Puad: PAS approached Umno with ‘backdoor government' plan, not the other way around
He instead claimed that PAS Deputy President Datuk Seri Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man had approached Umno intermediaries and offered the prime minister's post as part of a proposal to form a 'backdoor government'.
'From what I was informed, it was he who made the first move to approach Umno intermediaries and offered the post of prime minister to Umno if the party agreed to the 'backdoor government' plan,' he was quoted saying by Sinar Harian, referring to Tuan Ibrahim.
'But that idea was never brought to or discussed in the Supreme Council. Even if it had been tabled, I would have been the first to speak up and strongly oppose it.'
Puad said Umno had no intention of reuniting with PN, which he described as the most untrustworthy partner in Barisan Nasional (BN)'s history.
'Tuan Ibrahim knows full well that Umno will not fall into the same trap twice. All of this is just a ploy to ensnare Umno. A Umno-PAS cooperation, let alone with Bersatu, is nothing more than a pipe dream.'
'Umno has had enough of PN. In BN's history, PN is by far the most unreliable former partner,' he added.
He reiterated that the coalition between BN and Pakatan Harapan (PH) has been formalised and there would be no talks of new alliances, even with the Sabah state election looming.
PAS had recently claimed that Umno leaders had held secret meetings with PN figures to join a movement led by PN chairman Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin.
In response, Tuan Ibrahim confirmed that such alleged meetings had taken place and expressed openness to Umno leaders willing to work with PN.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
a few seconds ago
- Malay Mail
In Dewan Rakyat today: Cybersecurity, changes to TNB electricity bill structure, and high living costs
KUALA LUMPUR, July 23 — Cybercrime issues, cost of living, and changes to the Tenaga Nasional Bhd (TNB) electricity bill structure are among the matters that will be raised in Parliament today. According to the Order of Business on the Parliament portal, Chong Zhemin (PH-Kampar) will ask the Home Minister about the number of cybercrime cases reported throughout 2024 as well as the ministry's steps to improve the level of digital security of the people, during the question-and-answer session. Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainudin (PN-Larut) will ask the Finance Minister about the government's strategy to reduce the burden of the people's cost of living following the country's total debt now reaching RM1.5 trillion, in addition to the World Bank's announcement that Malaysia's gross domestic product (GDP) growth for 2025 will fall to 3.9 per cent and the country's situation facing reciprocal tariffs from the United States. Also expected to attract attention will be the question from Datuk Seri Takiyuddin Hassan (PN-Kota Bharu) who will seek an explanation from the Minister of Energy Transition and Water Transformation on the changes to the TNB electricity bill structure which no longer uses tiered rates for domestic consumers. He also will want to know whether the new mechanism would ensure cost fairness, energy efficiency, and maintain concentrated subsidies for the B40 and M40 groups. In addition, Chong Chieng Jen (PH-Stampin) will also pose a question to the Minister of Communications on whether social media such as Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Xiaohongshu which publish advertisements about various scams and fraudulent investment schemes are held accountable to the victims of scams and fraudulent schemes through the said platforms. After the question-and-answer session, the session will continue with the tabling of the Offenders Compulsory Attendance (Amendment) Bill 2025 and Fisheries (Amendment) Bill 2025, respectively for first reading. The Second Meeting of the Fourth Session of the 15th Parliament is scheduled to last 24 days, and among the focus is the tabling of the 13th Malaysia Plan on July 31. — Bernama
Malay Mail
a few seconds ago
- Malay Mail
A more just Malaysia begins with ending the death penalty — Suresraj Therambarajoo
JULY 23 — Minister Azalina Othman Said's recent announcement on the formation of a task force to review Malaysia's death penalty policy signals a moment of real possibility — a chance for our nation to reflect, to listen, and to lead. For too long, the death penalty has been seen as a necessary instrument of justice — a symbol of deterrence, of moral reckoning. But we know now, through the wisdom of experience and the clarity of data, that capital punishment does not bring back the lives lost. It does not heal broken families. And it does not make us safer. What it does do is place a permanent, irrevocable judgment in the hands of a justice system that, however well-intentioned, is not immune to error. We've seen this around the world — and we are not immune. No system designed by humans is infallible. And when the stakes are life and death, even one mistake is one too many. The shift away from mandatory death sentencing in 2023 was a courageous first step. Now, with this task force, we have the opportunity to complete the journey. Abolishing the death penalty in its entirety would not be an act of weakness — it would be a show of strength. It would signal to the world that Malaysia believes in redemption. T hat we are committed to justice that is restorative, not merely retributive. There are alternatives that protect society while affirming human dignity: life imprisonment with the possibility of rehabilitation, sentencing reforms that prioritise proportionality and deterrence, and expanded support systems for victims and their families. These approaches allow for accountability without surrendering our moral compass. President Obama once said, 'The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.' But it does not bend on its own. It bends because people choose to pull it in the right direction. Minister Azalina has opened the door to that choice. Let us walk through it with courage and compassion. ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Malay Mail
a few seconds ago
- Malay Mail
Amendments to Whistleblower Protection Act a major reform even if info breaks other laws, says Syahredzan
KUALA LUMPUR, July 23 —The bill to amend the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 (WPA) (Act 711), passed in the Dewan Rakyat yesterday, is a major amendment that will boost the effectiveness of the Act. Bangi MP Syahredzan Johan said the WPA was passed in 2010 to provide protection to whistleblowers, but there are several flaws in the Act that severely hampered its effectiveness. 'One major flaw in the Act is that the disclosure made must not be prohibited by any written law. This is found in a proviso in Section 6(1) of the Act. 'Thus, the disclosure of matters covered by the Official Secrets Act 1972, for example, would not attract protection under the Act. 'Consider the offence under Section 203A of the Penal Code of 'disclosure of information'. Under the section, a person who discloses any information or matter which he has obtained in the performance of his duties, or the exercise of his functions under any written law, commits an offence,' he said in a Facebook post yesterday. For example, he said if an individual uncovers improper conduct in a ministry, but that information is classified by the Official Secrets Act (OSA), even if he discloses it to an enforcement agency, he will not be accorded protection under the WPA. Syahredzan said laws such as the OSA and Section 203A of the Penal Code resulted in many whistleblowers and potential whistleblowers not falling under the ambit of protection within the WPA. 'With the amendment today, such disclosures are no longer disqualified. The proviso in Section 6(1) will be removed. In other words, even if the improper conduct is contained in a document classified under the OSA, the whistleblower can still be protected,' he said. He further said that if this bill becomes law after going through the Dewan Negara and the rest of the legislative process, a whistleblower will be protected even though the disclosure is prohibited by law. — Bernama
