Opinion - As US aid evaporates in Ukraine, civilian heroes are stepping up
Alongside him died Nick Parsons, a 28-year-old former Australian Special Forces Explosive Ordnance Disposal operator.
I had the privilege of working with both men as part of a four-man bomb disposal unit just days before their deaths. Their loss illustrates a painful truth: As official U.S. government aid to Ukraine dries up, private citizens from America and around the world are stepping into the breach — sometimes at the ultimate cost.
The roughly $130 billion of American aid has been essential in maintaining Ukraine's struggle for survival. But that aid, for the moment at least, will not be continued with any new assistance packages from the U.S. government. This is why the work of civilian organizations has become even more critical.
During my three-week humanitarian trip to the Kyiv, Kharkiv and Donbas regions, I witnessed firsthand what dedication to a dangerous cause looks like.
Garrett and Parsons would drive past army checkpoints into areas littered with mines, burning fields and freshly dug trenches in anticipation of fighting to come. Between clearing lanes on minefields and warily eyeing the sky for lethal drones, they maintained an almost surreal humor and calm.
At one point on the road south from Izium, Garrett abruptly halted our truck after spotting a red fox standing in a field. 'Watch out for mines, buddy,' he muttered before driving off. Like navigating a minefield himself, he was always alert, scanning for anything out of place. Not afraid to confront danger.
There's a famous George Orwell quote that states, 'People sleep soundly in their beds at night because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.'
Garrett was one of those rough men, and while he no longer did violence himself, his dangerous work allowed Ukrainians to sleep more soundly. In the 'most mined country on earth,' he made countless acres safer for civilians and soldiers alike.
Garrett and Parsons weren't alone. Prevail's teams operate across Ukraine, eliminating threats from landmines, unexploded ordnance and improvised explosive devices. Their medical teams deliver critical healthcare, transporting wounded civilians, police officers and military personnel to hospitals.
Another group, Task Force Antal, consisting of retired military combat veterans, has trained over 20,000 Ukrainian civilians in emergency response, with a waiting list of 50,000 more.
Prevail Together and Taskforce Antal are entirely volunteer organizations — warriors turned humanitarians. These organizations embody something profound about the global relationship with Ukraine: it transcends government policy.
While official U.S. aid may pause, the spirit of supporting those fighting for freedom continues through citizens from America and around the world willing to donate time, money and sometimes their lives. They deserve and need our continued support.
Beyond the humanitarian mission, there are strategic reasons we can't afford to abandon Ukraine. Russia is not America's friend; it is a hostile dictatorship, and Ukraine is fighting a courageous war of self-defense.
History has taught us to stop predators like Putin before they launch even larger wars. What message would Putin's success send to China regarding Taiwan, or to North Korea and Iran?
The Western world appeased Hitler, leading to World War II. We won't avoid World War III by appeasing Putin.
Despite the tragic loss of its founder, Prevail continues its mission in Ukraine. But it and other civilian groups like it need support — our support — to replace what the U.S. government has withdrawn.
When I think of Chris Garrett and Nick Parsons, I remember men who risked everything for people they had never meet. Their sacrifice demands we ask ourselves: If they were willing to give their lives, what are we willing to give?
Ukraine deserves peace, but not at the cost of sovereignty or territory. They deserve the just peace that brave defenders like Garrett and Parsons died trying to deliver.
As Americans, we may disagree about government policy, but we can still uphold our finest traditions by supporting the humanitarian heroes working on the ground.
Owen Pataki, who served in the 10th Mountain Division in Afghanistan, is an author and has recently returned from Ukraine's frontline regions as a humanitarian volunteer.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rachel Maddow Is Not Mincing Words When It Comes To The "Authoritarian" Nature Of The Trump Administration
MSNBC's Rachel Maddow says Americans no longer have to fear potential authoritarianism in their own country, because 'we are there' already — and cited President Donald Trump's widespread immigration raids, detainments without probable cause, and use of military force. 'We have crossed a line,' she said on The Rachel Maddow Show, Monday. 'We are in a place we did not want to be, but we are there. The thing we were all warning about for the last few years is not coming, it is here. We are in it. This is what [it's] like, it turns out.' Maddow argued that large swaths of the country might easily overlook this downward slide, as movies are still being produced, sports continue to be played, and families are still discussing the same old issues they always have around their kitchen table each night. 'But also, at the same time, life in the United States is profoundly changing,' Maddow added Monday. 'It's profoundly different than it was even six months ago, because we do now live in a country that has an authoritarian leader in charge.' Related: She then put it even more bluntly: 'We have a consolidating dictatorship in our country.' While the MSNBC host went on to acknowledge that this might sound 'melodramatic,' Maddow noted the US now seems to have its own 'secret police,' which is commonplace across dictatorships, in the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency under Trump. 'A massive, anonymous, unbadged — literally masked — totally unaccountable internal police force that apparently has infinite funding but no identifiable leadership,' said Maddow. 'And they act in ways designed to instill maximum fear and use maximum force.' Related: Maddow continued: 'I mean, when you imagine an authoritarian country, what you imagine is masked secret police breaking people's car windows and snatching people off the streets and out of church parking lots and courtroom hallways and taking them away with no charges, no notice, no paperwork, no explanation, not letting them see lawyers and then moving them secretly to what are effectively black site prisons where they won't tell you who's there and where no one's allowed in to see what's going on.' Experts have already warned that one such prison, Florida's immigrant detention camp that Republicans have dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz,' is 'a human rights disaster waiting to happen.' Democratic lawmakers initially blocked from visiting were finally granted access last month and confirmed its horrid conditions. Related: The president has justified nationwide crackdowns on undocumented workers, as well as the detainment, arrest, and deportation of college students and professors across the US, as necessary protection against supposedly violent and anti-American immigrants. Maddow argued it won't stop there, however, and that the US military in multiple states has already 'extended the legal boundaries of nearby military bases' by hundreds of miles 'so they can give active duty US troops the power to arrest and search people on US soil.' 'We are not heading toward something like this,' Maddow said Monday. 'We are there. It is here. It is the environment in which we are now living. And so, given that you now live in a country with an authoritarian leader, the question is: What can you do for your country?' Related: Watch the full monologue here: This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:
Atlantic
4 minutes ago
- Atlantic
What, Exactly, Is the ‘Russia Hoax'?
Trump's use of pardons may have induced some of his confederates—including Stone and Manafort—to not cooperate with prosecutors, or to only partly cooperate, thus depriving the public of a chance at receiving a full accounting. This was a kind of legalized obstruction of justice. Plenty of authorities have pointed out that Trump's claim of a hoax is nonsense. In 2017, PolitiFact named that its lie of the year. In 2018, The Washington Post reported: 'Trump's Russia 'Hoax' Turns Out to Be Real.' In 2019, a report by the Justice Department's inspector general concluded that, as my colleague Adam Serwer put it, 'the 'Russia hoax' defense is itself a hoax, and a highly successful one, aimed at reassuring Trump supporters who might otherwise be troubled by the president's behavior.' Still, the idea that the whole thing was a chimera has taken hold even within some precincts of the mainstream press, where the whole thing is treated as a weird passing obsession. The journalist Ben Smith, who made the decision to publish the Steele dossier, now contends, vaguely and in passive voice, that ' Trump was in retrospect treated unfairly.' Meanwhile, Trump world continues to cook up new iterations of the hoax claim. The most recent ones are driven by CIA Director John Ratcliffe, who has a history of weaponizing intelligence, to use a term he's a fan of, and Gabbard, who has for years repeated Kremlin talking points. Last month, Ratcliffe alleged that in 2016, three of the nation's top intelligence officials 'manipulated intelligence and silenced career professionals—all to get Trump,' but as my colleague Shane Harris reported, he didn't have evidence to back that up. Gabbard has released a dribble of documents intended to bolster it, but still nothing that matches the claims. In recent days, MAGA allies have pushed a new and shocking allegation: that emails show Clinton actually approved a plan to smear Trump by claiming he was colluding with Russia. The problem is that, once again, investigations have debunked it. A special counsel appointed by Barr during Trump's first term, with the goal of ferreting out political skulduggery in the Russia investigation, found that messages about Clinton being treated as a smoking gun were, in fact, likely concocted by the Russians. As The New York Times reported, 'The special counsel, John H. Durham, went to great lengths to try to prove that several of the emails were real, only to ultimately conclude otherwise.' Durham's finding of a Russian forgery is ironic: Someone has finally turned up a real Russia hoax. Rather than working to fight it, however, Trump's aides are once more colluding with Russia to mislead the American people and further Trump's political fortunes.
New York Post
4 minutes ago
- New York Post
Ghislaine Maxwell rejects DOJ bid to unseal grand jury transcripts as she pursues ‘legal options': ‘Jeffrey Epstein is dead'
If she can't have them, no one can. Ghislaine Maxwell, the notorious sex trafficker linked to Jeffrey Epstein, on Tuesday opposed the Justice Department's bid to unseal grand jury transcripts from her case, after trying and failing to view the records herself. 'Jeffrey Epstein is dead. Ghislaine Maxwell is not,' her lawyers wrote in a Manhattan federal court filing. 'Whatever interest the public may have in Epstein, that interest cannot justify a broad intrusion into grand jury secrecy in a case where the defendant is alive, her legal options are viable, and her due process rights remain.' 3 Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein's convicted accomplice, wants grand jury transcripts in her case kept secret. US District Court for the Southe The disgraced British socialite — who is serving a 20-year prison sentence — is lobbying the US Supreme Court to review her December 2021 conviction on numerous sex crimes for grooming young girls for abuse by her on-and-off lover Epstein. 'Given that she is actively litigating her case and does not know what is in the grand jury record, she has no choice but to respectfully oppose the government's motion to unseal it,' Maxwell's attorney David Oscar Markus wrote. Maxwell's push to keep the transcripts hidden comes weeks after a federal judge denied her attempt to see them as pursues her appeal. US District Court Judge Paul Engelmayer noted in his ruling that 'black-letter law,' or fundamental legal principle, dictates that defendants cannot review grand jury transcripts, which are by definition secret. 3 The DOJ admitted in a court filing that the Maxwell grand jury testimony will likely not include any revelations. US District Court for the Southe DOJ officials have cited the 'public interest' in urging Engelmayer and a separate judge to unseal transcripts of testimony from an FBI agent and NYPD detective heard by grand juries in Epstein's case in 2019, and in Maxwell's case in 2020 and 2021. But the feds admitted in a 12:04 a.m. court filing early Tuesday that 'much of the information' included in the Maxwell testimony was already made public during her headline-grabbing trial. The Epstein grand jury testimony may yield more new details as he never made it to trial after dying in federal custody, in what was ruled a suicide. 3 Maxwell was Epstein's former lover who groomed young girls for the sick financier to abuse, trial testimony revealed. US District Court for the Southe But the testimony the government is seeking in both cases represents a tiny fraction of the 300 gigabytes of files it says it has about Epstein but has declined to release — sparking an uproar among many of President Trump's supporters. An attorney for Epstein victim Maria Farmer, who testified at Maxwell's trial, wrote a letter to the court late Tuesday urging the judge to unseal both grand jury transcripts. 'Unsealing the grand jury transcripts will illuminate the scope of Epstein's and Maxwell's abuse, provide additional insight into those who enabled his abuse, and bring light to how these crimes were investigated and prosecuted,' lawyer Sigrid McCawley wrote. Lawyers for Epstein's estate separately wrote to the court Tuesday that they take 'no position' on the government's move to unseal grand jury transcripts in his case. Maxwell, 63, meanwhile was moved to a cushy Texas prison known as a 'Club Fed' last week, days after meeting with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, Trump's former criminal defense lawyer. DOJ officials have not explained why the convicted sex trafficker was transferred to a lockup typically reserved for convicts spending far less time behind bars.
