logo
GNU kicked off with newbie DA ministers told they do not just represent their party

GNU kicked off with newbie DA ministers told they do not just represent their party

News24a day ago

Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni says political parties have learned from one another in the government of national unity.
ANC ministers had to clarify that ministers, especially from the DA, do not just represent their party.
On Thursday, Ntshavheni addressed a press conference in Cape Town.
In the first year of the government of national unity (GNU), experienced ANC Cabinet ministers had to constantly remind their DA colleagues that they do not only represent their political parties.
'We had to clarify this is not a DA ministry, it's a government ministry,' Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni said on Thursday.
But one year into the GNU, the Cabinet has gotten over that hurdle and was 'now moving towards working as a government, accepting that the wins of one are the wins of all', added Ntshavheni when she addressed a post-Cabinet briefing in Cape Town on Thursday.
Asked how the GNU was working out, she said it was a huge transition for opposition parties.
Ntshavheni added they had to go from criticising the government to finding solutions to the country's challenges.
'It's easier to be in the opposition than to be in government because your job is to criticise when you're in opposition. When you're in government, your job is to find solutions to the country's challenges. That realisation made quite an impact on all of us and a commitment for all of us within the government of national unity to find solutions.
'Coalition governments have fallen in their first year, and through the Budget, we almost went there. But like South Africa and our resourcefulness, we worked it out. We now all agreed on the Budget, what it means, and the work that still needs to be done,' she said.
Ntshavheni added that ministers also challenged each other about the pace of implementation.
'In the first year, we had to deal with a lot of DA ministers, and we had to clarify … that [you] are not a DA minister, it's a government minister. We are now getting over that; we are moving towards working as a government, accepting that the wins of one are the wins of all and that there's no one department that is insular from the others. No one department can work outside the support of others,' she said.
The GNU was seriously jeopardised in February after the ANC and DA disagreed on the Budget.
The ANC rejected a DA proposal in which the parties agreed on shared economic policy management.
For the DA, which had pinned its support for the Budget on securing such an agreement, the rejection effectively ended talks on the Budget.
The DA had told the ANC that if it passed the Budget, it would effectively end the GNU without its support.
The ANC openly said it was shopping for votes among other GNU parties and non-GNU ones in Parliament.
Despite the hurdles, Ntshavheni said there were several positives.
'We have had to learn to do the consultation, [we looked at] how do you strengthen the mechanisms of engaging both formally in Cabinet and outside of government, but what I can assure all of you is that decisions in Cabinet have never been on a vote. They've been on a consensus basis to show solidarity,' she added.
Ntshavheni said although parties worked in the GNU, she knew they were still competing.
'Next year [in the 2026 local government elections] and by-elections, we will continue contesting each other. We win and lose some, but we are all committed to ensuring we grow South Africa. We are committed to ensuring our parties achieve victory in our different parties,' she added.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

South Africa No. 2 Party Stays in Coalition, to Boycott Dialogue
South Africa No. 2 Party Stays in Coalition, to Boycott Dialogue

Bloomberg

time14 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

South Africa No. 2 Party Stays in Coalition, to Boycott Dialogue

South Africa's fractious coalition survived after the second-largest party opted to stay in the government following its ultimatum to President Cyril Ramaphosa for firing one of its members as a deputy minister this week, while announcing it won't take part in a national dialogue. Ramaphosa set up the panel that includes business leaders, actors and the captain of its national rugby team to guide a dialogue on the country's future development path. The Democratic Alliance made the decision after accusing the president of double standards because he fired one of its members as a deputy minister for traveling abroad without permission while members of his African National Congress who were implicated in corruption retained their cabinet posts.

DA withdraws from National Dialogue - but stays put in GNU
DA withdraws from National Dialogue - but stays put in GNU

News24

time18 minutes ago

  • News24

DA withdraws from National Dialogue - but stays put in GNU

The DA has withdrawn from participating in the upcoming National Dialogue over the axing of former deputy minister Andrew Whitfield and what it described as 'serious disrespect'. DA leader John Steenhuisen announced this during a press briefing on Saturday. The National Dialogue will see civic society and South Africans come together to find solutions to South Africa's crises, from unemployment to gender-based violence and other social ills. The DA's Federal Executive met to decide on the way forward after issuing an ultimatum on Friday. Steenhuisen said leaving the government of national unity (GNU) and collapsing the government would not be in the best interest of South Africa. Political developments surrounding the GNU prompted President Cyril Ramaphosa to cancel his trip to Spain and delegate Minister of International Relations and Cooperation Ronald Lamola to attend. Whitfield was fired this week for travelling to the US without Ramaphosa's approval. The axing led to a standoff between the two biggest parties in the GNU. On Thursday, the DA gave Ramaphosa two days to dismiss several ANC ministers whom the party said were implicated in corruption.

Wall Street Bigwig Says He's Confused How He Ended Up Funding an Armed Coup in African
Wall Street Bigwig Says He's Confused How He Ended Up Funding an Armed Coup in African

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Wall Street Bigwig Says He's Confused How He Ended Up Funding an Armed Coup in African

Who among us hasn't stumbled headfirst into a violent coup attempt involving millions of dollars of black market weaponry? That's the argument Robert Granieri, multimillionaire cofounder of trading firm Jane Street, is invoking after being caught funneling hoards of cash to an opposition party in South Sudan. The funding allegedly included millions of dollars in backing to purchase rifles, Stinger missiles, bulletproof vests, and grenades meant to topple South Sudan's government. Granieri says he was "duped" into providing the funds by a man claiming to be an activist in the region. "Granieri is a longtime supporter of human rights causes," his lawyer told Bloomberg. "In this case, the person Rob thought was a human rights activist defrauded Rob and lied about his intentions." Jane Street is notably the launchpad of financial fraudster Sam Bankman-Fried before he launched his now-cratered cryptocurrency platform, FTX. Granieri, meanwhile, has a record of donations to NGOs like Ideas Beyond Borders in Afghanistan, which have been accused of treating third-world violence and suffering as "ample photo opportunities" with which to attract donors. The Wall Street hotshot's role in the plot was uncovered amidst the prosecution of Peter Ajak, a Sudanese political activist who was indicted last year for trying to smuggle the massive weapons cache from the US to the war-torn region. Though Ajak and his co-conspirator, Abraham Chol Keech, are alleged to be the masterminds behind the dramatic plot, it hadn't been fully explained who was funding the expensive venture. Far from the Mr. Magoo scenario that Granieri's attorneys are claiming, Ajak's lawyers paint a picture of a Wall Street financier who was "vital to the plan." In May, the Sudanese rebel's lawyers claimed that "without the significant financing that Mr. Granieri could and agreed to provide, the alleged conspiracy would have been impossible." Perhaps the most bizarre twist is the alleged involvement of Soviet chessmaster Garry Kasparov, who came to know both Granieri and Ajak through his work as chair of the Human Rights Foundation, according to Bloomberg. For his part, Kasparov denies involvement, saying that his "record and values are clear, and they remain unchanged." South Sudan officially separated from Sudan in 2011, following years of upheaval amidst a broader struggle by the United States and China for control over resources in the region. In 2021, a military coup toppled the transitional Sudanese government, leading to mass unrest and a resurgence of state violence. In the few short years since, over 10 million Sudanese residents have been displaced by war, while nearly 17 million people are considered food insecure. If Granieri is found guilty of knowingly funding the coup, he'll be the latest in a long list of American moguls caught meddling in the affairs of foreign lands — and unleashing devastating consequences on sovereign people in the process. More on Wall Street: This May Be the Most Terrifying Sign of Global Warming Yet

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store