Georgia jails top opposition figures as authorities ramp up crackdown
Nearly all leaders of Georgia's pro-Western opposition are now behind bars, as protests continue against the ruling Georgian Dream party and its decision last year to halt Georgia's bid to join the European Union. The demonstrators, who gather daily in the capital, Tbilisi, also say that the vote on Oct. 26 that handed Georgian Dream another term in power was not free or fair.
On Tuesday, politician Giorgi Vashadze of the Strategy Agmashenebeli party was sentenced to eight months in prison for refusing to testify in an official probe that Georgian Dream's critics call an act of political revenge.
The day before, three other opposition figures were handed comparable sentences after refusing to cooperate with the same parliamentary inquiry investigating alleged wrongdoings by the government of ex-President Mikhail Saakashvili.
Badri Japaridze and Manuka Khazaradze were both jailed for eight months, while Zurab Japaridze received seven months.
Opposition politicians have declined to attend the commission hearings, citing their ongoing boycott of parliament following the Oct. 26. election. Georgian Dream's critics say the vote was rigged with Russia 's help to hand it another term in power.
They also say the probe is a ploy by the ruling party to damage the opposition, particularly Saakashvili's United National Movement party.
Speaking to The Associated Press before he was handcuffed on Tuesday, Vashadze said the commission hearings went 'against the Georgian constitution' because no opposition lawmakers are represented, and that the probe's aim is to persecute the opposition.
'They are afraid of us because we are fighting for our country, and they see that there is big support from Georgian society… That's why I'm under arrest now,' he said.
Other prominent government critics remain in pre-trial detention for declining to appear before the commission investigating Saakashvili. They include Nika Melia, a former chairman of Saakashvili's United National Movement party, and Nika Gvaramia, who was a minister in Saakashvili's government. A former defense minister, Irakli Okruashvili, is also in custody.
Melia, Gvaramia, and Zurab Japaridze were among the leaders of the opposition grouping, Coalition for Change, that finished second in the October vote, according to official results.
Georgia's Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze on Monday denied that their arrests were politically motivated.
Meanwhile, anti-government protests continue daily in central Tbilisi. While numbers are far lower than last autumn, the demonstrations are big enough to block traffic around the parliament building.
Many protesters have worn masks since the government imposed harsh penalties for blocking streets.
Elene Khoshtaria, another prominent opposition politician, on Tuesday slammed Georgian Dream for using 'violence, repressions, political persecution' to snuff out dissent and Georgia's 'European future.'
She praised protesters for their persistence and called on Western countries to give stronger backing to Georgian Dream's critics.
'We are all in solidarity with all our friends and political prisoners,' she said, referring to those jailed or detained in recent weeks. 'As long as Georgia fights, I think our international partners should act in a very decisive and bold way.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
7 hours ago
- Telegraph
Pro-Palestine activists demand David Lammy be tried as a war criminal
The group added: 'The Labour Party is under immense pressure from the public, the media, and from their voting base (with the announcement of the new left party) to take a stronger stance on Gaza.' PYM said the protests were aimed at forcing the Government to give way on four demands, including instating a 'full, two-way' arms embargo on Israel. The toolkit document also added: 'We vow to make Zionism a political crisis for the political class in this country: practically, that means identifying and targeting their weakest pressure points'. Luke Akehurst, the Labour MP for North Durham, accused the group of 'intimidation tactics', telling The Times: 'Harassment by threatening a 'siege' towards elected representatives and their hardworking caseworkers – who serve all constituents in their public service – crosses every line of democratic debate'. Lord Walney, a former government adviser on political violence, added: 'Calling for a 'siege' is designed to intimidate MPs and is totally unacceptable. The threat level facing political representatives has increased greatly since the Gaza conflict began. 'I hope my colleagues will be vigilant and police forces will appropriately enforce the boundary between legitimate protest and criminal intimidation.'
The Guardian
12 hours ago
- The Guardian
Low-wage workers reeling over Trump's looming Snap cuts as food prices rise
Poverty and hunger will rise as a result of the Trump administration's unprecedented cuts to the US federal 'food stamps' program, according to experts. Low-income workers who rely on the aid are braced for dire consequences. Katie Giede, a single mother and waitress in Conyers, Georgia, is one of the 42 million Americans who use the supplemental nutrition assistance program (Snap). Even with the maximum benefit permitted, she struggles to afford food for her and her child. She makes $3 an hour plus tips at the fast-food chain Waffle House, where she has worked for 11 years. The company deducts meals from workers' pay check per shift, regardless of whether they eat one or not. 'Our pay is already so little that we're struggling with everything,' Giede told the Guardian. 'Single mothers like myself are reliant upon the benefits like Snap and Medicaid. So when you go and you cut that as well, now you have mothers out here that are not only worried at night because they already can't afford housing or a vehicle, but we're also worried what is our kid is going to eat? Because we no longer have help.' Giede said she received $450 a month for her and her child. She said working too many hours or receiving too much income was a constant concern, due to eligibility cut-offs. According to an analysis by the Urban Institute, at the end of 2024, even the maximum Snap benefit would not cover the cost of a modestly priced meal in 99% of all counties in the US. 'I dread that trip to the grocery store every week, because you have to sit down and you really have to budget,' said Giede. 'Every time you go, you're having to make the choice between something that's healthy or something that's cheaper, just so you can get enough to last all week. 'There are so many people in this country that rely on these benefits, and with these cuts, half of the people that are surviving right now off of this are going to lose their benefits. That's not even just people not eating a little bit. They're already not eating enough, so we're going to lose lives over this. It's those of us at the bottom that are really feeling it.' Waffle House did not respond to multiple requests for comment. Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' set the stage for significant cuts to Snap by shifting higher administrative costs to each state, expanding work reporting requirements and imposing restrictions on non-citizen eligibility. Many lower-wage workers have grown more reliant on Snap in recent years. US food prices rose by 23.6% between 2020 and 2024, according to official data. While inflation has since moderated, grocery costs remain high. As a result of the latest Snap changes, states will be responsible for 75% of administrative costs of handling the program from 2027, up from 50% cost-sharing with the federal government, which is likely to strain state budgets. From 2028, for the first time states will be forced to pick up some of the multibillion-dollar bill for Snap benefits. The state of New York, for example, faces a budget impact of about $1.2bn, according to the Food Research and Action Center (Frac), a non-profit advocacy group. While such shifting costs have raised fears that states will cut back Snap support, expanded work requirements have sparked concern that few people will be eligible. Analysis by the Urban Institute found about 22.3 million US families are set to lose some or all of their Snap benefits. 'This is a very targeted, well-thought-out plan of dismantling the Snap program that federal policy makers won't take responsibility for, because it is the states, it is the governors who will have to cut resources for Snap, who will have to cut the program in order to say we can't operate this because of what's happening at the federal level,' said Gina Plata-Nino, Snap deputy director at the Frac. 'Snap is a very important ecosystem at the local level, at the state level and the federal level, because billions of dollars go into states, and this federal money supports local economies,' she added. 'All of these proposals threaten this very delicate balance.' The White House deferred comment to the office of management and budget, which did not respond to multiple requests for comment. States across the US are braced for stark consequences. 'We're going to have worse hunger and ultimately, worse poverty,' said Seth DiStefano, policy outreach director at the West Virginia Center on Budget and Policy. 'There are entire regions of West Virginia where there aren't 20 hours a week [expanded Snap work requirement] of anything to apply for. What do you tell those families? 'We're talking families with kids now that are going to be subjected to these harsh work reporting requirements. We're talking folks in their 60s, literally in communities where there are no jobs, none, and ripping away the one outlet to their basic needs that's available to them.' Among the employers with the most workers reliant on Snap is Walmart, the largest private employer in the US, as much of its workforce receives only part-time hours. Christina Gahagan, 66, has worked at Walmart for a decade in western New York at several stores. She is currently based at a store in Geneseo, New York. 'I would say at least 50% of the people in my store rely on food stamps to make ends meet for their families,' said Gahagan. 'They're always trying to figure out where the best deals are, coupon clipping at lunch and reading circulars to see who's got the best deal on whatever, just to make their money stretch.' She has cut down on costly grocery items, eating cheaper junk food to get by. 'I was paying $9 a pound for roast beef. Today it's almost $13 a pound. So I'm not buying full pounds any more. I'm just buying a half a pound and making it work and just eating crap in between, like buying myself some chips out of the vending machine or something,' Gahagan said. 'Walmart is the largest employer in the US. We rival Amazon almost dollar for dollar in what we do. You would think a company like that could shell out a little bit more money per hour for associates in the store across the board, so that there aren't people who are having to depend so heavily on public assistance.' Walmart did not respond to multiple requests for comment.
The Guardian
13 hours ago
- The Guardian
Prominent historian cancels course at Columbia University over Trump deal
Historian Rashid Khalidi, the Edward Said professor emeritus of modern Arab studies at Columbia University, has cancelled plans to teach this fall in response to the school's recent agreement with the Trump administration. Khalidi made the announcement in an open letter to Columbia's acting president published in the Guardian on Friday. 'Although I have retired, I was scheduled to teach a large lecture course on this topic in the fall as a 'special lecturer' but I cannot do so under the conditions Columbia has accepted by capitulating to the Trump administration in June,' Khalidi wrote. Columbia announced last week that it would pay more than $200m in a settlement with the federal government after the White House claimed the university failed to adequately address alleged antisemitism on campus amid protests over the Israel-Gaza war, and threatened to pull significant funding. The Trump administration has accused several major US academic institutions of failing to tamp down on antisemitism during pro-Palestinian protests and sought to cut millions of dollars in support if the schools fail to submit to the government's demands. Columbia, which was the site of major protests over the war in Gaza, has served as a test case in the administration's efforts to gain greater control over higher education in the US. Under the deal, which will be overseen by an independent monitor that will report to the government, the university has agreed to expand its Institute for Israel and Jewish Studies and review its middle east curriculum. It also pledged to cut programs promoting 'unlawful efforts' related to diversity. Along with the $200m, Columbia will pay $21m to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission over alleged civil rights violations of Jewish employees. The agreement has drawn criticism from faculty, students and alumni who argue it amounts to capitulation that will have have significant repercussions for academic freedom, hamper the university's independence and restrict pro-Palestinian speech. In his open letter, Khalidi, who retired last year after teaching at the university for more than 20 years, fiercely criticized the agreement. Columbia chose to adopt a definition of antisemitism that 'conflates Jewishness with Israel, so that any criticism of Israel, or indeed description of Israeli policies, becomes a criticism of Jews', Khalidi said. The definition makes it impossible to teach honestly about the creation of Israel or the genocide in Gaza perpetrated by Israel, he wrote. The deal will infringe upon faculty members' academic freedom and speech, as well as that of teaching assistants and students, Khalidi said, who will be forced to constrain their speech in order to evade 'the fearsome apparatus that Columbia has erected to punish speech critical of Israel, and to crack down on alleged discrimination – which at this moment in history almost invariably amounts simply to opposition to this genocide'. ,Agreeing to submit the syllabi and scholarship of prominent academics for review by outside actors is 'abhorrent' he added. He concluded: 'Columbia's capitulation has turned a university that was once a site of free inquiry and learning into a shadow of its former self, an-anti university, a place of fear and loathing, where faculty and students are told from on high what they can say and teach, under penalty of severe sanctions.'
