Puad: PAS approached Umno with ‘backdoor government' plan, not the other way around
He instead claimed that PAS Deputy President Datuk Seri Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man had approached Umno intermediaries and offered the prime minister's post as part of a proposal to form a 'backdoor government'.
'From what I was informed, it was he who made the first move to approach Umno intermediaries and offered the post of prime minister to Umno if the party agreed to the 'backdoor government' plan,' he was quoted saying by Sinar Harian, referring to Tuan Ibrahim.
'But that idea was never brought to or discussed in the Supreme Council. Even if it had been tabled, I would have been the first to speak up and strongly oppose it.'
Puad said Umno had no intention of reuniting with PN, which he described as the most untrustworthy partner in Barisan Nasional (BN)'s history.
'Tuan Ibrahim knows full well that Umno will not fall into the same trap twice. All of this is just a ploy to ensnare Umno. A Umno-PAS cooperation, let alone with Bersatu, is nothing more than a pipe dream.'
'Umno has had enough of PN. In BN's history, PN is by far the most unreliable former partner,' he added.
He reiterated that the coalition between BN and Pakatan Harapan (PH) has been formalised and there would be no talks of new alliances, even with the Sabah state election looming.
PAS had recently claimed that Umno leaders had held secret meetings with PN figures to join a movement led by PN chairman Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin.
In response, Tuan Ibrahim confirmed that such alleged meetings had taken place and expressed openness to Umno leaders willing to work with PN.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
26 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
SARA RM100: Shifting the window for welfare — Derek Kok
JULY 24 — Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim announced yesterday a one-off RM100 cash aid for all adult Malaysians as a gesture of appreciation in conjunction with National Day to ease cost-of-living pressures. Much has been said about the limitations of this scheme, such as the small value of the cash aid and the existing spending restrictions imposed on the SARA (Sumbangan Asas Rahmah) scheme. Critics dismiss the amount as trivial; a populist drop in the ocean of rising living costs. Supporters hail it as timely relief. Both perspectives, however, miss the policy's potential significance. This scheme represents a potential policy 'trial balloon' for a fundamental shift in Malaysia's approach to social welfare that could pave the way for a more comprehensive social safety net. As stated by the prime minister himself, it is the 'first time in history that cash aid is extended to all adult Malaysians'. The universal nature of this aid can potentially shift the Overton window — the range of ideas the public is willing to consider and accept — on social protection in Malaysia. For decades, the national conversation on welfare has been confined to narrow, often divisive, frameworks of poverty-targeting and ethnic-based redistribution. Recipients of the SARA (Sumbangan Asas Rahmah) buying necessities during a Bernama photo survey at a supermarket in Kuala Terengganu, July 23, 2025. — Bernama pic By introducing a small-scale, universal benefit, the government can normalise a new principle: social support as a right of citizenship, not just a provision for the poor. The country's welfare architecture has been defined by a succession of means-tested cash transfer programs, evolving from Bantuan Rakyat 1Malaysia (BR1M) to Bantuan Sara Hidup (BSH) and, more recently, the targeted versions of Sumbangan Tunai Rahmah (STR) and the original SARA. These programmes were designed with the stated goal of channelling aid to low-income households, identified through income thresholds and databases like eKasih, which lists poor and hardcore poor families. The logic of these programmes has been to identify the 'deserving poor' through complex, and often flawed, means-testing. This model, while well-intentioned, has created a system that is fragmented, inefficient, and often fails to reach those most in need due to exclusion errors. It fosters stigma by dividing citizens into givers (the M40 middle class) and takers (the poorest bottom 40 per cent of the population). While concepts like a universal social protection floor or a UBI (universal basic income) have been discussed within academic and think tank circles, they have remained firmly outside the window of mainstream political viability and are often dismissed as fiscally profligate or politically unworkable. The national debate has been stuck in this polarised loop, with little room for alternative paradigms. Anwar's 'SARA Untuk Semua' initiative could pave the way for another paradigm to emerge from this deadlock. For the first time in our history, a social benefit is being extended to all adult citizens not because of their income, their ethnicity, or their level of need, but simply on the basis of their citizenship. This is a profound philosophical shift. It reframes social protection from a charitable handout for the unfortunate to a universal right and a collective investment in our national resilience. Its small, one-off, and controlled nature makes it a low-risk experiment, designed to normalise the principle that every citizen has a direct stake in the nation's social safety net. The built-in conditionality of the SARA scheme, whereby recipients were only permitted to use the aid to purchase a select list of groceries which excludes fresh produce, could also act as a soft launch for more universal modalities in government aid. In a political environment long accustomed to welfare models based on means-testing and conditionality, a purely unconditional universal grant might be dismissed as radical or fiscally irresponsible. By wrapping the novel concept of universality in the familiar language of control ('for essentials only'), the idea of universal programmes becomes more palatable. It appears less like a revolutionary departure and more like a sensible, controlled extension of existing principles. This approach serves to gently nudge the concept of universal aid into the Overton window, disarming potential critics by using the very lexicon of the old, targeted system to introduce a new, universal one. This move is made even more potent by its connection to another politically challenging reform: the rationalisation of blanket subsidies. For years, the removal of blanket subsidies for items like fuel has been politically perilous due to expected public backlash. Simultaneously, universal cash aid has been seen as too costly. By packaging them together, the government can create a new, more compelling policy proposition: 'We will replace inefficient, regressive subsidies that disproportionately benefit the wealthy with efficient, progressive, universal cash aid that benefits everyone'. In this construction, the universal cash aid acts as the direct, visible compensation that makes the pain of subsidy removal politically survivable. This manoeuvre attempts to shift the Overton window for both policies at once. It makes subsidy reform more 'acceptable' by cushioning its impact on the public, and it makes universal cash aid more 'sensible' by presenting a clear, fiscally responsible funding source through the savings from abolished subsidies. This represents a sophisticated political strategy to break the long-standing inertia on two critical areas of national reform. RM100 will not solve poverty. But to belabour the amount is to miss the point. This is a down payment on a different future. It is a pilot programme for a new way of thinking, a test case for a social philosophy rooted in solidarity, citizenship, and shared prosperity. The challenge now is to build on this foundation. We must move the conversation beyond the amount and focus on the principle. This RM100 has nudged ajar the Overton window of political possibility. It is now up to policymakers, civil society, and the public to push that window wide open and have a serious, mature conversation about building a comprehensive, universal social safety net that ensures no Malaysian is left behind. This small handout is not the destination — it is the start of the journey. * Derek Kok is Senior Research Analyst at the Jeffrey Cheah Institute on Southeast Asia, Sunway University. His research focuses on social protection policies. ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Malay Mail
26 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Tabung Haji to roll out digital passport submission for Haj pilgrims, eyes smoother process
KUALA LUMPUR, July 24 — Lembaga Tabung Haji (TH) is working to introduce a digital passport submission system for Malaysian Haj pilgrims to minimise the need for them to visit TH branch offices in person, the Dewan Rakyat was told today. Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Religious Affairs) Datuk Dr Zulkifli Hasan said the initiative is among TH's ongoing efforts to enhance and improve efficiency in Haj management for the comfort of the pilgrims. 'May the administration and management of Malaysia's Haj pilgrimage continue to be among the best in the world, God willing,' he said when replying to a question from Datuk Adnan Abu Hassan (BN-Kuala Pilah). Zulkifli said various measures have been implemented by TH to ensure optimal management of the pilgrimage, including the introduction of a digital Haj medical record book, which helps medical personnel check pilgrims' health records online. 'This also aims to prevent the loss of physical medical books. In addition, the Haj mobility application was introduced to assist staff in coordinating pilgrims' movements throughout the Haj season,' he said. Meanwhile, Zulkifli said all eligible Malaysian pilgrims successfully obtained their Haj visas, including those who encountered technical issues during biometric registration via the Saudi Visa Bio mobile application. He said the achievement was the result of close cooperation between TH, the Embassy of Saudi Arabia, and relevant technical agencies. However, TH is aware that a small number of pilgrims experienced difficulties registering biometric data through the app. 'The issue stemmed from technical factors such as mobile device incompatibility, inaccurate facial or fingerprint scanning, and the need for ongoing technical system upgrades in line with current developments,' he said when replying to a question from Datuk Seri Dr Ismail Abd Muttalib (PN-Maran). Zulkifli said TH has taken several proactive measures to help ease pilgrims' use of the application, including providing complete guidelines and support through its official portal at for downloading and using the Saudi Visa Bio app. 'TH also conducts briefing sessions during the basic Haj courses nationwide. These guidelines are also clearly outlined in the haj offer letter issued to each pilgrim. 'TH customer service centres at headquarters and in all state branches are also available to assist pilgrims facing technical issues or in need of additional support,' he added. For pilgrims aged 80 and above, he said they are automatically exempted from the biometric scanning process, while special exemptions are granted to pilgrims with facial or fingerprint impairments, subject to medical verification and supporting documents uploaded through the Saudi Visa Bio system. — Bernama
Free Malaysia Today
36 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Trump sets 19% tariff on Indonesian goods in latest deal, EU readies retaliation
Donald Trump announced that Indonesia agreed to buy US$19.5 billion in US goods and an order for 50 Boeing jets, with no timeline set. (AP pic) WASHINGTON : President Donald Trump on Tuesday said the US would impose a 19% tariff on goods from Indonesia under a new agreement with the Southeast Asian country and more deals were in the works as he continued to press for what he views as better terms with trading partners and ways to shrink a huge US trade deficit. The pact with the relatively minor US trading partner is among the handful struck so far by the Trump administration ahead of an Aug 1 deadline for tariffs on most US imports to rise again. The accord came as the top US trading partner – the European Union – readied retaliatory measures should talks with Washington fail. As that deadline approached, negotiations were under way with other nations eager to avoid more US levies beyond a baseline 10% on most goods that has been in place since April. Trump's roll-out of the policies has often been chaotic. His moves have upended decades of negotiated reductions in global trade barriers and roiled international financial markets and economic activity along the way. Based on Trump tariff announcements through Sunday, Yale Budget Lab estimated the US effective average tariff rates will rise to 20.6% from between 2% and 3% before Trump's return to the White House in January. Consumption shifts would bring the rate down to 19.7%, but it's still the highest since 1933. Trump outlined an Indonesia deal similar to a pact struck recently with Vietnam, with a flat tariff on exports to the US roughly double the current 10% and no levies on US exports going there. It also included a penalty rate for so-called transhipments of goods from China via Indonesia and a commitment to buy some US goods. 'They are going to pay 19% and we are going to pay nothing … we will have full access into Indonesia, and we have a couple of those deals that are going to be announced,' Trump said outside the Oval Office. Trump later announced on his Truth Social platform that Indonesia had agreed to buy US$15 billion of USenergy products, US$4.5 billion of American farm products and 50 Boeing jets, though no time frame was specified. Trump: India talks moving the same way Indonesia's total trade with the US – totalling just under US$40 billion in 2024 – does not rank in the top 15, but it has been growing. US exports to Indonesia rose 3.7% last year, while imports from there were up 4.8%, leaving the US with a goods trade deficit of nearly US$18 billion. The top US import categories from Indonesia, according to US Census Bureau data from the International Trade Centre's TradeMap tool, last year were palm oil, electronics equipment including data routers and switches, footwear, car tires, natural rubber and frozen shrimp. Susiwijono Moegiarso, a senior official with Indonesia's coordinating ministry for economic affairs, told Reuters in a text message: 'We are preparing a joint statement between US and Indonesia that will explain the size of reciprocal tariff for Indonesia including the tariff deal, non-tariff and commercial arrangements. We will inform (the public) soon.' Trump had threatened the country with a 32% tariff rate starting Aug 1 in a letter sent to its president last week. He sent similar letters to about two dozen trading partners this month, including Canada, Japan and Brazil, laying out tariff rates ranging from 20% to 50%, plus a 50% tariff on copper. Speaking in Pittsburgh on Tuesday, Trump said he favoured blanket tariffs over complicated negotiations, but his treasury secretary Scott Bessent and commerce secretary Howard Lutnick were keen to land more trade agreements. Upon his arrival back in Washington, Trump told reporters that letters would be going out soon for many smaller countries, suggesting they would face a tariff of 'a little over 10%.' The Aug 1 deadline gives targeted countries time to negotiate about lower tariff rates. Some economists have also noted Trump's pattern of backing off his tariff threats. Since launching his tariff policy, Trump has clinched only a few deals, falling short of earlier promises to land '90 deals in 90 days.' So far, framework agreements have been reached with the UK and Vietnam, and an interim deal has been struck with China to forestall the steepest of Trump's tariffs while negotiations continue between Washington and Beijing. Trump said talks with India were moving 'along that same line,' adding, 'We're going to have access to India. And you have to understand, we had no access into any of these countries. Our people couldn't go in. And now we're getting access because of what we're doing with the tariffs.' EU readies retaliation The breakthrough with Indonesia came as the European Commission, which oversees trade for the EU, prepared to target €72 billion (US$84.1 billion) worth of US goods – from Boeing aircraft and bourbon whiskey to cars – for possible tariffs if trade talks with Washington fail. Trump is threatening a 30% tariff on imports from the EU from August 1, a level European officials say is unacceptable and would end normal trade between two of the world's largest markets. The list, sent to EU member states and seen by Reuters on Tuesday, pre-dated Trump's move over the weekend to ramp up pressure on the 27-nation bloc and responded instead to US duties on cars and car parts and a 10% baseline tariff. The package also covers chemicals, medical devices, electrical and precision equipment as well as agriculture and food products – a range of fruits and vegetables, along with wine, beer and spirits – valued at €6.35 billion.
