at the bottom of the screen for quick access to active apps like timers or media controls.
But the most important software update is the addition of Gemini AI. The new Galaxy Watches are the first with Google's AI assistant built-in, bringing more complex commands and contextual understanding to your wrist. You can ask it to check your most recent running pace, start a five-mile run and launch your workout playlist simultaneously, set a timer to boil pasta based on a recipe in your notes, adjust the font size on the watch, or have it draft a text letting a friend know you're running late.
Since Gemini requires an internet connection to work, you'll need to have your phone paired nearby or use an LTE version of the watch.
Battery and storage
Let's set expectations: Just because the Galaxy Watch 8 looks like the Ultra doesn't mean it matches the Ultra's three-day battery life. But there's still good news to share.
Samsung says the Watch 8 has an 8% larger battery than the Watch 7: 325 mAh vs. 300 mAh (for the 40mm), and 435 mAh vs. 425 mAh (for the 44mm). The Classic tops out at 445 mAh, which is still well below the Ultra's 590 mAh battery. How much that translates into real-world use remains to be seen, but any boost is welcome, especially paired with the efficiency gains from the new Wear OS 6 update.
Storage also doubles across the board, with 64GB now standard (up from 32GB), including a new Titanium Blue version of the Ultra.
This is just a first look based on hands-on time. We'll find out if these features live up to the hype when put to the test in our full review, coming soon.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
9 minutes ago
- Forbes
Why The Future Of Trucking Litigation Is An Expert Arms Race
Robotic truck company Aurora shows off a self-driving semi-truck at the CES tech show in Las Vegas. A quiet revolution is reshaping America's trucking industry, and it's about to transform how trucking accident cases are fought in courtrooms across the country. Semi-autonomous systems—where drivers monitor AI-controlled vehicles—are already being deployed across commercial fleets, while companies like Aurora have logged five million fully autonomous commercial miles, proving that driverless freight is no longer science fiction. For the legal industry, this technological shift represents one of the most significant changes in commercial transportation litigation since the interstate highway system was built. With both human drivers and AI systems 'behind the wheel,' the fundamental nature of legal liability is being rewritten. To understand why this matters, consider how trucking accident cases are typically fought today. I interviewed Kenneth Williams, Transportation Practice Leader at the law firm Segal McCambridge, who has spent decades defending trucking companies in court. For the past fifteen years, plaintiff attorneys have relied heavily on "Reptile Theory," a litigation strategy designed to activate jurors' primitive survival instincts and make them feel that corporate conduct threatens community safety. This emotional approach has proven remarkably effective, generating billions in verdicts and settlements. As Williams explains, common questions include, "Does the trucking company agree that safety must be paramount?" and "A company must make the safest possible choice in all circumstances, correct?" These questions attempt to force defendants to agree with broad safety principles, then use those agreements to argue any deviation endangered the community. While data from today's trucks is already used by experts for accident reconstruction and determining driver distraction, the widespread adoption of semi-autonomous trucking systems will create more data, giving the truck more of a "voice" in litigation. These systems require drivers to monitor AI-controlled vehicles, but the AI handles part of the driving decisions. As Williams explains, "In near future jury trials involving commercial trucking litigation, you will hear from the commercial owner and from the driver, but the jury is now going to hear a new voice. They're going to hear from the vehicle itself—and vehicles don't give conflicting testimony, don't forget, and don't get nervous on the witness stand." Litigation Strategy Will Change As this technology continues to advance, litigation strategy will fundamentally shift from subjective human testimony to objective machine data. Instead of relying on a driver's recollection of events that occurred in milliseconds during a high-stress situation, through experts, legal teams can access precise sensor data showing exactly what the vehicle detected, when it detected it, and how the AI system responded. This includes everything from the exact speed and trajectory of surrounding vehicles to weather conditions, road surface quality, and even the driver's attention level as monitored by interior cameras and biometric sensors. The data richness extends beyond the moment of impact. Modern semi-autonomous systems continuously monitor and log driver behavior, creating detailed profiles of attention patterns, response times, and compliance with system alerts. This information provides unprecedented insight into the human-machine interaction that defines semi-autonomous operation, offering litigators objective evidence of driver performance that was previously impossible to obtain. As increasingly autonomous systems become more prevalent in commercial trucks, the litigation advantage will shift dramatically toward those who can secure and effectively utilize technical experts, but this shift also fundamentally changes litigation economics. Williams outlined the comprehensive expert team that will become essential, and why insurance carriers need to start wrestling with questions like, "Are you pricing policies to incorporate a digital forensic expert, an artificial intelligence expert, a biomechanical engineer, an accident reconstructionist, and a human factors expert on every case involving autonomous trucks? Let alone your medical doctors and toxicologists. Companies like Rimkus that are at the forefront of data retrieval, data interpretation, and AI expertise—that's who will be the industry leaders in assisting litigators." The Human Element Remains Williams noted the demographic implications: "The ramifications will impact who's on your jury. All the kids familiar with TikTok, WhatsApp, Instagram—they're miles ahead in technology compared to war veterans, retired school teachers, and end-of-career white-collar professionals.' However, even tech-savvy jurors need expert guidance to understand complex AI decision-making processes. The challenge lies in making sophisticated technology accessible to jurors with varying technical backgrounds while maintaining emotional resonance. As Williams explains, the most successful litigation teams will combine technical accuracy with compelling human narratives. They'll explain not just what the AI system did, but why those decisions matter for human safety and justice. The Shift from Personal Injury to Product Liability Perhaps the most fundamental legal transformation will be the gradual shift from traditional personal injury claims to product liability cases. In conventional trucking accidents, liability typically centers on driver negligence—whether the driver was distracted, fatigued, speeding, or otherwise failed to exercise reasonable care. The legal framework focuses on human error and company policies around driver training, hours of service, and vehicle maintenance. As AI systems assume greater control over vehicle operations, the liability calculus fundamentally changes. When an autonomous system makes a split-second decision that results in an accident, the question shifts from "did the driver act reasonably?" to "did the AI system function as designed?" This transformation moves cases from the realm of personal injury law—where human behavior is scrutinized—into product liability territory, where the focus becomes whether the technology itself was defective. Williams expects this shift to reshape commercial vehicle accident litigation, creating distinct categories of legal arguments. "Instead of arguing whether a driver should have seen a hazard or reacted faster, we'll be arguing whether the AI's object recognition algorithms were adequate, whether the sensors worked properly, or whether the decision-making protocols were reasonable given the circumstances," he explains. This evolution has profound implications for how cases are prepared and tried. Product liability cases require different expertise, different discovery processes and different legal theories. Rather than deposing drivers about their training and experience, attorneys will need to engage experts in software engineering, data science and artificial intelligence. The focus shifts from company safety policies to algorithmic decision-making processes and driver logs to code repositories. The transition also affects damages calculations. In traditional personal injury cases, damages often reflect the individual driver's actions and the trucking company's vicarious liability. In product liability cases, damages may encompass broader questions about whether entire fleets of vehicles share the same algorithmic vulnerabilities, potentially exposing manufacturers to massive aggregate liability that dwarfs today's trucking settlements. For insurance carriers, this shift represents a fundamental recalibration of risk assessment. The predictable patterns of human error that have long guided actuarial models give way to the more complex challenge of quantifying AI system reliability across millions of driving scenarios. The Coming Competitive Advantage While the full transformation remains years away, competitive advantages in the courtroom are already emerging. Williams emphasized: "Success will depend entirely on securing the best data interpretation experts early in the process. In this new reality, the side with superior technical expertise doesn't just have an advantage—they have an insurmountable one." The window for preparation is open now. As Aurora expands operations and other manufacturers accelerate deployment with semi-autonomous and fully autonomous commercial vehicles, those who build expert networks and develop technical competencies early will dominate the industry. The autonomous trucking revolution will transform commercial transportation litigation from emotion-driven to expert-driven. While human emotions and compelling narratives will remain important, the attorneys and insurance companies who can best interpret and present complex technical data in understandable, emotionally resonant ways will control the courtroom. The change is coming. The full transformation may take years, but the time to build expert relationships and develop technical competencies is now.
Fox News
23 minutes ago
- Fox News
China is exploiting our government's tech weakness. We need a rapid reboot
After more than two decades of serving in the U.S. Navy and building government systems, I have witnessed firsthand how millions of dedicated Americans work every day in service of their fellow citizens and the security of our democracy. I have also seen both the immense potential — and frustrating inertia — that plagues public service. An unrealized opportunity exists to connect the U.S. government's critical missions with the transformative power of commercial technology. Consider this: of the world's 10 largest companies by market capitalization, a staggering eight are American founded. This is no accident; it is a direct result of our nation's unparalleled entrepreneurial spirit. The critical question, however, is whether our own government is prepared to harness this strategic asset. Instead of tapping this engine of innovation, the U.S. government is held captive by its outdated processes. Entrenched legacy vendors have dug their claws in, and this has led to a general resistance to change. As the saying goes, "it takes a while to turn a big ship around." That rings true with actual warships and aircraft carriers, but it also applies to how government agencies resist adopting new tools that improve collaboration, efficiency and security. Instead, the U.S. government and its outdated procurement processes cling to existing technology platforms, such as Microsoft's suite of products that have been compromised time and again by China, which also happens to be one of the company's most significant business partners. Breaking the shackles of "vendor lock-in" — where the government becomes overly reliant on specific vendors even if they underperform — is crucial for fostering a new era of innovation that benefits America. When a company or product fails to perform well in the commercial sector, it's terminated immediately. In the public sector, the company is usually allowed to see out their multi-year contracts and when it's finally time to negotiate a renewal, all is forgotten. A more competitive public sector landscape, welcoming innovators and startups, can provide fresh perspectives, specialized solutions, and the speed to address rapidly evolving challenges. This is not a unique approach. Other nations are adopting this model, attempting to gain an edge over America. For example, China launched a program in 2023, with 39 partners, including Alibaba Cloud and Baidu, to advance computing power and AI. Russia subsidizes companies implementing digital transformation; and Iran, despite sanctions, is investing significantly in AI research and building a sovereign AI ecosystem. Our adversaries recognize that commercial tools drive rapid progress and are actively breaking down barriers to catch up to American AI leadership. There are understandable reasons for hesitancy. For years, Silicon Valley has been closely associated with the "move fast and break things" mantra, while the U.S. government has looked on with both envy (of the speed and efficiency) and concern (over potential impacts to its services). However, learning from the commercial mindset of agility and a relentless drive for improvement will help it to serve the American public better. The benefits? Reduced waste, greater efficiency and better taxpayer value. Nowhere is this approach more critical than in national security. The threats America faces are constantly evolving and leveraging emerging technology to do so. Maintaining our edge requires more than just incremental improvements; it demands continuous access to cutting-edge capabilities. Leveraging the R&D engines of American commercial innovation — in areas like AI, cybersecurity, data analytics and resilient infrastructure — is not just advantageous; it's essential. If Washington fails to leverage this homegrown ingenuity, it does so at our national peril, especially as our adversaries work tirelessly to do just that. Other nations are adopting this model, attempting to gain an edge over America. For example, China launched a program in 2023, with 39 partners, including Alibaba Cloud and Baidu, to advance computing power and AI. Government agencies tasked with everything from defending the nation to delivering health services need to have immediate access to the latest advancements in AI and data analytics, and they can only do so by leveraging powerful commercial tools with a platform for continuous improvement — an asset for national security and public service. AI could be used to accelerate some of the government's most notorious backlogs, such as the millions of immigration court cases, the accumulation in environmental reviews for energy projects, and pileups in programs like Social Security or Veterans Affairs healthcare. AI can analyze data at lightning speed, helping federal agencies and their partners deliver on mission-critical work at an accelerated pace. The urgent need for a more agile, efficient, innovative and secure government is too significant to ignore. This is a pivotal moment. By embracing the discipline, accountability, and innovative spirit of the commercial sector, the U.S. government can unlock new levels of performance and effectiveness. Change is hard. But as adversaries gain on America — or worse, overtake us — change is mandatory.
Washington Post
27 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Amazon delays Alexa's web debut — and a faceoff with ChatGPT
More than four months ago in New York City, Amazon executive Panos Panay said a new version of the Alexa virtual assistant would soon launch on the web at to 'help you do the long-form work you need to do.' The announcement set the voice-centric, artificial-intelligence-powered assistant that was first launched in 2014 on a new collision course with the popular text-heavy whippersnapper ChatGPT.
